whilst I respect your opinion on this new album to be coming soon I can not help but disagree with you, I've always felt, being called a new album it should have as many later Song's as possible (earliest being from 1994) but most of the time I would hope for Song's from 1998 to 2009! most of the other Song's would have more than likely been considered for anniversary releases anyway as they're so close to Michael's earlier studio albums. I personally think there is most definitely enough material from 1998-2009 to fill upset least another album after this one is showcased, maybe even two more! it has already been said that Michael over recorded for all of his albums and invincible was no different! his later voice gives us an insight into what his future records would have sounded like if he was still here! the similarity between his vocals on invincible and on hold my hand/best of joy is almost exactly the same! but compare that to Song's such as Love Never Fet So Good for example, he was still growing then! fair enough in 1989/90' being 32 his voice matured a lot but there is still a huge difference especially comparing Gone too soon with Don't walk away! all I'm saying is, the songs from Got to be there up to Dangerous should be left for anniversary releases. and the rest of the Song's from the invincible to the 2008-9' sessions should be on new albums. and to my petition for STTR It was originally intended to block the release of the Bieber duet . although I changed the title to release the 1989 demo to release the stand alone demo recording on iTunes as a release to give us something to listen to and adore along with the BAD25 documentary for 2013. but that time has gone now and I think the demo should be on Dangerous25. There's my thought's
back to the new album, I NEED AN ANNOUNCEMENT
:wild: haha
