Make WHE a #1 hit around the globe!

IMWhizzle

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
3,134
Points
63
The world needs a song like We've Had Enough right now. The lyrics are so fitting after the terror attacks in Paris last Friday.

Can we make this song a world anthem with the power of all fans together via social media and Spotify for example?
 
The world needs a song like We've Had Enough right now. The lyrics are so fitting after the terror attacks in Paris last Friday.

Can we make this song a world anthem with the power of all fans together via social media and Spotify for example?


What for?
 
The world needs a song like We've Had Enough right now. The lyrics are so fitting after the terror attacks in Paris last Friday.

Can we make this song a world anthem with the power of all fans together via social media and Spotify for example?

I dont think it fits. Verse one is about cops killing some girls father and verse 2 is some wartorn country. Its a protest song at the aithorities, not terrorists. Maybe thats just me?
 
Yes, you guys are right, didn't read the lyrics properly. Maybe heal the world is better indeed!

Can the title of this thread be modified please?
 
Yes, you guys are right, didn't read the lyrics properly. Maybe heal the world is better indeed!

Maybe! I really think the lyrics of TMBMTLTT are very relevant- the latest "gold mix" leak especially. Listened again last night and was like.... woah.... first time i got sad listening to that song thinking of those in Paris
 
How about pushing Heal the World?

That one or Man In The Mirror would be perfect. I know I'm sick of Imagine being the go-to song, mainly because it's more about dreaming than ACTION. I can "imagine" a better world until I'm blue in the face, but it doesn't mean shit if I'm not DOING something about it.

*steps off soapbox*

 
^^ I've always preferred Imagine over Heal the World/Man in the Mirror etc but that's just me :) They have the same objective, the same mission, but with a different approach.

John's song is the "first step" so to speak, and describes not only the problems that plague this world, but what caused these problems (even if it provokes controversy "...and no religion too"), along with suggestions of making this world a better place. It's also not a song that's only about imagining a better world (well, maybe if you take the lyrics at face value), the imagery it provokes of peace, equality, unity and global harmony is meant to also incite and inspire you into making the world a better place. If everyone dreamt of peace like this, no doubt a great deal of people would be inspired to make this vision a reality and would do so (hence "I hope some day you will join us, and the world will live as one.")."A dream you dream alone is only a dream. A dream you dream together is a reality" - Yoko Ono/John Lennon.

Like-wise, Man in the Mirror is telling us that to achieve this, we have to be the ones to make the change, we have to start with ourselves to make this change. The same mission but with a different approach to it.

That's how I've always interpreted the two songs. Regardless of whether you prefer Man in the Mirror or Imagine or whatever, both are excellent choices and I feel they both are the sort of songs we need at this moment in history especially (though both have been forever relevant since their releases). I'd be happy for any song of this sort to reach the top of the charts, I couldn't care which artist it was because that's really not important (seriously, even if was Justin Bieber's "Pray"). What's important is showing the desire for change, unity and peace in this world, to influence the population to become better people - to make that change and live as one, and finally bring the human race together through the power of music. :)
 
Last edited:
Imagine is basically a socialist/communist utopia, that was already proven to not work in reality IMO. No countries, no possessions, no religion - unrealistic, and I don't think striving for these things is the way to heal the world. (And I say that as an atheist.) It would basically make humanity uniform culturally, would make the world less diverse and more bland and more boring. (Countries/national identities and religion is a big part of people's cultural identity.) A culturally diverse world is not a bad thing and I don't think earsing that cultural diversity would solve all conflicts either. And how would you achieve that anyway? You cannot force people not to believe in things they believe in. Only maybe by force like the socialist/communist regimes tried to (and failed), but I doubt that's what we want.

Thing is, aggressivity, competition, loyality to our "tribes" (whether it is a family or a nation or a religion), territorialness is decoded in us evolutionary, so if it wasn't religion or a country people would find something else to fight for. So to me it is more important to learn about ourselves as humans and have that inner beast under control. Which is what Man in the Mirror is about and which is why I think it is a lot more positive/more realistic/more general message and more acceptable to people of all kinds of cultural identity than Imagine which is basically a leftist political utopia (which may easily turn into a dystopia, like it did in many countries in practice).

What I like in MJ's messages that he could convey a socially important message without picking a political side. I think Lennon can be linked to one certain political ideology which makes him less universal than MJ in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
^^ Even if I wouldn't call him a communist, I think it's possible he did agree with some of the communist ideas (which in itself isn't a bad thing as some of the ideas aren't necessarily bad, they just wouldn't work in real life). Which perhaps is why it's called Imagine and the lyrics are focused more on the dreaming/imagining aspect, he's describing a world that is unrealistic like you said but when you think about it, so is the idea of world peace realistically. There's always going to be some asshole who wants to start up crap with someone else (for the reasons such as territorialness you describe in your post).

Personally, one way I've always interpreted his "no countries" line as not necessarily getting rid of the cultures all together. I think he was referring to getting rid of these "borders" so that separate us so to speak (I don't necceserily mean just "physical" borders, even if thats some of it, I'm not sure how to articulate what I mean). People go "oh I'm Canadian" "Oh I'm Chinese" "Oh I'm American" ... "well no, we're not necessarily 200+ countries, we're all one." You kinda get what I'm saying? I don't believe he was against cultures, given he was interested in various cultures at different times in his life (even spending months on end in places such as India to take in and experience their culture).

I think what appeals most about the song to people and has given it such a universal appeal is the general message for peace that drives it. Wouldn't it be great if we didn't go to war over possessions, countries and religion especially? They're very common causes of war in history. "A brotherhood of man", what if we all just put our differences aside and got along? (like this comic of the song shows). I think you can disagree with the extreme utopia Lennon dreams of while still being in support of the idea of peace that ultimately drives the song. I myself don't agree with everything that he describes in the song, but it's still my most favourite "peace to the world" kind of songs. Obviously by far not the only song to have a general message for peace. There's likely some other reason I can't think of as to why it's so beloved (gimme a break it's 2am :p), there has to be because I see it performed more than any other "peace" song there is.

But you know, it is a very universal song, even with the political undertones. I saw earlier tonight that Jimmy Carter once said "And of course, as you know, in many countries around the world — my wife and I have visited about 125 countries — you hear John Lennon's song “Imagine” used almost equally with national anthems. So John Lennon has had a major impact on some of the countries that are developing in the world." [Source]. Man in the Mirror has the benefit of not taking a political side (and thus not alienating some people, like the religious lyrics in Imagine did), but I've personally seen more universal impact from Imagine than I have from MITM. Just the fact that whenever something like this happens, I more often see crowds singing Imagine than Man in the Mirror (and I do not mean to compete MJ vs JL, like I said in my original post, I'm just glad they're singing a song about peace and unity. It's not a competition and I am not ignoring the global popularity of MITM because it is a very popular song in Michael's catalogue).

I'm not going to ignore the controversy it has though, of course there's these communist/socialist utopia tones you mention, the anti-religious tones that have upset people and the fact that some people just downright don't like the song (but that's art for ya). Different strokes for different folks ya know :)
 
HIStoric;4116906 said:
Personally, one way I've always interpreted his "no countries" line as not necessarily getting rid of the cultures all together. I think he was referring to getting rid of these "borders" so that separate us so to speak (I don't necceserily mean just "physical" borders, even if thats some of it, I'm not sure how to articulate what I mean). People go "oh I'm Canadian" "Oh I'm Chinese" "Oh I'm American" ... "well no, we're not necessarily 200+ countries, we're all one." You kinda get what I'm saying? I don't believe he was against cultures, given he was interested in various cultures at different times in his life (even spending months on end in places such as India to take in and experience their culture).

I get what you mean and I get what Lennon probably meant, I just disagree with it. (I actually recently deleted Imagine from one of my playlists because I realized how much I disagree with it. LOL.) I don't think borders and national identities are evil things. I think Lennon identifies the root of the world's problems wrongly. You cannot aspire to solve world problems without considering reality. And differences between the cultures and mentality of different nations belong to that reality. The reality is that different nations or groups of nations have different cultures which may be incompatible with each other. So borders and nations and countries may well be warranted and there is nothing wrong with that. This doesn't mean that the different cultures cannot co-exist peacefully. I respect the right of other nations and people and cultures to live differently than I do but then I expect them to respect my nation's souverignity and right to decide its fate and how to live as well. And to have that souverignity the nation is a good entity. Exactly the current migrant crisis in Europe challenges the ideal of open borders very much these days.


But you know, it is a very universal song, even with the political undertones. I saw earlier tonight that Jimmy Carter once said "And of course, as you know, in many countries around the world — my wife and I have visited about 125 countries — you hear John Lennon's song “Imagine” used almost equally with national anthems. So John Lennon has had a major impact on some of the countries that are developing in the world." [Source]. Man in the Mirror has the benefit of not taking a political side (and thus not alienating some people, like the religious lyrics in Imagine did), but I've personally seen more universal impact from Imagine than I have from MITM. Just the fact that whenever something like this happens, I more often see crowds singing Imagine than Man in the Mirror (and I do not mean to compete MJ vs JL, like I said in my original post, I'm just glad they're singing a song about peace and unity. It's not a competition and I am not ignoring the global popularity of MITM because it is a very popular song in Michael's catalogue).

I don't know how often crowds sing Imagine, I don't think there is any representative data for that. I have seen crowds sing Heal The World, Man in the Mirror, TDCAU. I also can provide you data about the respective popularity of those songs on Spotify:

Man In The Mirror - 67,984,413 plays
TDCAU - 32,490,330
Heal The World - 15,310,104

Imagine -17,469,604 (it is Lennon's most popular song by far)

Although I can imagine that Imagine is easier to sing for people in a crowd than MITM or TDCAU as it is a more simple song. Heal The World is relatively easy to sing as well. And I have seen it being sung after tragedies like this (for example I have seen a video of a crowd singing it after the Australian terrorist attacks).

I think what appeals most about the song to people and has given it such a universal appeal is the general message for peace that drives it. Wouldn't it be great if we didn't go to war over possessions, countries and religion especially? They're very common causes of war in history. "A brotherhood of man", what if we all just put our differences aside and got along? (like this comic of the song shows). I think you can disagree with the extreme utopia Lennon dreams of while still being in support of the idea of peace that ultimately drives the song. I myself don't agree with everything that he describes in the song, but it's still my most favourite "peace to the world" kind of songs. Obviously by far not the only song to have a general message for peace. There's likely some other reason I can't think of as to why it's so beloved (gimme a break it's 2am
tongue.gif
), there has to be because I see it performed more than any other "peace" song there is.

Each and every political ideology says that its ultimate goal is world peace. It's just that they ALL imagine world peace is achieved when everyone believes in what they believe in. Fundamentalist Islam says their ultimate goal is world peace and there will be world peace when everyone in the world will be Muslim and observe the Muslim religion like they do. Communists said that there would be world peace when everyone on Earth will be Communists and believe in what they believe in. (I grew up in a socialist country and I remember the communist songs from my childhood where we sang about world peace. LOL.) Nazis said there would be world peace when they achieved their goals.

And to me Lennon's vision is not far from that mindset: there would be world peace when everyone will believe in what he believed in (in this case when there will be no religion, no countries and no possessions - it is basically the communist ideology). In reality all that can only be achieved through some sort of dictatorship or force. Even the no possessions thing is stupid, simply because not everyone works the same way. There are more hard working people and more lazy people so of course the more hard working ones will usually get paid more and eventually will have more possessions. So should some sort of political system take that away from them just to create some sort of false sense of equality? Would that be a fair and just system? Let me tell you this experiment was already carried out in former socialist countries and it was not good. My grandparents told me about how authorities came and took away the little possessions they had.
 
Last edited:
I get what you mean and I get what Lennon probably meant, I just disagree with it. I don't think borders and national identities are evil things. I think Lennon identifies the root of the world's problems wrongly. You cannot aspire to solve world problems without considering reality. And differences between the cultures and mentality of different nations belong to that reality. The reality is that different nations or groups of nations have different cultures which may be incompatible with each other. So borders and nations and countries may well be warranted and there is nothing wrong with that. This doesn't mean that the different cultures cannot co-exist peacefully. I respect the right of other nations and people and cultures to live differently than I do but then I expect them to respect my nation's souverignity and right to decide its fate and how to live as well. And to have that souverignity the nation is a good entity. Exactly the current migrant crisis in Europe challenges the ideal of open borders very much these days.

I actually recently deleted Imagine from one of my playlists because I realized how much I disagree with it. LOL.

That's allgood! I'll have to go and think about the song but you (once again) raise some very good points my friend :)

I don't know how often crowds sing Imagine, I don't think there is any representative data for that. I have seen crowds sing Heal The World, Man in the Mirror, TDCAU. I also can provide you data about the respective popularity of those songs on Spotify:

Man In The Mirror - 67,984,413 plays
TDCAU - 32,490,330
Heal The World - 15,310,104

Imagine -17,469,604

Although I can imagine that Imagine is easier to sing for people than MITM or TDCAU.

Don't get me wrong! Of course I've seen crowds sing Michaels songs too! However, I think it's important to note that John Lennon only joined Spotify about a year ago, his numbers will be a lot lower than if he had joined around Michael's time (which seems to be 2008-2009. Sony BMG added music in 2008, but they also added more of MJ's catalogue in 2009).
 
Last edited:
Don't get me wrong! Of course I've seen crowds sing Michaels songs too! However, I think it's important to note that John Lennon only joined Spotify about a year ago, his numbers will be a lot lower than if he had joined around Michael's time (which seems to be 2008-2009. Sony BMG added music in 2008, but they also added more of MJ's catalogue in 2009).

I guess what song is sung when also depends on the actual cause that people sing for. In this recent case I can see Imagine be more popular than anything exactly because of the "and no religion too" line as the terrorist attacks were religion motivated. However, during the black lives matter protests TDCAU was more relevant and I have seen people sing and refer to that song more than anything.

ETA: BTW, Imagine is on Spotify for much longer than a year. I have seen it added to playlists with much older dates. For example here is a playlist to which it was added in 2010:

Clipboard02.jpg



Maybe they added the main bulk of his catalog last year but probably his most important songs have been on Spotify for much longer.
 
Last edited:
Looks like "Imagine" is the song being sung for this-it's appropriate-someone from Germany traveled to Paris with his piano and was playing it for the people on the streets-GMA covered him, and so did Fox.
 
I dont think it fits. Verse one is about cops killing some girls father and verse 2 is some wartorn country. Its a protest song at the aithorities, not terrorists. Maybe thats just me?

This is what I think

Love was taken from a young life
And no one told her why
Her direction has a dimelight
From one more violent crime

She innocently questioned why
Why her father had to die
She asked the men in blue
How is it that you get to choose
Who will live and who will die
Did God say that you could decide?
You saw he didn't run
And that my daddy had no gun

Men in blue=Accordingly UN peacekeepers (often referred to as Blue Berets or Blue Helmets because of their light blue berets or helmets) can include soldiers, police officers, and civilian personnel.

In the middle of a village
Way in a distant land
Lies a poor boy with his broken toy
Too young to understand

He's awaken, ground is shakin
His father grabs his hand
Screaming, crying, his wife's dying
Now he's left to explain

He innocently questioned why
Why his mother had to die
What did these soldiers come here for?
If they're for peace, why is there war?

It´s still UN peacekeepers.
 
ETA: BTW, Imagine is on Spotify for much longer than a year. I have seen it added to playlists with much older dates. For example here is a playlist to which it was added in 2010:

Clipboard02.jpg



Maybe they added the main bulk of his catalog last year but probably his most important songs have been on Spotify for much longer.

Sort of.

Looking into it, some of his catalogue was in-fact added in late 2010. However not long after in early-2011, it seems his catalogue was removed off Spotify all together, before being finally re-added in late 2014.
 
Last edited:
Here's a controversial thought : we've had enough fits perfectly in the Palestinian context. I mean, there's police brutality there, there's war, there's bloodshed. What happened to Paris happens to Palestine just about every day. So yes, WHE is perfect. (Idk how I managed to say this in such a passive way).
 
here's a controversial thought : We've had enough fits perfectly in the palestinian context. I mean, there's police brutality there, there's war, there's bloodshed. What happened to paris happens to palestine just about every day. So yes, whe is perfect. (idk how i managed to say this in such a passive way).

exactly!
 
Back
Top