Book: Remember the Time: Protecting Michael Jackson in His Final Days / Review @pg8

Yeah that my radio station i listen to every morning and you are right that was a stupid question to ask but early in the show Tom mention about confidentiality agreement and he made a comment he said was it the black Michael or the white Michael if their did sign this i was so angry when he said that. I am so tried of ppls saying white Michael Jackson or black Michael Jackson it said on his BC black i wish ppls would stop doing that. Michael said on OW interview i am a black man.


In the bold i found that shocking too maybe MJ trust them.

I only started listening to the station about 10 minutes before Bill & Javon came on so I missed anything they had previously, but in that time, and even during the interview itself, a lot was said that left me wishing I hadn't tuned in at all.
 
I only started listening to the station about 10 minutes before Bill & Javon came on so I missed anything they had previously, but in that time, and even during the interview itself, a lot was said that left me wishing I hadn't tuned in at all.

But how did the bodyguards handle these disrespectful questions?
 
But how did the bodyguards handle these disrespectful questions?

They were very good, very professional about it. They either gave short answers then moved on- like with the nose question ("He has always had a nose")- or they just ignored them completely. Which was easy to do (ignoring) because it wasn't really like an interview where they would ask a question and Bill &/or Javon would answer... sometimes that happened, but it was more like everyone was trying to talk over everyone else. I mean, you have Bill & Javon trying to answer questions as best they can, and then 3 DJ's all trying to talk at once. So if somebody asked something that was unacceptable, it was pretty easy to just let it be.

But yeah, sorry, got off track there, lol. They were awesome about it :)
 
But how did the bodyguards handle these disrespectful questions?


When you look at ii there was not that many questions it was things we already knew like how Michael felt about his family did he date lady did their stay over at the house how the BG would take Michael to the lady he was have a date with their really didn;t say much the BG defend Michael about the nose how ppls was saying Michael did not have a nose and the BG said he did so their clear that up about the nose. There was no agreement between Michael and the BG but that really was not expalin their just said that their did not sign one that was something we didn't know.
 
They were very good, very professional about it. They either gave short answers then moved on- like with the nose question ("He has always had a nose")- or they just ignored them completely. Which was easy to do (ignoring) because it wasn't really like an interview where they would ask a question and Bill &/or Javon would answer... sometimes that happened, but it was more like everyone was trying to talk over everyone else. I mean, you have Bill & Javon trying to answer questions as best they can, and then 3 DJ's all trying to talk at once. So if somebody asked something that was unacceptable, it was pretty easy to just let it be.

But yeah, sorry, got off track there, lol. They were awesome about it :)

You are right i agree.
 
I only started listening to the station about 10 minutes before Bill & Javon came on so I missed anything they had previously, but in that time, and even during the interview itself, a lot was said that left me wishing I hadn't tuned in at all.

Anything Michael Jackson their jump on it and their ask so many questions all at once all 3 of them it is hard for the person to respone to them.
 
When you look at ii there was not that many questions it was things we already knew like how Michael felt about his family did he date lady did their stay over at the house how the BG would take Michael to the lady he was have a date with their really didn;t say much the BG defend Michael about the nose how ppls was saying Michael did not have a nose and the BG said he did so their clear that up about the nose. There was no agreement between Michael and the BG but that really was not expalin their just said that their did not sign one that was something we didn't know.

Yup. Pretty much sums it up.
 
I'm a little over half way through the book and am disliking Bain even more than I did before.
 
I believed opening night would prove to the world that Michael Jackson would be on top, once again, proving the naysayers wrong!
I think he was going to show them who he really was.
The greatest entertainer.

About 50 shows:if you are 50 and haven´t done exercise for years it´s tough to begin again.If you go to a workout or use a dvd, youtube video you struggle to try to do what the trainer does.
Afterwards you can feel your muscles ..and it doesn´t feel good.
Some give up after a couple of times but if you continue it gets better and better and then you can do the moves.
You get there piece by piece.
 
MJJC's review of Remember the Time is up on the RTT website- http://www.rememberthetime-book.com/fan:

“Without doubt an incredible read for all Michael Jackson fans. Remember The Time is not about sensationalism or full of the typical tabloid fodder one might expect when dealing with Michael Jackson. This book offers a real glimpse into the life of somebody who was far more than just a pop star and an entertainer; Michael was a kind, sensitive and loving father and a humble and generous man who was simply trying to live his life in peace. We commend and thank Bill, Javon and Tanner for giving us the opportunity to share a piece of Michael Jackson’s life” —MJJCommunity
 
Yeah that my radio station i listen to every morning and you are right that was a stupid question to ask but early in the show Tom mention about confidentiality agreement and he made a comment he said was it the black Michael or the white Michael if their did sign this i was so angry when he said that. I am so tried of ppls saying white Michael Jackson or black Michael Jackson it said on his BC black i wish ppls would stop doing that. Michael said on OW interview i am a black man.


In the bold i found that shocking too maybe MJ trust them.

Tom and his crew did the same thing during the Granny napping calling the estate situation with the kids "The white Jackson's against the black Jackson's". Those fools are so ignorant.
 
Tom and his crew did the same thing during the Granny napping calling the estate situation with the kids "The white Jackson's against the black Jackson's". Those fools are so ignorant.

For some reason, they can't seem to refrain from trying to make a racial issue when talking about Michael.

They've done that quite a few times.
 
The AEG civil trial proved Michael never signed any paperwork to complete 50 shows. He also did not sign any paperwork to increase production costs. AEG did both without Michael's written approval which was necessary to show both sides (AEG/MJ) agreed to changes to the original contract.
 
For some reason, they can't seem to refrain from trying to make a racial issue when talking about Michael.

They've done that quite a few times.

Tom Joyner and his crew have taken quite a few shots at Michael before. One morning they played Working Day and Night, and during the opening bit of the song TJ made a propofol joke. Ruined my whole day and it put me off from listening to the rest of the song. I never really listened to the show before but I've made damn sure to never tune in again. They're another one of those "We love/respect the guy but still make jokes about him because everyone gets made fun of even though the jokes against Michael are purposely designed to be mean-spirited and evoke hatred which defeats the purpose of a joke in the first place but hey who cares LOL SPECIFICS" types.
 
Tom Joyner and his crew have taken quite a few shots at Michael before. One morning they played Working Day and Night, and during the opening bit of the song TJ made a propofol joke. Ruined my whole day and it put me off from listening to the rest of the song. I never really listened to the show before but I've made damn sure to never tune in again. They're another one of those "We love/respect the guy but still make jokes about him because everyone gets made fun of even though the jokes against Michael are purposely designed to be mean-spirited and evoke hatred which defeats the purpose of a joke in the first place but hey who cares LOL SPECIFICS" types.

I definitely understand what you mean. I caught them asking something this morning that really pissed me off. I had never heard of this show before, but you can be damn sure I won't ever be tuning in again.
 
I guess the BG have to go to all these shows to promote the book. They probably feel really pissed off that they have to go to such people for help in selling their goods. Does the publisher make the appointment for the author to go on a show?
 
the body guards should have went to steve harvey's radio morning show. steve would have never asked such stupid, disrespectful questions about michael.
 
I guess the BG have to go to all these shows to promote the book. They probably feel really pissed off that they have to go to such people for help in selling their goods. Does the publisher make the appointment for the author to go on a show?

I thought of that as well and I wonder if that is the case... that maybe the publisher handles all the promotion.
 
the body guards should have went to steve harvey's radio morning show. steve would have never asked such stupid, disrespectful questions about michael.

^^True. That is why I was wondering if the publisher makes these assignments and the author has to go where the publisher says. Steve loves Michael. I guess they will be on Ellen. I guess authors/people selling something go on shows with a big audience. However, when the host laughs at your product or you on the show, do you really get a lot of sales from the audience? Isn't the audience loyal to the hosts and listen to them?
 
^^True. That is why I was wondering if the publisher makes these assignments and the author has to go where the publisher says. Steve loves Michael. I guess they will be on Ellen. I guess authors/people selling something go on shows with a big audience. However, when the host laughs at your product or you on the show, do you really get a lot of sales from the audience? Isn't the audience loyal to the hosts and listen to them?

Ellen? When?
 
the body guards should have went to steve harvey's radio morning show. steve would have never asked such stupid, disrespectful questions about michael.

Steve Harvey's show has really been cutting deep into Tom's morning ratings. Steve loves Michael and always speaks of him with love and respect. I hope he knocks Tom off the air!
 
Steve Harvey's show has really been cutting deep into Tom's morning ratings. Steve loves Michael and always speaks of him with love and respect. I hope he knocks Tom off the air!
yes, steve loves michael and i love steve even more for that. i would love for steve to knock tom off the air.

It's a shame to because I grew up listening to tom's morning show. I haven't listened to it in years though. so I didn't know he has been acting a fool towards michael.
 
^^True. That is why I was wondering if the publisher makes these assignments and the author has to go where the publisher says. Steve loves Michael. I guess they will be on Ellen. I guess authors/people selling something go on shows with a big audience. However, when the host laughs at your product or you on the show, do you really get a lot of sales from the audience? Isn't the audience loyal to the hosts and listen to them?
yes, IMO the audience usually goes along with the host. like on the wendy wiliams show she always says "you don't have to agree with me". I roll my eyes and say oh please you know durn well they are going to agree with you. you know they are not going to leave you hanging.
 
I love the book but some members make me wonder. If the party thing is not true, what else is inaccurate ?

I wouldn't worry much about it tbh. The party story is told to them by Grace - according to what they wrote. When people get information second hand there could be misunderstandings and their memory might not be so good. If you paid attention members have mentioned hearing a party after Michael was charged so if true that might be the party Grace talking about and bodyguards might have misunderstood or wrongly remember it as a party after the verdict.
 
I wouldn't worry much about it tbh. The party story is told to them by Grace - according to what they wrote. When people get information second hand there could be misunderstandings and their memory might not be so good. If you paid attention members have mentioned hearing a party after Michael was charged so if true that might be the party Grace talking about and bodyguards might have misunderstood or wrongly remember it as a party after the verdict.

What you said is true, but this is why I said they should have only talked stuff they seen themselves. Grace's story could have been easily been fact-checked. It seemed they included the story because it panders to fans and add drama. Much like them added their two cents about the AEG deal when they clearly did not know all the facts and didn't bother to Google.

I do not have a problem with them saying that Michael's Hollywood 'friends' abandoned them (many of them did), but they did not need this party story to sell it. It actually makes me wonder what they may have exaggerated or chose to believe to win fans over.
 
Fan reviews posted on Remember The Time website
http://www.rememberthetime-book.com/fan

I also want to say The Bodyguard did have a few mistakes about timelines and events when they were not present. such as when MJ left neverland and some info about TII shows etc. These are based on 2nd, and 3rd hand accounts from others. but ALL books have these types of errors. and there are very few. I agree they should have stuck with what they knew first hand. But That doesn't take away from their first hand accounts and stories of events from when they were present and with MJ and his children.
 
Last edited:
REVIEW: Michael Jackson’s bodyguards remember the time they protected the King of Pop in revealing new book


Bill Whitfield and Javon Beard are two men who were entrusted with duty of protecting the privacy and wellbeing of a single father and his three children. That single father just so happened to be the most famous human being on planet Earth and the greatest entertainer to ever live – none other than the King of Pop, Michael Jackson.


Now, five years after Jackson’s passing Whitfield and Beard, in conjunction with author Tanner Colby, have released a book – ‘Remember the Time – Protecting Michael Jackson in his final days’ - that delivers a previously-untold behind-the-scenes blow-by-blow of what the final years of Jackson’s life were really like.

Firstly, let me start off by stating the obvious; Michael Jackson would probably have never wanted this book written and released. That fact is acknowledged straight off the bat by Whitfield and Beard themselves in the very first sentence of the Introduction chapter on page one. And while Michael Jackson may not have wanted this book to be written, he would also not have wanted the plethora of malicious lies, sensationalism and propaganda the tabloid media publish about him to be written. But it is written. And it will continue to be written for all of eternity. So this book, which sheds light on the truth behind the puzzle that was the King of Pop’s life, comes as a rare breath of fresh air in the world of unauthorized Jackson literature.

As a fan, the first things I look for when reading about Michael Jackson are fascinating insights and new information. On most occasions I end up feeling like my time has been wasted. ‘Tell me something I didn’t already know!’ is a comment I commonly utter to myself after reading something Jackson-related. This book, however, delivers incredible insights and new information in abundance from beginning to end.

‘Remember the Time – Protecting Michael Jackson in his final days’ is presented as a word-for-word chronological narration by Whitfield and Beard as they recall stories, experiences and noteworthy events that occurred during their time serving as Jackson’s personal security team. These guys were by Jackson’s side around the clock for more than two years, so there were no shortage of tales to be told.

I really liked that sensationalism was seemingly set aside and truth was allowed to shine through. Nothing was sugarcoated; and nothing needed to be. Jackson is presented as a devoted and protective father who loved his children more than anything in the world and did everything in his power to give them all they needed. His children are presented as polite, humble, intelligent kids who dealt with the reality of their extraordinary lives by taking each twist and turn in their stride.

Talking about the children is an extra-sensitive topic for many fans, including myself. Jackson’s main concern regarding security was not his own, but his children’s privacy and safety. Whitfield and Beard spent more than two years protecting those kids at all costs. At one point in the book Whitfield recalls being instructed to chase down a photographer who had snapped a picture of the kids without their disguises. Once he caught the photographer Whitfield wrestled the camera from him and confiscated it before running back to Jackson’s vehicle with it.

Fans have raised questions about whether or not it’s morally okay to discuss private details of the children’s life. These questions are legitimate questions, especially considering how highly Jackson valued their privacy. However, the extent of detail regarding the children is very limited. There are mentions and recollections of moments involving the kids, such as Blanket’s fascination with the hippos are the zoo, Paris bringing Whitfield a cup of hot chocolate or Prince playfully trying to trick the bodyguards into buying him treats from the store.

However, since Jackson’s death the kids have been everywhere, willingly opening their private lives up to the public. They don’t wear disguises anymore, they’ve appeared on national television and have various social media accounts. The mainstream media has no qualms in discussing Paris’ personal issues, speculating about the paternity of the children, and even as recently as yesterday publicising their supposed annual allowance. A few tales about how sweet, funny and generous the kids were may be stepping over the line of what Jackson would have wanted and expected, but is by no means comparable to the bullshit they endure at the hands of a sensationalised tabloid media on a day-to-day basis. The stories about Jackson’s children made me smile, personally, and I’d be interested to hear their thoughts on what’s been written about them and their father.

Another thing I found interesting was who had Jackson’s back and who did not. The relationship, or lack thereof, that Jackson had with his manager, Raymone Bain, was bizarre. Bain was running Jackson’s entire empire from her home office – something Jackson had no idea about for quite some time. (He believed she had an office.) Jackson seemed to want to keep Bain as far out of the loop as possible at times, even restricting the bodyguards from reporting their movements to her. She was in charge of payroll, which was never in order and got worse and worse as time progressed.

The bodyguards would sometimes go months on end without being paid, and not even Jackson himself yelling at Bain over the phone could get her to pay them. She’d tell Jackson she’d do something, then just not do it. It made you wonder why Jackson didn’t sack her earlier than he did. It also made you wonder why Whitfield and Beard did not quit – a question they ask themselves numerous times throughout the book, then go on answer. Their frustrations over lack of payment (and other things) are expressed strongly but sincerely in the book. As you’re reading you can’t help but feel deeply for them. Ultimately their loyalties lied with their boss, Mr. Jackson – something that not many people can say for themselves.

One person whose loyalties seemingly always lied with Michael Jackson was the late-entertainment attorney Peter Lopez, who receives one of the most glowing wraps of all the characters detailed in the book. He was one person in Jackson’s life who always had his best interests at heart. During my time researching Michael Jackson’s career, specifically the years in which Peter Lopez was around quite often, I’ve never heard anyone who knew Jackson intimately utter a bad word about him – only good things. The same goes for those who have not been characterized positively in the book. Whitfield and Beard’s accounts, from what I’ve been told by those who were close to Jackson, ring true.

An interesting series of recollections involve Sony Music and the ‘Thriller 25′ project. For those of you who needed more proof than Jackson himself standing atop a double-decker bus in London yelling “Sony sucks” outside Sony HQ to conclude that Jackson indeed hated Sony, you’ll find what you’re looking for in this book. If you had somehow dreamt up the notion that because ‘Thriller 25′ was released via Sony Music that meant Jackson had patched things up with the label and was on good terms with them, you are mistaken.

Some of the most heartwarming stories in the book relate to Jackson’s generosity. For me personally, his humanitarian efforts across the globe throughout his life are far more important than his artistry. I often say you could take away his music, his dance and his films, and he’d still be my favourite superhero. Whitfield and Beard recall times when Jackson requested he be driven to the poorest parts of Las Vegas where the homeless community resides. Once there Jackson would crack the window of his vehicle ever so slightly and call the homeless people over. From there Jackson would reach into a bumbag filled with hundred-dollar bills, and pass them to the homeless through the gap in the window. And when he’d run out he’d get upset with himself for not having brought more cash to give away. This was not for show. This was not a stunt. He did not want thanks. He’d do all this without ever revealing even his identity. It came from the pure goodness of his heart.

There are stories in the book about the Jackson family; Michael’s brothers, sisters and parents are all mentioned at times. There are tales of Jackson’s lavish spending at department stores, his midnight recording habits, going to the movies, home-schooling his children, spending time with female companions, his vagabond lifestyle, his personal friendships and bouts of depression and paranoia. Some of the recollections are funny, and some are quite sad. Some will leave you hanging for more and some may be difficult to digest. However in each and every case the stories are told sincerely, and that’s what I value the most. Nothing has been not fabricated out of thin air. There were no crazy embellishments to present things as more exciting than they were. They simply were as they were, and that’s what you’re given. The truth as Whitfield and Beard heard it, saw it, experienced it and recalled it.


For more information or to order a copy of ‘Remember the Time – Protecting Michael Jackson in his final days’ visit: www.rememberthetime-book.com

Source: http://www.damienshields.com/review-michael-jacksons-bodyguards-remember-the-time-they-protected-the-king-of-pop-in-revealing-new-book/
 
Last edited:
But a little celebration is not the same as a party as the bodyguards are suggesting. Going by the accounts stated here, the bodyguards make it sound like that there was a party with invitations sent, but only the staff and the legal team came. Also since the bodyguards were not around during that time period (they were hired around 2007-2008 right), they are relying second-hand information from god-knows who. Maybe the cited who told them about this suppose party.

I kind of wish the bodyguards limited their stories to stuff they witnessed first-hand instead of putting stuff in they must have heard from other people like this party and everything involving AEG and TII. It makes their creditability questionable.

What you said is true, but this is why I said they should have only talked stuff they seen themselves. Grace's story could have been easily been fact-checked. It seemed they included the story because it panders to fans and add drama. Much like them added their two cents about the AEG deal when they clearly did not know all the facts and didn't bother to Google.

I do not have a problem with them saying that Michael's Hollywood 'friends' abandoned them (many of them did), but they did not need this party story to sell it. It actually makes me wonder what they may have exaggerated or chose to believe to win fans over.

I don't think the necessarily needed to fact check if it's made clear that the information is second hand.

Can I just throw it out there and ask how we know for sure that it didn't happen, that the event that we know that his legal team attended didn't start off as a much bigger party? I would agree that Michael probably wasn't up for organising a celebration but the family were still around.
 
Back
Top