144000
Proud Member
No, I'm not. My original comment had nothing to do with the Contract. I'm sorry I can't help you with your reading comprehension issues. Recap:
"The company had concluded the business had few growth prospects."
Comment posted: They sure changed their mind about that.
Me in response: Companies can't change their minds?
Cliff Note: The topic is Sony's opinion on the Catalog's growth potential.
Rather than being insulting, you could have just left me with Sony had an opinion..which has nothing to do with what I was trying to find out from you about how this contract was constructed for Michael, and how it was constructed for Sony.
You could simply leave me with what kind of point you were trying to make. The topic is that the transaction happened. Perhaps YOUR topic is.supposedly, an opinion that sony supposedly had...which, again..is just an opinion. So you can make the effort to insult me,about my reading comprehension, which I have a problem with,(I clicked 'Thanks' on quite a few posts, which I comprehended, perfectly) or just tell me what your point was, and just leave it at that. You don't help your case by attacking me, personally. What..you don't think how sony thinks, influences how they make up a contract?
Last edited: