Michael and Drugs

smoothcriminal12

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
1,850
Points
0
I realize that Michael's past history of drug use, admitted by himself in 1993, could be used by the defence for the upcoming trial...what do you guys think? How could Michael's past drug use affect the trial and how would the prosecution fight that?
 
Michael had some serious diseases and needed to take several prescription medications that CANNOT be misread as drugs.

Murray would have to proove that the medications he took were completely regardless of any illness Michael could have.

Same with insomnia. This is a serious problem and needed to be cured - by Murray btw.
 
Michael had some serious diseases and needed to take several prescription medications that CANNOT be misread as drugs.

Murray would have to proove that the medications he took were completely regardless of any illness Michael could have.

Same with insomnia. This is a serious problem and needed to be cured - by Murray btw.
exactly he had to take so many medicines for ailments he had,and also i was looking into some of the names of the drugs on google, most of them i looked at were used to treat anxiety and depression,poor michael,
 
some things are just so obvious

If you think that I am apart of Murray's team, you do not know how much I will blow up on you.

Anyways, that seems to be the hardest thing for the prosecution to get over. Many have said tho, that they've never seen Michael take drugs...

And daisy you're right about his problems. Conrad administrated the drugs without care, Michael needed them for various problems.
 
exactly he had to take so many medicines for ailments he had,and also i was looking into some of the names of the drugs on google, most of them i looked at were used to treat anxiety and depression,poor michael,

Exactly, and if you want to be serious at court, you cannot just generally argue as some tabloids - Michael was an addict - no you need to PROOVE it.
And not about 1993 but about recent health history.
Murray would have to then, actually, present his own history of "healing" Michael and I am not sure whether that would work good for him.
 
I am hoping the prosecution throw out every bad and untrue thing they heard about Michael and look at the evidence and work from there. I want them to see him as David in the suburbs single father taking care of his kids and working hard. Then maybe they will seek true justice.
 
Exactly, and if you want to be serious at court, you cannot just generally argue as some tabloids - Michael was an addict - no you need to PROOVE it.
And not about 1993 but about recent health history.
Murray would have to then, actually, present his own history of "healing" Michael and I am not sure whether that would work good for him.

True...if Michael had a history of drug use, it does not mean that Murray has to go and kill him...and I doubt that Michael was even involved with drugs anyways.
 
Exactly, and if you want to be serious at court, you cannot just generally argue as some tabloids - Michael was an addict - no you need to PROOVE it.
And not about 1993 but about recent health history.
Murray would have to then, actually, present his own history of "healing" Michael and I am not sure whether that would work good for him.


And what about this?

Michael practised meditation and there were proofs he was working with it during last rehearsals.

003.jpg




He wore brancelet with 108 pearls on his left hand.
The brancalet makes the proces of meditation easier.


Tibet Tribal Jewerly 108 jade Prayer Beads Necklace


http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/277495063/Tibet_Tribal_Jewelry_108_jade_Prayer.html


I don't know if it's correct. But if it's the case, I find it inconsistent - meditation in order to relax and raise oneself consciousness and the drama at home with background of such strong medicaments. It doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
I think the search warrants and the autopsy report speak volumes here. His drug addiction in 1993 for which he sought treatment was to pain killers. There was no pain medication found in his residence or in his system at autopsy, pending some results wich were not included in the autopsy report, so anyone trying to make such a claim will be blasted. Besides it bears no relevance to the fact that he was kiled because of the benzodiazepines and the propofol, administered to him by Dr Conrad Murray.
So in my opinion anyway, this strategy will not work!

The anti-anxiety meds were quite a few and then it becomes important to know as of when he was prescribed these meds, some of them highly addictive, and what was the underlying reason for needing to take anti-anxiety meds ?

The best would be if the defense can show that the anxiiety meds intake or prescriptions started/increased the same time the tour was decided upon or start of rehearsals. My point being that there was a REASON for him to take these meds, and it wasn't to get high or anything like that.
 
I prefer not to answer to your question.
Although my opinion is set,I would rather keep it private for safety reasons.
I wouldn't want to give Murray' s defense any arguments.I know they are all over the boards to try to spot whatever could be of use to them.
 
I prefer not to answer to your question.
Although my opinion is set,I would rather keep it private for safety reasons.
I wouldn't want to give Murray' s defense any arguments.I know they are all over the boards to try to spot whatever could be of use to them.
you are right,there will be people from murrays defence lurking the forum,so we,ve got to be careful what we discuss,
 
They also still have to take into consideration that MJ also had no major organ damage; which is cause by taking alot of drugs. If he was hooked on stuff like that since 93 then his body would have been jacked. Your liver is shot if you take too many Tylenol.

I believe that those docs did try to give MJ alot of meds but I don't think he took them all the time or as directed. Prob only took stuff when he did not feel well. I don't think he took everything as prescribed when giving it to them. Shoot! also so many bad people were working for MJ. Who's to say those med's that were under different names were actually MJ himself? Often alot of times..people made business decisions he did not know about. they prob used him for that as well.
 
I don't know if it's correct. But if it's the case, I find it inconsistent - meditation in order to relax and raise oneself consciousness and the drama at home with background of such strong medicaments. It doesn't make sense.


People meditate for different purposes.
 
I agree, and I didn't put it as a proof, but it seems still so incredible seeing Michael taking so huge risk...otherwise, I don't believe he had acted that way, and many facts are more and more obvious to me.
 
I agree, and I didn't put it as a proof, but it seems still so incredible seeing Michael taking so huge risk...otherwise, I don't believe he had acted that way, and many facts are more and more obvious to me.

Yes, I would see that as an example of showing that Michael was not solving his problems by medications (but: by meditations lol).
 
Back
Top