Re: Paris Jackson Possible Suicide Attempt Rushed to Hospital SHE IS OK
What I find worrisome is the behaviour of some fans which tend to be aggressive and hostile towards other fans. Let me state this:
It is OK to be a fan/supporter/sympathizer of the Jackson family, not just Michael. Why should it not be OK?
It is NOT ok to claim that anyone criticising the Jackson family would be a "fake fan", "idiot", "charlatan" or even a racist.
People are not criticising the Jackson family for no reason, their actions or lack of are speaking for themselves.
There are some facts that should not be whitewashed:
It is the Jackson family who is suing AEG.
All three still young children plus mother Katherine are influenced by other family members - we don't have to speculate to which degree, it is a logical conclusion.
The trial is about money and only money. Neither Katherine nor the three children do have an urgent necessity for it.
It is also logical to which conclusion an objective and judicuous observer will come bona fide.
I have been witnessing (as many have) how fans continue to drift further apart, simply due to different point of views. However there's a totally unnecessary alienation between fans taking place. This alienation is mostly based on a) lack of knowledge, b) nonrational personal convictions and c) accumulating abysmal hatred towards other individuals and corporate bodies.
Eg even though RadarOnline.com and x17online.com are linked to Randy Jackson as a "family source" / "family insider", some fans continue to claim that the "evil bad" MJ Estate would be providing info to these two sites because the "powers that be" (Randy Jackson quote often cited by some fans) would maintain an alleged smear campaign against the family.
Apart from the fact that Michael's estate is no party in the Jackson family's trial against AEG Live, to think that these statements who are clearly reported as being from a source within the family would be fake, is simpleminded and indicates a prejudiced way of looking at things.
Let me also explain this in detail:
In journalism you have protection of confidential sources which means that the identity of a source does not have to be disclosed to the public. HOWEVER if a statement that is published is untrue and is infringing personal rights, you can file a lawsuit in which the identity of the source will be disclosed in order to allow the plaintiff to request recovery of damages (eg damage to reputation).
Now let me remind you:
RadarOnline.com's article was the first one to contain claims by a "family source" who was suggesting (and the article emphasized on this several times) that the current AEG trial would be a main factor to Paris' personal issues.
And yet I am reading on forums and other social networks that the media or even fans would associate Paris' issues with the AEG Live trial.
HUH?!!
There are ACTUAL QUOTES from that very "family source" which are now re-quoted, re-phrased etc.
Now I'm asking who on earth wants to tell oneself that AEG or the "evil bad" MJ Estate would have anything to do with this media exploitation which is all bringing public attention to the trial again, prompting another (desperate) attempt at intimidation towards AEG's lawyers for alternative dispute resolution.
Why attacking AEG?
Why attackig MJ Estate?
And WHY _ _ attacking other fans?
REALLY?
The Jackson family is known to have been arguing out publicly for years since 2009.
Eg Randy Jackson knew very well about the formal error on Michael's will (which can't be faulted) in 2009 (source for his knowledge:
http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/22/micha...-witnesses-new-york-city-los-angeles-probate/), yet in 2012 he suddenly complained about it on Twitter like a little whining kid when it is a private matter - and no business of the general public - which the authorities have dealt with.
With all due respect, I like
The Jackson 5 and
The Jacksons as ARTISTS.
HOWEVER IMO people and fans MUST be able to distinguish between the Jacksons as artists/public figures and their real life personalities.
The real life personalities do not haveanything in common with the artists/public figures that have once sung:
All the colors of the world should be
Lovin' each other wholeheartedly
Yes, it's all right
Take my message to your brother and tell him twice
Spread the word and try to teach the man
Who's hating his brother, when hate won't do
When we're all the same, 'cause the blood inside me is inside you
CAN YOU FEEL IT? CAN YOU FEEL IT?
Katherine Jackson is simply too old and naive. She's been a Jehovah's Witness for most of her life and she's supporting her children and children's children and is listening to all of them. Just think about Jermaine explaining their family's "little lion cubs" philosophy or how she was lulled by Howard Mann. Don't get me even started on Joe's illegal businesses who's still trying to exploit Michael's likeliness in countries that don't care much about the law and are far, far away from the MJ Estate's agency...
If you for once put aside the musical talent of a few Jackson family members, then there's just a family left that hardly enjoyed education and has been advised for many, many years by corrupt and dubious people (lawyers, managers, business associates etc.) that all knew there was always a way to make $$$ when working for that family. What shall we expect from such a family?
Even though they managed to escape from their rather poor social background, their newly acquired richness by itself did not make them smart and civilized. This recent acting up as "the musical family dynasty" and the sudden popping up of Twitter accounts and web sites to this effect by Jermaine, Randy & Co. are speaking for themselves.
And just to remind everyone that Randy Jackson wrote in 2012 in that "nice" defamatory letter adressing the allegedly "fraudulent" estate executors that the Jackson family would take their "evidence" to the proper authorities. LMAO!
A short excursus about the will again:
If Branca, Siegel and Green had forged a will, they would have known FOR SURE where Michael was on that specific date.
It further demonstrates well that it's a formal error only, an obvious slip of the pen which happens often(!!!) and is factored in by the law by requiring further strength of evidence.
It also makes ZERO sense for them to fake a will that is not any different to a previous one, they are not even beneficiaries by the will, they are administrators. They were so in the previous will, too. Why fake something without any advantage? There is not any sign of the 2002 will being fake.
Haven't we noticed something similar in the recent trial against AEG Live? The Jackson family's lawyers are struggling to build a case upon private emails of AEG staff. It's as doomed as Murray's defense was, yet those lawyers are getting paychecks from the family nonetheless, of course.
Life should be harmony in this world of self-destruction (Michael Jackson)