To Catlovers

”In 2010, operating under the old adage that if you want something done right, do it yourself, a group of Alameda, CA, shelter volunteers banded together and told the City that they could not only run the shelter better (i.e., save more lives), they could save the City money in the process. They submitted a bid to run the shelter and got the contract. After 126 years of running the shelter, the City turned it over to the volunteers. In 2014, the shelter saved 92% of cats and 98% of dogs. You can read the inspiring story here: http://goo.gl/uOPHzw In Palm Springs, CA, under similar circumstances, the shelter now saves 95% of the animals. And in Petaluma, CA, a similar group saved 94% in 2013 and claims an even higher save rate in 2014 (see http://goo.gl/y1CznE):

“We figured out how to save over 97% of ALL our animals in an open admission city pound. By doing so, we have tons of donations, tons of volunteers, and tons of happy adopters. We run out of animals! In my experience, animal advocates arguing that we ‘have to kill’ animals (followed by the usual excuses…) is false… Kill shelters are on the way out. Modern, high achieving shelters are going to make sure of that.”

They are part of a growing number of shelters—run by newly formed groups—that wanted the shelter run right and decided to do it themselves. They have rejected the excuses of why ending the killing of animals is impossible, of why things have to be done the same way year after year, of why there is no choice but to accept the deadly results. And they are not alone. Similar examples exist in other states.

You can do it, too. Here are sample copies of their bids to take over the shelter for you to use and modify:

- Alameda, CA, Proposal: http://goo.gl/eNKW2x

- Billings, MT, Proposal: http://goo.gl/In5jfy

- Kansas City, KS, Proposal: http://goo.gl/87VV4R

Other approaches to saving lives in the local shelter include waging a political campaign for reform: http://goo.gl/z3qSgb, passing a law that requires shelters to save more lives: http://goo.gl/XlDN7R, or making sure that the person running the shelter is compassionate, effective, and hard working: http://goo.gl/lfj4GD”
https://www.facebook.com/nathanwinograd

The No Kill Equation

1"Trap-neuter-release (TNR) programs for free-living cats allow shelters to reduce death rates."[1]:4
2 low-cost, high-volume spay/neuter
3 Cooperation with rescue groups
4 Foster care
5 Volunteer program
6 Comprehensive adoption programs
7 Pet retention
8 Medical and behavior rehabilitation programs
9 Public Relations/Community Development
10 Compassionate director
11 Proactive redemptions

You can see nr 4 cooperation with rescue groups.
Rescue flights take pets from southern California with lots of cats and dogs to no kill shelters in the north
[video=youtube;Qqb91lKR4QY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqb91lKR4QY[/video]

This year they hope they can rescue 6000 pets
http://www.dogster.com/the-scoop/wings-of-rescue-volunteer-pilots-dog-transport-rescue-adoption
 
Last edited:
I´m looking at the kittens in the mirror..
[video=youtube;q7zo2BeMQoc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7zo2BeMQoc[/video]
 
Money.
Money...

I say it's just
In the devil's game
Of greed and lust

They don't care
They'd do me for the money
They don't care
They use me for the money

You do anything for money...

Anything
Anything
Anything for money

Some residents in Yulin tried to sell their pets to animal activists knowing that animallovers were desperate to save animals.It might be HSI or animal eqality who wrote it.But it also said that they didn´t buy pets like that , only from the cages.


Shutting Down Yulin
Humane Society International

When officials in Yulin, China enthusiastically endorsed the idea a few years ago of holding an annual “dog meat festival” at the summer solstice in hopes of attracting tourism and investment, they apparently did not realize to what extent a culture of pet-keeping had spread across the country, nor how powerful social media could be in arousing the ire of other animal lovers around the world. They’ve certainly made a name for their city now—but not in a good way.

Global outcry
In 2014, advocates succeeded in subduing the celebration, decreasing the number of animals killed and moving the slaughter out of the public eye, but this year, the pressure became overwhelming as hundreds of thousands of people including celebrities signed petitions, a slew of major media outlets covered the event and dramatic photos of candlelight vigils and dogs in cages helplessly awaiting a terrible fate circulated online.

Shining a spotlight
Last year and again this past week, HSI sent staff to the city ahead of and during the festival to photograph and report on the horrors taking place there in an effort to draw attention to the cruelty and pressure authorities into action.

On-site report
On the scene, HSI Director of Cruelty Response Adam Parascondola wrote: “It's been a real challenge to be here in Yulin over the past few days. I've witnessed truly heartbreaking suffering of dogs and cats that I will never forget, but at the same time I've also had the honor of working alongside really inspiring Chinese activists and ordinary animal-loving citizens who care deeply about ending this horrific trade. They give me hope for the future, and they in turn are feeling hopeful because they finally feel that their voices are being heard around the world. May this be the last we see of this brutal festival."

Hopeful signs
Signs of progress were evident, Adam said:

As last year, city leaders ordered restaurants to remove dog meat advertisements from their windows. Police patrolled the streets to make sure no public displays of dog eating would rile the crowds.

The notorious Dong Kou Market had fewer dog meat stands. HSI spoke with a former dog meat trader who confirmed a rapid downturn of business.

A Chinese activist who has observed the festival for the past three years estimated the average number of dogs sold per trader as 70 or so in 2012, compared to 20 this year.

Singapore News Channel Asia aired and more than 20 reporters covered a June 22 protest by members of VShine (a local HSI partner group), who unfurled multiple banners in Chinese and English calling for a shutdown of the Yulin dog meat festival and the industry as police chased them around the square--to the delight of onlookers. HSI also supported pre-festival protests in 50 cities and did numerous interviews to help spread the word.

The protests have set the more sophisticated Yulin folks to thinking, says a Yulin dog lover. Many of them have reduced their dog eating as a result.

We’ve also heard directly from the dog meat traders themselves that their business has become more difficult due to protests, government pressure in the form of unannounced safety visits, and their own family members, particularly their children, who condemn their trade. They admit that we have caused them a “huge headache” and that the dog meat trade “is not the livelihood [their] children will take over.


Supporting local efforts
HSI is contacting groups and individuals who have rescued animals to coordinate assistance for their care and accommodation, and is bringing a dog and two cats to the U.S. to serve as ambassadors for the cause. Photos of the latter—before, in utter misery and terror and afterward, cuddled in the arms of Chinese animal advocates—have been seen by millions of newspaper and website readers. The dog was named Little Ricky in honor of actor and comedian Ricky Gervais, who is supporting HSI’s campaign.

We also recently hosted a workshop to help teach the brave Chinese activists how to be even more effective, and are working to promote pet adoption from shelters.

Gradual progress
“China is not a democracy,” said HSI’s Dr. Peter Li, also present in Yulin. “A lot is not transparent. But, the call for ending or restricting the dog meat industry is stronger and the Chinese authorities have heard it. Things do not happen fast in China. But, it is moving in the right direction.” Join us in our fight to stop the suffering.

http://www.hsi.org/news/news/2015/06/yulin-dog-meat-festival-062415.html

Yulin dog meat festivale is over but cat and dog mest trade are going on in other places

150701
Chinese Activists Rescue 400 Dogs Bound for Meat Trade Slaughter in 50-Hour Standoff
First rescue coordinated by the China command center task force set up in partnership with Humane Society International after Yulin dog meat festival horrors
Humane Society International, VShine, EShine, Xi’an Small Animal Protection Association
http://www.hsi.org/news/press_releases/2015/06/kunming-dog-meat-truck-rescue-070115.html
 
Compassion through cultural change
To a Westerner, it seems unfathomable that some people might see no ethical problem with consuming ‘man’s best friend’. Even to Chinese urbanites who have grown to love dogs as pets — the practice is unthinkable. But for those whose ancestors have eaten dogs for thousands of years, the power of cultural conditioning is profound.

It’s nearly impossible to comprehend — until you realise that here in Australia we are victims of the very same cultural conditioning.

We too have been raised into a society that has normalised the slaughter and consumption of highly intelligent domestic animals — animals who are capable of experiencing fear and suffering — animals who will show affection, if given the chance. But rather than ‘dogs’ and ‘cats’, we call them ‘pigs’, ‘lambs’, ‘cows’ and ‘chickens’.

We will create a kinder, more caring society for ourselves if we can all widen our circle of compassion to those we have been taught to think of as ‘food’, rather than ‘friend’. Like people in China who value dogs only for their meat, many of us have simply never been given the opportunity to appreciate ‘food’ animals for the unique and curious individuals that they are.

Scientists now know that cows have best friends; that sheep can learn to respond to their own name; that chickens exhibit cognitive abilities beyond that of young children; and that pigs show empathy and can play computer games designed for chimpanzees...

And yet our own heritage has paved a pathway that has led us to confine, abuse, and kill these living, breathing individuals en masse — in modern day factory farms and slaughterhouses. We kid ourselves that they are just ‘dumb animals’. But science has proven they are anything but.

For many, the outrage at the thought of ‘dog stew’ is only matched by the frustration at only being able to register protest by way of a petition signature. But we are not powerless to end this suffering. By making kinder choices, we can impact the lives of needy animals in a very real way, every single day.

Take a leap of kindness this weekend. Sign a petition to help dogs in China — and then enjoy a delicious meat-free meal to help equally deserving animals right here at home.
http://www.animalsaustralia.org/features/yulin-dog-eating-festival-to-begin.php

It is not just Australia but the entire Western world.
I thought it would good to have a pig together with cats here is the story of master Julian king pig of Vawo
http://vnanimalwelfare.org/master-julian-king-pig-of-vawo/
(I searched cat rescue Vietnam and found a pig..)
 
Re: to catlovers

I don't usually come to this thread, but I don't really mind cats since I'm a dog guy.

But I like share this.

Top-10-Tsunderes-in-Anime-According-to-My-Navi-Woman-haruhichan.com-Yozora-Mikaduki-haganai.gif
 
Re: to catlovers

Great thread MIST, really great. Your dedication to animal rights is absolutely beautiful. Thank you for the posts in here and elsewhere :)

On the page with the video about kittens in the mirror you posted, I also found something else, equally adorable that thought fit very well here

 
I´ve found out there are many great exercisevideos on youtube and you can do them whenever you like to at home.
If you have cats you can have some problems
[video=youtube;SIatWYZgOKI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIatWYZgOKI[/video]

[video=youtube;f9rHFxKLQg0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9rHFxKLQg0[/video]
 
Re: to catlovers

^^^ Does it make me brutally honest if I recognized that I enjoyed the first video far more than the second? And not necessarily because the cats featured much more :p

I might as well carry on with the naughtiness, stay true to my naughty nature and post this

resemblance.jpg



Better return to the pure nature of thread though

download_3.jpg


But then again, it was the good Lord who made all types of kitties, well that is true for those of us who believe in Him anyhow.


Leaving jokes aside, cats ARE marvelous creatures, they truly are - the whiskers, the paws, the purring, the little tails, their constant need of attention and their playfulness are just beautiful to watch and to experience. Those who don't have them around really miss out on one of nature's greatest joys.
 
The government of Australia has literally declared a war on cats and intends to poison and shoot 2,000,000 of them by 2020:
https://goo.gl/BUjnCn
It is medieval in its barbarity.
Worse, it is being done in the name of "environmentalism." The ultimate goal of the environmental movement, however, is not slaughter and death.
It is to create a peaceful and harmonious relationship between humans and the environment.
To be authentic, this goal must include respect for other species who share our planet. And yet, the environmental movement has violated this ethic by targeting species for eradication because someone says they are "non-native" and therefore their existence conflicts with the world as some humans would like it to be.

Condemning animals to death because they violate a preferred sense of order does not reject human interference in the natural world as they claim; it reaffirms it. And in championing such views, the movement paradoxically supports the use of traps, poisons, fire and hunting, all of which cause great harm and suffering—the very things they ostensibly exist to oppose.

Over the last 250 years, the story of humanity has been the story of the human rights movement—of overcoming our darker natures by learning tolerance for the foreign and respect for the diverse.
In the early 21st century, these are the cherished ideals to which humanity aspires in our treatment of one another.
And yet when it comes to our relationship with other species, these values are turned on their head, and environmentalists—the very people who should be promoting tolerance and compassion for all Earthlings regardless of their antecedents—are instead teaching disdain for some, leading the charge to kill them and turning our beautiful, natural places into war zones and battlefields. We need a different, more humane and more responsible way of seeing the world and our place in it.

“Non-native” and “invasive species” are terms that have entered the lexicon of popular culture and become pejorative, inspiring unwarranted fear, knee-jerk suspicion, and a lack of thoughtfulness and moral consideration.
They are language of intolerance, based on an idea we have thoroughly rejected in our treatment of our fellow human beings—that the value of a living being can be reduced merely to its place of origin.
And when we speak these words, repeat them and pay lip service to their perceived implication that we must revere the familiar and disdain the foreign, we should not only be ashamed to do so, but realize that we are opening the floodgates of expression to our darker natures and our most base instincts—impulses which have been responsible for the most regrettable moments in human history, and which are posed to be blamed for yet another: the deliberate massacre of hundreds of thousands of cats and kittens.

We must reject the cruel pseudo-science of invasion biology in favor of reason, common sense and a broader understanding and appreciation of the changing nature of life on Earth. And we must replace the language of biological xenophobia with the language of tolerance and compassion. It is time to drive the terms “invasive species” and “non-native” into a well-deserved extinction.
Australians, please stand up for cats. Tell your government to abandon this horrific massacre.
Learn more:
Biological Xenophobia: http://goo.gl/yoIvsh
Rejecting Labels that Enable Great Harm: http://goo.gl/qSGhLx
The Life of the Wild Cat: http://goo.gl/XQtgzB
The Cat Hater's Great Hypocrisy: http://goo.gl/Ke7dfI[/
https://www.facebook.com/nathanwinograd/posts/1007687149255529:0


Did you know that Abbott plans to kill 2 million so called feral cats in Australia. The domestic moggy is also not safe. Time to keep the cats indoors and microchipped.
Did you also know the government released many cats into the bush in the 50's to combat rabbit and other feral animals in the bush They always seem have short sighted plans, to kill one thing or another.
Trap Neuter and Return is the only answer here, as well as strict control over registering people's cats and de sexing them.
Complain to your local federal minister, let your voice be heard
https://www.facebook.com/RescueCatAdoptionsNSW



Petitioning Australian federal government
Stop the culling of feral cats and implement alternative ethical solutions.

Cat lovers, Rescues of Australia, UNITE to stop the mass culling of the un-owned cat populations and help to provide an alternate solution!
None of us wish to see native species being wiped out for any reason, however, the statistics on feral cats and their impact on our Australian wildlife species is not based on factual evidence.
There are many other factors contributing to the decline of our native species such as foxes, dingo's cane toads, snakes, spiders, rodents, deer, boars, wild horses but the main contributor is HUMANS!
Millions of our native wildlife are wiped out by humans every year due to farming, mining, land development, transport, pollution, poisons and the decimation of natural habitat but still we blame it solely on the cats?
Yet Mr Abbot has approved a mass cull of feral and stray cats in Australia based on unproven figures provided by Greg Hunt, arch cat nemesis and coal mine fan.
Greg Hunt says "There are up to 20 million feral cats taking up to four native Australian animals a night. That is over 20 billion Australian native species being destroyed a year."
None of these figures are based on factual research, yet Mr Abbott has approved $6.6 million dollars of tax payers money into a program to eradicate 2 million cats over the next 5 years?
Abbott plans using poison bait molded into sausages, shooting them, hunting dogs and any other weapon of mass eradication to kill every cat that isn't indoors.

The elimination will involve the use of detector dogs, fencing, and shooting, as well as the use of a new poison bait called "Curiosity," which has been developed by the government and a private biotech company over several years.

A toxic compound in the bait stops the flow of oxygen within the poisoned cat, and is described in the government's plan as "The new humane feral cat bait." It will be placed inside pieces of meat that are molded to resemble sausages." I don’t think starving an animal of oxygen is very humane at all do you?

Not only will feral cats in the outback be targeted, any cat within a community is also at risk of being culled.
Any person with an app to report a stray cat in their area will be contributing to data about cats in their community. This means that anyone who sees a cat, in the community, whether it be owned by someone or not, is asked to report it. That information will then be used to target so called 'hot spots' in the community for the eradication plan. So, for example if your neighbour or neighbours have a particular hate for your pet moggy who is lying in the sun on the front lawn, they can enter that info into the app. Your pet moggy will then be identified as a stray cat and is in need of eradication along with every other cat that is logged in that area. Cat haters and animal cruelty lovers will no doubt abuse the use of this app and place thousands of loved family pets at risk of being targeted for killing.

We must STOP this inhumane, unethical and abhorrent killing, of yet to be proven guilty of killing all of our native wildlife, cats in Australia.
There is no one perfect solution for feral animal eradication but there are other ways in which to humanely and ethically manage cat populations in Australia, Trap Neuter Return has been proven to work in greatly reducing and managing the numbers of stray and feral cats in other countries, with great success.
Yet no consideration has been given to approve the use TNR practices here in Australia, even with factual, research based evidence to show that it does work. I implore you to sign this petition to save the un-owned cat populations and to demand the government to legalize, support, fund and implement TNR programes,
in Australia for a start and to tighten regulation of cat ownership, put in place measures to control the population such as enforcing laws for keeping cats contained as dogs must be; to protect wildlife, mandatory desexing unless a breeders license is obtained after stringent legislation is created for the grounds of breeding an animal, shut down backyard breeders and enforce harsher penalties, prohibit the selling or giving away of undesexed cats, provide subsidised programs for low cost/no cost desexing to make it widely available to all Australians, provide funding and or grants for small community based rescues to assist in colony management and education programs in the community and to end the culling of cats immediately!

https://www.change.org/p/australian...m=mob-md-share_petition-no_msg&fb_ref=Default
 
First they poisoned foxes, maybe dingos too and what happened?
Removing foxes from an environment has been shown to increase the number of feral cats in that same environment.

Feral cats have been in Australia for more than 100 years but mammalogist Professor Tim Flannery said their devastating impact on native wildlife has grown since recent pest management programs have decreased fox populations.

“As we have started to drive down fox populations by using bait… the next largest predator, the feral cat, has popped up because it [has taken] advantage of an ecological niche that has opened up for it,” he said.
To develop poison for foxes, cats it takes money .A lot of money.

However, this is just the same old discussion – killing stuff to save other stuff – wrapped up in brand new packaging to keep people in jobs and the government money pouring in.


How much money, exactly?

A lot. A ****ing lot.

Tony Peacock used to be CEO at the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, ‘Australia’s largest integrated invasive animal research program’ . He’s now got a new gig at the government funded Cooperative Research Centres Association, ‘a not-for-profit organisation operating to promote the pursuit of science’.

The Invasive Animals CRC has been given $72 million dollars by the Cooperative Research Centres Association for programs which includes partners; Animal Control Technologies and the CSIRO (!) and it will…

… release new products currently in the regulatory pipeline, such as new wild dog, fox and feral pig baits and delivery systems


There is big, big money in killing if you can keep people thinking it’s a good idea. The feral animal industry in Australia may have just completed the biggest, most high profile con-job in memorable history.

Here is a link to the full article
http://www.savingpets.com.au/2014/1...acked-our-love-of-animals-and-took-our-money/
 
Powerful New Film Exposes the Horrors of Captive Lion Hunting

Lions could be about to get their Blackfish moment thanks to a new film that exposes the dark side of the captive breeding and canned hunting industry in South Africa.

The film, Blood Lions, which premiered last week at the Durban International Film Festival in South Africa, brings to light the many problems that come with the continued exploitation of these big cats for profit and the lies that continue to be told to the public in an attempt to support the idea that it’s all being done in the name of conservation.

[video=youtube;-T86GCjCpus]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T86GCjCpus[/video]
According to Ian Michler, who plays a leading role in the film, the industry is continuing to grow. In 1999 there were between 800 and 1,000 lions in cages, but today there are more than 200 facilities holding between 6,000 and 8,000 predators, mostly lions, in captivity.

If things keep going the way they are, South Africa could have more than 12,000 captive lions by 2020.

A lot of lions might seem like a good thing for a species that’s facing a growing threat of extinction in the wild, but these lions are only being bred to be killed. According to the film, at least two to three captive bred or tame lions are being killed in canned hunts every single day, while hundreds more are killed annually for the lion bone trade.

Supporters continue to make a number of hollow arguments in defense of this industry, saying it supports conservation and education, but the film counters that none of the lions being bred will ever return to the wild to help bolster dwindling populations and the industry has nothing to do with true conservation efforts.

In reality, they’re only being used as a revenue stream for lion farmers who offer opportunities to pet cubs and interact with older big cats, along with providing steady flow of lions for wealthy trophy hunters who will drop thousands on a guaranteed kill.

Michler told National Geographic he hopes the film will increase the ongoing dialogue about how we treat animals and that we will use what we’ve learned about wildlife, animal welfare and ecosystems to change our behavior to reflect that knowledge.

He also hopes it will help bring about the end of canned hunting. Fortunately, the tide of public opinion is turning on this industry. Major airlines are turning away from shipping trophies and the awareness being raised by this film is igniting public outrage, which has already played a significant role in Australia’s recent move to ban lion trophy imports.

This week, the of the Professional Hunters’ Association of South Africa announced that their current “position on lion hunting is no longer tenable” and needs to be revisited.

Unsurprisingly, people don’t have to be into animal rights to be repulsed by the idea of killing a tame lion trapped in an enclosure. Hopefully the U.S., which is home to more than half of those who hunt these lions, will step up with increased protection before it’s too late.

For more info on the film and efforts to shut down the canned hunting industry, check out Blood Lions.



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/powerfu...rs-of-captive-lion-hunting.html#ixzz3hGWEVnNn

It's all absurd
They don't care

They'd do me for the money
They don't care
They use me for the money


Hunters are paying to kill the lions it´s breeders who earn money, lots of money

This
There's nothing that can't be done
If we raise our voice as one

They've gotta hear it from me
They've gotta hear it from you
They've gotta hear it from us
We can't take it
We've already had enough
 
Backlash against US dentist who killed Cecil the lion

000aeacd-642.jpg

Walter Palmer reportedly paid $50,000 to kill Cecil, who was one of the oldest and most famous lions in Zimbabwe

A US dentist who shot dead a famous lion with a crossbow before skinning and beheading the creature has been slated for his actions.

Walter James Palmer, from Minnesota, killed Cecil the lion who was being studied by Oxford University.

Dr Palmer reportedly paid $50,000 (€45,200) to kill Cecil, who was one of the oldest and most famous lions in Zimbabwe, earlier this month.

The Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force said Dr Palmer, a professional hunter and a farm owner, tied a dead animal to a car to lure the lion out of a national park before shooting him. The wounded lion was found 40 hours later and shot dead.

Within hours of the news breaking, Dr Palmer's social media feeds were flooded with blistering attacks -- and threats.

The Twitter and Facebook accounts and website of his dental practice were shut down. Nobody was answering the phone at the dental practice and the voicemail box was overwhelmed.

By late afternoon there were more than 1,800 messages about his practice on review site Yelp and a petition demanding justice for Cecil had garnered nearly 57,000 signatures.

Dr Palmer pleaded guilty in 2008 to US federal charges related to the poaching of a black bear in Wisconsin, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported.

Dr Palmer has released a statement explaining his actions.

In it he said: "To my knowledge, everything about this trip was legal and properly handled and conducted."

Statement:https://twitter.com/bouaKARE/status/626108485982269440/photo/1
Comment of his statement:
He deeply regrets killing a famous animal and would have preferred to hunt, torture and mutilate a less well-known creature

The statement added: "I had no idea that the lion I took was a known, local favorite, was collared and part of a study until the end of the hunt."

Dr Palmer added he regretted that this "pursuit of an activity I love and practice responsibly and legally resulted in the taking of this lion".

Cecil was lured out of the park he was living in using bait and was shot with a crossbow, according to Mr Rodrigues. He added that the killer paid a Zimbabwean hunter and a game park owner to lure the 13-year-old big cat.

The chairman of the task force, Johnny Rodrigues, said: "The saddest part of all is that now that Cecil is dead, the next lion in the hierarchy, Jericho will most likely kill all Cecil's cubs."

Earlier, a statement issued by the Zimbabwean Parks Authority made no reference to reports that it was a wealthy Spanish or American man had killed Cecil with a bow and arrow after paying a €45,000 fee.

000aeab5-614.jpg


Police said they had arrested two Zimbabwean men on poaching charges, and are looking for Dr Palmer in connection with the same case but said his current whereabouts were unknown. If convicted, they could face up to 15 years in prison.

A British amateur safari enthusiast has posted video online of Cecil the lion.

Paula French, who regularly travels to Africa to watch animals on safari, said she was prompted to post the footage on hearing news of the lion's killing.
[video]Police said they had arrested two Zimbabwean men on poaching charges, and are looking for Dr Palmer in connection with the same case but said his current whereabouts were unknown. If convicted, they could face up to 15 years in prison. A British amateur safari enthusiast has posted video online of Cecil the lion. Paula French, who regularly travels to Africa to watch animals on safari, said she was prompted to post the footage on hearing news of the lion's killing.[/video]

“I was sad to hear the news and so put the video up,” she said. Ms French said the lion was filmed during a November 2012 trip to Hwange National Park and identified as Cecil by accompanying rangers.

Professor David Macdonald, who founded the Wildlife Conservation Research Unit at Oxford University, said the death of Cecil would lead to a "cascade" of other deaths.

"The death of one lion is not just the death of one lion - it is a cascade. It has consequences.

"Cecil was the only male so it is highly likely that the incoming males will kill his [Cecil's] offspring."

Prof Macdonald's research aims to solve practical problems with wildlife conservation and environment management to inform policy formation, and he had been observing Cecil just a few months ago.

There are reported to be 30,000 lions left across the whole African continent, but Prof Macdonald warned that this figure, despite being "startlingly low", was likely to be an overestimate.

He added that he hoped there would be a "silver-lining" to Cecil's death by an increase in support for his research.

Source: AFP/Reuters
 
Last edited:
Office belonging to dentist who killed Cecil the lion is targeted by protesters

ad_176609933.jpg


An American dentist blamed for the killing for Cecil the lion has been bombarded with threats from animal activists.
Protestors dressed as hunters threw stuffed animal toys at Dr Walter Palmer’s office in Minnesota and pinned a sign to the door reading: ‘You are a coward and a killer! :(‘
Activists are mourning the death of the 13-year-old beast who roamed the African plains.

ad_176609934.jpg

Protestors dressed up as ‘dentist hunters’

Palmer has said that he had trusted his local guides to meet legal guidelines on his trip to Africa, during which he shot Cecil with a crossbow before skinning and beheading him around July 6.
The hunter’s office and practice website has become a target for animal rights activists disgusted at the dentist’s actions.
One of the strongest denunciations came from the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which said Palmer should hang for killing Cecil.

ad_176637007-e1438162269560.jpg

PETA has said the dentist should ‘hang’

A PETA spokesperson said on Twitter: ‘If, as reported, this dentist & guides lured #CeciltheLion out of the park with food so as to shoot him on private property because shooting #CeciltheLion in the park would have been illegal, he needs to be extradited, charged, &, preferably, hanged.
‘Hunting is a coward’s pastime. To get a thrill at the cost of life this man gunned down loved Cecil with a high-powered weapon.
‘All wild animals are beloved by their own, but to hunters like this overblown, over-privileged little man, they’re merely targets.
‘The photograph of this dentist, smiling over the corpse of another animal, will disgust every caring soul in the world.’

ad_176563315.jpg

The picture which has angered the world

The hunter allegedly paid $55,000 (£35,000) for a big game permit on the trip.
Palmer claims he that he did not know the lion was protected.
Emmanuel Fundira, the president of the Safari Operators Association of Zimbabwe, confirmed at a news conference on Tuesday that Palmer is wanted for the death of Cecil.
On Twitter people are paying tribute with the #CeciltheLion.

1


http://metro.co.uk/2015/07/29/prote...-killers-office-with-stuffed-animals-5317517/
 
MIST;4101468 said:
I signed the petition today.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/821/738/351/demand-justice-for-cecil-the-lion-in-zimbambwe/

He who shot the lion paid 55.000 for it. he wasn´t good at it, it took 40 painful hours before Cecil died.

It's not only that he killed Cecil. The next lion who takes dominant role, and most likely kills Cecil's cubs as they usually do, and then mother might get killed too by protecting her cubs:cry:

Lion's are in danger of disappearing from earth as is so many other animals because of these bastards. I read that wild lion population is as few as 20,000.


I cannot understand what is going on these men or women's head who does that trophy hunting ???
Do have they so small penis that they feel they need to compensate it and they feel themselves bigger if they kill?
Wouldn't they get better thrills shooting those animals with camera than gun or other weapon, and then seeing animals going on living?

l.jpg


If it is some kind of competition between these trophy hunters, could they not start shooting each other for trophy, and put their heads on the wall.
I most certainly think that those people needs to see therapist or psychology.
 
Last edited:
Re: to catlovers

I never understood killing for FUN, for "sport"...it's depraved and evil in my honest opinion. As for those that say the money for these canned kills goes to the conservation/preservation of endangered species, that makes no sense to me. How is paying to kill endangered animals saving them? Can't they just donate the money outright without the killing?

This isn't the first time that POS dentist hunted an animal illegally. He was busted and served probation for poaching a black bear in Wisconsin in 2012, I believe. He blatantly thumbs his nose at the laws/regulations concerning game hunting.
 
Re: to catlovers

I never understood killing for FUN, for "sport"...it's depraved and evil in my honest opinion. As for those that say the money for these canned kills goes to the conservation/preservation of endangered species, that makes no sense to me. How is paying to kill endangered animals saving them? Can't they just donate the money outright without the killing?

This isn't the first time that POS dentist hunted an animal illegally. He was busted and served probation for poaching a black bear in Wisconsin in 2012, I believe. He blatantly thumbs his nose at the laws/regulations concerning game hunting.

It is not sport and don't be fooled by these guys who says so. It is some sort of sick practice for these people who cannot bet their penis up without killing innocent animals and feeling big and manly that way. Then they get second boner when their hunter friends gather around their living room to admire the head of that poor animal.

Btw, guide who was in the hunting trip with this killer, gave an interview to Telegraph:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ant-next-but-couldnt-find-one-big-enough.html
He wanted to kill an elephant there too, but luckily (for elephant) they couldn't find big enough dentist to be happy:puke: Size does matter.

About the news of Safari Club International suspending this dentist's membership is laughable. They had no problem keeping him in their club the time his killed that bear, but now that his killing Cecil made international headlines, they threw dentist under the bus so they themselves appear like they hold up some rules.
They are cowards and trying to distance themselves from the bad media reports.

Hopefully Cecil didn't die in vain and all the articles about his insane killing educates people of what is going on those safaris and Africa.
Yesterday,I came across this article and to be honest, there is a lot that I didn't know
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/8b705800-36ca-11e5-bdbb-35e55cbae175.html#axzz3hPUId6oV


I have heard that sick explanation that hunters money goes to animal conservation. If so, why lions are on brink or being endangered, same goes with elephants, rhinos etc? If serial rapist donates money towards help for rapists victims, so then he can keep raping other women? If they have that much money to spend for hunting trip, they can donate money without killing any animals.

Lastly, there are serial killers out there that kill humans because their lust for blood. Once caught, they are placed behind the bars and given mental help. Why these trophy killers are walking free and are allowed to kill animals? They have the same lust for blood than seria killers? They should be put behind the bars are given mental help for their condition.
 
Last edited:
Re: to catlovers

The shooting of this lion is very sad and disgusting, of course. What I do not understand: Killing (just for fun and other reasons, too) of lions and other big 5-animals has been going on for a long time, as far as I know. Why is this case special? Because the lion had a name?

Well, maybe the sad death of that lion will help to protect wild animals in the future. "Cecil" seems to have been well known ... *sigh*
 
Cecil the Lion’s Death Reveals Americans’ Big Role in Trophy Hunting

A Minnesota dentist’s killing of the famous lion has sparked outrage, but it remains to be seen whether it will spur a crackdown on big game hunting.
With one shot of his bow, Walter Palmer went from being a Minneapolis dentist to the world’s most reviled big game hunter.

The public outcry following his hunt of Zimbabwe’s famous tourist attraction, Cecil the Lion, has not only led to the closure of his dental office but could be a galvanizing force in altering the trophy hunting industry in the United States that’s fueling wildlife loss in Africa, according to conservationists.

Killing rare animals is nothing new for the dentist, who has crossbow records for killing a menagerie’s worth of wildlife, including rhino, warthogs, buffalo, and more. But none of his kills brought a spotlight on the contentious issue of trophy hunting until he and his hired Zimbabwean hunters lured the black-maned Cecil out from the protection of national park boundaries with bait.

The heavily studied lion—he had a GPS collar on when he was shot—wandered wounded for 40 hours before finally being tracked down and shot with a gun by the hunters.

“I’ve never seen any sort of animal issue resonate like this before,” said Beth Allgood, campaigns director at the International Fund for Animal Welfare. When she first heard the reports about Cecil’s death at the hands of a Spaniard, Allgood was a little surprised, but then it was revealed the hunter was an American—a story line Allgood with her 20 years in conservation work is familiar with.

“Americans don’t like to accept the role we play in wildlife trade,” Allgood said. “We like to look at China fueling demand and Africa not doing enough to protect these animals, but when it comes to lions, we have a big part in it.”

Americans traveling to Africa make up more than 60 percent of the foreign-participated lion trophy hunts carried out each year, according to John Jackson, president of the lobbying group Conservation Force. About 15,000 hunters make the trek annually, and a majority of them want to bring back a trophy, Jackson said. The group argues that lion hunts are integral to the species’ conservation, and the big game industry—worth $675 million in South Africa alone—brings in money for habitat expansion and species conservation efforts.

But those efforts haven’t stemmed the rate at which lions are dying off. Across the continent, there has been a 60 percent decline in lions over the past 30 years. Habitat loss and poaching have contributed to the demise, but hunting also plays a role, said Allgood.

Oxford University professors have also been studying the effects of big game hunting on lion populations in Zimbabwe. Of the 62 lions they tagged in the region, 24 have been shot and killed by sport hunters. Ten have died from other causes.

There were once 200,000 lions roaming Africa. Today, there are fewer than 32,000. That has prompted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to consider listing African lions as a threatened species.

The move could potentially limit the countries from which big game hunters can bring back lion trophies. Eleven countries currently allow lion hunt safaris, but new regulations would require these countries to show FWS officials that their lion populations are healthy and managed properly, and that plans are in place to conserve the species.


But listing the lion only puts a Band-Aid on a bigger issue, argues Eric Jensen, a University of Warwick professor who studies public engagement in wildlife issues.

“The problem is a long-standing association between hunting large animals and masculinity,” Jensen said. “While most Americans don’t support the activity, it still resonates with key ideas like Davy Crockett and Theodore Roosevelt. The fact that in 2015 people are still travelling thousands of miles to kill exotic animals and bring back trophies shows that there are deep-seated cultural problems in Western societies, where such behavior should be unthinkable.”

Pro-hunting advocates argue that removing the older lions like 13-year old Cecil, who are less prone to breed, is actually beneficial for species populations because it allows more vigorous and youthful cats to mate more successfully.

That was not the case with Cecil, however. Hwange National Park officials said Cecil had been muscled out of his pride five years ago by a younger, stronger male. He subsequently mounted a comeback by forming a coalition with another older male lion named Jericho. For the past 18 months, Cecil had been back in charge of two prides—one of which consists of three lionesses and seven cubs under seven months old. Without Cecil to protect them, researchers who have been studying the animal expect a new lion to come in, take out Cecil’s cubs, and start his own bloodline.

“It’s called the ripple effect,” Allgood said. “You take out a pride leader like Cecil, and in the fight for dominance, the other males kill the young cubs.”

The Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force said the $54,000 Palmer spent to kill Cecil pales in comparison to the millions of dollars the big cat would have garnered in tourist dollars over the course of his life.

In a report to be released by the International Fund for Animal Welfare, researchers calculated the value of a live elephant by viewing camps, safaris, and photo tours in Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, and South Africa, where elephants drive a growing regional ecotourism industry.
“When viewed through the ‘nonconsumptive lens’ of tourism, the report estimates a single elephant can contribute $22,966 per year to the local economy, and that grows to $1.6 million during a 70-year lifespan,” Allgood said.

Compare that to the average cost of an elephant hunt at around $20,000. The disconnect between the true conservation value of hunting animals, and the true conservation value of actually conserving animals is part of the systematic problem Jensen says will take more than one dead famous lion to turn around.

“Most likely the outrage will just die out,” Jensen said. “This [trophy hunting] is a multifaceted problem requiring some fundamental changes to actually make a difference. The crucial turning point will be if this is seen as a symbol of a much larger problem, as it is.”

And that turning point could be coming sooner than later.

Even the Professional Hunters’ Association of South Africa is seeing the writing on the wall, sending out an email to its members that it should reconsider its position on lion hunting—especially captive bred lion hunts known as “canned hunting.”

“From my dealings with the media and the community, it has become clear to me that those against the hunting of lions bred in captivity are no longer just a small if vociferous group of animal-rights activists,” said PHASA president Hermann Meyeridricks in a statement. “The tide of public opinion is turning strongly against this form of hunting, however it is termed. Even within our own ranks, as well as in the hunting fraternity as a whole, respected voices are speaking out publicly against it.

“I have come to believe that, as it stands, our position on lion hunting is no longer tenable,” Meyeridricks said.

International airlines like Air France and Emirates have announced blanket bans for transporting hunting trophies of elephant, rhinoceros, lions, and tigers on their flights. And South African Airways, the largest airline on the continent, banned, and then was pressured into reversing its ban on trophy transport as well.
http://www.takepart.com/article/2015/07/29/big-game-hunters-and-cecil-lion

[video=youtube;hUeDrUOmHvw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUeDrUOmHvw[/video]

I don´t know how much it costs to go on safari but with a quite social lion like Cecil I think tourists were willing to pay quite a lot.
Hunters pay more to kill the animals but there are more tourists than hunters , I can believe Cecil was worth lot´s of money as a touristattraction.

I think I read something about the man who kllled Cecil got a rifle when he was 5 years old.
I don´t know about the other Americans hunting in Africa I just thought with another weapon policy it might be different with trophy hunting
 
Last edited:
Why is this case special? Because the lion had a name?

Why Cecil the Lion Was So Popular With People
"Large, powerful, but regal,"
Cecil was known for being comfortable around humans—and simply for having a name, say those that knew him.

For more than a decade, visitors to Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park would notice that one lion stood out from the rest—an enormous male with a long, shaggy black mane. The lion so endeared himself to tourists that he was given a name: Cecil.
These days, following the international uproar over his killing death, you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who hasn't heard of Cecil.

But lions have been killed by trophy hunters before and surely will be again.
So what was it about Cecil that struck a chord with the international community?

"Cecil was the ultimate lion," says Brent Stapelkamp, a field researcher with Oxford University's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), who knew Cecil perhaps better than anyone else."He was everything that a lion represents to us as humans," Stapelkamp says. "He was large, powerful, but regal at the same time."

And Cecil was close to humans, too. Stapelkamp has been studying the lion since 2008, and Cecil and his pride had been part of an ongoing research project with Oxford since 1999.

Indeed, part of what made Cecil such a favorite among tourists on safari was the way he became accustomed to people.
Stapelkamp says Cecil would allow vehicles to get close to him, sometimes within just 30 feet (about 10 meters), "which made photography and research very easy."

Inside a Lion Pride

Stapelkamp once found Cecil and around 20 other lions from his pride feeding on the carcass of an elephant. It was a banner day for observation, and he remembers taking over 500 photos.
"He was receiving a lot of attention from both his females and his cubs," Stapelkamp remembers. (See "Opinion: Why Are We Still Hunting Lions?")

"He later fell asleep on the carcass with his head on the elephant's chest while the rest shared the meal."

Cecil wasn't just a good photo op.

"The collaring of lions like Cecil have given us a vast amount of knowledge about lions and their behavior in the environment," says Stapelkamp.

For instance, tracking the lions of Hwange National Park revealed that some of the animals range over long distances—even swimming across rivers that get in the way.

Stapelkamp says one of the WildCRU-collared lions traveled around 150 miles (240 kilometers) from Hwange National Park to the city of Livingstone, across the border in Zambia. It seems the lion attempted to swim across the Zambezi River, which is notorious for its whitewater rapids.
"He was washed 400 meters [nearly a quarter mile] downstream before he could get out," says Stapelkamp. (See National Geographic's lion pictures.)

By studying these animals, WildCRU hopes to better understand the threats they face in the wild and learn how to mitigate them.

WildCRU also runs an anti-poaching team, a local conservation-themed theater group, and an education campaign that targets schoolchildren.

The Oxford project also works with local farmers to find ways to coexist with lions, and partners with Long ******* Lion Guardians, a program led by Stapelkamp to lessen conflicts between people and lions.

Tourism Draw

Luke Dollar, program director for National Geographic's Big Cats Initiative, says he remembers Cecil for the sheer fact that he had a name, which was unusual.

When animals become well known to people, as Cecil did, it "becomes easier to relate to them and communicate their tales, which creates an additional draw for tourism and human interest," Dollar says.

Lions are at the top of every safari tourist's wish list, and Cecil's iconic status alone probably helped generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in tourism each year.

Even in death, Cecil's impact on global big cat conservation cannot be underestimated, he notes. (See "Can Lion Trophy Hunting Support Conservation?")

But "one of my greatest fears is that, in light of recent events, would-be visitors and ecotourists might refrain from visiting Zimbabwe or other African countries and parks where big cats are also readily seen," says Dollar.

"Doing so would cause an even greater loss of economic justifications for protection of wildlife."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/150730-cecil-lion-africa-hunting-science-animals/
 
MIST;4102360 said:
Why Cecil the Lion Was So Popular With People
"Large, powerful, but regal,"
Cecil was known for being comfortable around humans—and simply for having a name, say those that knew him.

For more than a decade, visitors to Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park would notice that one lion stood out from the rest—an enormous male with a long, shaggy black mane. The lion so endeared himself to tourists that he was given a name: Cecil.
These days, following the international uproar over his killing death, you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who hasn't heard of Cecil.

But lions have been killed by trophy hunters before and surely will be again.
So what was it about Cecil that struck a chord with the international community?

"Cecil was the ultimate lion," says Brent Stapelkamp, a field researcher with Oxford University's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), who knew Cecil perhaps better than anyone else."He was everything that a lion represents to us as humans," Stapelkamp says. "He was large, powerful, but regal at the same time."

And Cecil was close to humans, too. Stapelkamp has been studying the lion since 2008, and Cecil and his pride had been part of an ongoing research project with Oxford since 1999.

Indeed, part of what made Cecil such a favorite among tourists on safari was the way he became accustomed to people.
Stapelkamp says Cecil would allow vehicles to get close to him, sometimes within just 30 feet (about 10 meters), "which made photography and research very easy."

Inside a Lion Pride

Stapelkamp once found Cecil and around 20 other lions from his pride feeding on the carcass of an elephant. It was a banner day for observation, and he remembers taking over 500 photos.
"He was receiving a lot of attention from both his females and his cubs," Stapelkamp remembers. (See "Opinion: Why Are We Still Hunting Lions?")

"He later fell asleep on the carcass with his head on the elephant's chest while the rest shared the meal."

Cecil wasn't just a good photo op.

"The collaring of lions like Cecil have given us a vast amount of knowledge about lions and their behavior in the environment," says Stapelkamp.

For instance, tracking the lions of Hwange National Park revealed that some of the animals range over long distances—even swimming across rivers that get in the way.

Stapelkamp says one of the WildCRU-collared lions traveled around 150 miles (240 kilometers) from Hwange National Park to the city of Livingstone, across the border in Zambia. It seems the lion attempted to swim across the Zambezi River, which is notorious for its whitewater rapids.
"He was washed 400 meters [nearly a quarter mile] downstream before he could get out," says Stapelkamp. (See National Geographic's lion pictures.)

By studying these animals, WildCRU hopes to better understand the threats they face in the wild and learn how to mitigate them.

WildCRU also runs an anti-poaching team, a local conservation-themed theater group, and an education campaign that targets schoolchildren.

The Oxford project also works with local farmers to find ways to coexist with lions, and partners with Long ******* Lion Guardians, a program led by Stapelkamp to lessen conflicts between people and lions.

Tourism Draw

Luke Dollar, program director for National Geographic's Big Cats Initiative, says he remembers Cecil for the sheer fact that he had a name, which was unusual.

When animals become well known to people, as Cecil did, it "becomes easier to relate to them and communicate their tales, which creates an additional draw for tourism and human interest," Dollar says.

Lions are at the top of every safari tourist's wish list, and Cecil's iconic status alone probably helped generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in tourism each year.

Even in death, Cecil's impact on global big cat conservation cannot be underestimated, he notes. (See "Can Lion Trophy Hunting Support Conservation?")

But "one of my greatest fears is that, in light of recent events, would-be visitors and ecotourists might refrain from visiting Zimbabwe or other African countries and parks where big cats are also readily seen," says Dollar.

"Doing so would cause an even greater loss of economic justifications for protection of wildlife."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/150730-cecil-lion-africa-hunting-science-animals/


I know I´m being naive - and "money" will be the answer - but still, naive me is asking: Why can rich Europeans/Russians/... still get into (African) National Parks and trophy hunt lions (as well as other endangered animals) just for fun? Why can those people take and share disgusting trophy pictures and get away with everyting? The case of Cecil seems to be an exception because it was a well known and beloved animal and everyone knows the name of its butcher.
 
moonstruck87;4102363 said:
I know I´m being naive - and "money" will be the answer - but still, naive me is asking: Why can rich Europeans/Russians/... still get into (African) National Parks and trophy hunt lions (as well as other endangered animals) just for fun? Why can those people take and share disgusting trophy pictures and get away with everyting? The case of Cecil seems to be an exception because it was a well known and beloved animal and everyone knows the name of its butcher.

I myself cannot understand that insane killing either, and why these people are not put in to psychiatric ward to get help for their brood thirst like other serial killers, what these so called hunter really are?

It is not just a rich European/Russian, but it is mostly rich American's as they make 70% of hunters travelling to Africa to kill animals for trophies.
Quote from one article I found:
"Of 600 permits to kill lions in all of Africa in 2012, 566 were bought by Americans."

In your earlier post you asked why this case is different than others, was it because Cecil was named?
I think this case got international media attention because it showed disgusting behaviour from this so called "human", and even more because media got his name and face to put in their articles.

There has been similar news that went international and those animals didn't have names.
Do you remember this:
http://www.thejournal.ie/hunter-giraffe-ricky-gervais-2051223-Apr2015/
or this one:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...one-of-africas-rare-black-rhinos-9054250.html
and then there was this awful thing that happened in Danish zoo (that giraffe had name, but that wasn't the reason it got media attention).

I think it is more to do with that in these cases media has name and face to put in their articles, whereas if there is an article of nameless/faceless poacher, people have no one to direct their anger or disgust at.

From article Mist posted earlier:
The fact that in 2015 people are still travelling thousands of miles to kill exotic animals and bring back trophies shows that there are deep-seated cultural problems in Western societies, where such behavior should be unthinkable.”

Many things have changed during the decades and centuries, and humans don't do things that were acceptable back in time. Hunting like those people do, was acceptable back in the day, but not anymore. Some people have adapted the changes over the time, but there are some people stuck in the past, and here is one disgusting individual
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-killing-old-giraffe-warns-haters-s-come.html

The more I read these thing, the more angrier I get. Why people with tons of money get their way and are allowed to kill as they pleases, and because they get what they want, many animals are extinct or endangered? The more endangered animal, the more desirable trophy it becomes to these serial killers.
 
What Cecil the lion's death can teach us about empathy

Zimbabwe's much-loved lion — Cecil — was lured from national park lands and shot dead by a trophy hunter earlier this month. His story is making global headlines. But why this lion?

The tragic death of one of Zimbabwe's most loved lions — Cecil — has sparked global outrage. And understandably so. It's hard to fathom why anyone would want to shoot and kill such an incredible animal. The American dentist who hunted and shot Cecil with a bow and arrow, reportedly paid $55,000 for a permit to kill a lion. Reports say that Cecil was lured from the protection of the Hwange National Park and then killed. It's illegal to hunt within the National Park.

Cecil's death is undeniably devastating. But it begs the question — would this story even be told if it had been any other lion who was shot? Approximately 600 lions are killed every year on trophy hunts. In a statement, the hunter who killed Cecil said:

"I deeply regret that my pursuit of an activity I love and practice responsibly and legally resulted in the taking of this lion"

This lion.

Had he shot any other lion (or any other animal) we might never have heard about it. But Cecil had a name. He had a personality. He was loved.

Does having a name make Cecil's life more valuable? All lions have unique personalities. They have loved ones. They may have cubs, like Cecil did. But their deaths would not make global headlines.

Rightly or wrongly, it is an undeniable trait of human nature that we care more about those we know than about those we barely know. With Cecil, we see on a global scale that even by simply knowing an animal by name, we feel more connected to him. We understand that he is a someone.

But what if we could expand our compassion to the animals who we don't know?

What if — as that trophy hunter squared ‘another unfamiliar lion’ in his sights — he recognised that when it comes to how lions value their own lives — every lion is Cecil?

Our tendency to favour the interests of those we are most familiar with over those we don't know might feel ‘normal’. But when it comes to deciding what is fair and just, familiarity can be like waving a magnet in front of our moral compass.

Would Cecil's final moments have been any easier if he hadn't been famous? Perhaps for us — because sometimes compassion hurts. But they wouldn't have been any easier for Cecil. And it wouldn’t have been any less wrong.

If you agree with that then you’ll agree that this is a clear ethical argument for ending trophy hunting of all animals. But it's also more than that.

The truth is, closing our eyes won’t ease another’s pain — it only ******* us from sharing it — and prevents us from stopping it.

The world was understandably outraged that Cecil's life was cut short. Most would agree that his life was more valuable to him than that single moment of pleasure was for the hunter. How can the two be compared?

There is predictably similar outrage at the thought of eating dogs in some parts of the world. Surely a moment's culinary pleasure can't possibly justify slitting the throat of a someone like Lassie. Perhaps, if only they knew dogs like we do, they would recoil at the idea, too...

Where does that leave the animals we don't know — who remain unnamed and unfamiliar to us? If we got to know them, might we recoil at the way they are treated, too?

In parts of India where cows are sacred, people cannot fathom how we in Australia could turn these gentle-natured and curious animals into burger patties.

Then there are pigs — most often encountered in the supermarket deli — who can also make remarkable pets. People who’ve had the fortune to adopt pigs come to see these intelligent, social animals as friends, even family — and recoil at factory farming, or eating them. After all, they wag their tails when happy, will respond to their own name and can be very affectionate.

Animal industries know that we’d lose our lunch if we were told that the sausage on our plate was once an individual named ‘Margaret’, who was withdrawn and a bit shy, but dearly loved her babies. Animals in factory farms don’t have names. They are numbers. But they are no less unique individuals.

This lion mattered. Cecil's death mattered. Not because we knew his name, but because every individual’s life and dignity matters.

So is a world where we extend our compassion to those we don't know — human and animal — possible? Yes! Compassion is like a muscle — when we exercise it, it gets stronger. And strength in numbers can transform entire traditions, and industries, and most importantly, lives.

Every day we make choices about how we treat individuals who we will never meet — from what we wear, to what we buy, and most especially what we eat. To create a kinder world, we need only harness the power of our everyday choices to transform the lives of animals for the better. And we can start today.

http://www.animalsaustralia.org/features/cecil-the-lion-killed-in-zimbabwe.php?ua_s=e-mail
People were relieved that Cecil´s partner Jericho wasn´t killed, but another lion was killed.
A lion with no name, perhaps he or she had cubs-hunters don´t care if cubs lose protection from their parents.
About 600 lions are killed by trophyhunters every year but noone knows how many cubs dies because of it.
 
A few days ago, I posted about the killing of Cecil the lion and my concern that at least one organization was trying to quell people’s outrage: https://goo.gl/K8pkp
While most people shared my concern, a few felt it was all too much, saying that it was “embarrassing that this lion gets so much publicity” when “human suffering doesn't.” One example given was that 1,200 people were killed in Syria since Cecil’s death and that has been “largely ignored.” I disagree with the notion that the amount of press the killing of Cecil is getting is out of proportion and that we ignore human suffering.

When an earthquake devastated Haiti, not only did human suffering dominate the news, we donated half a billion dollars to help them. It seems the complaint shouldn’t be that it is “embarrassing” that people are so outraged about Cecil, it should be that the news industry tends to focus on unique events that cause suffering—an Earthquake in Haiti, for example—rather than structural suffering or suffering that is sustained (continued civil war in Syria).
In addition, there are multitudes of ways that billions of animals are made to suffer every day, and none of these things is regularly on the news. Moreover, Cecil is representative of a larger issue—"big game" hunting—and his killing, given the response of outrage and how that has been expressed such as the shutting down of the hunter’s dental office, is most certainly news.

More to the point, the argument suggests that caring about animals and being outraged over the killing of Cecil somehow detracts from our concern about people. This is a misanthropic view of humanity which suggests that compassion and empathy are in limited supply and must be doled out in a miserly fashion rather than felt as need demands. It also suggests a myopic view of how change in the world occurs.

History reveals that social progress does not occur in a steady, linear fashion. Often, the most groundbreaking change occurs in response to tragic events which throw an issue into stark relief, and thereby give us an opportunity to define as a people what it is we stand for, as well as what it is we don’t. It is often the story of the individual that brings attention to a fate suffered by the many—events such as Rosa Parks being arrested for refusing to give up her seat, the killing of Matthew Shepard, or in this case, the killing of an old lion who was lured off a preserve and forced to endure days of suffering before his life was cruelly taken.
Cecil’s death has produced a loud and determined call to end “big game” hunting. To the extent that we don’t continue to express our outrage for as long as we can in the hopes of making profound changes for lions and other animals, that opportunity might be lost, the issue might sink back into obscurity and other animals will continue to suffer Cecil’s fate. How would that outcome serve humanity?

Sadly, we cannot bring Cecil back. And we will remember his killing as many things: tragic and heartbreaking, chief among them. Nothing can alter that calculus. But we can lessen the futility of his death if we learn from it, and alter our society in such a way as to prevent such a betrayal from ever happening again. We can’t let that opportunity pass in deference to the false notion that it somehow takes away from the compassion we owe to humans who are also suffering. Compassion is simply not limited, nor zero sum.

Lastly, there is not a victory in the moral enlightenment of humanity in which some people who did not share the newer, more encompassing ethic did not lament the amount of attention that was paid to that issue because they regarded it as less important than others. That is to say, prejudice is often, in its day, seen as a virtue. It is exactly the attitude that Cecil’s suffering is somehow less important that enabled the tragedy that befell him.
If some people do not want the plight of animals at the hands of some humans to dominate the news and public concern, then they should wish for a world where such outcomes are no longer permitted.
As for me, I find the fact that people are bemoaning expressions of empathy and compassion entirely counterproductive to the cause not just of animals, but of people, too.
Love, however it manifests itself, should always be welcomed as it can only make our world a kinder, gentler place filled with people who are intolerant of cruelty and violence.
https://www.facebook.com/nathanwinograd/posts/1014988961858681:0[/B]

It´s a quite common question; Why are you helping cats when there are people suffering?
If You Care Enough
For The Living
Make A Better Place

You can try to make a better place for both animals and humans,
Love should always be welcome
 
It´s World Lion Day today

In celebration of the world's most iconic species and the King of all Beasts - The Lion.

World Lion Day is the first annual campaign to raise much needed conservation awareness for the 'Vulnerable' African lion and 'Endangered' Asiatic lion.

The lion is an enduring symbol across the nations and has fascinated man throughout the millennia. To lose such a species would be to lose a significant part of our global heritage.

Join us in saving this magnificent species and unite those across the world in recognising their importance to us culturally, symbolically, economically and biologically.

'Saving the King of Beasts to Save Ourselves'

info@worldlionday.com

Beautiful lions
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...ing-the-King-of-the-Jungle.html?frame=3403372
 
Back
Top