larry141094
Proud Member
Have the song on repeat, it's quite sexy this one eh? Slightly repetitive towards the end, but its a good track. Any background on this track? When was it recorded? It sounds like a later track to me
is it Best of Joy 2.0?
Love it love it!! Now how do I get the file from Facebook onto my computer? :scratch:
Are you serious, man? The vocals are HEAVILY processed on this song, I have no idea what kind of equipment you are using. It shouldn't even matter. Try bumping the volume up a bit.Did someone here seriously suggest that there was vocal processing on this song?
I'm sorry, but some people don't know what they're talking about. Chicago, I can see the argument on that song, but anyone can tell that Michael's vocal track is clear on this track.
If the Estate wanted to release a love song as first single, Lovin' You should had been the one. It has a stronger performance, stronger lyrics and music. I definitely love it better than Chicago, it's quite pleasent to listen.
Are you serious, man? The vocals are HEAVILY processed on this song, I have no idea what kind of equipment you are using. It shouldn't even matter. Try bumping the volume up a bit.
And no one eve dare to come at me saying I am just complaining about this song. I want to wait to share my opinion on it, but had to comment the above. I love the song itself.
Then I don't know what to tell you. Maybe you just can't hear it - like Hess mentioned he couldn't hear any "hiss" or other "artifacts" in the LNFSG mix when it's clearly there.I've played it over my computer speakers. Over my Skullcandy headphnes. Over my friend's Beats. In varying volumes, ranging from blasting to quiet. And there isn't anything on it. I don't know what you're hearing but the vocal here is clean.
I'm glad you enjoy the song, but I don't hear what you hear.