Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / Trial date April 2, 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Of course they were bluetopez, that's why the family have absolutely no credibility. Janet was talking about conference calls with her brothers but they were waiting for one member and he was on the fence because he wanted to do his own thing. This was in 2008.. We all know she was talking about MJ. So they were all willing for their 'sick and addicted' brother to go on the ALLGOOD family reunion tour with them but for AEG he wasn't well enough? Mind you in 2008 I guess after MJ said no, Janet went on her own rockwitchu tour which she cancelled kind of early due to 'vertigo'

:agree:^Yep, I remember all that! By the way when Janet said on LKL that one family member is on the fence, Larry did ask her if it was MJ and she answered Yes!

But, at the same time I have no idea why MJ told TMZ camera's in 09 that YES, he was gonna tour with his family when they ask him!?:scratch:

Did he changed his mind?

Which is even more confusing for the family to say he was not healthy for "This is it!" But, was okay with him touring with them after all!

Seriously...WTH? :mello:
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I wonder the same thing if MJ was so sick for this is it then why was Katherine taking 1 million dollar bribe to get MJ to sign all goods contract for him to tour with the brother?
Lenard Rowe say it in his book, and when MJ turn them down janet was mad at him.
I don't see how the family can blame every one but them self, they were hounding MJ to tour like AEG too.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I wonder the same thing if MJ was so sick for this is it then why was Katherine taking 1 million dollar bribe to get MJ to sign all goods contract for him to tour with the brother?
Lenard Rowe say it in his book, and when MJ turn them down janet was mad at him.
I don't see how the family can blame every one but them self, they were hounding MJ to tour like AEG too.

Oh so Rowe admits that he and Joe were asking Katherine to make MJ sign the contracts? And in return Katherine was going to get 1 million dollars? Oh I knew Katherine was there to pressure MJ.. She was always pressuring MJ to get him to do things to help his brothers. Well that's why she needs so much money now to take care of them. Katherine along with Joe share a lot of blame as to what happened to MJ.

If he couldn't sleep they were partly the reason why he couldn't sleep. They should feel very guilty.

I also see why Janet has been very nasty towards MJ since his death. She wanted him to tour for her own good as well. She was using him too. If Janet thought her brother was sick and ill and she was trying to intervene then why would she pressure him to tour?
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Oh so Rowe admits that he and Joe were asking Katherine to make MJ sign the contracts? And in return Katherine was going to get 1 million dollars? Oh I knew Katherine was there to pressure MJ.. She was always pressuring MJ to get him to do things to help his brothers. Well that's why she needs so much money now to take care of them. Katherine along with Joe share a lot of blame as to what happened to MJ.

If he couldn't sleep they were partly the reason why he couldn't sleep. They should feel very guilty.

I also see why Janet has been very nasty towards MJ since his death. She wanted him to tour for her own good as well. She was using him too. If Janet thought her brother was sick and ill and she was trying to intervene then why would she pressure him to tour?
of course, katherine was always the one pressuring mj, she has been pressuring him for 30 years. and she was always getting some kind of $$ in order to make him do something.
those jacksons knew katherine was his weak point and they werent ashamed to exploit this again and again,. katherine including,
thanks god they dont get anything. Im really looking forward to what happens to these ppl in say 10-20 years. who will be there to leech upon then?
no one, my advice to all of them is, get a paying job and live within ur means, or else welfare will become ur future. And I for one, don't want to see this distinguished family end up like that.
 
Last edited:
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

of course, katherine was always the one pressuring mj, she has been pressuring him for 30 years. and she was always getting some kind of $$ in order to make him do something.
those jacksons knew katherine was his weak point and they werent ashamed to exploit this again and again,. katherine including,
thanks god they dont get anything. Im really looking forward to what happens to these ppl in say 10-20 years. who will be there to leech upon then?
no one, my advice to all of them is, get a paying job and live within ur means, or else welfare will become ur future. And I for one, don't want to see this distinguished family end up like that.

I seriously wonder if Katherine even feels any guilt whatsoever? A mother that didn't save her struggling son has to feel some guilt.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Her only regret was not having forced her son to do a 'better' testament for the family.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

:agree:^Yep, I remember all that! By the way when Janet said on LKL that one family member is on the fence, Larry did ask her if it was MJ and she answered Yes!

But, at the same time I have no idea why MJ told TMZ camera's in 09 that YES, he was gonna tour with his family when they ask him!?:scratch:

Did he changed his mind?

Which is even more confusing for the family to say he was not healthy for "This is it!" But, was okay with him touring with them after all!

Seriously...WTH? :mello:



Michael was a family man and probably thought it was right for him to help out with the tour.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Her only regret was not having forced her son to do a 'better' testament for the family.

by better testament do you mean a better will? Since they all thought he was a druggie and would die of an overdose anyway I am shocked she didn't have a hand in his will. Janet said she wasn't surprised because she knew it could happen considering his drug problems. I guess Katherine is a tad bit upset that MJ didn't leave his father anything or his siblings. I guess that's why she's trying to get all she can before she dies.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

StacyJ;3208665Janet said she wasn't surprised because she knew it could happen considering his drug problems[/QUOTE said:
:eek:...She said that??
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

:eek:...She said that??

pretty much... she said it to Robin Roberts and Oprah. Oprah asked her if she was surprised that it was 'drugs' that killed Michael and she said no because she knew something like that could happen when you have someone who has a problem etc...

That is why I find it hard to understand why there are some MJ fans that do not understand why so many of us are really disappointed with members of this family.

Janet said this crap even though Michael was in the care of his personal physician and even though Murray was charged with involuntary manslaughter. The way she was talking you would think MJ was some crack fiend getting drugs from the dope dealer in the back alley.

I will never ever forgive them for that.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

pretty much... she said it to Robin Roberts and Oprah. Oprah asked her if she was surprised that it was 'drugs' that killed Michael and she said no because she knew something like that could happen when you have someone who has a problem etc...

That is why I find it hard to understand why there are some MJ fans that do not understand why so many of us are really disappointed with members of this family.

Janet said this crap even though Michael was in the care of his personal physician and even though Murray was charged with involuntary manslaughter. The way she was talking you would think MJ was some crack fiend getting drugs from the dope dealer in the back alley.

I will never ever forgive them for that.



Wow from the way u wrote made it sound like janet had a "matter of fact " attidude bout it. Like she was sure it would happen
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Wow from the way u wrote made it sound like janet had a "matter of fact " attidude bout it. Like she was sure it would happen

that is how she sounded to me
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Michael was a family man and probably thought it was right for him to help out with the tour.
no he was turning them down, he was busy with his own tour, life and career he didn't need a bunch of oldies harassing his ass and causing further stress, pain and insomnia. he needed to be left alone and not harassed. He had no intentions of joining them and their silly little 'family tour' not in 2007, not in 2008, and not certainly not in 2009. He didn't need Joseph showing up with his ex con pal L. Rowe on the eve of his daughters birthday harassing him, he didn't need a bribed Katherine along with Joseph and ex con artists as Rowe and Majestik the Clown following and harassing him. nothing had changed with these ppl, one would think they had learned from their past mistakes (i.g the moonie's) but no, not these ppl, they were still eager and willing to harass him, same actions of 1989 were repeated in 2009, only this time the final curtain fell.
Michael as stressed as he already was, needed some piece and quiet he didn't need a bunch of men in their upper 50s riding on his coattails.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

no he was turning them down, he was busy with his own tour, life and career he didn't need a bunch of oldies harassing his ass and causing further stress, pain and insomnia. he needed to be left alone and not harassed. He had no intentions of joining them and their silly little 'family tour' not in 2007, not in 2008, and not certainly not in 2009. He didn't need Joseph showing up with his ex con pal L. Rowe on the eve of his daughters birthday harassing him, he didn't need a bribed Katherine along with Joseph and ex con artists as Rowe and Majestik the Clown following and harassing him. nothing had changed with these ppl, one would think they had learned from their past mistakes (i.g the moonie's) but no, not these ppl, they were still eager and willing to harass him, same actions of 1989 were repeated in 2009, only this time the final curtain fell.
Michael as stressed as he already was, needed some piece and quiet he didn't need a bunch of men in their upper 50s riding on his coattails.

I agree with everything ur saying but im sure i just read here someone saying that mj said he was doing it to a press guy.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I agree with everything ur saying but im sure i just read here someone saying that mj said he was doing it to a press guy.
No, again someone here is twisting and turning facts as s/he pleases (not you).
I happen to have seen that footage and I believe I've saved it somewhere as well, he was coming out of Klien's office or some place else and a bunch of paparazzi were asking random questions and hunting his ass, inclduing the AGE concert question, Michael was replying with 'yes, yes'' to ALL of the random questions, inclduing to the ''Michael how are you'' question.
He wasn't paying any attention whatsoever, those questions were being asked by a bunch of paps, Michael was followed by his usual entourage of bodyguards and a handful of stalkers, screaming 'Michael I love''.
This whole 'questioning' lasted around 30 seconds, and you could tell his prime concern was to get into his escalade safe and sound.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

No, again someone here is twisting and turning facts as s/he pleases (not you).
I happen to have seen that footage and I believe I've saved it somewhere as well, he was coming out of Klien's office or some place else and a bunch of paparazzi were asking random questions, inclduing the AGE concert question, Michael was replying with 'yes, yes'' to ALL of the random questions, inclduing to the ''Michael how are you'' question.
He wasn't paying any attention whatsoever, those questions were being asked by a bunch of paps, Michael was followed by his usual entourage of bodyguards and a handful of stalkers, screaming 'Michael I love''.
This whole 'questioning' lasted 30 seconds at most.


poor michael :(
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I wonder the same thing if MJ was so sick for this is it then why was Katherine taking 1 million dollar bribe to get MJ to sign all goods contract for him to tour with the brother?
Lenard Rowe say it in his book, and when MJ turn them down janet was mad at him.
I don't see how the family can blame every one but them self, they were hounding MJ to tour like AEG too.

I wish AEG would counter this lawsuit by putting info like this out there about the family. They need to be knocked off their pedastal. AEG was obvioulsy greedy, but so was MJ's family.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

No, again someone here is twisting and turning facts as s/he pleases (not you).
I happen to have seen that footage and I believe I've saved it somewhere as well, he was coming out of Klien's office or some place else and a bunch of paparazzi were asking random questions and hunting his ass, inclduing the AGE concert question, Michael was replying with 'yes, yes'' to ALL of the random questions, inclduing to the ''Michael how are you'' question.
He wasn't paying any attention whatsoever, those questions were being asked by a bunch of paps, Michael was followed by his usual entourage of bodyguards and a handful of stalkers, screaming 'Michael I love''.
This whole 'questioning' lasted around 30 seconds, and you could tell his prime concern was to get into his escalade safe and sound.

Thanks for placing Michael's comments in the context in which it was stated. His answers now give a whole different meaning.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

No, again someone here is twisting and turning facts as s/he pleases (not you).
I happen to have seen that footage and I believe I've saved it somewhere as well, he was coming out of Klien's office or some place else and a bunch of paparazzi were asking random questions and hunting his ass, inclduing the AGE concert question, Michael was replying with 'yes, yes'' to ALL of the random questions, inclduing to the ''Michael how are you'' question.
He wasn't paying any attention whatsoever, those questions were being asked by a bunch of paps, Michael was followed by his usual entourage of bodyguards and a handful of stalkers, screaming 'Michael I love''.
This whole 'questioning' lasted around 30 seconds, and you could tell his prime concern was to get into his escalade safe and sound.

Gee thanks for the INSULT!!:mello:

I wasn't twisting anything! :smilerolleyes:

Goodness, I was just asking why would he say that he was touring with his family by replying, Yes!

I doubt MJ is deaf! I'm sure he answered yes to everything asked because he wanted to! Even though he could have not meant it! The guy asking him the question I'm talking about was very load when asking that!

And if I'm not mistaken the pap mentions the fact that one of MJ's kids is there (Blanket) and says something like "oh look the kiddies" and blanket looked back right at the pap! So if he can hear then why can't MJ!?

But, if he wasn't paying attention then fine we don't know for sure?! So, I wasn't trying to twist anything! It was something I noticed and wanted to share and was just asking a question about! SMH

Edit: Just found the video! I am right! He answered the question with a YES and he definitely heard the guy!! By the way it was only one person asking MJ questions! Also blanket was there too! ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55iKwoJrT5U

 
Last edited:
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I found myself thinking: if they had asked to MJ if he was an ET and he had answered "yes", we'd be having the craziest thread ever.

lol

We have to laugh here to avoid crying.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Katherine's lawsuit isn't going to go anywhere and its a waste of time. The emails that came out with Murray asking for life saving medical equipment was not for Michael's house, this was a request for the tour which is a legal requirement made by insurance companies. In a performer over the age of 50 going on a tour it is by law that life saving medical equipment must be provided. The Rolling Stones had to have this equipment when they went on tour. IT IS NOT AN INDICATION THAT SAID PERSON IS A DRUG ADDICT. ITS A LEGAL REQUIREMENT. AEG did noy provide the equipment for Michael's house as they were not asked for it for his home. They were asked for it for London. This is what proves Murray was the only one at fault. He knew that he didn't have the life saving equipment needed when administering propofol at Michael's home, and admitted this by email, but he went ahead and did it anyway.
that indeed is pretty interesting!!! can you provide a source please... about the law or wherever you've found this Sophie?

oh and I'd like this thread to stay on topic... the AGE stuff is on a complete different page, isn't it?
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

MJStorm;3208858We have to laugh here to avoid crying.[/QUOTE said:
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

Does any1 knows jermaine's e-mail adress?please mail me
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I found myself thinking: if they had asked to MJ if he was an ET and he had answered "yes", we'd be having the craziest thread ever.

lol

We have to laugh here to avoid crying.
exactly
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

I think Michael got himself in serious problems/lawsuits because of answering "YES" to many requests/questions.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

A spoken 'yes' means nothing really in the definitive end without a signature to validate it. Many didn't care about that, however, and took his kindness/frail ability to say 'no' for granted, took advantage of it all too often with all the bogus claims and abusive lawsuits.
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

As we know Katherine sued AEG & its owners and Kenny Ortega
AEG filed a request for the dismissal of the case
Kenny filed a request to be removed as defendant
Katherine filed a response against to AEG and Kenny's requests
and
recently Kenny and AEG filed a response to Katherine's response

This is the documents

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/radaronline.com/files/Katherine Jackson Doc.pdf

This is the summary of main points

Kenny Ortega

- Ortega says "has been extremely hurt by this mistaken and misguided Complaint publicly naming him as a defendant allegedly responsible for his friend's death."
- Ortega says he's not an agent or joint venturer with AEG.
- Ortega says he wasn't a party to "MJ- AEG" or "Murray-AEG" agreements.

AEG's response
- They say even if KJ's claims were true AEG can only be responsible for "hiring" Murray and not the care he gave Michael as the harm to Michael resulted for Murray's failure for proper care. In other words they say even if they hired Murray, they cannot be responsible for his negligence (they cite a case that says asking an employee to get a medical test doesn't bring the company the obligation to oversee the medical exam)
- Plus they say any negligence claim requires "foreseeability" - which means that it should be "foreseeable" for AEG to think Murray as a doctor would violate standard of care etc and administer MJ propofol. They say the events were "unforeseeable" and therefore they shouldn't be found in negligence. (In basic terms they try to say "we cannot prevent something from happening if we had no idea about it happening")
- The equipment request was mentioned in KJ's response. AEG addresses this and says there was no indication that it was requested for home use (how and when they would be used was unknown) and that they couldn't known that Murray would perform dangerous procedures without them. They argue even if they knew such equipment were requested to be used in giving nightly sleep remedies, logically they couldn't think/knew that Murray would violate his medical obligations and give such remedies without the proper equipment.

Note : It seems like Ortega and Murray was hired or was going to be hired as an "independent contractor" and not an "AEG employee".
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

This is the documents

http://www.radaronline.com/sites/radaronline.com/files/Katherine Jackson Doc.pdf

This is the summary of main points

Kenny Ortega

- Ortega says "has been extremely hurt by this mistaken and misguided Complaint publicly naming him as a defendant allegedly responsible for his friend's death."
- Ortega says he's not an agent or joint venturer with AEG.
- Ortega says he wasn't a party to "MJ- AEG" or "Murray-AEG" agreements.

AEG's response
- They say even if KJ's claims were true AEG can only be responsible for "hiring" Murray and not the care he gave Michael as the harm to Michael resulted for Murray's failure for proper care. In other words they say even if they hired Murray, they cannot be responsible for his negligence (they cite a case that says asking an employee to get a medical test doesn't bring the company the obligation to oversee the medical exam)
- Plus they say any negligence claim requires "foreseeability" - which means that it should be "foreseeable" for AEG to think Murray as a doctor would violate standard of care etc and administer MJ propofol. They say the events were "unforeseeable" and therefore they shouldn't be found in negligence. (In basic terms they try to say "we cannot prevent something from happening if we had no idea about it happening")
- The equipment request was mentioned in KJ's response. AEG addresses this and says there was no indication that it was requested for home use (how and when they would be used was unknown) and that they couldn't known that Murray would perform dangerous procedures without them. They argue even if they knew such equipment were requested to be used in giving nightly sleep remedies, logically they couldn't think/knew that Murray would violate his medical obligations and give such remedies without the proper equipment.

Note : It seems like Ortega and Murray was hired or was going to be hired as an "independent contractor" and not an "AEG employee".

:bugeyed


Well, then this not really going anywhere.... ???
 
Re: Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed / Ortega wants to be removed / KJ respo

:bugeyed


Well, then this not really going anywhere.... ???

There's a hearing this Wednesday. and then there would be developments, decisions by the judge. we'll see whether it goes to court or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top