Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael"/ Excerpt @pg151/New Interview Post 3743

Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Actually, I no longer care about the Q&A or what Frank has to say to save his ass, and his book sales. Backtracking doesn't amuse or impress me. I will judge him by what he has written about Michael in the book, and not by what he says in interviews now, as part of damage control within Michael's fanbase.

Pissing off fans isn't gonna do him or his book any good. Who does he think will end up buying his book? At least Jermaine got that right- he knew that he wouldn't get anywhere with a Michael book if Michael's fans turned against it.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

I haven't been following this but Frank ain't implying anything about the molestation charges, is he? I went through a few pages and it's about the use of propofol only, right? That stuff can be taken out of context by media very easily.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Thank GOD this book didn't come out BEFORE the trial! With all that talk of propofol, it could have played directly into the hands of the defense, who were trying to portray Murray as a helpless victim to Michael's "quest for propofol!" But, Murray will no doubt try to appeal. If the appeal goes forward, Frank has now positioned himself as a prime witness, for the DEFENSE, with what seems to be his direct knowledge of Michael's propofol use in the past. Way to go, Frank, and good luck with that?

(edit) Oh, and we can throw a little weed into the mix? What may have been a peaceful moment on a mountain-top now can translate into "Michael Jackson the POTHEAD!" We already know that the defense strategy was almost entirely character assassination. . of Michael. It's a really, REALLY good thing this book didn't come out before the trial. Isn't it? Doubtful if Murray will get an appeal, but if he does? There Frank will be, no doubt, for the DEFENSE.
 
Last edited:
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

no one is defending the book , people are saying wait for the book to come to a conclusion. That's two different things.




yes they did. let me quote the author

Q: Jobs could be notoriously difficult. Did you wind up liking him in the end?

Isaacson: Yes, I liked him and was inspired by him. But I knew he could be unkind and rough. These things can go together. When my book first came out, some people skimmed it quickly and cherry-picked the examples of his being rude to people. But that was only half the story. Fortunately, as people read the whole book, they saw the theme of the narrative: He could be petulant and rough, but this was driven by his passion and pursuit of perfection. He liked people to stand up to him, and he said that brutal honesty was required to be part of his team. And the teams he built became extremely loyal and inspired.

I watched tens of show talking about how "bad" he was. So it happens to anyone and every book. That's how media acts.




actually let's give michael more credit shall we? I believe regardless of issues and allegations, most people would agree that he's the greatest entertainer. I don't see that being hurt in any way.
In any of the stories that were generated as a result of Frank's "revelations", was Michael's Genius mentioned?Was his pursuit for perfection mentioned?

The greatest entertainer who spent the majority of the time drugged up?:-"It had become clear to me that Michael's drug use was escalating,"

Also, surely being potrayed as rough and unkind is better than being potrayed as a long-term drug addled individual who isn't even bothered about staying way from drugs on the day that you are going to perform at a huge concert?
 
Last edited:
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

using propofol was not illegal so MJ using it before won't help murray. the jurors did not say we convicted him because he gave him propofol , they said we convicted him because he did not call 911, did not have equipment to revive ...etc.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

using propofol was not illegal so MJ using it before won't help murray. the jurors did not say we convicted him because he gave him propofol , they said we convicted him because he did not call 911, did not have equipment to revive ...etc.

Of COURSE. But yet, that was the primary "strategy" that the defense seemed to be trying (and especially Flanagan). In the documentary, there are behind-the-scenes moments with the attorneys where they say exactly THAT, that tarnishing Michael really was the only chance that Murray had. Given Murray's "seventeen egregious failures of standard of care," they didn't have much to work with?

I just find it very, very unfortunate that Frank felt the need to write a book about Michael, at ALL.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

I would think it was for lupus ie the cortizone injections not vitiigo as that makes no medical sense imo

I'm not saying if it makes medical sense or not. That's what T-Mez wrote in the court documents. He explained blood with demerol as due to IM injections for vitiligo.

I haven't been following this but Frank ain't implying anything about the molestation charges, is he? I went through a few pages and it's about the use of propofol only, right? That stuff can be taken out of context by media very easily.

imply? he's denying those.

Thank GOD this book didn't come out BEFORE the trial! With all that talk of propofol, it could have played directly into the hands of the defense, who were trying to portray Murray as a helpless victim to Michael's "quest for propofol!" But, Murray will no doubt try to appeal. If the appeal goes forward, Frank has now positioned himself as a prime witness, for the DEFENSE, with what seems to be his direct knowledge of Michael's propofol use in the past. Way to go, Frank, and good luck with that?

They already wanted Frank to be a witness especially based on Grace's statement about what he knew. but as Pastor said he would keep it limited to 3-6 months before Michael's death, it wouldn't make any difference if it was released before the trial. And as for the appeal as Walgren said "no one is denying Michael wanted Propofol" , his previous use is kinda unimportant. Defense wanted to include his desperation (so that he would self medicate) and more importantly Demerol.

In any of the stories that were generated as a result of Frank's "revelations", was Michael's Genius mentioned?

his book is not out till tomorrow and no media will get a copy until then. so let's talk after the media gets the book, shall we? I believe I know the excerpt the press (and us) we will get tomorrow - and it will have nothing to do with these topics.

Of COURSE. But yet, that was the primary "strategy" that the defense seemed to be trying (and especially Flanagan). In the documentary, there are behind-the-scenes moments with the attorneys where they say exactly THAT, that tarnishing Michael really was the only chance that Murray had. Given Murray's "seventeen egregious failures of standard of care," they didn't have much to work with?

primary? I would disagree. I think their primary was he was desperate enough to self medicate and demerol addiction. Propofol was just "Murray wasn't the only one he asked for it / gave it" and Walgren kinda made it a moot point by saying "no one is denying MJ wanted Propofol".
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

^But the excerpts that are out already are from advance copies that were given to the media.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

^But the excerpts that are out already are from advance copies that were given to the media.

no. media wasn't given an advance copy. it's only one person somehow got an advance copy. I'm in communications with the publisher, they haven't sent out any promotion material , any excerpts , any copies yet. It's all going to happen tomorrow. We will get the same package that the media will get tomorrow.
 
Roger Freidman has a column about the book. He says it's a must read for all MJ fans. I'm not sure if that endorsement will help or hurt Frank's book with the fan base. Personally, Freidman's saying that it's a must read makes me believe that it's not for me. Frank seems to do a good job with the part about the allegations. Maybe this book is not targeted to fans. Oh well, the book will be out tomorrow, and we can judge it for ourselves.


Michael Jackson Not A Pedophile, Says Author Who Grew Up with Him

11/14/11 12:40am Roger Friedman


Michael Jackson was not a pedophile. So says Frank Cascio, who grew up with Jackson as a kid along with his siblings. Cascio, now in his early 30s, details his life with Jackson in “My Friend Michael,” officially published tomorrow. It’s the first real, true account of Jackson, including recent books by his brother and sister, Jermaine and LaToya.
Cascio, who knew Jackson from age 5, knew Jordy Chandler and Macaulay Culkin and all the kids who passed through Neverland, writes: “Michael’s interest in young boys had absolutely nothing to do with sex. I say this with the unassailable confidence of firsthand experience, the confidence of a young boy who slept in the same room as Michael hundreds of times, and with the absolute conviction of a man who saw Michael interact with thousands of kids. In all the years that I was close to him, I saw nothing that raised any red flags, not as a child and not as an adult. Michael may have been eccentric, but that didn’t make him criminal.”
Cascio details all the times he and his brothers and sister slept in Jackson’s bedroom, and shares stories of other kids who got the Neverland treatment. Cascio has always maintained this stance, since I met him in 2000. His accounts jibe with those of Culkin and other young men who visited Neverland. Cascio recounts Jackson’s reluctance settle the Chandler case out of court. And he details the story of the greedy, scheming Arvizos.
This past weekend, some press accounts concentrated on Cascio’s admission that Jackson was hooked on a variety of drugs. Fair enough. But as a historical chronicle, “My Friend Michael” is about so much more. Because Cascio and his whole family had a unique place in Jackson’s life. He lived in their homes as an adult, and the Cascios were regular visitors at Neverland, and in Bahrain when Jackson went into self imposed exile. It was Frank Cascio’s minute record keeping in 2003 during the Gavin Arvizo scandal that exonerated Jackson from child molestation and conspiracy charges.
What makes Cascio’s book so compelling for Jackson fans aren’t the drug revelations. Cascio tells the story in minute detail of Jackson’s financial situation and the machinations of various people around him during a key period–from 1994 and the Jordy Chandler scandal through 2000, the “Invincible” album, and the arrest in 2003.
Cascio has no love lost for John McClain, Jackson’s sometime manager and now, by fluke of a 2002 will, the co-executor of his estate. According to Cascio’s account, which I reported at the time, McClain was a constant thorn in his side, undermining their friendship. Years later, in 2010, it would be McClain who would make a mess of the posthumous “Michael” album by encouraging fans to doubt the veracity of tracks produced by Cascio’s brother, Eddie.
“My Friend Michael” is a must read for any Michael Jackson fan. I’ll have some more bits from it as the day goes on.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Sure, the defense was "Michael self-medicated." Based on his apparent "yearning" for propofol. However, in the documentary, there was NO discussion of that. There was a scene from Flanagan's house, where he was trashing Michael -- as if assassinating his character was a DEFENSE STRATEGY. From Flanagan's OWN words. So absolutely, that was part of it.

True, Pastor limited the time frame. Good for HIM.

I do know that some others feel differently, and that is perfectly fine. But myself, I sincerely wish Frank had kept his "private moments with Michael," ENTIRELY private. I really, really do. . . .
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Wow I always found it weird when Roger Friedman actively defended the casinos songs back then consider his anti Michael history (btw i supported michael and trusted the casinos at that time) And now he was actively promoting frank's book again. funny...( when frank announced this book deal, I expected him to talk about john mcclain in this book because of mcclain's fight over those songs. Now it seems that we are going to have a story of how bad and evil this executor Michael trusted and placed in his will betrayed and hurted Michael over the years.)
 
Last edited:
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Rogers certainly doing major damage control. for frank. why frank is friends with friedman after the things hes said is beyond me. throw in the rabbi aswell
 
Resa;3537829 said:
Roger Freidman has a column about the book. He says it's a must read for all MJ fans. I'm not sure if that endorsement will help or hurt Frank's book with the fan base. Personally, Freidman's saying that it's a must read makes me believe that it's not for me. Frank seems to do a good job with the part about the allegations. Maybe this book is not targeted to fans. Oh well, the book will be out tomorrow, and we can judge it for ourselves.


Michael Jackson Not A Pedophile, Says Author Who Grew Up with Him

11/14/11 12:40am Roger Friedman


Michael Jackson was not a pedophile. So says Frank Cascio, who grew up with Jackson as a kid along with his siblings. Cascio, now in his early 30s, details his life with Jackson in “My Friend Michael,” officially published tomorrow. It’s the first real, true account of Jackson, including recent books by his brother and sister, Jermaine and LaToya.
Cascio, who knew Jackson from age 5, knew Jordy Chandler and Macaulay Culkin and all the kids who passed through Neverland, writes: “Michael’s interest in young boys had absolutely nothing to do with sex. I say this with the unassailable confidence of firsthand experience, the confidence of a young boy who slept in the same room as Michael hundreds of times, and with the absolute conviction of a man who saw Michael interact with thousands of kids. In all the years that I was close to him, I saw nothing that raised any red flags, not as a child and not as an adult. Michael may have been eccentric, but that didn’t make him criminal.”
Cascio details all the times he and his brothers and sister slept in Jackson’s bedroom, and shares stories of other kids who got the Neverland treatment. Cascio has always maintained this stance, since I met him in 2000. His accounts jibe with those of Culkin and other young men who visited Neverland. Cascio recounts Jackson’s reluctance settle the Chandler case out of court. And he details the story of the greedy, scheming Arvizos.
This past weekend, some press accounts concentrated on Cascio’s admission that Jackson was hooked on a variety of drugs. Fair enough. But as a historical chronicle, “My Friend Michael” is about so much more. Because Cascio and his whole family had a unique place in Jackson’s life. He lived in their homes as an adult, and the Cascios were regular visitors at Neverland, and in Bahrain when Jackson went into self imposed exile. It was Frank Cascio’s minute record keeping in 2003 during the Gavin Arvizo scandal that exonerated Jackson from child molestation and conspiracy charges.
What makes Cascio’s book so compelling for Jackson fans aren’t the drug revelations. Cascio tells the story in minute detail of Jackson’s financial situation and the machinations of various people around him during a key period–from 1994 and the Jordy Chandler scandal through 2000, the “Invincible” album, and the arrest in 2003.
Cascio has no love lost for John McClain, Jackson’s sometime manager and now, by fluke of a 2002 will, the co-executor of his estate. According to Cascio’s account, which I reported at the time, McClain was a constant thorn in his side, undermining their friendship. Years later, in 2010, it would be McClain who would make a mess of the posthumous “Michael” album by encouraging fans to doubt the veracity of tracks produced by Cascio’s brother, Eddie.
“My Friend Michael” is a must read for any Michael Jackson fan. I’ll have some more bits from it as the day goes on.

What did Friedman mean by "it was Frank Cascio's minute record keeping in 2003 during the Gavin Arvizo that exonerated Jackson?" I'm scratching my head now...

Wasn't Frank just a teenager in the 90's? How could he tell details of Michael's financial situation in the 90's? I highly doubt Michael would share such kind of information with him?

As someone who followed the "Michael" controversy from the very beginning, I can say it's absolutely not John McClain who encourage fans to doubt the authenticity of the Cascio tracks. It's totally not fair to blame John McClain.

Seriously, what's between Roger Friedman and Frank?
 
Loveliness;3537650 said:
— but I've now heard others state they believe that Michael molested children while he was under the influence of the drugs. What Frank has disclosed has not helped Michael's public image. It's further reinforcing the whacked out conception of him.

Oh Lord now you see why most of us are upset by Frank's words. Here we go again with the linking of the drug use to molestation. Doesn't Frank realize that people are simply looking for information they could link to make these allegations possible? Is Frank so hard up for money that he does this to someone who helped him to make tons of money in the past? Thanks Frank.
 
Resa;3537829 said:
Michael Jackson Not A Pedophile, Says Author Who Grew Up with Him

11/14/11 12:40am Roger Friedman

that's a positive headline in the media by one of the people that wrote the most negative stories about Michael.


Cascio, who knew Jackson from age 5, knew Jordy Chandler and Macaulay Culkin and all the kids who passed through Neverland, writes: “Michael’s interest in young boys had absolutely nothing to do with sex. I say this with the unassailable confidence of firsthand experience, the confidence of a young boy who slept in the same room as Michael hundreds of times, and with the absolute conviction of a man who saw Michael interact with thousands of kids. In all the years that I was close to him, I saw nothing that raised any red flags, not as a child and not as an adult. Michael may have been eccentric, but that didn’t make him criminal.”

Cascio details all the times he and his brothers and sister slept in Jackson’s bedroom, and shares stories of other kids who got the Neverland treatment. Cascio has always maintained this stance, since I met him in 2000. His accounts jibe with those of Culkin and other young men who visited Neverland. Cascio recounts Jackson’s reluctance settle the Chandler case out of court. And he details the story of the greedy, scheming Arvizos.

another quote

This past weekend, some press accounts concentrated on Cascio’s admission that Jackson was hooked on a variety of drugs. Fair enough. But as a historical chronicle, “My Friend Michael” is about so much more.

What makes Cascio’s book so compelling for Jackson fans aren’t the drug revelations. Cascio tells the story in minute detail of Jackson’s financial situation and the machinations of various people around him during a key period–from 1994 and the Jordy Chandler scandal through 2000, the “Invincible” album, and the arrest in 2003.

personal note: I hate when I find myself agreeing with the likes of Nancy Grace and Roger Friedman and such.


ps: the only "negative" about this is that Friedman isn't seen as the most credible source as for many and probably his previous support of Cascio's will make him seem as biased in his review of the book.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

wow I just didn't go up here for 2 days and there are around 50 pages of posts! Took quite a long time to read through them. The Cascios really can make lots of argument and divide fan community. Before I got to the most recent news about the Cascios book. I have to say I always though the Cascios were the true friends of MJ. I do believe the tracks were MJ (I mentioned this because it seemed that some are saying people are against the Frank because of his last name and because of the tracks). In my point of view, those track just really unfinished and over produced. I do have to admitted that I don't like their way to handle the tracks fiasco not explaining what really went on, saying they had working tape but never show, Joe Vogal tried to reach them but they refused to talked about it etc . However, the bottom line is I do believe those were MJ's I just didn't agree how they deal with the situation.

When Frank first revealed his was writing this book I was on the fence about this but more to the supporting side. If he bring some lights to MJ's legacy, then good for him. I also have to admit that I loved all those cute and lovely stories shared by many people spent time with MJ. I thought the book will focus on how his family interacted with MJ etc, (all the loving stories) and Frank will know what line he should no cross. However as the time went by, his interview and all the news regard this book turn out to make the public think quite negative to MJ. I agreed with Ivy and others that the media for sure will twist the words to grab attention and we should not jump to the conclusion before we read the whole book. However, the fact is Frank, like others did again give the media the fuel to write all those negative articles.

I don't want to comment on the book, since it is not out yet. I think I would read it then decide. However, I do want to comment for current leaked parts of the book and the media coverage. Although we should wait a little longer to give full comments. The fact is most non- fan people don't care about the full context of the books. They read the news or sometime just the headlines then conclude all the negative things said about MJ were true. It's Frank who give the fuel to the media. I don't believe he was so naive not to know what would happened if he wrote all those stuffs. So why put out there? What's the point to say MJ's marriage to LMP and Debbie to please the Prince?etc I just didn't get it. Are all these necessary to be in the book?

Yes, we should not just jump to the conclusion to slam Frank. However, I just don't understand why he provided more fuel to the media to condemn MJ. I really doubt he won't know this would happened. The media the public won't care about there were reasons why MJ use those medicine. They just saw a drug addict who doctor shop and Murray was just bad luck. As for fans, we already knew that MJ had legit reasons to seek out medication. Frank claimed he want to clear MJ's name etc. So far, he fails big time. The public think MJ not just a pedophile but now a drug addict who lose control of his life. The fans community got divided because of this book.
 
Last edited:
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

I don't know how anyone could but pill taken and drug abuse together. And anyone that does is out of there damn mind anyway
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

What did Friedman mean by "it was Frank Cascio's minute record keeping in 2003 during the Gavin Arvizo that exonerated Jackson?" I'm scratching my head now...

he and his friend (I forgot his name now) used to take Arvizo's to shopping etc. He had the receipts that was showing that Janet Arvizo getting body wax etc , or buying items worth thousand dollars etc when she was supposedly being kept against her will and making escape plans. thus making it seem like what she was claiming was unrealistic. It basically debunked the conspiracy claim.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Vinny Amen or Aman
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

The issue isnt whether any of what frank is saying is true its the fact he shouldnt be sayibg it at. all. i got several phonecalls after the verdict last week. i was asked to speak on the radio about it as my bro works in the industry and has many contacts. Same happ in 05 aswell. i refused just like i refused when outside of mjs hotels aswell when the media would cone sniffing for a soundbite. i dont talk to them cause they twist everything and no doubt they would have brought up questions about drugs etc and tried to make it negative. so i dont even give them a chance to go there as i love and respect mj to much to give anyone ammunition to use against mj.


then we have frank!

Elusive I see we share the same feelings about the media. When I went to the first day of trial, they came around asking for an interview. One of them from ABC also asked me to give an interview, and I told all No Thank You. We all know how they twist things, and you have to be prepared to deal with them. One of them tried to needle me by stating "I never knew Michael Jackson fans were shy," with a smirk on his face. However, a fan standing by me said, "we are not shy, we just don't talk to the media." Of course some did and did a good job, but I know what you mean about twisting what someone says. Someone even tried to entice me by saying "you look so nice and I like your hair." However, I already know I look good, so I don't need someone to tell me to build up my self-esteem. She used the wrong hook on me for sure.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

ps: the only "negative" about this is that Friedman isn't seen as the most credible source as for many and probably his previous support of Cascio's will make him seem as biased in his review of the book.

Indeed... Friedman is so biased in this article that I have a hard time in taking it seriously. Blaming John McClaim for starting the mess? Claiming it's Frank's record that exonerated Michael?

I hope Frank did not share in details about Michael's financial situation in the 90's and the Invincible era. Again, I highly doubt he got the whole complete picture.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

What did Friedman mean by "it was Frank Cascio's minute record keeping in 2003 during the Gavin Arvizo that exonerated Jackson?" I'm scratching my head now...
Wasn't Frank just a teenager in the 90's? How could he tell details of Michael's financial situation in the 90's? I highly doubt Michael would share such kind of information with him?

As someone who followed the "Michael" controversy from the very beginning, I can say it's absolutely not John McClain who encourage fans to doubt the authenticity of the Cascio tracks. It's totally not fair to blame John McClain.

Seriously, what's between Roger Friedman and Frank?
I think that Freidman is giving Frank too much credit for Michael's acquittal. I guess T-Mez didn't have anything to do with it. I guess the fact that Sneddon didn't prove his case because he didn't have anything because Michael was really innocent didn't mean a thing. Freidman's giving Frank all of the credit is similar to when he gives Quincy Jones or Frank Dileo all of the credit and over look that Michael had anything to do with his own success.

Freidman's article also make me question the validity of the John McClain story on the YRMW set. Did McClain really want Michael to use darker makeup and putty on his nose, or is this story a way to get back at McClain for his questioning those songs?
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Friendship is sacred and the Cascio's befriended one of the most popular, interesting and controvercial figures in history.. then its just thrown away flippantly just like that. Frank if he wanted to dispel rumours had enough opportunity and a medium to set the record straight.

What angers me is that so many have washed their hand clear of any moral and professional obligation to help Michael in the past by perpetuating this drug addict theory, he was beyond help, he demanded these drugs, he paved the way for his own death, he lied, he deceived ... the last thing we need is yet another 'insider' attesting to MJ's drug problems. We need to move on...no one is asking why it started, when it was fuelled etc etc. Sad.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

Seriously, what's between Roger Friedman and Frank?

^^Maybe love. It's love of something, maybe money. Notice when he did a review of Jermaine's the tone was much different. He schoffed at Jermaine belief that the children were Michael and other things. Now everything in Frank's book is good and fans should read it. The day I listen to Roger to help me make a moral and ethical dicision, you all can call the mental health authorities.
 
love is magical;3537856 said:
Claiming it's Frank's record that exonerated Michael?

Resa;3537857 said:
I think that Freidman is giving Frank too much credit for Michael's acquittal. I guess T-Mez didn't have anything to do with it.

Although his current text makes it sound like he was all the reason, that's not what Friedman is saying. This is from a previous article " It was Cascio’s record keeping that helped exonerate Michael on the counts of conspiracy in 2005." Also if you go back and read Friedman's articles from the trial time he details the thousand dollars of money spent on Arvizo's and Frank's records of those. That's what he's talking about. Also Sneddon offered both Frank and his friend Vinnie immunity to testify against Michael. They didn't take it.

note to self: I feel like an ancient dinosaur and a walking library.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

we got the Jacksons attack John branca and told us how much he betrayed and hurt michael. The hate is so strong that Michael had to wrote all over his walls to remind himself this hate. And now we have cascios tell us the bad John mcclain's story.
 
ivy;3537863 said:
Although his current text makes it sound like he was all the reason, that's not what Friedman is saying. This is from a previous article " It was Cascio’s record keeping that helped exonerate Michael on the counts of conspiracy in 2005." Also if you go back and read Friedman's articles from the trial time he details the thousand dollars of money spent on Arvizo's and Frank's records of those. That's what he's talking about. Also Sneddon offered both Frank and his friend Vinnie immunity to testify against Michael. They didn't take it.

note to self: I feel like an ancient dinosaur and a walking library.
My comment was about what Freidman says in this article.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

^^Maybe love. It's love of something, maybe money. Notice when he did a review of Jermaine's the tone was much different. He schoffed at Jermaine belief that the children were Michael and other things. Now everything in Frank's book is good and fans should read it. The day I listen to Roger to help me make a moral and ethical dicision, you all can call the mental health authorities.

This Roger Friedman dude is insulting fans' intelligence...

Gee... so John McClain is now the bad guy? Seriously, if Michael's relationship with McClain went sour. Why wouldn't Michael replace McClain with another professional? Doesn't it take only minutes to amend a will?

Although I don't agree with all the artistic decisions the Estate has made, I don't support the character attacks aimed at the Executors. I find the family's accusations on Branca offensive. Likewise, I find the bad-mouthing on McClain equally offensive.
 
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011

My comment was about what Freidman says in this article.

I know what he says in his article but it's also obvious what he means from his previous articles that he wrote about the same subject and from the information we have from the trial. They don't count?
 
Back
Top