And which title rolls off the tongue better? Chicago nineteen fourty-five or Chicago Nights? It'd be a good change here. Besides, let's not act like the song isn't already being altered against MJ's will when Porcaro himself has been making changes to the song for 10 years now.
A lot of those songs were recorded in 1990 or 1991 and Teddy Riley began working with MJ in June 1990 so it's either of those years.
Not really about a specific track, but anyone knows what year this early Dangerous songs list could've been from?
Bro truthfully I don't care either way. I never care about either name change. I think we're just that badly starved that we gotta quibble about names they pick based on lyrics.
I love Fly Away. I think Michael did a fantastic job on it, as did Rebbie in her own right. I would have loved if this was on the final Bad album. This is in my top 5 for the Bad era outtakes, behind Streetwalker & Price Of Fame.
Personally, I think Chicago 1945 is a better title as it indicates the setting and historical context- the lyrics about the 1945 World’s Fair, Al Capone, etc tie into that. Chicago Nights, obviously, does not do that. I also disagree with whoever said Chicago Nights is the better title, it’s too generic for me.
I never knew Teddy worked on Don’t Be Messin’ Round, hopefully we’ll hear it eventually!
Not really about a specific track, but anyone knows what year this early Dangerous songs list could've been from?
Even the idea of such releases would overwhelm the estate.
The idea of loading a dusty cassette into a tape deck compels them to have an afternoon nap.
Hm, I dunno. I think they would just be so full-on confused by it they'd probably think it was an AI-generated idea, lol.
i'd love to see something like this with don't be messin' 'round tbh. it's not my fav really but since there's a version made for almost every album it'd be fun to see the song's evolution
Not really about a specific track, but anyone knows what year this early Dangerous songs list could've been from?
I'm sure it would've been rearranged to be cohesive but some of these songs would clash if they were together on an album....I also wonder what that duet is....the leak from Brad showed a Janet/MJ duet from 1990
also i don't really think this would be the track list, maybe just a list of songs he considered finishing
So did Mike present Q and Bruce with the 30 odd demos he had worked on by January 1987, then between the three of them picked the 12 they felt were strong enough to work on?
To set the record straight on both your posts, that was a work list from late 1990/early 1991, not a real tracklist. And the "MA and MJ duet" refers to the original plan for In the Closet, which was meant to have a feature from Madonna.
Agreed. Though Chicago Nights sounds smoother, 1945 gives more meaning to the title. Chicago 1945 puts me directly into the setting just by reading the title. Chicago Nights can be a modern day Chicago nightlife meaning for all I know
Also agreed. The EPs potentials are huge for MJ imo and would be a great way to "milk" songs because Michael often have demos and alt. versions available of songs, spanning not over just a few years, but decades.
Two separate songs.
is there two songs named stay or is it the same one??
oh nope, no mijac there
Someone here asked a person who was credited to some of those hidden songs registered in the early 80's and they were writer's demos. It's possible that some of those songs are simply writer's demos that MJ never recorded.
It sounds like an opportunity to release what we've all been waiting for - "Jason Malachi: The Indispensable Collection".Imagine if the Estate opened a random vault somewhere and found 6 albums worth of unreleased material
Knowing them they probably still mess it up somehow
