IMWhizzle
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 3,146
- Points
- 63
Why not?I don't see Chris Brown endorsing MJ as a great thing really.
He has a repeated history of beating women to a pulp.Why not?
I'm not cancelling anyone, I just don't think a serial woman beater associating himself with MJ is a good thing, doesn't matter how many fans he has lol.I try to separate the art from the artist. Or else we'd be cancelling everyone. Each to there own I suppose.
Nah, not gonna happen. The Estate stated several times that there will be no more unreleased songs completed by other artists after 'It Don't Matter To Me'. Branca himself then said that they have no plans to release any unreleased material in the near future, so it will definitely be a T-Shirt, some sort of merchandising or just a Chris Brown dance-related tribute.If this allows us to hear an unfinished MJ song, I don't mind it being made into a duet. Especially if it's an artist who showed his love to MJ.
I just hope we get to hear the original one day. So I'm crossing my fingers.
Type of Work: | Music |
---|---|
Registration Number / Date: | PAu003461307 / 2010-03-03 |
Application Title: | 11pm. |
Title: | 11pm. |
Description: | Electronic file (eService) |
Copyright Claimant: | Bradley Buxer. Address: 553 Summit Oaks Ct., Nashville, TN, 37221, United States. |
The Estate of Michael Jackson, Transfer: by Will. Address: c/o Hoffman, Sabban & Watenmaker, 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, United States. | |
Date of Creation: | 2009 |
It's not endorsing MJ, it's the other way around. He's a fan, that's not a secret. He's using MJ to pique interest. And it's working.I don't see Chris Brown endorsing MJ as a great thing really.
there will be a duet?I just had a random thought - assuming this is for an unreleased song; since the duet will be called '11:11' what if the song Chris will be dueting is the song '11pm'?
Type of Work:Music Registration Number / Date:PAu003461307 / 2010-03-03 Application Title:11pm. Title:11pm. Description:Electronic file (eService) Copyright Claimant:Bradley Buxer. Address: 553 Summit Oaks Ct., Nashville, TN, 37221, United States. The Estate of Michael Jackson, Transfer: by Will. Address: c/o Hoffman, Sabban & Watenmaker, 10880 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, United States. Date of Creation:2009
We don't know for sure yet, that's why I said "assuming that it is". It could very well be a tribute like SmoothCriminal1995 mentioned or it could be a sample from a song that's already been released.there will be a duet?
No one knows...there will be a duet?
the duet will be called '11:11'
I have class today. I just enjoy being angry
I got an angry face too and put on his ignore list.
Interesting how this title is similar to “11 PM”. Hoping there’s at least some unreleased MJ vocals on it.
I think there’s a clear divide between an artist whose allegations are objectively questionable and full of inconsistencies and as such can be comfortably deemed false, and an artist who has openly admitted to being a piece of sh*t and beating women.Michael Jackson fans should know more than most about separating art from the artist due to the controversy about MJ.
I personally feel it's like double standards being totally against breezy yet have a 1 million percent backing of MJ.
That's a pretty ignorant (one could even call it dumb) take, as for beginners: MJ is & always was INNOCENT !Michael Jackson fans should know more than most about separating art from the artist due to the controversy about MJ.
I personally feel it's like double standards being totally against breezy yet have a 1 million percent backing of MJ.
As an artist, the only comparison the two have is the they both sing and dance - MJ is super on every level and did it on a massive scale.
This song is interesting though whatever it might be, perhaps it does contain unreleased MJ vocals
don't make Chris angryI predict too high expectations and a big disappointment
I'd say from one of the nasty women songsInteresting. I wonder what this could be. A duet? But then from what song could they have extracted Michael's voice?