classic
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,135
- Points
- 0
It will be interesting to see if the Jacksons continue to defend him.
What I don't get is that if he truly didn't refer to Michael and this was clever editing, why isn't he the one screaming from the mountaintop? No matter what, he is the only one that can truly take care of this, just like the guy from the original 1993 accusation case. At some point, it is not about anyone else making statements to defend Michael. It's about what they will man up to do.
What I don't get is that if he truly didn't refer to Michael and this was clever editing, why isn't he the one screaming from the mountaintop? No matter what, he is the only one that can truly take care of this, just like the guy from the original 1993 accusation case. At some point, it is not about anyone else making statements to defend Michael. It's about what they will man up to do.
Last edited: