"Michael", a biopic about Michael Jackson, is officially happening.

The Jacksons Share Their Thoughts on the Michael Jackson Biopic and Praise Jaafar Jackson​

Technically there's 2 other movies related to the Jackson family, but not directly about them. Janet is character in biopics about Bobby Brown & Bobby DeBarge. Jermaine & LaToya are also characters in the Bobby DeBarge movie. I've seen the Brown biopic, but not the DeBarge one other than some clips.
 
Are there actually actors for Evan Chandler and Jordan Chandler in the biopic? I hope so.
 
I wonder how they will handle the beatings Joe gave. Only Michael seemed to get really hurt by them as the other brothers never complained or downplayed it some. I’m wondering if Michael was the only one affected by it.
I'm not so sure about that. Where did I read this - was it Jermaine's book? The story about Marlon getting a beating and Joe made him go out back and get a piece of wood off the tree or shrub which Joe then used to thrash him? Normally I take anything Jermaine says with a pinch of salt but, I dunno, I can imagine this story being true. I've seen comments that Michael got beaten worse partly bc he was so defiant but I've also seen comments that Marlon got it worse than the others bc he wasn't so good at the dancing. Personally, I think psychological damage creates problems as much as physical harm does.

Maybe they will happen off-screen? 🤷🏽‍♀️
 
Well I don’t see why there should be direct physical violence in a biopic. There should be more subtle ways.
Well because highly emotional dramatic scenes are what make a movie interesting. Otherwise you might as well just read his Wikipedia page. A good movie makes the audience feel what the characters are feeling, and you can achieve that a lot more effectively when you show what they went through than when you just subtly mention it. Michael talked about the pain he suffered during his childhood all the time, he talked about a fear so great he fainted or threw up at the mere sight of his father, yet people still don't understand him or why he was always crying about his lost childhood, sometimes even his own fans downplay the abuse. Some people have to see it and feel it to understand it.
 
Well because highly emotional dramatic scenes are what make a movie interesting. Otherwise you might as well just read his Wikipedia page. A good movie makes the audience feel what the characters are feeling, and you can achieve that a lot more effectively when you show what they went through than when you just subtly mention it. Michael talked about the pain he suffered during his childhood all the time, he talked about a fear so great he fainted or threw up at the mere sight of his father, yet people still don't understand him or why he was always crying about his lost childhood, sometimes even his own fans downplay the abuse. Some people have to see it and feel it to understand it.
That is the things they can show. young Michael being distraught, scared, sick. I don’t think we need to see the belt beatings, it is not a horror film
 
That is the things they can show. young Michael being distraught, scared, sick. I don’t think we need to see the belt beatings, it is not a horror film

MJ The Musical featured a short scene of MJ being smacked as a boy and later shoved by Joseph as an adult, so I doubt they'll shy away from it in a biopic drama if they covered it in his jukebox musical.

It's a reality of his life that he wasn't afraid to graphically describe. Obviously they don't need to have prolonged, sadistic scenes of whippings via microphone wires, but censoring his reality makes no sense. The American Dream did a pretty good job of using camera work to pan away from the more distressing scenes of abuse.
 
The story about Marlon getting a beating and Joe made him go out back and get a piece of wood off the tree or shrub which Joe then used to thrash him?
That's called a switch, which is a stick from a tree/bush. It was pretty common in families decades ago, at least where I'm from in the southern US. Just like in school the teachers would spank students with a wood board, called a paddle. At my middle school, the gym teachers would paddle kids (3 times) who wasn't dressed for PE and then make them walk around in the back of the school campus for the entire class period. Which was dark blue shorts & a white t-shirt (for boys) & the girls wore dark blue shorts and a sleeveless top with blue & white stripes. Some kids didn't want to wear that when it was wintertime and rather got the spanking instead. My fourth grade teacher was old and didn't use a paddle, she would hit students on the hand with a wooden spoon, which actually hurt more than the board. Some parents would spank with an electric cord or their hand, but leather belts were probably the most common thing to use.
 
That's called a switch, which is a stick from a tree/bush. It was pretty common in families decades ago, at least where I'm from in the southern US. Just like in school the teachers would spank students with a wood board, called a paddle. At my middle school, the gym teachers would paddle kids (3 times) who wasn't dressed for PE and then make them walk around in the back of the school campus for the entire class period. Which was dark blue shorts & a white t-shirt (for boys) & the girls wore dark blue shorts and a sleeveless top with blue & white stripes. Some kids didn't want to wear that when it was wintertime and rather got the spanking instead. My fourth grade teacher was old and didn't use a paddle, she would hit students on the hand with a wooden spoon, which actually hurt more than the board. Some parents would spank with an electric cord or their hand, but leather belts were probably the most common thing to use.
yeah, I know all of this. Sadly, I grew up in the era of this type of punishment. It was considered normal. Not really up for delving back into the details of it, tbh.
 
That is the things they can show. young Michael being distraught, scared, sick. I don’t think we need to see the belt beatings, it is not a horror film
For some people that would be enough. But there are people who still wouldn't understand why he's so distraught, scared and sick unless you showed them why. A movie that censors all the strong, sensitive moments instead of using them to create drama and very powerful scenes will get destroyed by the critics, and rightfully so. Can you imagine if the movie Titanic hadn't shown people drowning and instead just showed the survivors being sad after the ship sank? Wouldn't it lose its effect a little bit? It would still tell the whole story, but the point of a movie is to make you feel what it was like, not just to tell you.
 
Well because highly emotional dramatic scenes are what make a movie interesting. Otherwise you might as well just read his Wikipedia page. A good movie makes the audience feel what the characters are feeling, and you can achieve that a lot more effectively when you show what they went through than when you just subtly mention it. Michael talked about the pain he suffered during his childhood all the time, he talked about a fear so great he fainted or threw up at the mere sight of his father, yet people still don't understand him or why he was always crying about his lost childhood, sometimes even his own fans downplay the abuse. Some people have to see it and feel it to understand it.

The truth of the matter is that Joseph Jackson was a ****** tyrant to his children, and a serial adulterer to his wife. He may have formed the first version of his sons' band and helped them get started, but it was Berry Gordy and those around him who treated them with human dignity (not that he was a saint when it came to anyone's deserved royalties). Later, Quincy Jones was instrumental in Michael's early solo success, and after that he was able to flourish more independently.
 
It's September & we don't have a trailer yet? I gotta feeling the movie will be delayed because like... nothing at all has even been spoken of
 
Does anyone know if the first rough cut of the movie has even been edited together yet? Many studios won't fashion a trailer until at least that point.
Unless someone is actively working on the project there's no way to know without any official confirmation statements. But I do remember some comment from the director that they are editing it (obviously since principal photography ended months ago).

Aside from the teaser trailer we are all waiting for I'm also wondering if we would get any word of potential reshoots if applicable
 
Unless someone is actively working on the project there's no way to know without any official confirmation statements. But I do remember some comment from the director that they are editing it (obviously since principal photography ended months ago).

Aside from the teaser trailer we are all waiting for I'm also wondering if we would get any word of potential reshoots if applicable

Almost every motion picture undergoes some level of reshoots, usually to improve the pacing or film a scene they weren't able to get during main unit photography. The only director I can think of who's publicly stated he refuses to do reshoots is Christopher Nolan; the guy's insanely detailed when it comes to scheduling on his movies.
 
I’m wondering if the film might get pushed back? It happens all the time with films.

Might explain why we don’t have a trailer yet?
 
I’m wondering if the film might get pushed back? It happens all the time with films.

Might explain why we don’t have a trailer yet?

The biggest reason any film is ever pushed back is because the filmmakers can't meet the studio's original release date. This can happen for a variety of reasons, but its also dangerous financially to keep postponing it repeatedly. When that happens, both the studio and the press start to think its not any good, and those ideas then trickle down to the public. So while a few days' or even a week's delay may not be much of a problem, once you get closer to a month and beyond you might as well shoot yourself in the foot.
 
I’m wondering if the film might get pushed back? It happens all the time with films.

Might explain why we don’t have a trailer yet?
Surely they're just busy with post-production? Editing can't be rushed and they have more than six months still to go. I've never in my life followed the development of a film but it doesn't seem weird to me that the trailer hasn't emerged yet.
 
final edit for the biopic 3 months!!,so the end of this month it's done!!!,trailer mid-december approximatively 4 months before
 
Back
Top