The Resurrection of Michael Jackson - Music Monthly

Thank you.

I find it weird that people would defend this Matt Fiddles guy just because he is friends with the family. He said that he was MJ friend, that I doubt. He might be Tito's friend but whatever.

The picture of MJ in St. Tropez - I never seen that before. Don't tell me that is one of his children next to him. He looks tall.
Bee, That was the fake picture that the tabloids created when they ran a front page news that |MJ had a sex change. Remember that. It was fake.Bain gave a statement to deny it.:mello:
 
I don't understand some of the posts here. I liked reading the article very much. I felt it was a good, interesting and balanced piece.
 
diane is that you ??? lol fox news fair and balanced
 
Last edited:
What about all the lies that were told in the article? Were they balanced too?

Just because you may not regard something as factually accurate, does not give a person the right to label them as "lies". Sometimes things are not factually accurate, but it does not imply that there was any malicious intent. Don't be so paranoid. If you get a question wrong in a test, it doesn't mean you said a lie does it? The problem here, is that many people here do not want a balanced piece at all
 
Just because you may not regard something as factually accurate, does not give a person the right to label them as "lies". Sometimes things are not factually accurate, but it does not imply that there was any malicious intent. Don't be so paranoid. If you get a question wrong in a test, it doesn't mean you said a lie does it? The problem here, is that many people here do not want a balanced piece at all
Lies are lies. You may dress them up as you look but they are still lies. If I said I saw you making out in the park with a same sex partner last night, would you call me a liar or was I facuall inaccurate?;)
 
Lies are lies. You may dress them up as you look but they are still lies. If I said I saw you making out in the park with a same sex partner last night, would you call me a liar or was I facuall inaccurate?;)

That depends on whether you honestly thought that I was (a case of mistaken identity) and you had made reasonable attempts to verify my identity, or whether you were just "making it up". In any case, I'm also actually quite offended by the example that you used. It could be interpreted as being quite a homophobic statement, given that your tone would seem to suggest that there is something wrong with such conduct in the first place.
 
Just because you may not regard something as factually accurate, does not give a person the right to label them as "lies". Sometimes things are not factually accurate, but it does not imply that there was any malicious intent. Don't be so paranoid. If you get a question wrong in a test, it doesn't mean you said a lie does it? The problem here, is that many people here do not want a balanced piece at all
Well they seemed to have failed their journalism test. I think they should find another profession.

Tabloids lie and fabricate things on purpose. They do it to make money off of the backs of the people they are trashing. It is a piss poor way to make a living. They were dang sure malicious. Did you read the post about the source of the supposed photo of Michael in the Aba? That Bain refuted it? The whole first 2/3 of the article is one lie after the other. That wasn't a question on a test, it was the whole test.
 
That depends on whether you honestly thought that I was (a case of mistaken identity) and you had made reasonable attempts to verify my identity, or whether you were just "making it up". In any case, I'm also actually quite offended by the example that you used. It could be interpreted as being quite a homophobic statement, given that your tone would seem to suggest that there is something wrong with such conduct in the first place.
I am glad you are offended. Now spear a thought for what Mr Jackson endures on a daily basis. What do you think writing an article about MJ dressing up in woman's clothing and having a sex change is meant to do to him? Why even assume that the people was Mr Jackson? Why would this article even show the picture even though it was denied. The intent was there to deceive yet you call it fair and balanced. LIES. If they had checked DD's history they would see that she had a history of lying about MJ, yet they couldn't be bothered. They had no intention of getting at the truth. LIES.:huh:
 
Last edited:
While reading Elizabeth Day's writeup, I kept seeing flashes of Schaffel in my mind. How he took the rights of the charity single What More Can I Give, and tried to sell it so he could pocket the money. How he took that $2mm that Michael gave him and did nothing good with it. How he took the footage of Private Home Movies and kept it for himself. How he spent a large amount of his time recording telephone discussions instead taking care of real business. How he wanted to take the car that had all the celebrities' signatures in it even though he knew it was meant to go to charity. How he said he was going to take Neverland. How he went and had those checks with large dollar amounts backdated and written out to him even though he knew he had already been fired, and that that money could have gone to the people that were still working at Neverland.

Much of Michael's money problems stemmed from this type of underhanded stuff that was being done.

I guess Elizabeth Day has selective memory.

Have you guys notices how well things are going now that Schaffel and the other crooks are gone? Things are going way better. Things are now working as they should be.
 
Last edited:
I am glad you are offended. Now spear a thought for what Mr Jackson endures on a daily basis.

I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't offended by the suggestion that I was engaging in the above mentioned conduct with a person of the same sex as myself, but rather that your thought of two same sex individuals engaging in such conduct is somehow scandalous. I'm offended by what appears to be your homophobic attitude. Such comments have no place in this forum.
 
mmmmm...... It's just an article..... Let it pass....

People are soo tense these days... relax! In the end it will be good!
 
Last edited:
think you misunderstood me. I wasn't offended by the suggestion that I was engaging in the above mentioned conduct with a person of the same sex as myself, but rather that your thought of two same sex individuals engaging in such conduct is somehow scandalous. I'm offended by what appears to be your homophobic attitude. Such comments have no place in this forum

its called an example lol
 
I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't offended by the suggestion that I was engaging in the above mentioned conduct with a person of the same sex as myself, but rather that your thought of two same sex individuals engaging in such conduct is somehow scandalous. I'm offended by what appears to be your homophobic attitude. Such comments have no place in this forum.
I wonder why you should be offended by my example of your homosexual engagement, yet not be offended that I said your were engaging someone in an OPEN park. maybe it is you who are homophobic? Look in the mirror.
At the same time, try and think of how the LIES may be affecting MJ and also the unobjective people who believe the LIES, Not fair and balanced at all:(
 
I wonder why you should be offended by my example of your homosexual engagement, yet not be offended that I said your were engaging someone in an OPEN park. maybe it is you who are homophobic? Look in the mirror.

Because making out often is just used to describe kissing, and I don't think there is any problem with that. FYI last time I looked in the mirror, I was definitely not homophobic. I'm not prepared to argue with you further, though I think you should have just apologised much earlier for your comment rather than trying to always deflect the issue. Please refer to point one of the forum rules.
 
Last edited:
That article wasn't informative in the least bit...infact it hardly had much of information on a comeback, it threw in a bit of will.i.am mentionings including the talks with O2 aside from that the piece drew reference to useless financial info they classed as excessive spending, compulsive buying, colour of skin, etc etc.

I wouldn't call it a horribly distorted article though they quoted the usual hazy sources (Fiddes) perhaps the only exception to that being Peter Lopez but still I didn't see anyhting interesting in it.
 
the picture isnt of mj or any of his kids. it was aset up in the U.S/ uk press. they plastered it all over the front pages claiming it was mj when itwas clearly not. bain released a statement about it

Really? Damn. I did not know that. Thanks for that information. That is insane ish. LOL. No wonder, because his child cannot be that tall. LOL.

That just tells you about the media of today : trash.
 
Because making out often is just used to describe kissing, and I don't think there is any problem with that. FYI last time I looked in the mirror, I was definitely not homophobic. I'm not prepared to argue with you further, though I think you should have just apologised much earlier for your comment rather than trying to always deflect the issue. Please refer to point one of the forum rules.
Oh, so you want an apology for my comment, but Michael Jackson must accept anything that is written about him as 'fair and balanced'. This is very interestimg. I suppose Mj should just grin and bare it, cause he is considered to be lower than us human. We can feel pain and feel hurt and offended but he can't. Man in the mirror,:(
 
Last edited:
Just because you may not regard something as factually accurate, does not give a person the right to label them as "lies". Sometimes things are not factually accurate, but it does not imply that there was any malicious intent. Don't be so paranoid. If you get a question wrong in a test, it doesn't mean you said a lie does it? The problem here, is that many people here do not want a balanced piece at all
after all the malicious stuff thrown at MJ, how can you say that?

actually the fans are behaving quite well, considering the history of the press and MJ.

so i think 'balance' has a new meaning when it comes to MJ.

it's only right that fans are wary. the press' relationship with MJ is unprecedented. it has been MOSTLY against MJ for YEARS. i am certain that if you were subjected to that kind of imbalance for years, you would not take it very well either.

why does MJ have to be held to a different standard than everybody else when it comes to being verbally attacked, over the course of many years?
 
Last edited:
I don't understand some of the posts here. I liked reading the article very much. I felt it was a good, interesting and balanced piece.

Well, Imma be real, I do not understand your posts. That article was a waste of paper. The paper should be recycled. There was nothing balanced about that article. Once Diane Demon was mentioned, the article went to hell. On top of that, these clowns posted a fake picture of MJ and some kid. Just pathetic.

BTW, what is the e-mail address of the writer of this article?

Have you guys notices how well things are going now that Schaffel and the other crooks are gone? Things are going way better. Things are now working as they should be.

I have noticed that as well. Things are going good for Team MJ and here comes this crack "journalist" doing an trash article on MJ. Pathetic. As usual. on point, AllforMJ.
 
Well, Imma be real, I do not understand your posts. That article was a waste of paper. The paper should be recycled. There was nothing balanced about that article. Once Diane Demon was mentioned, the article went to hell. On top of that, these clowns posted a fake picture of MJ and some kid. Just pathetic.

BTW, what is the e-mail address of the writer of this article?



I have noticed that as well. Things are going good for Team MJ and here comes this crack "journalist" doing an trash article on MJ. Pathetic. As usual. on point, AllforMJ.

and this is why that idiot journo does not like MJ's new team....becuz they are not feeding him his crumps....his stories are wishy washy & fantasy because he has to piece together from past employees and the receptionist/admins..secondary workers for companies Michael might be dealing with...he has to work extra for that :bs he prints..

anyone related to MJ that - that journo likes is the one feeding him info...you can bank on that...

and one day it will come to light who the person is that's been lining his pockets to do this for the last 8years..
 
fans just get tired of ppl acting like media whores and using their "relationships" with mj as a way of getting themselves free publicity at every oppotunity.same ole.with most real friends, fans dont even know they excist or arnt aware for along time because their friendship is purely that and they dont use it every chance they get in order to get publicity for themself or their business.mark lester for eg

Matt Fiddes has no reason to use MJ as publicity, he is hugely successful in both his martial arts and property business, surely the fact he has bodyguarded MJ in the past and Jackson family members regularly visit him points towards a friendship.

Thank you.

I find it weird that people would defend this Matt Fiddles guy just because he is friends with the family. He said that he was MJ friend, that I doubt. He might be Tito's friend but whatever.

The picture of MJ in St. Tropez - I never seen that before. Don't tell me that is one of his children next to him. He looks tall.

Why do you doubt he is his friends with MJ, there is more proof showing that they are friends than proving that they aren't.

I don't see anything wrong with Matt. He's always said great things about Michael. I don't think he's mooching, especially if what you say is true Xscape, about them being friends.

What im saying is true, they have been friends for years.
 
Surely the relationship Matt Fiddes has with the rest of the Jacksons speaks for itself. He's been MJs bodyguard before too... why do people doubt him so much. I think a lot of fans just get jealous when someone relatively "Normal"... and "every day" gets close to the jacksons...
 
And, also... i dont see why people jump on this and automatically assume Fiddes talks bull. This isn't as though he's dissing Michael or something. Why do people automatically sit on the negative side of the couch?
 
Matt Fiddes has no reason to use MJ as publicity, he is hugely successful in both his martial arts and property business, surely the fact he has bodyguarded MJ in the past and Jackson family members regularly visit him points towards a friendship.

well ive seen him crop us constantly lately giving interviews to the press about his "relationship" with mj . imho its no coincedence. as i said real friends such as mark lester dont go to the press every two minutes giving interviews and talking about his "friendship" he may have a business etc but no one knows who he is outside of his own neighbourhood so not sure why that matters.

surely the fact he has bodyguarded MJ in the past

not really.he worked for uri geller for a few days back in 02 cause of the whole exeter thing.never worked for mj again on his trips.

like i said alot of fans have issues with ppl who claim things in releation to mj when if they were real friends they wouldnt be giving interviews in order to promote themselves every 2 minutes.its the old rifing on coat tails and using their 15 mins of fame for the next 10 years.

Why do you doubt he is his friends with MJ, there is more proof showing that they are friends than proving that they aren't.

other than his work in 02 there is no evidence that the relationship extended from there. ppl doubt because theres no evidence other than him working for mj because of geller back in 92 for a couple of days or so. you cant blame ppl cause its not exactly rare for ppl to use mj for their own ends
 
Last edited:
The first article I ever read about Matt sugested that he was a volunteer body guard for about 2 days. There was never any evidence that he was an official body guard or that he was friend with MJ. He has met MJ doesn't make him friends with MJ. We know that he has met with Jermaine and Tito, but they were invited down to speak to school children about bullying. That doesn't add up to friendship either There is no evidence that MJ has been to Devon. I doubt that Devon would not have known about this visit, esp when matt told them that he was going to invite MJ down, but he never did. Of course he is going to say nice things about MJ, but to be honest, I am uneasy about how often his name has been mentioned in the papers in connection to MJ, It is almost as if he has become MJ's spokes person.
 
Last edited:
The first article I ever read about Matt sugested that he was a volunteer body guard for about 2 days

basically yes because of his friendship with geller.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top