Latest on MJJC

MJ Estate Probate Notes

Bubs said:
It must be for Prince

06/12/2015 Request - Special Notice (Filed By: Jackson, Prince Michael, II, Subject Person Repres By: Hutchinson, Nicholas M., Esq., Attorney for Petitioner )

Seemingly Nona Jackson is not going to give up
03/28/2016 Declaration (Repres By: IN PRO PER, Attorney for Petitioner Filed By: Jackson, Nona Paris Lola Ankhesenamun, Petitioner )
03/28/2016 Declaration (Repres By: IN PRO PER, Attorney for Petitioner Filed By: Jackson-Richie, Nona Bonnie Bianca, Petitioner )

This judge has allowed this kind of stuff going on for way too long.
Click to expand...
So many blasted court cases-can't keep them straight. Which one was this again??
 
elusive moonwalker said:
Thats blanket isnt it? Thats his legal name
Click to expand...

You are right. I just assumed it's Prince because attorney mentioned is his attorney, at least his firm is represents Prince' company in his application papers.
Maybe Bigi wants to change his name officially or something:)

Barbee, she is mother of one of Michael's twin kids, but I don't know who is the mother of the other twin :scratch:
Also she is MJ's widow and married to Lionel Richie.
 
she is mother of one of Michael's twin kids, but I don't know who is the mother of the other twin
Also she is MJ's widow and married to Lionel Richie.
--------

LOL you have a way with words bubs
 
Bubs said:
You are right. I just assumed it's Prince because attorney mentioned is his attorney, at least his firm is represents Prince' company in his application papers.
Maybe Bigi wants to change his name officially or something:)

Barbee, she is mother of one of Michael's twin kids, but I don't know who is the mother of the other twin :scratch:
Also she is MJ's widow and married to Lionel Richie.
Click to expand...
I'm the mother of the other twin, but I usually keep that to myself.
 
By the lols, I may have messed up my description of Nona Jackson:scratch:

Basically she says MJ is father of one of her twins, but I don't think she came clear who is the father of the other twin, so Barbee you cannot be other mother as there is only 1 mother, but 2 fathers for these twins:D
 
Bubs said:
By the lols, I may have messed up my description of Nona Jackson:scratch:

Basically she says MJ is father of one of her twins, but I don't think she came clear who is the father of the other twin, so Barbee you cannot be other mother as there is only 1 mother, but 2 fathers for these twins:D
Click to expand...
No, she's just confused.
 
08/15/2016 at 08:30 am in department M at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401
Hearing On Petition(RE FIFTH ACCOUNT CURRENT ANDREPORT OF STATUS OF ADMINSTRATIONAND PETITION FOR SETTLEMENTTHEREOF;)


Ivy, are you planning to get accounting documents?
 
No I don't. I'm trying to get them. Beckloff moving to Santa Monica made it quite challenging to get it.
 
^^Ok, thanks.

Do you have any ideas of this:
07/15/2016 Notice of Motion (FOR DISCOVERY REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WITH INTERROGATORIES TO ESTATE EXECUTORS; )
Filed by Interested parties

I wouldn't have paid much attention to that, only because it was filed by Interested parties?

How about this one:
07/15/2016 Application - Miscellaneous (TO FILE UNDER SEAL KATHERINE E. JACKSON'S RESPONSE AND REQUEST THAT THE COURT WITHHOLD A DECISION ON EXECUTORS' PETITION FOR ORDER INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS AND APPROVING OR AUTHORIZING....)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

KJ is against this business transaction?:
05/31/2016 Petition (FOR ORDER INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS AND APPROVING AND/OR AUTHORIZING BUSINESS TRANSACTION )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
 
More stuff, Anthony is not done yet. Earlier he wanted visitation right to PPB, now he claims to be beneficiary?

PETITION HEARING
Petitioner(s): JACKSON, ANTHONY JAMES II

FACTS: Petnr alleges he is bene. Alleges that exrs, John Branca and John McClain, failed to give notice to petnr. Alleges wrongdoing and self-dealing by exrs.

MATTERS TO CLEAR:
A) No 15-day spec ntc on mandatory Judicial Council Form DE-120 to Kathy Jorrie, Esq.; Stefanie J. Lipson, Esq.; Cathy S. Miller-Ginsburg, Esq.; LeVelle Smith, Jr., Paul S. Malingagio and Nancy B. Reimann; FTB; Daniel Herbert, Esq. and Lori B. Wade, Esq., and Brent Ayscough, Esq. and Sidney Lanier, Esq.
B) What is petnr's standing? How is he a beneficiary of the estate? Any documentation? supp required
C) No petitioner verification - supp required
D) No legal points and authorities provided - supp required
E) Need separate section of petition with a specific prayer for relief rather than requests made throughout the petition - supp required
 
Bubs said:
B) What is petnr's standing? How is he a beneficiary of the estate? Any documentation? supp required
Click to expand...

I guess he will try to do something with the passage in MJ's will that names among others him as one of MJ's beneficiaries IF Katherine, Prince, Paris and Blanket all die. MJ named six of his nephews and cousins as such beneficiaries: Taj, Tarryll, TJ, Elijah, Levon and Anthony. But that's only if Katherine and PPB all die, so I don't know how he is planning to solve that little "obstacle".
 
Bubs said:
^^Ok, thanks.

Do you have any ideas of this:
07/15/2016 Notice of Motion (FOR DISCOVERY REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WITH INTERROGATORIES TO ESTATE EXECUTORS; )
Filed by Interested parties

I wouldn't have paid much attention to that, only because it was filed by Interested parties?

How about this one:
07/15/2016 Application - Miscellaneous (TO FILE UNDER SEAL KATHERINE E. JACKSON'S RESPONSE AND REQUEST THAT THE COURT WITHHOLD A DECISION ON EXECUTORS' PETITION FOR ORDER INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS AND APPROVING OR AUTHORIZING....)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

KJ is against this business transaction?:
05/31/2016 Petition (FOR ORDER INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS AND APPROVING AND/OR AUTHORIZING BUSINESS TRANSACTION )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner
Click to expand...

I don't know who the interested parties are. I wouldn't say KJ is against business transaction- YET. This is the key one.

07/08/2016 Declaration (OF KATHERINE E. JACKSON )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
07/08/2016 Request (FOR A TWENTY-ONE DAY CONTINUANCE TO FILE A RESPONSE OR OBJ TO THE PETITION FOR ORDER INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS AND APPOVING/AUTHORIZING BUSINESS TRANSACTION )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff
Click to expand...

She is asking for 21 days to file a response or objection to the Executors request to approve business transaction. She also filed a declaration. She is shown as "plaintiff"

07/15/2016 Application - Miscellaneous (TO FILE UNDER SEAL KATHERINE E. JACKSON'S RESPONSE AND REQUEST THAT THE COURT WITHHOLD A DECISION ON EXECUTORS' PETITION FOR ORDER INSTRUCTING EXECUTORS AND APPROVING OR AUTHORIZING....)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant
07/15/2016 Response
Filed by Attorney for Defendant
Click to expand...

"defendant" presumably Executors have filed a response and asked the court to seal KJ's declaration.

So as now the only thing is KJ is asking for 21 days. We will see what she will file (if anything) after 21 days.
 
Anyway of finding out what the transaction kj isnt happy about is ivy? (Sony/atv?) Wouldnt have the estate filed their request with the court or do we not have access to that
 
elusive moonwalker said:
Anyway of finding out what the transaction kj isnt happy about is ivy? (Sony/atv?) Wouldnt have the estate filed their request with the court or do we not have access to that
Click to expand...

estate filed their request with the court but the business deals gets filed sealed. (actually there is a sealing request as well). it looked like they also asked KJ's declaration to be sealed. So most likely it will be all sealed.

But presumably it's the Sony/ ATV deal. Parties came to a definitive agreement in April 18. On May 31st executors filed a petition with the court to approve the business transaction (they also filed a motion to seal). So that fits with the timeline. On the day of the hearing (July 8th) Katherine asked for a 21 day extension and it looks like the court granted it. Continued the original hearing and now a July 26th date for hearing is shown.
 
Last edited:
Ivy, do you know what case these are related:

10/07/2016 Stipulation and Order (AND AGREEMENT RE REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT FROM 8/21/09 )
Filed by Stipulated by all Parties

10/07/2016 Order (ON EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SET TRIAL; )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner

10/07/2016 Ex-Parte Application
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner

I found them from under BP117321

and this

Future Hearings

01/11/2017 at 10:00 am in department M at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401
Court Trial - Short Cause(TRIAL ON LIABILITY ISSUES;)
 
PRINCE JACKSON STANDS UP FOR GRANDMA IN COURT
Update:
12:53 PM PT -- The judge just ruled Katherine knew exactly what she was doing when she replaced her previous attorney with Joy Bass ... saying there is no question in his mind.


Prince Jackson looked like man on a mission ... all in the name of his grandmother, Katherine Jackson.

Michael's son appeared in a Santa Monica court Monday for a hearing regarding Katherine getting a new attorney. The new lawyer is Joy Bass, and she says she's now representing Katherine in all matters related to Michael's estate.

This, apparently, was news to the Katherine's current attorney ... and sources close to the family tell TMZ Prince is in court now to tell the judge they're disputing the new attorney's claim she's now speaking for Katherine.

We got Prince and TJ Jackson (Tito's son) on the way into court and they were tight-lipped.
 
Eh. Is it just me or is that confusing even for tmz. So some female lawyer is saying shes now repping kj but prince kj and others are saying no she isnt but the judge has ruled that yes she is?

Sounds like typical jackson muckery.jerk and others where there so its gotta be about money! Is the new lawyer charging more.waiting for new requests to the estate to be made. Prince seems to be easily used by the family when it comes to kj.like father like son. He needs to be careful.ppl say what they want about paris. But shes very much as mj said not allowing herself to be used (so far) by the family.
 
Last edited:
It is confusing.

I understood it like this

- a new lawyer files a notice of appearance saying she is Katherine's new lawyer.

- the current lawyer had no idea Katherine was changing lawyers.

- TJ and Prince opposed to the new lawyer. they probably had questions, concerns.

- Judge talked to Katherine and convinced that she changed her lawyers knowingly and willingly.

Because technically speaking let's say a lawyer files a notice with the court and says I'm Katherine's new lawyer. Katherine could have said "no she is not" and that would be the end of it. It wouldn't require a hearing and/or determination by the judge. So I'm thinking TJ, Prince etc. was blindsided with the lawyer change, they might have assumed that this was done under influence of someone, that's why they objected to the new lawyer and the judge held a hearing to talk to parties including Katherine to determine if she made the change in her free will or under duress.
 
Thanks glad it wasnt just me!. Which begs the question which side is jerk on must be important for him to show up!!$$
 
I got this feel she knew if Katherine did not say no this is not my lawyer then she is aware of the change That why TJ and Prince are involed i was afraid of this something is not right.
Thanks for the updated Ivy.
 
Last edited:
#MJforever57 said:
I got this feel she knew if Katherine did not say no this is not my lawyer then she is aware of the change That why TJ and Prince are involed i was afraid of this something is not right.
Thanks for the updated Ivy.
Click to expand...

I hope this doesn't turn into Granny gate part 2.0. When I see Jermaine there it takes me back to that "hostage" tape of Katherine with MJ siblings reading out that statement, and we know how that turned out. Talk about dodgy.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top