Lightbringer
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2003
- Messages
- 1,215
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was exactly my first thought tooAt the start of the biopic when little Mike locks himself in the bathroom after Joseph hits him, he slides down the wall and curls himself up, it reminded me of this photo Michael drew. It featured in the booklet of HIStory album.
![]()
Just wanted to add that technically Graham King could use MJ's music even without getting the Estate and Michael's kids involved in part 2. I mean the only reason why movies normally need to have the authorization to use the music is so that they do not get sued. But if they know the Estate is not gonna sue them, then they don't need to get their official permission, do they? If the Estate doesn't sign any contract, doesn't participate in the making of the movie and doesn't get paid for the music, it's not like the Chandlers could sue the Estate just for not suing Lionsgate for the unauthorized use of Michael's music, could they? It's certainly a nice loophole that the settlement agreement doesn't say that the Estate has the obligation to sue people for using unauthorized music, isn't it? They could cover the Bad era, the Dangerous era and the 1993 allegations in part 2, and then let the Estate get involved again for part 3, covering the History era, Invincible era, 2005 trial and Michael's death. Just let Jaafar be in charge of approving the script for part 2 and making sure that the movie is accurate and respectful of Michael.That's an interesting idea. They could do like what Michael did with the panther scene in Black Or White: build the movie in a way that if a judge rules that they have to stop selling movie, they can just easily remove the problematic scenes and still re-release the rest of the movie. But by then, everybody will already have watched or bought the original cut if they make sure to release it to streaming and blu-ray as soon as its theatrical run is over. And the original cut will forever exist on the Internet. The fact that Evan Chandler very obviously went around the settlement terms by using his brother to write a book might weigh against the Chandlers if they decide to sue. Afterall, it seems very unfair that the Chandler managed to tell their side of the story while Michael couldn't.
Disgusting. They are beyond pathetic. Well I'm glad they are showing their asses actually. It proves what many of us have been saying about the media when it comes to MJ. It's not us being fanatical and not being able to accept any criticism of MJ like some think.andjustice4some - Michael Jackson FAN account
@andjustice4some
·
4h
Trying to post positive content, but please, boycott Trolling Stone. The desperation is real.
![]()
andjustice4some - Michael Jackson FAN account reposted
I've also noticed it only on my third viewing.Just finished my 3rd viewing, I noticed Michael's vitiligo on his chest and arms when he was in the pool
Really hope the don't overlook the Bad era
How on earth could anyone know that? Why are you getting worked up?Just saw someone post on facebook that part 2 may end in 95!!!![]()
I'm sure they have an idea of what years they want to cover. Also the already filmed material helps.How on earth could anyone know that? Why are you getting worked up?
I could post on Facebook that Part 2 covers the 1996 Atlanta Olympics and the rise and fall of the Tamagotchi - that doesn't mean it's going to happen?
Not to mention that at this moment in time, THERE IS NO PART 2 conceived, written let alone completed.
Fuqua said in a recent interview that the original film ended a couple of years after the allegations. Theres also photos from the set of different phases of mjs life and the last two are from around that time. Theres also leaked video footage of jaafar filming a concert scene and in the audience someone is holding a history album cover. So if and a big if part two takes the same timeline then yes it may end with the histry comeback.Just saw someone post on facebook that part 2 may end in 95!!!![]()
They are really desperate and it doesn't surprise me one bit. They are jealous of the movie success at the box office and the love MJ is getting form the moviegoersandjustice4some - Michael Jackson FAN account
@andjustice4some
·
4h
Trying to post positive content, but please, boycott Trolling Stone. The desperation is real.
![]()
andjustice4some - Michael Jackson FAN account reposted
That's fair enough - right now. "Michael" was supposed to end post '93, and it ended '88. What I'm saying is there is absolutely no reason to believe a Facebook post that says Part 2 will end in 95 when Michael has only been out 5 minutes. Screenplays go through lots of reworks. At the moment they have X amount of footage, but they are not pigeon holed into any time frame.Not to mention that at this moment in time, THERE IS NO PART 2 conceived, written let alone completed.
——————
I would think a large part already is, as fuqua says theres a third of footage already filmed that could be used for part two. Ie footage that was originally shot for part one. So there will be a basic script based on the dact part two should have been in part one if that makes sense before all the changes