[Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror / New assult Pg 38

Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I'm still wondering how they can claim mitteager's files which seem to have been amongst those shown on the mirror's website are said to be in pellicano's possession when the fbi raided. Mitteager left all his tapes etc when he died to barresi who transcribed them all. But Mitteager didn't die until 1997. So why wd pellicano have them in his filing cabinets - he was working for bert fields as a pi for mj during the chandler affair only from july-nov 93.

I reread that ghastly mirror article and still can't get where the heading of 24 boys being paid $35million comes from. In the body of text it says 24 boys were paid off but in another place it quotes barressi, the anonymous investigator, as saying 'at least 3 boys got hush money' - these would be jordie, jason who we've known about for the past decade, and presumably this fictional brandon k richmond who has the contract drawn up by weitzman. There's just zilch attempt to say anything about the other 21 boys and the over $10millon still remaining of hush money apart from that list of blacked out names in an email from some anonymous person saying mj paid off these victims. It's just unbelievable how bad the reporting is, they know they can just say whatever they want about mj, even knowing one of his chidren has just had a suicide attempt. I imagine there will be the fbi files #2 in this sunday's paper too.

It's even more shocking that the rest of the media does not seem to have the brain or willingness to see this article for what it is, they just copy&paste uncritically. A case study could (and should!) be written about it in academy where they are dealing with media analysis.

Yep, the article all over the place. 24 boys, 17 boys or 3 boys? They contradict themselves three times within an article!

BTW Jordan and Jason did not get "hush money" either, even if the media likes to use that term for it. The idea in this article is that MJ paid off boys to buy their silence. But that is precisely what he REFUSED to do in Jordan's case and that's why the Chandlers accused him! The settlement came after it went public and to authorities. Same with Jason. The settlement came after criminal proceedings were over and also after Jason's allegations went public. So none of that was "hush money". Though I agree probably that's what Barresi means + the fictional Richmond.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Why?

I was wondering about the connection between Barresi and the FBI myself.

@shellywebster. yes why, where did that info come from. The tapes of mitteager were taped by mitteager, pellicano was up for wiretapping wasn't he so why wd mitteager's tapes be relevant?
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I just want to point out that Paul Baressi sold the same exact stories, including transcripts from the LeMarques etc., to US tabloids including New York Daily News weeks before the 2005 trial began, which the papers used to try and taint prospective jurors. Baressi didn't care what impact it had on the case or Michael, his only concern was getting paid as always.

The stories included the same Marlon Brando and Elizabeth Taylor claims that the Mirror has posted, which again all originate exclusively from the LeMarques tabloid conversations. Absent from Baressi's original claims in '05 were that they were from "FBI files" and, of course, there was no mention anywhere of the two dozen victims Michael supposedly managed to pay off and keep secret.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Why?

I was wondering about the connection between Barresi and the FBI myself.

The Mitteager tapes did not only include conversations about Michael. Who knows what else was there about Pellicano.

But Barresi's reason to give it to the FBI could simply be for what he is doing now: to be able to tell these are "FBI files" knowing that it gives credit to them in the eyes of people who are ignorant about how it works. That's actually what he tells in that Frontline documentary about why he gave the LeMarque tape to the police. This is his modus operandi!

"We met, Stella and Phillip, myself and this correspondent from Inside Edition. By then I had heard the story probably a half a dozen times. And the only difference is this time I had a tape recorder in my belt. I wanted to seize an opportunity to sell their story myself. Monday morning I got up and I realized what I wanted to do with the tape. I wanted to take it to the district attorney's office and turn it over to them as evidence. I knew that the DA would be happy to receive the information with open arms. And two, I knew how to play the tabloids like a harp.""If Baressi brought the tape to the DA, he'd have nothing to fear for his illegal tape recording. Besides it would juice up the story. If the DA's working on it, that's action, that's inside information." Baressi goes on to state,

"That was the edge that worked well. If my story appeared in the slightest, innocuous, they would throw it out the window. So this is one way to do it with grand style, certainly.

From one of Friedman's articles in 2005:

He bequeathed the tapes to investigator Paul Barresi, who spent a year and a half transcribing and editing them. The hundreds of hours of recordings describe the Enquirer's unsavory tactics dealing with sources, subjects and the police.

What Barresi found, among other things, is that the Enquirer routinely turned over its notes to police after it was done with them.


The tabloid was thus able to avoid lawsuits by claiming it got its information from police sources. This was a clever tactic, but the complete opposite of what actually happened.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I just want to point out that Paul Baressi sold the same exact stories, including transcripts from the LeMarques etc., to US tabloids including New York Daily News weeks before the 2005 trial began, which the papers used to try and taint prospective jurors. Baressi didn't care what impact it had on the case or Michael, his only concern was getting paid as always.

The stories included the same Marlon Brando and Elizabeth Taylor claims that the Mirror has posted, which again all originate exclusively from the LeMarques tabloid conversations. Absent from Baressi's original claims in '05 were that they were from "FBI files" and, of course, there was no mention anywhere of the two dozen victims Michael supposedly managed to pay off and keep secret.


Thanks for this. When the actual FBI files were released and there was no real smoking gun, the media was very 'whatever'. There was talk about a porno tape going through Customs somewhere that had Michael's name on it. From what I remember that was what the media chose to focus on, rather than the lack of evidence of child sexual abuse.

But some slimeball now claims to have "FBI files" and it is all over tabloid land. That says it all about media and social culture. For some, the narrative about Michael is that is a child molesting drug addict and anything that supports is wholeheartedly embraced.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's not only in tabloids. In France, it was published as facts on the websites of Le Point and 20 minutes which are not tabloids.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's not only in tabloids. In France, it was published as facts on the websites of Le Point and 20 minutes which are not tabloids.

Yes, that's my experience as well that European newspapers seem to think it's a fact that the FBI released some files which prove MJ abused and paid off 24 boys. That's why a strong denial by the Estate in which they point out it's not what it's claimed to be, would have been useful.

Of course, it's another matter that it's shocking to see that so many journalists around the world are so lazy and don't do their job an and they do not check out info properly and don't even seem to realize the difference between a tabloid and a legitimate news source.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's not only in tabloids. In France, it was published as facts on the websites of Le Point and 20 minutes which are not tabloids.

When it comes to Michael almost all news sources become tabloids. Even the most realable
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I dont think its laziness or ignorance this is all intentional. the media world wide,media outlets that are all owned by the same ppl will do anything to destroy mj and keep the public brainwashed. they dont care if the info is false and they know dam well it is. if it supports their agenda against mj they will print it. they will do whatever it takes to turn and keep ppl against mj. the

There is no difference between tabloid and what we call broadsheets (respectable high end papers) over the years i have seen such newspapers re publish national enquirer articles as fact i have seen articles written that come with as much lies and venom as u would find in a tabloid. there is no difference as all the mainstream media have the objection. to destroy mj. they showed their colours when they chose their side in 93 regardless of such things as evan chandlers bkackmail threars on tape. find me another celeb that wouldnt have the media on their side with that evidence. They have no problem not caring about others like polanski. but there was to much money to be made from destroying mj and even now they think they can do the same.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I dunno maybe we could come up with a template and everyone make a complaint to the uk press complaints comission. fruitless i know but...its not like the estate care
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's even more shocking that the rest of the media does not seem to have the brain or willingness to see this article for what it is, they just copy&paste uncritically. A case study could (and should!) be written about it in academy where they are dealing with media analysis.

Yep, the article all over the place. 24 boys, 17 boys or 3 boys? They contradict themselves three times within an article!

BTW Jordan and Jason did not get "hush money" either, even if the media likes to use that term for it. The idea in this article is that MJ paid off boys to buy their silence. But that is precisely what he REFUSED to do in Jordan's case and that's why the Chandlers accused him! The settlement came after it went public and to authorities. Same with Jason. The settlement came after criminal proceedings were over and also after Jason's allegations went public. So none of that was "hush money". Though I agree probably that's what Barresi means + the fictional Richmond.

Yes, about that "hush" $$$--Jason Francia testified in 05, Blanca Francia testified in 05, June Chandler testified in 05--guess they forgot to Hush???
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Tabloid report on Michael Jackson 'FBI files' questioned
By Alan Duke, CNN

Los Angeles (CNN) -- A London tabloid declared Sunday that "secret FBI files" reveal Michael Jackson paid millions to silence dozens of boys he abused.

The story quickly echoed throughout global media, perhaps in part because of the trial of the Jackson family's wrongful death lawsuit against a concert promoter and the recent suicide attempt by Jackson's teenage daughter.

A website can enjoy a sharp spike in traffic -- which can translate into advertising revenue -- with a sensational headline.

But journalists and others who have closely followed the controversies and legal fights surrounding the pop star found the description by the Sunday People newspaper of the documents as being from FBI files to be questionable.

'Recycled tabloid reports'

"None of this is new -- zero -- and there was no FBI involvement," said CNN Special Investigations reporter Drew Griffin. "It just sounds like recycled tabloid reports from 20 years ago."

Griffin saw and reported on the same material more than a decade ago as a local Los Angeles reporter.

"The bottom line is this stuff was not in the FBI files," said Tom Mesereau, the lawyer who successfully defended Jackson against child molestation charges in a lengthy trial in 2005. "The FBI closed the investigation. It sounds like a bunch of utter nonsense."

Journalist Diane Dimond, who is no defender of the pop icon, also attacked the Sunday People article.

"It is obvious the paper took this old story and proceeded to make it seem new by adding numbers to it -- 24 boys paid off $35 million by Michael Jackson," Dimond said. "The problem is there's no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs."

Dimond's book "Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case" details her coverage of allegations of improper relationships between Jackson and boys.

The tabloid report was published at a critical time for the Jackson family, as its wrongful death lawsuit against a concert promoter entered its 10th week and while Jackson's daughter, Paris, is being treated after a reported suicide attempt.

"The files will also dismay *****'s kids, Prince, 16, Paris, 15, and 11-year-old Blanket, who have not yet come to terms with losing their father," the Sunday People story said.

Michael Jackson considered the British tabloids' use of "*****" to be a derogatory term.

Griffin, Dimond and Mesereau each point to Paul Barresi, a former porn actor who lost his private investigator's license for fabricating evidence, as the person who possessed the material published Sunday.

It included an audio recording of an interview done by Jim Mitteager, a reporter with the U.S.-based Globe tabloid, with a couple who worked as chefs at Jackson's Neverland Ranch. Mitteager left the tape to Baressi when he died of cancer in 1997.

"Paul Barresi made it no secret over the years that he had come into possession of the Mitteager tapes and that they included a long interview with Philip and Stella LeMarque, the former live-in couple at Neverland," Dimond said. "He discussed the tapes and their contents with me on several occasions."

Griffin said Barresi also gave him access to the material years ago. It included reports Barresi wrote when he worked for now-disgraced celebrity investigator Anthony Pellicano. Pellicano is serving a 15-year federal prison sentence for a wiretapping and racketeering convictions.

Porn star turned P.I.

"Since Barresi has fairly recently been stripped of his P.I.'s license, I can imagine that money has been tight for him," Dimond said. "My best guess is that the UK paper offered Mr. Barresi several thousand dollars for his copies of the old Pellicano files."

When CNN called Barresi on Tuesday to ask if he sold the materials to the newspaper, he responded: "I have no comment and that's all I have to say."

But before the question could be posed, he asked if the reporter wanted to know how many times he's had sex in a hammock. He explained it was a common question people ask because of his porn film career.

Barresi's films, with titles such as "Married Men with Men on the Side" and "Leather Bears and Smooth Chested Huskies," won him the X-Rated Critics' award for best "group grope scene" in 1985 and he was inducted into the GayVN's Hall of Fame in 2008.

Barresi, now 60, retired from the porn business to focus more on his investigative work, but court records suggest he was not as successful in that work.

He obtained a California private investigator's license in 2009, but lost it three years later. He signed a "stipulated settlement" with the state admitting that he faked a report about an ex-girlfriend's drug use to get her fired from her hospital job as a nurse in 2011.

Federal court records also show Barresi and his wife filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2010.

Tabloid stands by story

A Sunday People spokesman would not confirm that Barresi was the paper's source or if it paid for access, but he did stand by the story.

"Our article clearly states that we have seen copies of reports, phone transcripts and interviews carried out by an agent working for private investigator Anthony Pellicano who had been hired by Michael Jackson," Rupert Smith said in an e-mail to CNN. "The files were seized by the FBI when Pellicano was himself investigated in 2002. The documents then became part of the FBI's files on Jackson case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046."

In fact, the FBI released files it collected on Michael Jackson in December 2009, six months after his death. Most of them related to the federal agency's support of the California investigations of child molestation allegations against the entertainer.

Los Angeles Police, who were investigating child molestation allegations against Jackson, called the FBI's Los Angeles office in September 1993 to suggest the agency look into a "possible federal violation against Jackson concerning transportation of a minor across state lines for immoral purposes (Mann Act)", one document said.

The Los Angeles County district attorney did not pursue criminal charges against Jackson, but the singer did reach a confidential financial settlement with the 1993 accuser, Jordan Chandler, and his father after they filed a lawsuit. Reports at the time said the Chandlers got between $16 million and $20 million from Jackson's insurance company.

The Chandler accusation became a key part of the prosecution's case when Jackson was tried and acquitted of molestation a decade later in Santa Barbara County, California.

Mesereau, who reviewed the 330 redacted pages released by the FBI, said the documents purported by the newspaper to have been included in the files were not there.

CNN also reviewed the files, which are still posted on the FBI website, and found none referring to other payoffs by Jackson. None of the file numbers matched those quoted by the newspaper.

"You can imagine what the prosecutor in Santa Barbara would have done with this information if they really had it," Mesereau said.

Phillip LeMarque did testify, telling the court that he once caught Jackson improperly touching then-child actor Macaulay Culkin while he worked as Jackson's self-described cook and "majordomo" for about 10 months in 1991.

Culkin, the second witness called in Jackson's defense, denied any improper touching by Jackson.

Jackson's guilt is 'inconsequential'
Barresi represented the LaMarques in an attempt to sell their story to tabloid media outlets, Mesereau said.

LeMarque admitted at the trial that he tried to make money from his story, even meeting with Barresi, who promised him $100,000 from the tabloid press, maybe more if the story were dirtier.

"He began to make the story more and more graphic as the price went up," Mesereau said, referring to Phillip LaMarque.

"Was it true that the broker told him the payoff might be higher if Mr. Jackson's hand was inside Culkin's pants?" Mesereau asked during cross examination.

"That's what he said," LeMarque said.

Barresi discussed his deal with the LaMarques in an interview for a PBS "Frontline" documentary in 1994.

"My interest in helping them was that they promised me a percentage of what they made," Baressi said. "I was not on any kind of crusade to bring anyone to justice. Whether Michael was guilty or innocent at that point was inconsequential. My interest was strictly for the money, as was theirs, I might add."

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/03/showbiz/michael-jackson-files/?hpt=en_c2
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Alan Duke did his homework. :phew:

I hope it stops people believing it since CNN has more credibility than tabloids.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Very good article, kudos to CNN and Alan Duke for doing this. We need this article to reach the masses.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

OMG! Everybody tweet, Facebook this, etc. for the world to see!!! That was a damn good and thorough article. Alan Duke deserves some love for this.

It must have been hard for Diane Dimond to admit she was wrong. LOL!!!!!:wild:
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It's a bunch of crap and people need to understand that. People are so hateful and want Michael to look guilty so badly that they don't care for the actual truth. It's pathetic and sad and people like Wade want to use this? I say go ahead because it will make him look more foolish. The truth is on Michael's side.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

So happy with that CNN article! And found it hilarious Diane Dimond had to agree that the Sunday People story is B.S! But, I could have done without a stupid plug to her ish book!
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Now we need to flood the internet sites who ran with this bogus story in the first place. Force them to post this information. Jen Hedger from Radar Online better be the first one up!!
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

U were trying to use fake files for ur fake story! Ur so credible!:rollin:


I have a feeling that maybe what he did!
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I'm a member of another (general) message board and I'd been avoiding the "celebrities" section these past few weeks, afraid of what I'd find about MJ. Today I gathered my courage and had a look. Turns out the Wade allegations were completely ignored but someone did start a thread about the "FBI files", asking if it could be true. To my surprise, all the responses so far are in favour of MJ, saying this is tabloid trash and he should be left alone. I posted the Thomson and Friedman articles to be sure (and the article that proved these documents came from Baressi with the picture) and I will probably post the CNN article (which is excellent btw!) in the next few days :)

I think MJ has a lot more supporters than some of us realise. On that message board there was another discussion about the influence of American celebrities on the rest of the world and someone said MJ "wasn't overly talented". I set him straight and I received a ton of reps for it :D
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

The heads must be exploding on the haters who were desperately clinging to this story and hoping it to be true.

tumblr_lpzaeyxuVu1qejgz3o1_500.gif
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

The heads must be exploding on the haters who were desperately clinging to this story and hoping it to be true.

tumblr_lpzaeyxuVu1qejgz3o1_500.gif

Its so sad isnt it lol
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Tabloid report on Michael Jackson 'FBI files' questioned
By Alan Duke, CNN

Los Angeles (CNN) -- A London tabloid declared Sunday that "secret FBI files" reveal Michael Jackson paid millions to silence dozens of boys he abused.

The story quickly echoed throughout global media, perhaps in part because of the trial of the Jackson family's wrongful death lawsuit against a concert promoter and the recent suicide attempt by Jackson's teenage daughter.

A website can enjoy a sharp spike in traffic -- which can translate into advertising revenue -- with a sensational headline.

But journalists and others who have closely followed the controversies and legal fights surrounding the pop star found the description by the Sunday People newspaper of the documents as being from FBI files to be questionable.

'Recycled tabloid reports'

"None of this is new -- zero -- and there was no FBI involvement," said CNN Special Investigations reporter Drew Griffin. "It just sounds like recycled tabloid reports from 20 years ago."

Griffin saw and reported on the same material more than a decade ago as a local Los Angeles reporter.

"The bottom line is this stuff was not in the FBI files," said Tom Mesereau, the lawyer who successfully defended Jackson against child molestation charges in a lengthy trial in 2005. "The FBI closed the investigation. It sounds like a bunch of utter nonsense."

Journalist Diane Dimond, who is no defender of the pop icon, also attacked the Sunday People article.

"It is obvious the paper took this old story and proceeded to make it seem new by adding numbers to it -- 24 boys paid off $35 million by Michael Jackson," Dimond said. "The problem is there's no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs."

Dimond's book "Be Careful Who You Love: Inside the Michael Jackson Case" details her coverage of allegations of improper relationships between Jackson and boys.

The tabloid report was published at a critical time for the Jackson family, as its wrongful death lawsuit against a concert promoter entered its 10th week and while Jackson's daughter, Paris, is being treated after a reported suicide attempt.

"The files will also dismay *****'s kids, Prince, 16, Paris, 15, and 11-year-old Blanket, who have not yet come to terms with losing their father," the Sunday People story said.

Michael Jackson considered the British tabloids' use of "*****" to be a derogatory term.

Griffin, Dimond and Mesereau each point to Paul Barresi, a former porn actor who lost his private investigator's license for fabricating evidence, as the person who possessed the material published Sunday.

It included an audio recording of an interview done by Jim Mitteager, a reporter with the U.S.-based Globe tabloid, with a couple who worked as chefs at Jackson's Neverland Ranch. Mitteager left the tape to Baressi when he died of cancer in 1997.

"Paul Barresi made it no secret over the years that he had come into possession of the Mitteager tapes and that they included a long interview with Philip and Stella LeMarque, the former live-in couple at Neverland," Dimond said. "He discussed the tapes and their contents with me on several occasions."

Griffin said Barresi also gave him access to the material years ago. It included reports Barresi wrote when he worked for now-disgraced celebrity investigator Anthony Pellicano. Pellicano is serving a 15-year federal prison sentence for a wiretapping and racketeering convictions.

Porn star turned P.I.

"Since Barresi has fairly recently been stripped of his P.I.'s license, I can imagine that money has been tight for him," Dimond said. "My best guess is that the UK paper offered Mr. Barresi several thousand dollars for his copies of the old Pellicano files."

When CNN called Barresi on Tuesday to ask if he sold the materials to the newspaper, he responded: "I have no comment and that's all I have to say."

But before the question could be posed, he asked if the reporter wanted to know how many times he's had sex in a hammock. He explained it was a common question people ask because of his porn film career.

Barresi's films, with titles such as "Married Men with Men on the Side" and "Leather Bears and Smooth Chested Huskies," won him the X-Rated Critics' award for best "group grope scene" in 1985 and he was inducted into the GayVN's Hall of Fame in 2008.

Barresi, now 60, retired from the porn business to focus more on his investigative work, but court records suggest he was not as successful in that work.

He obtained a California private investigator's license in 2009, but lost it three years later. He signed a "stipulated settlement" with the state admitting that he faked a report about an ex-girlfriend's drug use to get her fired from her hospital job as a nurse in 2011.

Federal court records also show Barresi and his wife filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2010.

Tabloid stands by story

A Sunday People spokesman would not confirm that Barresi was the paper's source or if it paid for access, but he did stand by the story.

"Our article clearly states that we have seen copies of reports, phone transcripts and interviews carried out by an agent working for private investigator Anthony Pellicano who had been hired by Michael Jackson," Rupert Smith said in an e-mail to CNN. "The files were seized by the FBI when Pellicano was himself investigated in 2002. The documents then became part of the FBI's files on Jackson case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046."

In fact, the FBI released files it collected on Michael Jackson in December 2009, six months after his death. Most of them related to the federal agency's support of the California investigations of child molestation allegations against the entertainer.

Los Angeles Police, who were investigating child molestation allegations against Jackson, called the FBI's Los Angeles office in September 1993 to suggest the agency look into a "possible federal violation against Jackson concerning transportation of a minor across state lines for immoral purposes (Mann Act)", one document said.

The Los Angeles County district attorney did not pursue criminal charges against Jackson, but the singer did reach a confidential financial settlement with the 1993 accuser, Jordan Chandler, and his father after they filed a lawsuit. Reports at the time said the Chandlers got between $16 million and $20 million from Jackson's insurance company.

The Chandler accusation became a key part of the prosecution's case when Jackson was tried and acquitted of molestation a decade later in Santa Barbara County, California.

Mesereau, who reviewed the 330 redacted pages released by the FBI, said the documents purported by the newspaper to have been included in the files were not there.

CNN also reviewed the files, which are still posted on the FBI website, and found none referring to other payoffs by Jackson. None of the file numbers matched those quoted by the newspaper.

"You can imagine what the prosecutor in Santa Barbara would have done with this information if they really had it," Mesereau said.

Phillip LeMarque did testify, telling the court that he once caught Jackson improperly touching then-child actor Macaulay Culkin while he worked as Jackson's self-described cook and "majordomo" for about 10 months in 1991.

Culkin, the second witness called in Jackson's defense, denied any improper touching by Jackson.

Jackson's guilt is 'inconsequential'
Barresi represented the LaMarques in an attempt to sell their story to tabloid media outlets, Mesereau said.

LeMarque admitted at the trial that he tried to make money from his story, even meeting with Barresi, who promised him $100,000 from the tabloid press, maybe more if the story were dirtier.

"He began to make the story more and more graphic as the price went up," Mesereau said, referring to Phillip LaMarque.

"Was it true that the broker told him the payoff might be higher if Mr. Jackson's hand was inside Culkin's pants?" Mesereau asked during cross examination.

"That's what he said," LeMarque said.

Barresi discussed his deal with the LaMarques in an interview for a PBS "Frontline" documentary in 1994.

"My interest in helping them was that they promised me a percentage of what they made," Baressi said. "I was not on any kind of crusade to bring anyone to justice. Whether Michael was guilty or innocent at that point was inconsequential. My interest was strictly for the money, as was theirs, I might add."

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/03/showbiz/michael-jackson-files/?hpt=en_c2


Finally someone does his job and does not just copy&paste.

A Sunday People spokesman would not confirm that Barresi was the paper's source or if it paid for access, but he did stand by the story.

"Our article clearly states that we have seen copies of reports, phone transcripts and interviews carried out by an agent working for private investigator Anthony Pellicano who had been hired by Michael Jackson," Rupert Smith said in an e-mail to CNN.

Yes, what you have also posted on your website and none of which prove what you claim in your article.


"The files were seized by the FBI when Pellicano was himself investigated in 2002. The documents then became part of the FBI's files on Jackson case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046."

Which files became part of Pellicano's files? Some of these are Barresi's documents and have nothing to do with Pellicano. Some might have been attached to Pellicano's files, but just because something gets attached to someone's FBI files it does not mean it proves anything. The manipulative suggestion in the article clearly was that the FBI found proof that MJ abused and paid off 24 boys. None of the files presented prove anything like that. In fact that Mitteager-Pellicano conversation where Pellicano tells Mitteager there were no other boys proves just the opposite.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Well said. these scum reporters are pathetic. they know dam well what they are doing. trying to imply these are files the fbi created with info they believe to be evidence against mj. when they know dam well that isnt the case. they are a bunch of lieing manipulative bastards

ill say aswell that it says alot when we are thankful that a journo actully does their job properly and reports the facts. isnt that what they are supp to do in the first place
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

"Our article clearly states that we have seen copies of reports, phone transcripts and interviews carried out by an agent working for private investigator Anthony Pellicano who had been hired by Michael Jackson," Rupert Smith said in an e-mail to CNN.
It's funny how they word things, trying to act like Paul Barressi worked for MJ in some capacity, just having done some work for Pellicano is apparently enough for them to try and make it seem like it was MJ who hired Baressi or knew or cared about what he did for him.

I'm seeing people in comments sections still clinging to these files now LOL They really needed them to be true so bad. Guess it'll go into the imaginary evidence they rely on for everything else.

I'm worried about this Sunday though, will they try getting some other scoop? I hate the British Sunday papers.
 
Last edited:
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

And my sister. She's so gullible she believes anything these tabloids publish and doesn't bother to research for facts before jumping to conclusions. She is completely resistant to anything I throw at her that will enlighten her. There are way too many closed minded, gullible people just like her (as evidenced by twitter when this latest story came out) who want to believe what they want to and nothing can change their minds.


YOur sister seem to do it because she knows it bothers you.

Yeah that too. It's stinks. But I will never give up defending Michael. If she continues to post dumb tabloid stories about MJ I will continue to debunk them for her. She's just making herself look stupid anyway. -_-
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

Of course the gonna said they "stand" by their story until otherwise if they are order to redacted the article.. This is not a new tactic other newspapers and websites have says things to that effect. For example, tmz running the "Janet Slap Paris" story they stand by it as well.. Until the truth came out and Janet got her lawyers and threaten to sue them, that when they took down the article and change the story..
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

It can't be stressed enough that this CNN article needs to be posted everywhere. Every place you see the news posted about the People article, post this CNN article in response. Send the CNN article to competitor newspapers, post it on their comments pages. Make sure they are aware we will not sit idle while they spread their muck.


Just spend 15 minutes of your day to do this. It's not much effort really.
 
Re: [Discussion] Michael Jackson Slandered By The Mirror

I woke up today hoping to find the CNN article "copied and pasted" into other entertainment/news websites, just like they did with the fake FBI files article that started at The Mirror. And what do you know.... NOTHING. Not a single one like Radar Online, The New York Daily News, and the multiple British rags that distributed it earlier in the week.

Not a single one of them are going to admit that they posted pure crap, are they???
 
Back
Top