RedMaryFlint
Proud Member
They're trying to steer a "reasonable" middle ground -- say that Murray did some things wrong, took some chances, but that he had the situation under control and nothing would have gone wrong but for the crazy addict celebrity. Defense theory #1254837 is that Murray was using conscious sedation, which he is certified in, to treat insomnia. That is why White emphasizes that there are common off-label uses for medications and defends that Chinese study as "interesting" and worthy of further study. That is why White sticks hard and fast to the idea that Murray gave only 25 mg of propofol at a time, and there couldn't have been a drip. And that is why Michael "has" to be an addict, to introduce a rogue factor into the conscientious doctor's plans and make it all go south. The jury is supposed to focus on the idea of death by crazy happenstance, with poor Murray doing his best to manage a difficult patient and winding up caught in a bad situation. This is meant to engender enough sympathy for the jury to let Murray off or at least to garner the lightest sentence possible if he's convicted.Exactly. I don't understand why the defense brought it up - it makes murray look even worse (it that is at all possible lol)
And the defense can just forget about it. Walgren will flatten them on cross.