See, the haters use the fans ignorance of the cases against him:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...ets-should-look-at-the-man-in-the-mirror.html
Read the comments by the obsessive hater who claims:
1) MJ settled because the description was a match. Nope.
2) Claims the FBI investigated Jackson over molesting 2 Mexican boys in the 80s - this was really Victor Gutierrez who had called the FBI in December 1993 to TELL them they had investigated Jackson over boys in the 80s, and the FBI checked their files and could find no record of this. This is her proof he molested boys in the 80s.
3) Claims Sneddon tried to beg for the photos/description to be used in the case and MJ fought tooth and nail to not have it in - nope, it was submitted a few weeks before the end of the 5 month trial, and Sneddon knew already they could not be entered because Jordan was not a witness. MJ's lawyers didn't have to fight over anything. My belief is Sneddon did this so he could have the media report about it. Also, Sneddon only claimed one blotch was in the same rough area as on Jackson - except in Ray's book he claims Jordan spoke about many blotches, and Dr Strick said Michael's penis was both light and dark. So why did Jordan get all of that wrong too? On top of the circumcision issue.
4) Vitiligo can be given by medical creams - not true, medically impossible.
5) that Prince was given vitiligo by MJ wiping his creams on his son - LOL again, impossible.
But for the public they could believe these things were true. Notice how they include a link to their hater crazy website.
Anyway, if you want leave comments, or at least "recommend" the good ones, so the hater (who is Desiree, famous for supporting pedophilia and her sock puppets), can be ignored.