Is Michael Jackson's will valid or part of elaborate murder conspiracy

BRAVO!

Yes the will is fake. John Branca is the number one beneficiary IMO he controls everything. He is involved in the murder. Both he and a certain record company should be questioned by the police. Of coarse this will never happen. Also(about the vid) Michael was taking perscription medications but he was not an addict an the Propofol stories are fabrications. Murray introduced this into MJ system; that was his job and why he will not go to jail.


Branca is a part of this murder he is a servant to the same group that run entertainment, music and media and hated MJ. They are the priciples here. They were the ones who kept MJ in court, who slandered his name and tried to end his career for the last 16 years. They are the ones whom said "he must sell that catalog", "He's broke", "He's W@**o" and they arec the same ones telling us he a "drug addict." Remember this was and is being done for a reason and a purpose. The Jackson's aswell as Londell know MJ was murdered and for the SONY music publishing worht billion(s) $5,000,000,000. They also know if they fight they will get nothing and the controlled corporate MJ bias media goes to work on the Jackson family's reputations and possibly could lose the children & the estate.


Yes the Courts and the Police are bought and paid for.


This is why they make "noise" but do not expose the obviously phony will. Those who belive the lies of the media only process information yet cannot think beyond what they are told.




HemLock you and others like Gaisichild, Amber, Afika, Cherumb, and a few others you know who you are, NEVER let others forget what Michael Jackson was ALL about and why he did what he did for his TRUE FANS, its remarkable the LOVE you continue to show for Michael dispite all the Negative Press and Posts. I believe with all my heart as you and the others roam ETERNTIY with our God, Saviour and Michael I will finally get chance to met you and all these other BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE who in spite all EVIL in this EARTH kept LOVE ALIVE.


Yes JOHN BRANCA is now the SOLE BENEFICIARY of MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE, I sometimes just visualize him in his POWER and SPENDING FRENZY just living in HEAVEN buying his children all kinds of stuff, Laundering Money in all kinds of places for future use, LASHVISHING HIS NEW YOUNG WIFE with the same OVER THE TOP GIFTS Michael was critizes for BUYING, Johnny Boy reaping all that money back he had to pay in CHILD SUPPORT the last ten years, buying up everything in sight, him and SONY and the other UK boys just PRODUCING REMASTERS on every corner spending Michael Jackson's MONEY like its growing on a TREE. But like in all CRIMES especially with this DARK CLOUD of HOMICIDE on top of their HEADS, its no doubt someone is going to muddy the water for JOHNNY-BOY and HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS this ESTATE is TOO HUGE its BILLIONS and not just for now but for as LONG AS THIS EARTH REMAINS MICHAEL JACKSON's NAME and MUSIC WILL BE GETTING PAID Im pretty sure some of them will in up in Mind Maddness and this GREED is whats going to cause the RIP in their MURDER CONSPIRARCY , the same GREED that they used to take an INNOCENT MAN's LIFE this same GREED will make them ENEMIES. Too MUCH POWER given to "1" Man always does it.
 
Michael told Dick Gregory "THEY ARE TRYING TO KILL ME" and THEY are MANY that PLANNED and CARRIED out this HORRIFIC MURDER planned to Look Like an OVERDOSE but LA COUNTY has told them YOU ALL LIED ITS A MURDER AND ITS OFFICAL, I would bet Michael dropped specific names with Mr. Gregory, I really believe this is going to bust the Entertainment World Wide Open with their Greedy Shady Emblezzling Murdering Selves. I know the DEA and FBI and IRS are Hot on their trail they have opened up a whole new can of whopazz on the Music and Film Industry because they all are tied in together. Amber I believe you just lit a "FIRE" on these DATES and TIME when Michael alledgedly signed this FAKE Will, Great Find you pulled together this needs to brought to the attention of Katherine Jackson NOW. Its obvious in all the years they planned Michael Jackson's MURDER they still didnt think it all the way through and they have really left themselves wide open. I believe Mrs. Jackson hired a PI early on and if so I know he is hard at work with this much information they have left exposed because the way the planned and carried out Michael Jackson Murder there was just no way they could have COVERED ALL THEIR BASES and the date and time they used is whats revealing everything, they waited along time to Kill Michael Jackson but they did pick the wrong date and time after all but they where in a HURRY because they knew if they let him board that plane for LONDON and once he hit that 02 Stage EVERYONE including ALL his HATERS and LIARS everyone would know MICHAEL JACKSON IS BETTER THAN EVER and he would have become the most POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD and they all would have BEEN WITHOUT A JOB once he returned back to the USA. Michael was after all very hard to kill mainly because he kept his body in such GOOD HEALTH WITHOUT DRUGS and they never could get around that because they knew you cant deceived FORENSICS in a HEALTHY PERSON even with the poisioning of his FOOD AND HEALTH DRINKS and when Michael thought he was getting B12 and Vitamins Injections they where putting something else in their deadly needles drugging him all they had was LIES THEY COULD GIVE TO THE MEDIA AND FANS EVEN HIS FAMILY and there was no way not "1" of their LIES would stand after he hit that stage, so now they want to BOOTLEG his PERFORMANCE and SELL it as a REHERSAL DVD this is so SLAUNDOUS, MICHAEL JACKSON would have NEVER APPROVED of a SELL like this he gave his FANS 300% just the way Michael was dressed he would have NEVER ALLOWED this and thats not because he was ASHAMED its the QUALITY of ENTERTAINMENT MICHAEL ALWAYS gave his FANs, these GREEDY HEATHENS should be ASHAMED marketing any "THIS IS IT" and certainly it should not be at any Theaters and I will continue to HONOR Michael Jackson BY NOT TAKING PART in anything that has to do with "THIS IS IT" . Looks like the saying still stands NO MURDER IS PERFECT. Thanks again Amber Great Looking Out !

MJ#1WhoIsIt
Thank you for your great post. No worries, I found a comment related to those dates in another post. It really got my attention.
Yes there is NO PERFECT MURDER. ‘They’ were in a rush to bring out a Will otherwise it would’ve been declared Michael died ‘intestate’.
Someone mentioned in another thread that Tom Mez might have known about if there was another updated will, because he worked with Michael in 2005, in case the verdict of the trial was negative (just thinking of it, gives me heartache), Tom Mez might have had Michael to update his will.

What do you think?

Also I found Tom Mez had re-valued Sony/ATV :

In 2005, Jackson's defense attorney, Thomas Mesereau, revealed that the song catalogue had been valued at between $4 billion and $5 billion.[26] The company's song catalogue is believed to generate up to $80 million a year; The Beatles' hits alone bring in $30 million to $45 million a year.[24] Jackson's other publishing firm, Mijac, which publishes songs written by Jackson himself, is valued to be worth at least $75 million.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony/ATV_Music_Publishing

As Michael was aware that ‘they were trying to kill him’ for many years, I strongly believe he had left clues/names with other people like Dick Gregory. Michael had A FEW GOOD MEN in his circle; otherwise he wouldn’t have survived until he was 50.
Hope Katherine Jackson has ‘good’ PIs and ‘good’ lawyers who would work best interest of Michael and his mother.
 
HemLock you and others like Gaisichild, Amber, Afika, Cherumb, and a few others you know who you are, NEVER let others forget what Michael Jackson was ALL about and why he did what he did for his TRUE FANS, its remarkable the LOVE you continue to show for Michael dispite all the Negative Press and Posts. I believe with all my heart as you and the others roam ETERNTIY with our God, Saviour and Michael I will finally get chance to met you and all these other BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE who in spite all EVIL in this EARTH kept LOVE ALIVE.


Yes JOHN BRANCA is now the SOLE BENEFICIARY of MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE, I sometimes just visualize him in his POWER and SPENDING FRENZY just living in HEAVEN buying his children all kinds of stuff, Laundering Money in all kinds of places for future use, LASHVISHING HIS NEW YOUNG WIFE with the same OVER THE TOP GIFTS Michael was critizes for BUYING, Johnny Boy reaping all that money back he had to pay in CHILD SUPPORT the last ten years, buying up everything in sight, him and SONY and the other UK boys just PRODUCING REMASTERS on every corner spending Michael Jackson's MONEY like its growing on a TREE. But like in all CRIMES especially with this DARK CLOUD of HOMICIDE on top of their HEADS, its no doubt someone is going to muddy the water for JOHNNY-BOY and HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS this ESTATE is TOO HUGE its BILLIONS and not just for now but for as LONG AS THIS EARTH REMAINS MICHAEL JACKSON's NAME and MUSIC WILL BE GETTING PAID Im pretty sure some of them will in up in Mind Maddness and this GREED is whats going to cause the RIP in their MURDER CONSPIRARCY , the same GREED that they used to take an INNOCENT MAN's LIFE this same GREED will make them ENEMIES. Too MUCH POWER given to "1" Man always does it.
Thank you for another sensible post.
Thank you to Michael to bring me here and give me a chance to meet you - MJ#1WhoIsIt and other lovely fans.
Michael was back stabbed, betrayed, tortured and murdered for money. The same money is going to bring out the truth and justice. We can see from their acts how greedy they are and they get greedier by the minute.
God be with Michael and his mother and children and us. :angel:
 
What do you think guys about the signed date of 2002 will?

Michael Jackson speaks out against the then CEO of Sony Music, Tommy Mottola, in Harlem, New York on July 6th 2002

July 7, 2002 Michael calls Tommy Mottola a racist

The alleged will was executed 7 July 2002 at 5:00PM in Los Angeles

Is this possible?

I believe Frank Dileo is on AEG's payroll. He called John Branca as he was advised by AEG and Sony.

Moonlight, great post, I guess it's ok to discuss about other 'handlers' - lawyers, accountants, managers and business partners and also doctors who 'controlled' Michael's mood - in this thread as well. We can start from 2002 will and current situation and go all the way back.

I couldn't help myself but getting teary all day today, this is so unbearable what these people had done and still doing to Michael.

The other thing I find perplexing about these dates is that the will was signed 7/7/2002 exactly 7 years to the date of memorial on 7/7/2009. As Michael used to wear number 7s. Is this coincidence or part of ritual. The mafia do use ritual in their murders.
 
^^^Gaiachild thanks. Yep that's an interesting find. It's a ritual/math 2009-7 = 2002 - perfect all these executors worked for Michael in 2002. Also, it seems like 'they' already had chosen the date of memorial (7/7) while they trying to work out the date of the will.

Will is only 5 pages long. Can we believe Michael Jackson had only 5 pages long will when some ordinary people like us could have more than 10 pages?
http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdai...l-filed-in-court-neverland-memorial-unlikely/
 
Is Michael Jackson's Will Valid?
Tuesday July 7, 2009

Rumors have been circulating since Michael Jackson's death about the validity of his 2002 Last Will and Testament, and yesterday it was reported that more than one will exists. So what? Michael Jackson's will that was signed in July 2002 is apparently his last will, and on top of that it is a Pour Over Will that is designed to take assets from his estate (meaning things titled in his individual name or as a tenant in common) and put them inside the Michael Jackson Family Trust, a Revocable Living Trust that has become irrevocable now that Jackson is dead. With that said, Michael Jackson's will isn't the relevant legal document - the Michael Jackson Family Trust is. And as I wrote yesterday in Michael Jackson's Will vs. the Michael Jackson Family Trust, it's quite possible that Michael Jackson amended the trust or completely restated its terms years after the July 2002 will was signed, and if this is the case then it will be more important to focus on the validity of the trust than on the validity of the will. And even if the 2002 will is found to be invalid, that doesn't mean the trust, which, again, could have been amended or completely restated long after the 2002 will was signed, is invalid. This makes for ongoing court room drama and posturing that in the end will keep the lawyers representing Michael Jackson's family and business associates busy and fill their pockets with legal fees.

This begs the question, could any of this have been avoided? Perhaps, if Michael Jackson had shared his estate planning goals with his family, but as flighty as Michael Jackson was it's possible that he changed his mind and his estate plan frequently. As in life, in death Michael Jackson continues to weave one tangled web.
http://wills.about.com/b/2009/07/07/is-michael-jacksons-will-valid.htm

Michael Jackson's Will vs. the Michael Jackson Family Trust
Monday July 6, 2009

Is there any significance in the difference between the date Michael Jackson's Last Will and Testament was signed (July 7, 2002) and the date the Michael Jackson Family Trust was amended and restated (March 22, 2002)? Perhaps. We can only speculate that Michael Jackson originally updated his estate plan in March 2002 and then decided to make additional changes to the plan less than four months later. In other words, even if Michael Jackson made changes to the Michael Jackson Family Trust after he amended and restated it in March 2002, the name and date of the trust still remained the same. On the other hand, a will must be dated on the date it's created. Thus, it's possible that Jackson could have amended the Michael Jackson Family Trust or even completely restated its terms months or even years later. But ultimately if Michael Jackson's estate plan works the way it's supposed to, then the provisions of the Michael Jackson Family Trust won't be made public.
http://wills.about.com/b/2009/07/06/musings-about-michael-jacksons-estate-plan.htm

Pour Over Will

Definition: A special type of Last Will and Testament that is used specifically with a trust-based estate plan. Instead of governing the distribution of all of your property, the Pour Over Will simply states that any of your property that hasn't been funded into your Revocable Living Trust prior to your death will be funded into the trust after you die. This means that, unfortunately, if any of your property isn't funded into your trust before you die, then the unfunded property will need to be probated through the use of your Pour Over Will.
http://wills.about.com/od/termsbeginningwithp/g/pouroverwill.htm

What is a Revocable Living Trust?
http://wills.about.com/od/fiveessentialdocuments/a/rlts.htm?mr=680
 
wow so if the family know it's not valid and want allhis money then they can bring that up. they can't prove it b/c it is valid.
 
The plan is for Branca aka The EXECUTIONER which has not paid any of Michael's SO CALLED DEBTS because like Dick Gregory said the only DEBTS Michael had where the ones they had CREATED, so after they continue their CONSPIRACY with their CO-CONSPIRATORS to place before the courts LAWSUITS against Michael's Estate and DEBTS in riduculous AMOUNT, they will continue the EMBLEZZLMENT of a DEAD MAN's ESTATE by LAUNDERING his ESTATE MONEY PAY-OFFs. Its no doubt the IRS are already INVOLVED and watching their every MOVE. But first they must MARKET all the BEATLES MUSIC being paid for with Michael's Estate Money, and hide as Much of Michael's Millions in PRIVATE ACCOUNTS of FAMILY, FRIENDS, FAKE BUSINESS as Possible, then hopefully they will hand Mrs. Katherine Jackson, Prince Michael Jackson, Paris Kathrine Michael Jackson and Prince Michael Joseph Jackson II about 2 million to divide amongest each other. The Will is WHY Michael was Murdered everything is because of The Will which Michael didnt have because he set up a TRUST. So his Moles must continue to send Red Herrings outs and try to Brainwash everyone into thinking Michael just had a Will, but they know now that his DEATH has being ruled a MURDER their JOB just got alot harder and more EXPOSABLE and that means in COURT and trust me they have not and CANNOT PAY everyone off whom they will have to CONFRONT. The best thing so far they think they did was SHUT Michael Jackson Fans down so they wouldnt protest at every Court Hearing. Michael Jackson would still be alive if it wasnt for this Fake Will ESTATE ATTORNEY John Branca CREATED.

I agree that the will is suspicious as he was in New York on July 6 but not impossible to be in LA on July 7 at 5 pm. He would have had to have been in LA by 3-4 pm at the latest to read thru the document, have it explained & sign everything too - even if it was just an update. Perhaps there is something else to document where MJ was on that day. Hmmmmmm

I think Malnik is very suspicious about the will. When MJ first died, he claimed to everyone he had one from 2003-2004 which made him the executor.
Link:
http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2009/06/michael_jackson_al_malnik_mottola_sony_beatles.php




UPDATED: Reputed Mobster Al Malnik Says He's Executor of Michael Jackson's Will and "Blanket"'s New Dad

By Bob Norman
Friday, Jun. 26 2009 @ 10:44AM


malnikjackson.jpg
At The Forge (from left): Shareef Malnick, Al Malnick, Serena Williams, Michael Jackson, Chris Tucker, and Bret Ratner (front).
[UPDATED: Holy shit. Jose Lambiet got Malnik on the phone, and he said Michael Jackson named him the executor of his will and godfather and guardian of Jackson's youngest son, Prince Michael "Blanket" Jackson. Read Lambiet's "Page 2" post here. Malnik also spoke with CBS4's Lisa Petrillo and said he was executor of the will in 2004, but he's not sure if he's still in the will. Considering the fact that Jackson reportedly believed he was the victim of a
"conspiracy" by Malnik and Tommy Mottola to grab his assets, I doubt Malnik is still either executor or guardian of Blanket. But wow, Malnik really got his hooks into the King of Pop. The crazy thing is that neither Lambiet nor Petrillo mentioned Malnik's Mafia past, which is arguably the best part of the story. Guess that's why Malnik talked to them. This Malnik thing is going to get madly interesting, I'm afraid.]

http://cbs4.com/local/michael.jackson.al.2.1061187.html

Longtime Jackson friend and Miami businessman Al Malnik told CBS4's Lisa Petrillo in an exclusive interview that he and Jackson had a signed document that said Malnik could take custody of the youngest child, Prince Michael II, also known as Blanket.

"I guess in 2003 or 2004, he asked me if anything ever happened to him, if I would become godfather and parent to Prince Michael. So I signed a document at that time agreeing to bring up Blanket in the event anything happened to him," Malnik said.

According to Malnik, he was the executor of Michael Jackson's will in 2004. But he has no idea what has transpired since then, or if there is a new, updated will. Still, he's sure the children will be taken care of for years to come.

link:

http://www.page2live.com/2009/06/26/palm-beach-accountant-could-be-guardian-of-michael-jackson-son/
“He and I signed a legal document in 2003 after he asked me to be (6-year-old) Prince Michael II’s guardian if something were to happen to Michael.
“Of course, I didn’t expect it ever to happen. If the family asks me, it’d be my duty to take care of him. I promised to raise him as my own.”
Jackson at the time also became the godfather of Malnik’s 11-year-old daughter, Spencer.
And there’s something else Malnik says he agreed to in writing in 2003: to be the executor of Jackson’s estate.
“There could always be a superseding document he signed since then. I haven’t heard anything yet, but it’s probably too early.”



Malnik is a smooth talking crook IMO. He was a lawyer for Meyer Lansky. Meyer Lansky was a year before his death worth reportedly $100,000,000- $400,000,000 but somehow ended up with $37,000. My bet is Malnik embezzled it, its not like Lansky's family could complain - he was mafia.
link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_Lansky

Malnik is also tied to Joel Steinger who was just indicted earlier this year along with some others for a ponzi scheme of a billion dollars according to Bob Norman.
link:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2009/lr20846.htm

Somehow Branca & Weitzman must have made a deal with Malnik after MJ died, I am sure somehow he must have had a will or perhaps did it to get their attention, he wanted a cut of the deal.

As far as whether Branca & Weitzman ( & others) directly had something to do with MJ death, there would need to be alot of proof - however I do feel Weitzman, Fields & Pellicano are responsible for the 93 case. Pellicano is now the only one in prison, but Fields almost was & Weitzman & Fields both deserve to be in prison. My advice to Pellicano: rethink taking the fall for everyone. This was their scheme:

“If you find dirt on a celebrity, then you go to the attorney, or directly to the client, and say, ‘Hey, there’s a story brewing with the tabs, we need to quash it: Most celebrities are not gonna hesitate, because a celebrity is the most naive, infantile person in the world. They get preferential treatment, but if boulders fall on their head in real life, they don’t know what to do, other than dig deep into their pockets,” says Barresi. “Pellicano was the master of getting them to do that–the celebrity never knew how simple it was to put a fire out, or that sometimes there was never really a fire in the first place. There would be a story brewing, but the reporter couldn’t nail it down. So Pellicano would light the fire. He was the arsonist—and then he’d come back and put the fire out.”

Pellicano got his info from wire taps. You can intercept faxes too. Even Diane Dimond was indignant when she was wiretapped by Pellicano & I do believe her on that. I am sure initially they conned celebrities, but I am certain they came across business information which I bet was more profitable to Fields & Weitzman & probably much safer. Branca & possibly McClain has been getting inside info I am sure via Weitzman for many years. They almost got Fields but I am sure the feds have not forgotten him nor Weitzman & they would love to get Malnik.

I pray for light to come to this darkness.
 
his death alone is a conspiracy the truth will get out sooner than you think. A damn shame I just can't it for real
 
O.K, I'm finally say it. What I don't get is I have a hard time seeing its June 24th, 2009 and Michael being asked ,would say, that he wants Diana Ross to be the secondary guardian of his children. Yes, she's a good mother to her own kids but how close were she and Michael during the later years?
Maybe, just maybe, he felt that she was a logical choice in 2002 but now? especially after the trial. I don't see it. I see him making Janet a financial guardian and Rebbie a custodial guardian, after Katherine of course. Why do you suppose they picked Diana?

I think there was a later will too but I bet it was destroyed because it didn't fit someone's agenda. The problem Londell and company have is they can't prove it exists so they're stuck with this one unless Katherine wants to be cut out and you can best believe that she and those kids will get peanuts compared to what other conspirators are going to get. They'll give them enough to make them comfortable but others will rule Michael's money.
 
To be honest whom ever was in the last WILL, is also suspect. People were only interested in Michael's money not Michael and his children. They would ruin the estate. Better the Devil you know that the one you dont know.
 
What do you think guys about the signed date of 2002 will?

Michael Jackson speaks out against the then CEO of Sony Music, Tommy Mottola, in Harlem, New York on July 6th 2002

July 7, 2002 Michael calls Tommy Mottola a racist

The alleged will was executed 7 July 2002 at 5:00PM in Los Angeles

Is this possible?

I believe Frank Dileo is on AEG's payroll. He called John Branca as he was advised by AEG and Sony.

Moonlight, great post, I guess it's ok to discuss about other 'handlers' - lawyers, accountants, managers and business partners and also doctors who 'controlled' Michael's mood - in this thread as well. We can start from 2002 will and current situation and go all the way back.

I couldn't help myself but getting teary all day today, this is so unbearable what these people had done and still doing to Michael.


The dates on the will ARE fishy. I poured over the internet & ended up finding this at another fan site. Perhaps someone else has posted this here & it was in the missing data? This was posted by Cassandra. Hope she doesn't mind. It is a great find:
link:
http://www.life.com/image/942261











942261.jpg

Michael Jackson Vs. Sony Hip Hop Summit

NEW YORK - JULY 9: Recording artist Michael Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton participate in the Michael Jackson Vs. Sony Hip Hop Summit at the National Action Network headquarters July 8, 2002 in New York City. Jackson contends that current music industry contract conventions are unfair for recording artists.
Photo: Lawrence Lucier/Getty Images

Jul 09, 2002


I think it would be hard although not impossible for MJ to be in NY on July 6 & July 8 & still in Los Angeles at 5:00pm on July 7th, Sunday, to sign his will. I think Cassandra also pointed out that it was a 4th of July weekend. I can't imagine him not making phone calls to someone which would document where he was, if not hotel records or credit card records. Or perhaps a fan took a picture with him. Hmmmmmm. Somebody should be fired by Branca & Weitzman for not checking the calendar & the internet. OOPS.

link to calendar:
http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/monthly.html?year=2002&month=7&country=1


I believe Dileo works for Branca or maybe he works for both AEG & Branca but he said in his LKL interview:

link:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0908/04/lkl.01.html

He also said something interesting earlier, that Katherine can work with the executors, opening the door to perhaps a deal to be worked out. There is no question that the two administrators are very well qualified to do this job. They guided Michael Jackson's career.

I talked to one biographer of Michael Jackson today and said -- he said, without John Branca, there wouldn't even be an estate to deal with. That is how good these people are.

KING: Do you think they will work it out, Frank?

DILEO: Very optimistic. Mrs. Jackson is very level headed. Our attorneys are very level headed. There will be a resolution.

link to MJ will:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0701091mjwill4.html
 
Thanks for the great post and links jrsfan.

MJ most certainly had other things on his mind when doing those speeches against Mottola and Sony. He was definititely in NY on 6th and 8th, and although it is probably not impossible to fly to LA to sign the will, it really does seem unlikely that he would go to LA to sign this will, when he has got other things on his mind and go back to NY when he is in the middle of something else.

Not to mention, it is known that he made new wills every 5 years.
 
Can we find a photo or article that would proof Michael was in NY or anywhere but not in LA on July 7th???? dig deep guys...it is very vital piece of information. thanks
 
And then he flew back to New York to be with Sharpton on the 8th? And your source is? Thanks in advance.

would he have to fly out to sign the will? he couldn't do it from new york???
do we definately know that he allegedly signed in in la?
 
would he have to fly out to sign the will? he couldn't do it from new york???
do we definately know that he allegedly signed in in la?

We definitely know it was signed in LA. at 5:00pm.
link:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...91mjwill4.html

He was in New York on the 6th, he was with Sharpton & did an interview with Rita Cosby that evening (on youtube) & then was again with Sharpton on the 8th in New York. I don't think anyone would just fly out to sign a will in LA & then fly right back to New York. Also in the pic on the 8th with Sharpton he looks really great, not tired.
 
I'm wondering why the address given for Michael's children was Hayvenhurst? In 2002, Michael had a fixed address, at Neverland. Not Havenhurst. Strange. . . . .

The children are living at Hayvenhurst NOW, but not back then.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0701091mjwill7.html

Because you linked the PETITION FOR PROBATE which is now attached to the will of 2002. If you look further down, you see Edmund G Brown, Attorney General. That's Gerry Brown of California and he's only been attorney general for about 3 years now. You've linked us to the updated document that was filed in probate. The actual will ends on page 5.
 
all of you are doing great anaylysis, I wish we could find something to prove this will is fake...I'm really angry to know this whole estate and the executors are jus a joke.
 
I also think the will is fake. I can't find the link now, but I remember seeing Michael's passport and his name is stated as Michael Joe Jackson, and in the will it is stated as Michael Joseph Jackson. Also, the children's names don't match with the names written on their birth certificates (unless these were fake).
 
If Michael really had signed this 2002 will, he didn't sit with lawyers and executors and witness (funny thing is the executors are the witnesses too), and he didn't read the will at all. He just trusted who prepared this damn will, and signed it.
I wish there is another will.
However, it was stolen and destroyed :(

AEG and Sony has been carrying on Michael Jackson business as always, and Michael's death hadn't changed a thing because of this damn will.
 
Because you linked the PETITION FOR PROBATE which is now attached to the will of 2002. If you look further down, you see Edmund G Brown, Attorney General. That's Gerry Brown of California and he's only been attorney general for about 3 years now. You've linked us to the updated document that was filed in probate. The actual will ends on page 5.


Ah, ok. That explains.

I think that in all of this, more will become clear as time passes. We still need to see who cashes in, for what, and for how much. So far, the logic points to this will being valid. All I have is. . . a hunch that there was a will as recent as last summer. For one reason, Omer is not mentioned (not going to get into a paternity discussion here, though.). He was very close to Michael and Michael treated him like a son. I find it strange that he was not provided for, unless there are codicils to the will that we have not seen. I doubt that he was provided for there either, though, because the percentages of the estate are all accounted for. The other thing I find very strange is the naming of Diana Ross as "second-guardian." She did not know the children. She has not come forward, or issued a statement. I just find that very, very odd.

Time will tell. . . . . .
 
Ah, ok. That explains.

I think that in all of this, more will become clear as time passes. We still need to see who cashes in, for what, and for how much. So far, the logic points to this will being valid. All I have is. . . a hunch that there was a will as recent as last summer. For one reason, Omer is not mentioned (not going to get into a paternity discussion here, though.). He was very close to Michael and Michael treated him like a son. I find it strange that he was not provided for, unless there are codicils to the will that we have not seen. I doubt that he was provided for there either, though, because the percentages of the estate are all accounted for. The other thing I find very strange is the naming of Diana Ross as "second-guardian." She did not know the children. She has not come forward, or issued a statement. I just find that very, very odd.

Time will tell. . . . . .

Agree 100%. Diana Ross as a second guardian looks very strange.. If this will is fake the real one is gone anyways.
 
Also in the pic on the 8th with Sharpton he looks really great, not tired.

A good make-up artist can do wonders about that.

It can't hurt to ask Al Sharpton about the time MJ was in NYC.
 
Latest from the estate: "Michael Jackson's estate lawyers want the judge to lay down the law once and for all ... John Branca and John McClain have broad powers to make decisions for all things M.J."

God....this is scary........it's like they are asking for more POWER.......? Don't they have enough power already? This doesn't sound right.....I just feel not so good in this.......I just hope that the Jacksons can find some ways to stop this.....

Complete CONTROL of MJ's estate for whose benifit???????.....MJ's estate? or their own bank account? Does the court keep track of all their transactions on the behalf of the estate? I'm not really so familiar with the laws on this type of matters.....

But I'm really so doubtful......in all of these......I really hope and pray that this will that they're holding on to is NULL and VOID. And somewhere......there's another will ...

I just don't TRUST "John Branca ,John McClain, Frank Dileo and etc......all sorts of men that MJ had already cut ties before and all of a sudden came back to his life...a few weeks or days before his DEATH?
 
NO good could come from this people...nothing going to be left for the children in the end, they are going to bankrupt in less than a year. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom