Latest on MJJC

The Official 'Michael' Bio-Pic Thread

At the start of the biopic when little Mike locks himself in the bathroom after Joseph hits him, he slides down the wall and curls himself up, it reminded me of this photo Michael drew. It featured in the booklet of HIStory album.

images
 
(EXCLUSIVE) Jafaar Jackson on Which Michael Jackson Song He REALLY WANTS in Biopic Sequel!
104,226 views Apr 21, 2026 #EntertainmentTonight
Jafaar Jackson chats with ET's Kevn Frazier at the premiere of 'Michael,' in theaters on April 24.
The nephew of Michael Jackson opens up about how his family has reacted to his portrayl of the late 'Thriller'
singer and which song he really wants to do in the sequel.

👑 🫶🧚‍♀️
 
etoile 37 said:
That's an interesting idea. They could do like what Michael did with the panther scene in Black Or White: build the movie in a way that if a judge rules that they have to stop selling movie, they can just easily remove the problematic scenes and still re-release the rest of the movie. But by then, everybody will already have watched or bought the original cut if they make sure to release it to streaming and blu-ray as soon as its theatrical run is over. And the original cut will forever exist on the Internet. The fact that Evan Chandler very obviously went around the settlement terms by using his brother to write a book might weigh against the Chandlers if they decide to sue. Afterall, it seems very unfair that the Chandler managed to tell their side of the story while Michael couldn't.
Click to expand...
Just wanted to add that technically Graham King could use MJ's music even without getting the Estate and Michael's kids involved in part 2. I mean the only reason why movies normally need to have the authorization to use the music is so that they do not get sued. But if they know the Estate is not gonna sue them, then they don't need to get their official permission, do they? If the Estate doesn't sign any contract, doesn't participate in the making of the movie and doesn't get paid for the music, it's not like the Chandlers could sue the Estate just for not suing Lionsgate for the unauthorized use of Michael's music, could they? It's certainly a nice loophole that the settlement agreement doesn't say that the Estate has the obligation to sue people for using unauthorized music, isn't it? They could cover the Bad era, the Dangerous era and the 1993 allegations in part 2, and then let the Estate get involved again for part 3, covering the History era, Invincible era, 2005 trial and Michael's death. Just let Jaafar be in charge of approving the script for part 2 and making sure that the movie is accurate and respectful of Michael.
 
Annita said:
andjustice4some - Michael Jackson FAN account
@andjustice4some
·
4h


Trying to post positive content, but please, boycott Trolling Stone. The desperation is real.


HHBijGQbIAEy_7E





andjustice4some - Michael Jackson FAN account reposted
Click to expand...
Disgusting. They are beyond pathetic. Well I'm glad they are showing their asses actually. It proves what many of us have been saying about the media when it comes to MJ. It's not us being fanatical and not being able to accept any criticism of MJ like some think.

Those losers at Rolling Stone have truly hit a new low.

Thankfully, MJ's legacy continues to thrive! #1 movie worldwide. 5 million new listeners on Spotify. MJ can't stop winning!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top