Memefan
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,382
- Points
- 0
Re: Frank Cascio "My Friend Michael" book release date Nov 15 ,2011 / Excerpt posted at @pg151
Paternity. Maternity.
Is there really a difference? WE've been told the kids were off limit. Personal and paparazzi pictures cannot be posted here, yet discussions about their DNA is permitted.
He presented MJ's POV, as he heard it to rebuke Frank's.
Dead at you using flip flop....I've been saying the same thing about the Frank's supporters.
I don't see how else he could have refuted FC's claims without putting in context his own experience with MJ.
I thought it was only limited to paternity
Paternity. Maternity.
Is there really a difference? WE've been told the kids were off limit. Personal and paparazzi pictures cannot be posted here, yet discussions about their DNA is permitted.
I understand the first part about Propofol. Although I'm not sure how moody would know whether Michael got propofol or not for certain unless he /she was spending every minute of every night with Michael in his room.
and the second part is just an assumption to which moody himself/herself said "I can be wrong". Michael was talking about a friend which moody assumed to be Frank. yet everyone is acting like it's a fact. during that discussion moody revealed a special woman in Michael's life. Plus if what Frank says is true and he didn't have contact with Michael by T-Mez's orders how was he able to set him up with woman? And if moody only meant Frank talking to Friedman about the fan story then the rest of what Michael said was not needed to be revealed - if this is an issue about invasion of privacy.
and to be clear - I had no issues with Frank writing that Michael loved some woman in his book and I have no issues with moody writing Michael had a special someone in his life.
The issue - and what Pace pointed out was - some people who hated on Frank for writing "private" information on his book and questioned his information and honestly and such, somewhat so easily accepted moody's "private" information with no questions of "who are you and how do you know this" - as long as it was badmouthing Frank. That's what we were talking about.
and note: as I said moody knows what I think about his/her information. This is not about moody but how people flip-flop on this thread.
He presented MJ's POV, as he heard it to rebuke Frank's.
Dead at you using flip flop....I've been saying the same thing about the Frank's supporters.
I don't see how else he could have refuted FC's claims without putting in context his own experience with MJ.