Latest on MJJC

Shana Mangatal is publishing a book on Michael's Birthday 2016

You know what type of women don't have many female friends? .. hoes

And they always blame other woman for being jealous, catty, and emotionally instable.. girls that don't have girlfriends have... boyfriends!!


This is not everyone, but I read Shana, I've known women like her
 
It's funny as hell watching Shana and Karen take shots at each other.
laughing2.gif.31100acc741b9f601b92db992c219dd3.gif
 
TBH this is how I imagine both Shana and Karen typing every time I read their Twitters because they're liars, scammers, and messy bitches that live for drama.
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
redfrog said:
I

shanamangatal Thank you @vbr70 . Why does she sit on social media all day revealing her ex boss' personal business and trashing people? No professional person does that. No one. She should be happy that she was blessed to work with such an incredible artist and man instead of hating on others who received the same blessing.
Click to expand...

While Karen is no better, Shana has some nerve. She just wrote a book about MJ's personal business (at least her imagined version of his personal business) and she is the one to lecture others? Of course, the same can be said about Karen. They are made of the same cloth. LOL.

shanamangatal @vbr70 She's about to get sued for slander if she continues to make up lies about me. I was astonished by the stuff I've been told she said! What an evil person! How would she even know? She doesn't own Michael and was only with him in work situations, not in his private time. I was a part of Michael's management team for nearly 7 years and his friend until the end. The things she said don't even make sense. I can assure you she was not around 90% of the time I was with MJ and has no idea what went on. She shouldn't speak about things she doesn't know. For her to try to lessen my importance by belittling me is astonishing. How can she call herself a professional while behaving in this manner?
Click to expand...

Lucky for you Shana that MJ cannot sue you now for lying about him, isn't it?

She doesn't own Michael and was only with him in work situations, not in his private time.
Click to expand...

Just like you, Shana.

For her to try to lessen my importance by belittling me is astonishing.
Click to expand...

Your "importance"? LMAO.

The nerve both of these people have. Pointing fingers at each other for things they BOTH do. LOL.
 
KOPV said:
You know what type of women don't have many female friends? .. hoes

And they always blame other woman for being jealous, catty, and emotionally instable.. girls that don't have girlfriends have... boyfriends!!


This is not everyone, but I read Shana, I've known women like her
Click to expand...

You could criticize Shana without being sexist and stereotypical.
 
Shana talking about Karen: "She doesn't own Michael". Take back what I said-they sound about six years old.
 
I know Shana's book is just garbage, but noticed those interviewers tried to make something out of the fact that she was "17 or 18" when they met. They just never stop trying.
 
Elvis got with Pricilla when she was a teen.. she was 14 and he 29... 15 and a 30yr old think about that..
 
KOPV said:
Elvis got with Pricilla when she was a teen.. she was 14 and he 29... 15 and a 30yr old think about that..
Click to expand...
Elvis and his past had nothing to do with this-they are insinuating that she was a "child" when they met, when in many states 17 or 18 is an adult. Besides they're talking about a meet and greet after party. They are just trying to insert the allegations into her story.

Why does Australia interview people like Murray and her? Nobody else of interest there?
 
To me the fact they can turn any conversation about MJ with a minor into something cynical has very much to do with how they never turn another big star Elvis into something cynical.. The fact Elvis has had well known relationships with younger women (not just Pricilla) never turns into a negative or cynical story... and when someone releases a book and they do the math and figure 17 or 18 when they met, intentionally bringing her young age to surface says a lot to me..


It was ok for Elvis to have 'slumber parties' with young teens and have 'pillow fights' etc... And this is a known heterosexual man. But seemingly every story that Michael has with people the first thing they do is try to figure out if they were a 'young child' when they met.. for disgusting reasons
 
KOPV said:
To me the fact they can turn any conversation about MJ with a minor into something cynical has very much to do with how they never turn another big star Elvis into something cynical.. The fact Elvis has had well known relationships with younger women (not just Pricilla) never turns into a negative or cynical story... and when someone releases a book and they do the math and figure 17 or 18 when they met, intentionally bringing her young age to surface says a lot to me..


It was ok for Elvis to have 'slumber parties' with young teens and have 'pillow fights' etc... And this is a known heterosexual man. But seemingly every story that Michael has with people the first thing they do is try to figure out if they were a 'young child' when they met.. for disgusting reasons
Click to expand...

Now now, we all know that there are rules for Michael and then there are rules for everyone else.
More double standards are applied to Michael then anyone else I've ever seen or heard of.
Even the most mundane and normal things are twisted by the media to be seen as weird if they're done by Michael.
People were/are out to ruin Michael and drag his name through the mud because they were and still are threatened (pun intended) by him, and also by the things he did and accomplished.

If people were as hellbent on catching actual pedophiles as they were on painting Michael as one then there would be A LOT less pedophiles on the loose.
It's sad and very ironic.
 
Last edited:
..largest raid in American history!! Think about the crime figures that have been in this country (crime king pins, cereal killers, mass murderers...) and Michael Jackson had more people search Neverland than any other investigation...
 
barbee0715 said:
I know Shana's book is just garbage, but noticed those interviewers tried to make something out of the fact that she was "17 or 18" when they met. They just never stop trying.
Click to expand...

They are all over the place. For decades they said MJ was into boys and boys only, he didn't care about girls.
Now what, he was into 17 year old girls? That wouldn't make him a pedophile by the way
age of consent is 16 in many places and a 17 year old girls are not a pre-pubescent children anyway.
They just grab whatever bullshit they think they can throw at MJ just like Sneddon and Zonen did it in
2005: look he had books with naked men that proves he is into men. But look the boys our out of his room
after they hit 14, he loses interest in boys when they get too old.
Look he has Barely Legal because those girls look like the girls in Gavin's class.
But he has Plumpers and Over 50 and 44 Plus...err.... OK let's just ignore that.
Look he has an alarm in the hallway he is so scared he would be caught.
But he slept over in June Chandler's house 30 nights and molested Jordan there and
was not concerned about getting caught at all he was so heedless.
 
Last edited:
redfrog said:
Look he has Barely Legal because those girls look like the girls in Gavin's class.
Click to expand...

No, the girls in Barely Legal do not look like 13-14yo girls. That's nonsense. They look like 18-22yo girls that they are. And this is not an allegations thread.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top