beltrano
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2022
- Messages
- 1,336
- Points
- 113
nothing official !!,first part october 2025NOTHING happened and we have May
Always possible !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nothing official !!,first part october 2025NOTHING happened and we have May
They would still need to recreate it with actors, they couldn't play the actual recordings because it's not a documentary, but what they could do is show Conrad Murray pressing the record button on his phone while Michael is unaware that he's being recorded, so that people know that there's an actual recording of Michael saying those things. Same thing for the Evan Chandler tapes, they need to show Dave Schwartz recording the conversation and make it clear that there's an actual recording of Evan saying those exact words, that those are not lines written just for the movie.That and the Chandler phone call should both be included in real version. No actors are needed. Real words.
This would surely make for a compelling and tear jerking end to the movie. I have mixed feelings about it.If they decide to show his death, I hope they'll have him say the exact words that he said to Conrad Murray on that recording he made while he was drugging him. Not the first part, that the media loves to play just because he sounds drugged up, but the second part, the one that the media never plays because it actually shows what was truly in his heart, even when he was drugged up.
What does that have to do with anzthing? Can a movie not include real footage? Real Elvis was shown on his last performance in his biopic!They would still need to recreate it with actors, they couldn't play the actual recordings because it's not a documentary, but what they could do is show Conrad Murray pressing the record button on his phone while Michael is unaware that he's being recorded, so that people know that there's an actual recording of Michael saying those things. Same thing for the Evan Chandler tapes, they need to show Dave Schwartz recording the conversation and make it clear that there's an actual recording of Evan saying those exact words, that those are not lines written just for the movie.
There might be some copyright issues, since the Estate doesn't own those recordings, unlike the Elvis footage. Documentaries can more easily get around copyright thanks to the fair use law.What does that have to do with anzthing? Can a movie not include real footage? Real Elvis was shown on his last performance in his biopic!
That recording was included in court documents when Evan sued Dave schwartz (thats where the full transcript came from) so it's public record.There might be some copyright issues, since the Estate doesn't own those recordings, unlike the Elvis footage. Documentaries can more easily get around copyright thanks to the fair use law.
We have access to the full transcript, but we've only heard very short snippets from the actual recording, do we even know who has access to the full recording now? Evan was suing Dave for recording him without his permission, who won that lawsuit and what happened to the recorded tapes as a result of that ruling?That recording was included in court documents when Evan sued Dave schwartz (thats where the full transcript came from) so it's public record.
That is interesting!! Does being a public record make it legal to a.use the real voice message in a movie or b.have the exact same words said by a caracter in a movie?That recording was included in court documents when Evan sued Dave schwartz (thats where the full transcript came from) so it's public record.
Another good question!! Would the outcome of that lawsuit play a role in the legality of using the recording or at least have the words redone by a caracter? Do we have a legal expert on this board?We have access to the full transcript, but we've only heard very short snippets from the actual recording, do we even know who has access to the full recording now? Evan was suing Dave for recording him without his permission, who won that lawsuit and what happened to the recorded tapes as a result of that ruling?
I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think it does. Take for example when Michael was sued by people who claimed he stealed their songs, they played Michael's songs in court to compare with those people's demos. Now does it make it legal for people to use Michael's music in movies because it was played in court? No. So I don't see how playing a recording in court would suddenly mean that anyone is free to use it as they want. For a documentary, yes, if used under Fair Use. But I don't see how they could claim Fair Use for an entertainment movie.Does being a public record make it legal to a.use the real voice message in a movie
I might be wrong, but at the time I remember this recording couldn’t be used because it was obtained by celebrity PI Anthony Pelicano who obtained it using illegal methods? Pelicano went to jail for other similar things as I recall. Anyone here from the era remember this more accurately?That is interesting!! Does being a public record make it legal to a.use the real voice message in a movie or b.have the exact same words said by a caracter in a movie?
Another good question!! Would the outcome of that lawsuit play a role in the legality of using the recording or at least have the words redone by a caracter? Do we have a legal expert on this board?
There might be some copyright issues, since the Estate doesn't own those recordings, unlike the Elvis footage. Documentaries can more easily get around copyright thanks to the fair use law.
I'm not sure but it does ring a bell..I might be wrong, but at the time I remember this recording couldn’t be used because it was obtained by celebrity PI Anthony Pelicano who obtained it using illegal methods? Pelicano went to jail for other similar things as I recall. Anyone here from the era remember this more accurately?
huh? What Budapest concert? There's no Budapets concertI mean, the estate was all over This Is It, they released the Budapest concert on Youtube and everything...
I think they mean Bucharest.huh? What Budapest concert? There's no Budapets concert
YesI think they mean Bucharest.
Same same but differentI think they mean Bucharest.
Fuz, is there any particular reason you were thinking something might happen in late June? Obviously, there's the two significant dates in June but was there something else you had in mind?We might get some precise info around late June?
for me part one october 2025Anyone else feel this won’t be happening in October? If it means they make the best film(s) possible then I can wait. It would be nice to get some sort of update though.
Ah, still the same yep.for me part one october 2025
No clue on the second part .I just feel october to start ..Oct is 'always Michaele-y' and I stick beside your opinion with that.part 2 april 2026.
Assuming an October release is still set, I'd just concluded the (media) buzz around Michael's passing date would be perfect time to drop a teaser. Followed by an actual trailer in late August.Fuz, is there any particular reason you were thinking something might happen in late June? Obviously, there's the two significant dates in June but was there something else you had in mind?![]()
Nothing in mayWe're halfway through May now, I think if we don't anything before June, a statement about a Delay or 2 Part film is inevitable. In my opinion
We're halfway through May now, I think if we don't anything before June, a statement about a Delay or 2 Part film is inevitable. In my opinion