^ this is heading towards conspiracy.....so I won't get much into it.
A small amount given at any time during that night could help Murray in his story that "he was trying to wean Michael off". Maybe it was given on purpose. That to me, makes good sense if this was all planned to look like an accident. Things like this are planned by the very detail.
so is the claiming that Michael needed that propofol to sleep during this time.
murray and the concert promoters are not trustworthy. do you seriosuly believe in what they say after all the lies/contradiction they've both told?
There's so much we still don't know, so we cannot answer. little bit of propofol??? I don't think a "little bit" of propofol would have caused it to appear in his eyes and stomach. I don't think a little bit of propofol would bring down a full grown bull elephant. And we can't forget the entire empty bottle of propfol which would mean Murray gave Michael 40x as much propofol than he admited, that's if it was used that night. Strange how one empty bottle would be found in a closet alone though....
and u need to prove he used the spike method which seems difficult to me a bolus injection wouldnt need a pump?correct?
So, the 25mg that Murray claims to have given Michael would only equal a 1/2 teaspoon of liquid or 2.5ml, which would be impossible to administer ACCURATELY without using a syringe if you didn't have a IV pump present, which he did not
Murray did give the INITIAL induction dose via syringe but then after spiking and connecting the bottle of propofol to the mainline...
Murray didn't move him at night-it was the morning of the 25th of June-after the full synergistic affect of all of the CNS depressant benzos-the respiratory distress to resp arrest-that led to full cardiac arrest which was almost immediately after the (LARGE) dosage IV bolus (push) of the Propofol had been administered-and on top of all of that nightmare-the 02 tank went empty during this whole macabre scenario.
For Michael, the induction dose should have been less than 20mg based on his weight, and then decreased even further based on what he had already been given.
Quote:
For Michael, the induction dose should have been less than 20mg based on his weight, and then decreased even further based on what he had already been given.
KASUME: There must have been some missprint or sthg there. The average induction dose is 2 - 2,5mg/kg, which means at least more than 120mg as the recommended dose. (Sleep lasts for 5 to 10 minutes).
Another thing is the dose for repeated boluses to maintain sleep, which could be 10 - 20mg, every 5 to 10 minutes, according to this link:
http://www.uam.es/departamentos/medicina/anesnet/agenda/farmacologia/propofol.htm
(Though in other sites, they mention increments of "25 to 50mg".
http://www.anaesthesia-az.com/search/?itemId=3095665 )
-----------------------------
I find it peculiar the mention of the 25mg declared by Murray.
- Once I saw information about "conscious sedation" with propofol (used in combination with local anaesthesia) and the induction dose "0.2 -0.5mg/kg" (about 25mg) made me think if Murray declared that amount because the only medical equipment needed for it was an oximeter and "suplemental oxygen via nasal cannulae" (which he declared he had, though the oximeter was found in a closet in another room...). In the link, it's said: "Of particular importance, low-dose infusions of propofol have very little depressant effect on cardiovascular and respiratory variables . Nevertheless, monitoring of oxygen saturation is recommended and supplemental oxygen via nasal cannulae..."
http://www.eurosiva.org/Archive/Vienna/abstracts/Speakers/HOLAS.htm
There's no point in anything declared by Murray, that's the key point.
i dont believe it was some big conpriacy to kill mj by AEG etc and murray was brought into do it as you are implying with the question. if u are going to post in this thread and section u need to stick to the facts as we have them and not some theory that supports a conspiracy. theres a section for that. this is for the facts of the casemurray and the concert promoters are not trustworthy. do you seriosuly believe in what they say after all the lies/contradiction they've both told?
yeah from whats been said/read from the AR i think its given that the bolus was given and mj passed within minutes cause the amount was so high. theres another question though over the Loraz as i think soundmind mentioned that it showed that the loz was given after the bolus injection. anyone else got an opinion on thatSo according to that person, looks like this bolus dose was the last thing given.
he didnt know he would be dealing with it yet had a meeting in march with that other dr and mj and ordered and had the stuff sent to him in may. yeap totally clueless!
i dont believe it was some big conpriacy to kill mj by AEG etc and murray was brought into do it as you are implying with the question. if u are going to post in this thread and section u need to stick to the facts as we have them and not some theory that supports a conspiracy. theres a section for that. this is for the facts of the case
yeah from whats been said/read from the AR i think its given that the bolus was given and mj passed within minutes cause the amount was so high. theres another question though over the Loraz as i think soundmind mentioned that it showed that the loz was given after the bolus injection. anyone else got an opinion on that
"An essential fact in this case is not only how much propofol was in Michael Jackson's body but how it was put into his body," Flanagan wrote.
Shouldn't be merged with "Urgent plea for testiing..."??
doubt it. its defence evidence not prosecution so not really connected
and there u go .his lawyers confirmed the TMZ article about what defence they will use. but has the testings of the amounts been a red herring? are they looking for finger prints on the tubing. cause theres no way whatever amounts left in the syringe etc will tell u what was originally in there
has it ever been documented what exactly was found at the scene or did alberto say what he saw. cause what exactly is the allegation from the defence. mj had a small iv in him was a needle connected to that IV while murray was in the toliet/on the phone? was a huge amount of diprivan left in the needle and was hangining out of the tubing? cause otherwise they are trying to say mj got up went and got a new bottle opened it up used the syringe to take out a measurement. claimbed back into bed and then self injected and fell back onto the bed. cause either murray was def and having the longest wee ever or its about as believeable as the tooth fairy
i thought the lidocaine that was used was a cream that was placed around where the injection would be done. and once again they are going on about an IV bag. one wasnt found? correct?Attorneys for Dr. Conrad Murray have been asking for months that fluids in two syringes and an IV bag found in Jackson's rented mansion be tested to determine how much of the anesthetic propofol and painkiller lidocaine they contained.
i thought the lidocaine that was used was a cream that was placed around where the injection would be done. and once again they are going on about an IV bag. one wasnt found? correct?
i thought the lidocaine that was used was a cream that was placed around where the injection would be done. and once again they are going on about an IV bag. one wasnt found? correct?
They did find an IV bag with liquids to treat rehydration. That's why Murray was there every night eventhough he now wants everyone to believe he was there to give propofol .Either propofol is given via a bolus injection using a syringe or the propofol vial is directly hooked to the long section of an IV tube which is connected with the Y connector attached to the body , you can't mix propofol with other liquids in an IV bag, it is not given that way.
None of the drugs Murray gave to MJ that night could be mixed with other drugs or liguids.
thx soundmind
So if that's the case then I'm confused. What is Murray trying to say then? is he admitting he mixed all the meds together? wouldn't that make him even more reckless?