MJJC Exclusive Q&A with Taj Jackson - Read Taj's answers

ivy

Proud Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
15,262
Points
0
Location
USA
Before I post Taj Jackson's answers to your questions let me tell you a little bit about what happened behind the scenes.

First of all I hope all of you can realize the importance of this Q&A. As Michael Jackson fans we had questions, we had concerns in issues related to the Jackson family and Taj Jackson agreed to take questions and answer them to best of his ability so that we can fix misunderstandings and overcome negativity and realize that despite our difference of opinions we are all on the same side - Michael Jackson. As MJJC it's our hope that we can all move towards a more positive and harmonious future.

Secondly today I have seen some rumors that said Taj Jackson was selective with the questions he answered, this is absolutely false. Taj did not give me any rules about the questions he's willing to answer and he replied all of the questions I sent his way.

Finally as I mentioned before I don't give any deadlines for replies to our questions. I was constantly in contact with Taj and I'm the one that told him to take as much time as he needed. So I'm the one that's responsible for any delay, do not put it on Taj.

I hope that you can read Taj's answers with an open mind and we can all be more positive. Enjoy !!!

MJJC Exclusive Q&A with Taj Jackson

Taj+Jackson+787337498_l.jpg


MJJC: Many believe MJ wasn't close to his family for many years before he passed. Some have put the timeline as far back as Off the wall. Janet has confirmed this in her interviews prior to his passing, while Latoya & Jermaine book reinforced this notion. Can you tell us how close was MJ to his family in general? How often did you have contact with him & the children before June 25th? How often did you see MJ after he returned from Bahrain?

Taj Jackson: Well I think that answer depends on which family members you are talking about. I know that my uncle Michael had never stopped being close to us (me and my brothers). I also know that my uncle Michael was always extremely close to my Grandma.

Yes, I know some members of my family weren't as close to my uncle in the later years as before, but for us that never was the case. I talked to him and saw him very often.



MJJC: There have been some questionable ventures that included Michael’s children such as children being listed in the contracts as a condition, promoting products/ charities that are involved in legal fight with Estate, giving interviews to journalists (ie: Frauke Ludowig) that made disparaging remarks about MJ before. What do you think of your family putting Michael's three vulnerable children out into the spotlight every time something MJ's related happens? MJ went to extreme lengths to protect his children from the media, so why just a year after his death have his children begun to appear on TV in interviews all round the world, have pap photos of themselves appear constantly in the media, and have public twitter accounts which are picked up by gossip websites like TMZ. As his nephew do you think this is what MJ would have wanted for his young children? Do you ever think that maybe Michael wanted his children protected?

Taj Jackson: We are really trying to do our best with the situation in front of us, but we are only human. It's always easier to sit back and judge. But no one else is really in our shoes.

As for his kids, they are his legacy now. They are the ones that can and will carry on the MJ name and message. We don't force them to do that, they are proud to do it.



MJJC: Are the adults aware of the ongoing cyber bullying Paris & Prince have been subjected to on Twitter? (Unsavory characters have tweeted them the autopsy picture, made crude jokes, curse and ridicule the children). Why are the children allowed to be on Twitter when so many hate on them? Are they being monitored when they go online? Are there concrete and serious steps being taken to protect the children against cyber bullies?

Taj Jackson: We take cyber bullying VERY seriously and appropriate steps have always been taken when warranted. However the last thing we want Prince, Paris, and Blanket to feel is that they are being imprisoned. No matter how much we want or try to protect them, there will always be people out there full of jealousy and hate.



MJJC: Do you feel, in your heart of hearts, that THIS GLE/JA-TAIL “MICHAEL FOREVER TRIBUTE”, was worthy of MJ? Do you really believe the lineup was the best for the greatest entertainer? Were the fans concerns about the tribute ever taken seriously?

Taj Jackson: No tribute will ever truly be worthy of MJ. He is undoubtedly the greatest of all time. However that doesn't mean that there should never be any MJ tributes. Personally I think there should be MJ tributes all the time. My uncle should ALWAYS be celebrated.. not just for his music contribution, but for the incredible person he was.

I did this tribute for my uncle. And knowing my uncle… he would have much rather have seen his mother and kids there…and his own brothers, sister, and nephews 3T up on stage performing a tribute to him, then ANY other big named artist(s).



MJJC: We now learn GLE has filed for bankruptcy on October 8th, THE NIGHT OF THE TRIBUTE. What steps will you & your family take, to make sure GLE/JA-TAIL respects their commitments to the workers? Did the charities receive their promised donation?

Taj Jackson: I am not GLE, and don't have all the details on what exactly transpired, therefore I can not comment on this yet. Sorry.

I really hope there is more info in the near future.



MJJC: Since you were a consultant to the estate, you must not believe the will is fake. But do you know why some in your family would think the will is fake, but never went to court to legally challenge it? Have you ever discuss the issue with your family? What is their thinking, and how did they come up with the belief that the 2002 will wasn't signed by MJ? Has the Jackson family cooperatively decided to start working with the MJ Estate or are some still holding out and consider them an enemy?

Taj Jackson: I still am involved in the Estate. And regarding these questions , I can only speak on my behalf. Or things that I was personally part of.

I think the us (the family) vs them (the Estate) mentality is very dangerous and non productive. When you compete or consider someone the enemy, then there has to be a clear winner and a loser. Why would I want my uncle's Estate to fail? Communication is the key though and for the longest time there was definitely a lack of it on both sides. It also doesn't help the situation when you hear someone say go "Team this" or "Team that". For me it's all about my uncle legacy and not a game. The only team should be Team MJ.

Also the Jackson Family is a huge family and although we are a family unit, it is still made up of many individuals. Please remember, one person does not speak for the whole family or represent the whole family.



MJJC: Paris and Prince openly support other Artists music and Albums and even Jackson family endeavors on Twitter but no mention at all of their Dads new releases. They have even been tweeted questions from their followers but refuse to reply. Seeing how they are vocal of how proud they are of their dad's accomplishment, it raises a lot of questions. Have MJ's children been forbidden to support Estate ventures for their dad?

Taj Jackson: MJ's kids have never ever been forbidden to support Estate ventures. They have been to and supported many ventures that the Estate was directly behind. They are VERY proud of their dad's accomplishments.


MJJC: Do the oldest two know and understand the estate is theirs? Their dad's legacy? His gift to them?

Taj Jackson: I'm sure someone has told them all of this, but I would never have that conversation with them. I'm focused on their health and happiness. It is my job to make sure that they become something my uncle would be proud of.

My brothers and I have gladly put our music career on hold for over 2 years in order to make sure my Grandma and our 3 cousins were doing okay. That is our number one priority. And it's the least we can do considering everything our uncle did for us.



MJJC: Every new venture bring forth to capitalize on MJ's fame, arts, notoriety, not sanctioned by the MJ estate, is by definition, undermining MJ's wishes and taking money from his rightful heirs. Why are the children used in projects which are against the MJ estate's interest and so in effect against the children's long-term interest? Two examples - GLE tribute which appeared to ignore the Estate completely in their planning for the concert and tried to embarrass the executors and MJ himself by offering $100K to MJ's children who have been provided with untold wealth from their father, also public involvement of the children in the Heal the world foundation which is in a costly and lengthy lawsuit with MJ estate. Do you think it is fair or ethical to use these young children in that way? Do you understand how it is viewed from the outside that the children are being asked to endorse products that go directly against MJ's wishes in establishing an estate for them?

Taj Jackson: This is another family vs estate debate…. so I think I'll pass on this one :)

Taj_Michael_Jackson.jpg


MJJC: Do you understand the concern fans have over the people (such as: Dieter Weisner, Marc Schaffel, Melissa Johnson, Howard Mann aka Henry Vaccaro aka Vintage Pop) that had fall outs with MJ being in business with both your grandparents now? Anything you want to tell us about this?

Taj Jackson: That's a very interesting concern… but going by those rules, there would definitely have been no "This is It" movie or soundtrack, or "Michael" album, or "MJ" Julien auction either.


MJJC: Are people, outside or inside of the family, taking advantage of your grandmother? Many fans believe Katherine Jackson is used as a front because fans love her & respect MJ's deep affection for her. But many fans have woken up to the game being played, and the GLE revolt has shown that. Is it now clear to the family, that most fans will not blindly support a questionable venture, just because Katherine Jackson or MJ's kids are used as the selling point?

Taj Jackson: Is this a question or a statement? Not sure. But I will still try and answer it. :)

People will believe what they want to believe. People will support what they want to support. People will think what they want to think. I always try and do my best to keep an open mind and see both sides of the story.



MJJC: Do you think Michael would be happy with the various book releases, merchandising deals and tributes that the Jackson family has endorsed in the last twelve months? What's your response to those who claim that the family have been cashing in on Michael's passing?

Taj Jackson: This question reminds me of when my brothers and I first started promoting 3T back in the day. All the French promo posters and billboards said "Nephews of Michael Jackson". The next time I saw my uncle I started to apologized to him about this. I started to tell him that we didn't tell Sony France to put that on all the advertising. He stopped me before I could finish and I'll never forget his response, . He said, "Applehead don't ever apologize, you are my nephews, flesh and blood and I love you. You are a Jackson. Be proud and wear that name like a badge of honor. I'm counting on you guys to carry on this legacy when I'm done."

So…. my uncle Michael considered his legacy to be a piece of the Jackson legacy. For him, it had always been about the Jackson name living on. And I don't believe family can "cash in" on their own name.



MJJC: Even before your uncle was officially declared dead on 25th June, your family through its spokesman, Oxman, and various family members since, has made the serious allegation to the media that Michael Jackson's problem with overmedication was so bad that you as a family were attempting interventions. Can you clear up this confusion with fans as it severely impacts on MJ's reputation, especially as a father?

Taj Jackson: If someone goes out and speaks on your behalf without your agreement or knowledge, does that make him your spokesman? Brian Oxman is not the family spokesman and he definitely does not speak for the entire family or me.


MJJC: About Cascio Tracks: How can you be so sure that the voice in the tracks is not real? Do you have any evidence to support that besides your own ears? Did you guys seek out experts to analyze the tape and having forensic evidence? If you believe the tracks were fake, why did you not take legal action? Did you talked to Eddie Cascio or any member of the Cascio family about the tracks before or after the album fiasco? Do you tried to reach out each other and hear both side of opinion and tried to sort thing out? Why did you feel you had to involve the public by bringing the fight on twitter? Do you take some responsibility for the major division this has created within the fan community? Do you reckon, some will FOREVER question the veracity of every new project?

Taj Jackson: That's a very sore subject, the Cascio Tracks. But just know, A LOT went on behind the scenes before things went public and plenty of time before the "Michael" track list was even finalized. I really shouldn't say anymore otherwise I might say things I'll later regret. :)


MJJC: You have tweeted that Michael's fans don't understand and that we only know part of the story. We can understand how that must be frustrating, equally from Michael's fan base perspective it is also frustrating when we reach out to the family and don't get any feedback. The fans look to the family for support and answers to various questions, but it appears there is not if much if any response from the family. What can the family and the fans do to correct the breakdown in communication'? Would the family be willing to establish an official line of communication and if so, what method of communication would the family be comfortable with? It would be great to see a dialogue between the fans and family.

Taj Jackson: That's a tough situation. I'm not sure anyone in our family wants to be the messenger or liaison anymore. People always want to blame or kill the messenger when something goes wrong…lol

Every problem, concern or incident would lie squarely on that person's shoulders. No thanks. As much as I would love to help with that now. I've been there… done that. That's not for me… I would rather put that energy into my uncle's mother and kids.



34112782img240-jpg.jpg


MJJC: Did MJ ever record his own solo version of Why? If he did, what can you tell us about Michael’s original demo for WHY? Do you think it could see a release?

Taj Jackson: No, unfortunately it doesn't exist. There was only my uncle's backgrounds on the demo. There is a Babyface version of Why with MJ backgrounds though.


MJJC: We all know MJ was an amazing person, what do you love most about him?

Taj Jackson: His heart. Period. "Amazing person" is totally an understatement. His care for children and the world was not a gimmick, it was who he really was. If I could be a tenth of the man my uncle was, I would be happy with my life.


MJJC: What's your favorite memory of MJ?

Taj Jackson: One favorite memory is the time my brothers and I spent with him in Nagasaki, Japan. There is a Dutch Village Theme Park called Huis Ten Bosch. We had such an incredible time there and laughed so much during that trip. I am blessed and lucky to have so many great and happy memories with him. Enough memories to last a lifetime. :)


MJJC: How was it like to work with MJ? Was MJ still being like an uncle when working or he was just pure professional?

Taj Jackson: He was absolutely a creative genius. Every time I worked on something with him, it never ever felt like work.

For example, the music video shoot for "Why". My first worry was that my uncle was playing around just a little too much…. cause he kept trying to make us laugh every time the camera was rolling. But afterwards I understood exactly what he was doing.

I was way too serious for the video, thinking in my head…this is a music video with Michael Jackson…

But that was never the relationship we had with our uncle. Our relationship with him was filled with love, fun, respect and mutual admiration. And the video at the end of the day captured that perfectly.



MJJC: What is the single most important advice MJ had given you or your brothers, and you would like to share with his own kids?

Taj Jackson: We have shared almost everything my uncle has ever said or taught us with his own kids.

The single most important advice he has ever given me is to truly believe in my dreams. Also to be appreciative of and grateful for what I have and always give back to the world…to those less fortunate… and stand up for those without a voice.
 
wow ivy thanks so u mind if i share this with others fans ivy? (i'll make sure to post the MJJC link)
 
wow ivy thanks so u mind if i share this with others fans ivy? (i'll make sure to post the MJJC link)

of course - as long as you mention the source and give a link back to MJJC.
 
^^ thanks will do, i posted this on mjfc and put the MJJC link on the thread as well
 
Thank you Ivy and Taj :)
While I wish he he wasnt so vague with some of his answers, I do understand his reasons and appreciate him agreeing to try and bridge the gap by answering all the questions you presented.
 
ivy;3592418 said:
Taj Jackson:

Also the Jackson Family is a huge family and although we are a family unit, it is still made up of many individuals. Please remember, one person does not speak for the whole family or represent the whole family.

Well I do agree with him and it is evident that not all of them agree on the same thing.



MJJC: Every new venture bring forth to capitalize on MJ's fame, arts, notoriety, not sanctioned by the MJ estate, is by definition, undermining MJ's wishes and taking money from his rightful heirs. Why are the children used in projects which are against the MJ estate's interest and so in effect against the children's long-term interest? Two examples - GLE tribute which appeared to ignore the Estate completely in their planning for the concert and tried to embarrass the executors and MJ himself by offering $100K to MJ's children who have been provided with untold wealth from their father, also public involvement of the children in the Heal the world foundation which is in a costly and lengthy lawsuit with MJ estate. Do you think it is fair or ethical to use these young children in that way? Do you understand how it is viewed from the outside that the children are being asked to endorse products that go directly against MJ's wishes in establishing an estate for them?

Taj Jackson: This is another family vs estate debate…. so I think I'll pass on this one :)

I wished he answered that
 
I think he kinda answered it on the previous question by saying not be Team Jackson or Team Estate.
 
I think he kinda answered it on the previous question by saying not be Team Jackson or Team Estate.

I know but I wished he had elaborated more about what he feels about those events that are not licensed by the estate goes against the childrens interests. He says "Why would I want my uncle's Estate to fail?"... but ummm does he realize that all non-licensed events are cheating out the kids on financial resources? A consequence of that can be that the estate fails.

I dont know but just wished to hear his thoughts about this specific.
 
Last edited:
Wow, Ivy, thank you for posting the answers from Taj. It was very nice to hear from him. If you are able to communicate with Taj again, please add my name to the list of those who which to thank him for taking the time to do this. My sincere gratitude. :angel:
 
Thank you Ivy.

Thank you Taj for taking the time.
 
Geez, it was sooo vague. The only thing I take from it all is that NOTHING will change. That was so clear to me with alot of the important questions he answered.

Anywho, thanks MJJC and Taj!

Now ready for Jermaine answers! :)
 
I can't say thank you enough to Ivy and Taj for the time and effort taken to fulfill this, they don't owe us things of this sort at all ,so yes I'm very appreciative of this and many other Q + A's. :)
 
Thanks, Ivy and Taj for taking time to do this interview.

Although I have to say I didn't find most of his answers satisfactory... I wish he had been more specific and open in his answers.
 
His answers are often shorter than questions and are very general. He hasn't really explained anything, or provided reasons for anything. Not that I expected he would. But thanks Ivy.
 
I do appreciate him taking the time to answer, but those are some really vague, sugarcoated replies.
 
I read his answers very late last night... i was too drugged up to comment then, but i am not even sure i want to comment now.

I appreciate some of his answers. For example, i am glad he didn't push the idea that MJ was close to his family. We know, and i think they now understand, fans are far more knowledgeable about MJ and his strenuous with the Jacksons, than they realize before June 25th 2009.


The single one thing i took from his answers is: he is one person among many, all pulling in different AND often opposite directions. They don't see to have a dialogue among themselves, and no one seems to know how to get all of them in a room, that is reflective of the very public bickering we see on Twitter & in the media. No decorum.

I understand why MJ pulled away...and i think, when so many people with divergent opinions where no one will take the lead, no one wants to follow, for one's sanity, it's best to walk away.

Ivy, your intro was very misleading....there can't be a communication line with the fans, when there's none within the family. lol

Again i appreciate your effort to pull this off and also, thankful that Taj took the time. If one disregard his Cascio response (he should have been able to answer this one sincerely because he was one of the instigators), It's obvious, that he tried to do the best he could, but he doesn't hold all the cards.

ETA: One final point before i move on, i will never accept that MJ's legacy is intertwine with the Jacksons. Too many things have gone wrong since 1991 and too many things continue to go opposite of enhancing MJ's legacy.

And thankfully, the general public isn't linking MJ's legacy to the Jacksons. And again, I am glad the kids won't control the estate for many years to come, by the time they are in charge they will wise up to many things.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Ivy for your hard work and efforts in organising this for us, and many thanks to Taj for taking the time to answer the questions.

I must say the answers were pretty much as I thought they would be, perhaps he would have wanted to say more on some issues but the middle road is the best course in public.

My hope is that perhaps Taj will have a better understanding of where we are coming from on some issues.
 
thank you but he didn't make things more clear about anything except the issue with the will and the estate. liked his answers about oxmen
 
MJJC: Do you understand the concern fans have over the people (such as: Dieter Weisner, Marc Schaffel, Melissa Johnson, Howard Mann aka Henry Vaccaro aka Vintage Pop) that had fall outs with MJ being in business with both your grandparents now? Anything you want to tell us about this?

Taj Jackson: That's a very interesting concern… but going by those rules, there would definitely have been no "This is It" movie or soundtrack, or "Michael" album, or "MJ" Julien auction either.

Sorry but what This is it movie has to do with crooks like Mann or Schaffel?
 
Thanks for organizing the Q&A ivy. It is indeed a bit of a pity that he decided to refrain from really giving any in depth answers, but I do appreciate that he took time out to do this.
 
Sorry but what This is it movie has to do with crooks like Mann or Schaffel?

the question is worded as "people that had fall outs with MJ" and his response is that there are other people in other projects that had fall outs with Michael as well.

we didn't clarify what we mean clearly I guess.
 
Thanks Ivy and MJJC to put together this Q&A and for Taj to answer the questions. For the Q&A itself, I think it's kind of go as expected. I like him acknowledge that this is a big family that they didn't agree with each other. This is nature and I am really tired about the tight nit J family figure many J family members want people to believe. I also think the way he describe MJ as an uncle is sweet and loving.

However, I do think he avoid to answer lots of "conflict" questions with lots of unclear answers. I expected this but still a little bit disappointed. I really wanted to know what's going on with the Cascios tracks. I still don't understand why they didn't say it clearly if they have evidence to prove those are the fake songs.

The part I really don't like is the part he put Howard Mann, fake HTWF, the horrible tribute concerts, and all those shady people in the same category with This is it movie. What the hell???? I know the estate can't always make good decision and they can't satisfy everyone but Howard Mann and many others have no legal right to use MJ's image and songs and no legal right to do anything related to MJ. I don't even want to mention the way they tried to use MJ to profit is way too low and shady. The answer he gave about the tribute concert promoter running with bankruptcy is interesting. I know they might not know how the promoter organize the whole things. But if they care so much about MJ's legacy, they should choose people to work carefully. Using the name of charity to scam money is one of the most horrible thing to do. Why can't they just work with estate and put out a reasonable tribute? My biggest problem with that tribute concert is not there wasn't enough big star. My biggest problems is the way they went overhead above the estate and scam people using the name of charity and MJ.

Base on his answer, I really don't know whether Taj understand why fans are so against the projects put out by the family. Many projects they put out are with no dignity. I am sorry to say this.

Edit:
the question is worded as "people that had fall outs with MJ" and his response is that there are other people in other projects that had fall outs with Michael as well.

we didn't clarify what we mean clearly I guess.

I saw this after I reply. Ok, now, I kind of seeing what he mean. However, I still don't think he should put Howard Mann, Mellisa Johnson and Branca in the same category. The first two people didn't actually fit the fall outs with MJ part. The only two that might be comparable is Dieter Weisner, Marc Schaffel. And to be honest, people don't like Julien auction and they didn't work with the estate. I believe some of the stuffs Julien auction had is actually from the J family. People complains about the Michael album and TII sound tracks.
 
Last edited:
virginia_woolf;3592650 said:
Sorry but what This is it movie has to do with crooks like Mann or Schaffel?

I don't get it either....Julien isn't in business with the estate.

And MJ was working with ALL THE FOLKS involved in the This is it movie

MJJC: Do you understand the concern fans have over the people (such as: Dieter Weisner, Marc Schaffel, Melissa Johnson, Howard Mann aka Henry Vaccaro aka Vintage Pop) that had fall outs with MJ being in business with both your grandparents now? Anything you want to tell us about this?

Taj Jackson: That's a very interesting concern… but going by those rules, there would definitely have been no "This is It" movie or soundtrack, or "Michael" album, or "MJ" Julien auction either.

ivy;3592667 said:
the question is worded as "people that had fall outs with MJ" and his response is that there are other people in other projects that had fall outs with Michael as well.

we didn't clarify what we mean clearly I guess.

The question wasn't that hard to comprehend.... maybe we should have asked: People he had fall outs with and he NEVER invited back in his organization...(that would obviously include the family, but exclude Branca and Dileo lol)
 
Thanks Ivy and MJJC, and thanks go to Taj for taking the time to respond.

My first impression is that his answers may have been "vetted" by an attorney, or at least he is keeping legal issues in mind with his answers. There are ongoing lawsuits -- Katherine's against AEG/Murray, and Joe's wrongful death suit, and now the lawsuit about Joseph's perfume line, that clearly uses Michael's image. So I'm sure he had to be careful in his responses.

One thing that is a constant about the Jackson family is the promotion of the American Dream mythology, going back for decades. In that sense, we saw little Michael performing on stage, and being beaten privately, at home. It's not a healthy situation, but there must be immense pressure to keep to the "party line." We've seen the results when a family member transgresses, i.e. when LaToya broke ranks and was shunned by the family until she recanted. With all the money filtering through Katherine, that would be great incentive to gloss over, or answer vaguely.

I think he didn't understand what was being asked with this question, or he did understand, and chose not to answer?

MJJC: Do you understand the concern fans have over the people (such as: Dieter Weisner, Marc Schaffel, Melissa Johnson, Howard Mann aka Henry Vaccaro aka Vintage Pop) that had fall outs with MJ being in business with both your grandparents now? Anything you want to tell us about this?

Taj Jackson: That's a very interesting concern… but going by those rules, there would definitely have been no "This is It" movie or soundtrack, or "Michael" album, or "MJ" Julien auction either.

Logic is lacking in this answer. Clearly, the liaisons with the likes of Howard Mann, Weisner, and others that could be mentioned, are NOT the same as "This is It" or other Estate promoted ventures. Some are legal, and some are not. ONLY the Estate should be using "Michael's name and image." There have been many times when Katherine has used Michael's name and image for "extra-Estate" promotions/ventures, and I think so far the Estate has handled her gently out of deference to her age and status as Michael's mother. Too bad Taj answered in this way, because that was a VERY valid question. Money generated by Estate sponsored events goes into the Estate for Michael's children's futures. Money generated by ventures NOT sanctioned by the Estate, do not neceessarily benefit the children, at all. I think the question was clear, and it wasn't genuinely answered.

Also, I highly doubt that limiting or forbidding the children's use of social media comprises "imprisonment." It would simply be good parenting, in that instance. Paris is only thirteen, and cannot possibly understand the implications of her tweets. It's perfectly possible to forbid or limit a thirteen-year-old's computer time and content, for the child's own welfare.

One thing that is clear is that there is dissension in the ranks, i.e. family members have different opinions. He stayed AWAY from specifics about that can-of-worms. Which is understandable. . .

The answers were almost entirely as expected. No surprises there, and the responses had the characteristic "Jackson generic answers." I doubt that in the future, ANY Jackson will break ranks and say what they REALLY think. Too much is at risk, i.e. money filtering through Katherine, as an amazingly effective form of social control in the family.
 
Thanks Ivy. Thanks Taj.
I see he didn't clarify anything at all. The one of reasons why I don't understand some of family members is their tendency to talk too much but can't speaking straight out. His answer about Cascio tracks is just about nothing. I don't get why adult man preferred to tweet so much things but refused to explain straight his own point of view.
All i see from Taj's interview is that some Jacksons doesn't even know what are the others Jacksons doing and thinking of.


 
Back
Top