bubbyduck4MJ
Proud Member
Re: Regarding the Coroner's Report...
Is the report on here somewhere?
Is the report on here somewhere?
Let's hope the 2nd Autopsy is shown to the public to be more positive however I have a funny feeling the Autopsy photos are going to be made public very soon.
Let's hope the 2nd Autopsy is shown to the public to be more positive however I have a funny feeling the Autopsy photos are going to be made public very soon.
I am scared to read it...
I just read what the other fans have summarized because I feel physically ill just thinking about it.
From what I have read from other users, Michael was healthy despite his other illnesses such as vitiligo and lupus! His death was so avoidable...
I feel numb....
Is the report on here somewhere?
Let's hope the 2nd Autopsy is shown to the public to be more positive however I have a funny feeling the Autopsy photos are going to be made public very soon.
For years they called him a pedophile, and after the execution of over 100 search warrants, nothing could be found to prove it.
For years they called him a drug addict, and now here is an autopsy report that proves that he wasn't.
They started saying he could no longer sing, and "This Is It" has proven that he still could. This type of stuff just went on and on and on.
They made him live a life of total scrutiny and nothing that they were looking for was there to be found. NONE OF IT!!!
Now they all can go back to their miserable lives...they're own miserable SECRET lives.
Michael Jackson's final destination is Heaven.
Their final destination is Hell.
But the change is he's not here now anymore to defend himself, and that's exactly what's making me so scared of what is all to come. Ofcourse the family can jump in when these kind of things are done, but still....just like Sony can release f*cking demo's...I'm really afraid these kind of pictures will be released someday too. In a very sneaky way.Remember, they have "other pictures" of him too. From 93. Those never saw the light of day, and never will.
That's exactly what I also asked in a different thread, but apparently they can't prove that it was malicious.
But to me it does sound malicious. He made so many mistakes, I can't even see them as such.
I'm glad it says, very clearly VITILIGO. Obviously I never doubted it. I'm just glad there's proof to show the haters. Not that there is anything remotely satisfying about any of this painful process.
I've read. I feel like I am back in June 25.
Michael should still be with us enjoying his life. WHY did it happen to him OF ALL PEOPLE. I am just broken. Why did it have to happen? I want Murray rot in hell.
But it won't bring our Michael back.
After reading all the info about propofol in the report I can't understand how they could charge him with involuntary manslaughter? How is it involuntary?? He knew the risks and he ignored them and still went for it. I just don't understand this.
And yet there are some people in the media that are covering it up.
Is it standard practice to identify someone by their drivers licence? Did Michael have a current drivers license? He didnt have it with him as he was only wearing a hospital gown.
What about the reports that MJ was bald? I did not understand this, was he bald or did he have little hair left...?
Yes, he had a current one. I've seen it myself. Besides the identification was before his relatives arrived.Is it standard practice to identify someone by their drivers licence? Did Michael have a current drivers license? He didnt have it with him as he was only wearing a hospital gown.
EXACTLY. He had all the equipment there at the house which tells me he KNEW what he SHOULD have been doing. But its like he got lazy and skipped out on his responsibility. Maybe he thought he has done it heaps of times and so didnt bother with the MINIMUM level of care. The thing is anyone can google propofol and see that when doubled up with sleeping pills (like diazepam or lorazepam) that it can be fatal. And then he says he didnt give him anything that SHOULD have killed him!? PFFFFT! COME ON!
I have said before and will say again - this case is a JOKE.
Is it standard practice to identify someone by their drivers licence? Did Michael have a current drivers license? He didnt have it with him as he was only wearing a hospital gown.
Let's hope the 2nd Autopsy is shown to the public to be more positive however I have a funny feeling the Autopsy photos are going to be made public very soon.