Soundmind
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,667
- Points
- 0
a short set would be unnecessary altogether for a one time bolus injection because you only need an additional IV setup if you "spike" a bag, or in this case, a bottle of propofol. If he had no intention of "spiking" the bottle and then running it as a continuous drip, there are ports present in the mainline IV setup for syringe injections to be given and he would not have used a second set.
what the hell was that? what short set is he/she talking about?
EMPTY one, where did that huge amount of propofol disappear tell me ? I'm 1000000% sure from the toxicology report MJ did not receive anything close to that amount that night . so how do you explain that?How would you explain the "spiked" bottle then and the quote above? And Dr. Dombrowski's article was being discussed...w
Did that asshole doctor after reading the toxicology report tell TMZ Murray basically lied about everything regarding the administration of lorazepan ? Did he tell them the amount of propofol in his urine indicate a relatively very small amount of propfol and no excessive use prior to death? if he did not do that then he is just another attention seeking whore.
Murray used the injection ports in that second set for the induction dose.
what second sets for God's sake?! and now we finally know what Murray's explanation will be for those particular syringes.!!!
NO. Your words remind me of those published in the article "Death from propofol: accident... murder?". In the first case reported of murder with propofol, the items (syringes, vials of propofol, etc) were found in bags adjacent to garbage cans. The article says: "There was no way the victim could have self-injected propofol, gathered all the drug vials and injection paraphernalia into garbage bags, walked outside to dispose of the materials, come back inside and then collapsed on her bed." The same applies here. Who moved the spiked bottle??? Who bought everything? Who cleared the crime scene? Who told endless lies to the police? Murray.
That's why he came back two days later armed with a top lawyer and was "reading a script". That's why he asked Alvarez to remove everything from the scene so ALVAREZ'S fingerprints would be all over the evidence and he would blame any "missing" removed evidence on Alvarez ....etc Just keep in mind Murray is not charged with covering up or cleaning the scene for one particular reason : ALVAREZ .If the prosecution did not eliminate MJ scientifically as a possible "suspect" Murray will walk free even if the prosecution are able to introduce endless list of evidence incriminating Murray.
NO. The coroner said: "Circumstances indicate that propofol and the benzodiazepines were administered BY ANOTHER.The circumstances do not support self-administration of propofol". (signed on 19th August after taking into account the Anesthesiology Consultation signed on 3rd August and that you insist so much on giving it another different meaning to the one the coroner gave).
Yes I insist the expert did state it was given via bolus injection and that's why the coroner ruled it as homicide.
IF a continuous infusion was given, IT WAS ONLY ADMINISTERED BY MURRAY!!!
NO, IF a continuous infusion was given MJ could have done it himself and Murray will be cleared no doubt about that and that Chinese male nurse case is a very well documented case of this scenario. Explain to me how could the prosecution eliminate MJ as a possible suspect? HOW?
NO, read better please
yes you did. I did a research on that particular case you had mentioned before and found out the Chinese male nurse committed suicide hooking himself to an IV drip and received almost 2400 mg of propofol but the HUGE difference between that case and MJ's case was the propofol levels in his urine which did indicate an excessive abuse of propofol prior to death UNLIKE MJ.
R U Beachlover? no it would only mean MJ could have done it himself that's why Murray told them he gave it via an IV drip .BE RESPECTFUL PLEASE. I'm not desperate to prove anything. If anything, a continuous infusion would prove it wasn't homicide, BUT MURDER.
Last edited: