Re: [Discussion] Wade Robson / James Safechuck file claim of sexual abuse against MJ-Estate
I don't know if it is just your writing style but please calm down and think before you post.
Evidence/information etc. is found during discovery process - which has started March 2016 and is/was still ongoing. You don't need to provide any evidence in your initial complaint. You make claims and it's considered to be truth until after demurrer. Furthermore depending on the protective order - meaning if an information is classified as confidential - no lawyer can mention it publicly. It can only come out during a proper legal proceeding.
I did think before I posted. If Robson had strong evidence he would have already mentioned it in his story.
That is not dependent on any discovery the question is whether Robson himself has anything like a recorded phone call
or fax or letter.
Such evidence was mentioned in Safechuck's complaint
the medallion the letter MJ sent to him or the recorded interview. Of course they don't prove anything
but it just shows that they grabbed whatever they could to make the story sound credible.
Even if we talk about evidence that can only be found through discovery there was already discovery during the probate case
they got all the police reports, depositions connected to the 1993 2005 cases AND Robson's lawyer
said they looked at thousands of documents already that's why they discovered "shocking evidence"
that the companies procured kids for abuse AND if Finaldi said watch out 2 3 weeks from now you will
see the evidence in the press then obviously Finaldi already knows what that evidence is.
Asking the question why can't you reveal that evidence now why do you want to send it to the press
2-3 weeks later would have been logical.
They DID include "evidence" found during discovery in the complaint, namely the statements of those four employees.
So if Robson had anything "explosive" it would have been mentioned in his complaint especially in the latest version
which was written after his new lawyers looked at all the documents and certainly Finaldi could reveal it
during that interview. If it was classified he wouldn't have said watch the press.
Assuming of course that he was not talking out of his ass and making shit up just to make himself sound more credible, which is quite possible also.
we don't have any info that they are contingency lawyers.
I bet I read that in one of these articles recently and I don't know which one was it.
He makes a comment saying that those men abused as kids are afraid as Robson/Safechuck initially were
Which is yet another lie. They didn't claim that they were afraid. They claimed they didn't know it was abuse and
didn't realize they were molested and were fine with the whole thing. That's the opposite of being afraid.
And what exactly would they be afraid of anyway? The whole ****ing media and the police were on Arvizo's and Chandler's side
and now once again nobody in the media challenges Robson or Safechuck. Accusing MJ is safe.
Actually American justice system strongly believes everyone deserves their day in court. That's why you would see them give plaintiffs all the chances they can.
And that's pretty good evidence that the system is irrational. Not everyone deserves their day in court!
Obvious liars crooks who copy paste another case filled with absurd nonsense like the company controlled the president and sole owner of the company should not get their day in court. That MJ was fined for not showing up in court during the Bartucci case
is just another example of this insanity.
That a grown man can say before age 29 I didn't know child rape was wrong so I couldn't have possibly filed this lawsuit
before that and get his day in court itself shows how rotten the US system is. It a system that rewards sheer madness.