Roger cannot get his fact straight it seems. He makes it look like the material shown in court to Wade was all graphic homosexual material, close to being "teenporn". Actually there was only ONE book of graphic homosexual nature - and it was not teen themed - (Sexual Study of Man), which was a book from the 1960s and it was found in a cardboard box among hundreds of other books. Michael might have not even seen it, but surely it did not hold a special place in his collection. It was among the thousands of books he had stored in cardboard boxes.
This was the only graphic homosexual material! There were other art books some with nude males, some with nude females, some with people of both genders. No other book with male nudity was graphic sexual material - just books with artistic nude pics. Michael had a collection of thosands of art books, it's only natural that there would be some books with nudes in it (and it wasn't many books considering his vast collection). Most of those books were in big cardboard boxes with thousands of other books.
There were NO homosexual adult magazines found in Michael's possession. All the adult magazines found were HETEROSEXUAL. Roger mentions "Hard Rock Affair" as a gay magazine. Wrong. It's a heterosexual one. From Wade's testimony:
Roger writes:
I checked it out. No such thing was said in Robson's testimony. No one said or claimed anything about "teenporn".
The adult magazines were found in Michael's nightstand, in a box at the base of his bed, in a briefcase in closet of his bedroom, so it's safe to say they mirrored Michael's sexual ineterst. But they were ALL, I mean 100%, the types those are made for heterosexual men. No male/male gay porn AT ALL!
So I wonder what's Roger really up to with this article. He tries to act like he's defending him, but he actually spreads more harmful lies here about "gay teenporn". Isn't he supportive of AEG?
errinWade Robson you f#%^ing traitor!!!!
