elusive moonwalker
Guests
aint suspicious minds on the mijac cat.? b4 sony/atv bought out leiber and stoller i think mj owned around 20 elvis songs on mijac
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
aint suspicious minds on the mijac cat.? b4 sony/atv bought out leiber and stoller i think mj owned around 20 elvis songs on mijac
plenty of Elvis play today, on the radio, seeing it's his birthday.
Hmmm...
Maltby Capital Ltd
Annual Review
Year ended 31 March 2008
Pages 40-41
Market Share
...EMI Music Publishing’s share of the music publishing market has been about 20% for some years. Universal Music Publishing Group, boosted by its acquisition of BMG Music Publishing in 2007, has a slightly higher estimated 22.2% share, while Warner Chappell (14.8%) and Sony/ATV (7.4%) are in third and fourth place respectively...
http://www.emigroup.com/NR/rdonlyre...ltbyCapitalLimitedAnnualReviewStatements1.pdf
Recommended cash offer for EMI Group plc by Maltby Limited
May 2007
The board of directors of Maltby and Directors of EMI are pleased to announce the terms of a recommended cash offer for EMI at a price of 265 pence in cash for each EMI Share, valuing EMI on an enterprise value basis at approximately £3.2 billion.
http://www.emigroup.com/NR/rdonlyres/6A4C19CF-25A3-4A60-86E4-B59A4B2F9C31/1401/21May2007.pdf
:scratch: My take on this is, being # 1, based on market share, seems to be dependent on how many songs are owned, rather than the value of the company, which is based on the value of the songs.
I.E., you could own 3 million songs, but if they're not valuable songs, they're not worth as much.
:smilerolleyes: There is a big difference.
yeah there is, but MJ owns enough songs for the spaghetti to stick. people love elvis, period. lol
:agree: Right, right :yes:
My question is does Sony/ATV earn more with less, proportionately, because of the value/popularity of the songs in their catalog :scratch:
EMI, for example, has over 3 million songs in their catalog.
A firm's market share is the proportion of the market which it serves, expressed in financial terms.
Just wondering...
I am more and more amazed with every post I read about Sony/ATV!!
Anyone know if ATV stands for anything??
(no I don't mean All Terrain Vehicle) lol
![]()
Taylor Swift
Fearless
![]()
![]()
Soundtrack
Twilight
![]()
![]()
Britney Spears
Circus
![]()
![]()
Keyshia Cole
A Different Me
![]()
![]()
Jamie Foxx
Intuition
![]()
![]()
Akon
Freedom
![]()
![]()
Ludacris
Theater Of The Mind
![]()
![]()
Fall Out Boy
Folie A Deux
![]()
![]()
David Cook
David Cook
![]()
![]()
Beyonce
I Am...Sasha Fierce
![]()
![]()
Everlast
Love, War And The Ghost Of Whitey Ford
![]()
![]()
Ne-Yo
Year of the Gentleman
![]()
![]()
Nelly
Brass Knuckles
![]()
![]()
DJ Khaled
We Global
![]()
![]()
The Game
LAX
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
^There are also quite a few TV spots for the same thing. They all feature this packet of bills with attached googly eyes. It's all about "the money you save" watching you. It's kind of hilarious.
&nbsp
&nbsp
I rather enjoy the commercials. Each time they come on it gets in your head. I've heard my brother singing it after the commercial tooso it's not just me. Catchy song that one
. But does MJ get paid royalties for it? He was never officially credited for the song. He didn't write it and this version is a cover. But maybe MJ owns the song?
unfortunately no... the song was written by Motown writers and Universal/Motown own the publishing rights to the song..
Michael only get notierity ...for singing that FAMOUS hook....
i didn't know that. but i think the noteriety is much more valuable. after all, people pay a fortune for commercials for the super bowl, just to get publicity. and if MJ is involved with anything, he's gunna get the most publicity from it. he is the king of receiving publicity, unintended. and that's a good thing. and he doesn't have to pay to get it. his fame is that powerful. so, if universal thinks they are reaping more money than MJ, from this..they are wrong. karma suggests that people getting free publicity from MJ has warranted him getting free publicity from everybody else.
after all, when a Jackson 5 song is played, who really benefits from it more..?
unfortunately no... the song was written by Motown writers and Universal/Motown own the publishing rights to the song..
Michael only get notierity ...for singing that FAMOUS hook....