Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

It's so crystal clear that the people calling this powerful and all that bullshit have no idea about W&S's background. That much is for damn certain. I'm just glad that we're seeing plenty of support from non fans now too on social media. I'm sure we're gonna see a whole lot more glowing reviews and we just gotta go on. I rather not click on the reviews, but maybe we can email the writers of those reviews with facts?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

2005 was really really bad but this is so much worse hence mike not being here to defend himself

How can it be worse. Mj was fighting for his life on trial every day for 4 months. With totally one sided media reporting with no social media where we could point out the facts from the transcripts which we got of the testimony.we lived under a horrendous cloud for a year and and half scared to death that hey were trying to send mj literally to his death. lets put some prespective into this.I'll never forget the feeling the morning after the verdict feeling like the weight of the world had been lifted off my shoulders. They cannot hurt mj. Hes thankfully blissfully unaware. The only negative is as you say he cannot defend himself. But if he were here this would not be happening. Robson would still be inviting them around for BBQ's
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

France is boycotting it!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

How can it be worse. Mj was fighting for his life on trial every day for 4 months. With totally one sided media reporting with no social media where we could point out the facts from the transcripts which we got of the testimony.we lived under a horrendous cloud for a year and and half scared to death that hey were trying to send mj literally to his death. lets put some prespective into this.I'll never forget the feeling the morning after the verdict feeling like the weight of the world had been lifted off my shoulders. They cannot hurt mj. Hes thankfully blissfully unaware. The only negative is as you say he cannot defend himself. But if he were here this would not be happening. Robson would still be inviting them around for BBQ's


its worse cuz he not here to defend himself! and its doesnt help that his estate aint doing anything bout it
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

How can it be worse. Mj was fighting for his life on trial every day for 4 months. With totally one sided media reporting with no social media where we could point out the facts from the transcripts which we got of the testimony.we lived under a horrendous cloud for a year and and half scared to death that hey were trying to send mj literally to his death. lets put some prespective into this.I'll never forget the feeling the morning after the verdict feeling like the weight of the world had been lifted off my shoulders. They cannot hurt mj. Hes thankfully blissfully unaware. The only negative is as you say he cannot defend himself. But if he were here this would not be happening. Robson would still be inviting them around for BBQ's

Very well said. It can't possibly be worse because like you said, there was a chance he was gonna be sent to jail. We just gotta wait and see how things look after this shitstorm. If the numbers of supportive social media users keep adding up, I honestly don't care what these reviewers of sites think and a Belgian popstar? Meh.

As long as his art stays available, so his music on streaming services and radio still playing it too, it should be fine. Look at actual bad people like Woody Allen, Roman Polanski, R Kelly. The first two are still widely celebrated for their work and the last one's music is still fully available on Spotify. I'm starting to become immune for the reviews of this filth and the media in general can really **** off anyway.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

its worse cuz he not here to defend himself! and its doesnt help that his estate aint doing anything bout it

It wouldnt be happening if he were here. Its worse for you not mj.

The media will never stop trying to destroy mj. We do what we can via social media and keep fighting. As as we have seen,while the media are trying to brainwash the public.they dont appear to be falling for it
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Ok which countrys do we have now?

USA
United Kingdom
Austrailia
Sweden
Netherlands
Denmark
Belgium

Did I forget one?
Exept from USA have all countrys mostly a white population.
It will be released as a streaming documentary via HBO in Norway in Mars as far as I know
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

It wouldnt be happening if he were here. Its worse for you not mj.

The media will never stop trying to destroy mj. We do what we can via social media and keep fighting. As as we have seen,while the media are trying to brainwash the public.they dont appear to be falling for it


i sure hope the public dont fall for it
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

What's the deal with this loser Jacobshagen anyway? So he's carrying that book And we all know there's nothing wrong with that book. So even if it was MJ's real autograph, which I really doubt, what does that prove at all? Seriously laughable.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I have heard from fans, who were together with Jacobshagen at a fan gathering, that he was trying to get information out of people who had met Michael and how that was for them (fishing for things to put in a book he was writing or something to that extent), while, at the same time, trying to sell more of his fake autographed crap. When they started demasking him, he turned violent, police were called and he got arrested.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

2005 and 1993 were way worse than this
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

2005 and 1993 were way worse than this
I somewhat I agree as Michael is not suffering because of this. But his children and family are suffering. We as fans are suffering but this too shall pass. MJ is too big a star and has too large a fan base for this rubbish to destroy his legacy. What Dan Reed has done was lazy. Opportunistic and evil. But we have the truth on our side like we did in 1993, and 2005. We are stronger for these trials and we will never stop fighting for MJ and his legacy. No other fan base I can think of is this informed, intelligent and well organised.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I have heard from fans, who were together with Jacobshagen at a fan gathering, that he was trying to get information out of people who had met Michael and how that was for them (fishing for things to put in a book he was writing or something to that extent), while, at the same time, trying to sell more of his fake autographed crap. When they started demasking him, he turned violent, police were called and he got arrested.


Why does everybody immediately start writing books???
 
As disgusting as this is we have to remember that Michael can’t die again. He has already been gone almost 10 years. His family however is still alive. Paris right now on twitter talking about what she sounds like then she is stoned. I hope it’s a joke but I kind of feel like a concerned parent. She is an adult by now but she is still so young, to young to remember anything about what it was actually like in 05 and I hope people are there to support her.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

What's the deal with this loser Jacobshagen anyway? So he's carrying that book And we all know there's nothing wrong with that book. So even if it was MJ's real autograph, which I really doubt, what does that prove at all? Seriously laughable.

The press will grasp at any straw to join this bandwagon (sorry to mix metaphors!).

Jacobshagen is just another 'straw'. He had one day (as a child) of basking in MJ's reflected glory, and has spent the rest of his life trying to recapture the magic, by any means possible.

He's tried everything, always for max publicity. He's taken German press into Forest Lawn, he's made out that he had a trove of letters from MJ (selling fake autographs and then pretending that MJ left him messages in 2009 that MJ feared being killed- Jacobshagen wrote all those letters). He's tried getting close to MJ associates (Ola Ray, as her 'manager'), and to Katherine (possibly by selling fake autographs to another MJ associate, and then using the money to access Katherine).
Also seemingly getting Katherines' permission to release his fake MJ 2009 letters to the press.

Now he'll trash MJ with fake writings and autographs, just to get himself on the current news bandwagon.
Sadly, he has some very serious problems, and the press are using him.

R and S are not much different, except they had a plan, and tried to get money.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

How can it be worse. Mj was fighting for his life on trial every day for 4 months. With totally one sided media reporting with no social media where we could point out the facts from the transcripts which we got of the testimony.we lived under a horrendous cloud for a year and and half scared to death that hey were trying to send mj literally to his death. lets put some prespective into this.I'll never forget the feeling the morning after the verdict feeling like the weight of the world had been lifted off my shoulders. They cannot hurt mj. Hes thankfully blissfully unaware. The only negative is as you say he cannot defend himself. But if he were here this would not be happening. Robson would still be inviting them around for BBQ's

For me it never felt as bad as it does now because MJ was innocent and I believed in court to show the world the truth. MJ must have felt it too, if you're innocent you believe in a positive verdict. He had nothing to hide so he must have been very confident.
People like Paris now or other family and friends are basically defenseless.
Now the verdict is already out and it's negative.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Who is seriously going to watch 4 hours of someone describing "child abuse"? Most people will see the running time and turn the channel over.

They are relying on fans to tune in to watch it to get good ratings. That's their "master plan". Trust me. That is why I keep trying to make everyone understand WHY it is EXREMELY IMPORTANT that no fan tunes in whatsoever no matter for what reason. Giving them ratings for WHATEVER REASON means endorsing them and helpng them in their plan. We can debunk their lies the way we have been doing it now too....once someone posts something that is untrue, go correct them and post them some facts. But don't watch and then start ACTIVELY debunking everything going "I watched it and I'm outraged" because that would just give them free publicity and attention and endorsement (because you watched it).. After it airs...LET IT DIE. If someone posts lies first, go correct them but don't start posting YOURSELF. And ignore the tabloids like The Sun, The Mirror, Radar Online, The Irish Times, etc....no use in wasting your energy on them because they won't change. Their whole business is based on spreading lies. It's wasted energy. LET T DIE. That's how the whole news world works...there will always be another shocking story around the corner and people will get tired of the old one and forget it. Let it become "yesterday's news".

I hope dearly this gets to court again, it's the only way to clear his name...]


but how can it go to court? michael not here to defend himself so how can it go to court? if you are hoping the estate will do anything if wishful thinking cuz they wouldve done more by now

I think we all need to have some patience and give the Estate time and have a little more faith in them.They already sent warning letters before the mockumentary airs. After it airs without HBO, etc. STILL having given them a chance to defend MJ's side or let them see the film or even agree to meet with the Estate...it could be that they have more ammunition to take some kind of legal action. Or they will have a better position because they weren't given a fair opportunity for their voice. It could be they found some legal loophole they can use and are just waiting now until after it airs for their counter action. It ain't over until the fat lady sings so be patient.

I have a feeling, that we will win this game!

We will.

It's so crystal clear that the people calling this powerful and all that bullshit have no idea about W&S's background. That much is for damn certain. I'm just glad that we're seeing plenty of support from non fans now too on social media. I'm sure we're gonna see a whole lot more glowing reviews and we just gotta go on. I rather not click on the reviews, but maybe we can email the writers of those reviews with facts?

99% of the comments everywhere are pro MJ. The media is trying to do whatever they can to slander MJ but obviously the majority isn't having it. People are starting to see the media as it is: not trustworthy. Even a radio reporter said, when talking about Smollet, that "I don't even know what's true anymore" because the media keeps posting so many stories that it's hard to know what is the truth because so many media outlets have stooped to the tabloid level and aren't reporting the truth anymore but a biased twisted version of lies. They try to lynch MJ in public and destroy his image and that is why it's important that we keep keep posting facts and keep posting MJ's songs and postive MJ related things to fight back. And whatever you do.....DO NOT TUNE IN to watch the mockumentary and give them ratings. They can try all their tricks but if the audience disagrees and they keep getting negative feedback and low ratings they will be forced to re-think how they treat MJ in the future if they want to still be able to stay in the busness and HAVE an audience.

How can it be worse. Mj was fighting for his life on trial every day for 4 months. With totally one sided media reporting with no social media where we could point out the facts from the transcripts which we got of the testimony.we lived under a horrendous cloud for a year and and half scared to death that hey were trying to send mj literally to his death. lets put some prespective into this.I'll never forget the feeling the morning after the verdict feeling like the weight of the world had been lifted off my shoulders. They cannot hurt mj. Hes thankfully blissfully unaware. The only negative is as you say he cannot defend himself. But if he were here this would not be happening. Robson would still be inviting them around for BBQ's

Exactly. This ain't nothing compared to 2005. At least now they can't hurt MJ. He's in a safe place and thank god won't have to see this and go through this anymore.(Which is exactly why Wade and James are doing this now and keep saying "MJ's dead." Because that is how they are obviously justifying this to themselves. In their sick minds they apparently think they aren't hurting him now when he's dead, so it's somehow okay.) I do feel really sorry for his children though and it breaks my heart to think what this does to his mother. But for us this is nothing compared to 2005 and we have learned a LOT since then. And unlike in 2005 when it was just the media who had a voice...thanks to social media now WE ALSO have a voice and can use it to fight back and to share FACTS to inform people on what is REALLY going on. In 2005 we didn't have that.

And yeah, this film would never exist if MJ would still be alive. 1. Because he would be able to sue for defamation and defend himself and 2. Because Wade would be too busy giving interviews on how he's friends with MJ.


It will be released as a streaming documentary via HBO in Norway in Mars as far as I know

Do a lot of people usually have HBO in Norway? Is that a major channel there or is it on cable only?

i sure hope the public dont fall for it

They won't. And as I keep saying...they are betting all of their chips on MJ fans watching it. If MJ fans tune in they get great ratings and that's what they are relying on. But if MJ fans stay away...Most of the publc is blissfully unaware about the film. Then they need to have enough free time first to watch it for two hours. And enough interest to tune in....not to mention...enough interested to keep watching. Then they also need enough time and interest to watch another two hours. if you're not a fan, that's one major time investement. people with families don't have time to sit in front of the TV for 2 hours. And people with families will turn the channel the second they start getting graphic. No parent will let their kids watch someone talk about spreading butt cheeks and masturbating. And if there are a lot of commercials, people will change the channel by the second commercial. I know I do. I haven't been able to commit myself to one show for years because I got sick of all the commercial breaks. I got so sick of it that i ended up not turning my TV on for over a year. And once I did, it blew up (literally LOL) and I couldn't have been bothered to buy a new one. They are expecting a lot from the audience to watch the film and like I said, a lot of people don't even know about it. I haven't heard ONE person mention it here and it has not been anywhere in the media here. Have also not heard anything from my family about it.

And what comes to the public....there have always been the sick jokes about MJ and name calling even before this. But he still sold out 50 shows in London. People keep throwing thoughtless comments and jokes around about MJ because they think it's "funny" but most of them don't mean it. And as the father of the boy whose nanny I used to be used to always say in the end of our arguments about MJ "I don't really hate him or think he's a bad person....I actually like him. But I love how riled up you get and how you start defending him so passionately every time so I'm just too tempted to tease you about him." A lot of people are like that....especially on social media... They are just trolls who get a kick out of getting people riled up but in reality they don't really care one way or the other...or are actually in reality more fans than haters but just like pushing people's buttons.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

[QUOTEI hope dearly this gets to court again, it's the only way to clear his name...]


but how can it go to court? michael not here to defend himself so how can it go to court? if you are hoping the estate will do anything if wishful thinking cuz they wouldve done more by now

R and S are awaiting the outcome of their appeal, which is listed for sometime later this year (August or later)?

Their case is against the MJJ companies and various named staff, and they say they want a trial. On the basis of the testimony they have already provided, their case will clearly fall apart if it does go to trial.
It would however be damaging regarding publicity, as we are already seeing with all these old 'faces' reappearing (like McManus from Neverland staff, Dimond as a commentator etc etc).
 
Anyone here seen the interviews Wade and James have given to USA Today and the LA Times? Pathetic. I hope they keep speaking to the media because they’ll eventually be exposed.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

It's pretty simple if they don't want this to get to court then what exactly do they want? There has to be a verdict and a settlement you don't shit on a dead man for nothing, something has to be gained from this for Robson and Safechuck...In the meantime I'm sure they're looking for more people to back their stories, it won't just end after the airing of LV. There's more coming.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

R and S are awaiting the outcome of their appeal, which is listed for sometime later this year (August or later)?

Their case is against the MJJ companies and various named staff, and they say they want a trial. On the basis of the testimony they have already provided, their case will clearly fall apart if it does go to trial.
It would however be damaging regarding publicity, as we are already seeing with all these old 'faces' reappearing (like McManus from Neverland staff, Dimond as a commentator etc etc).

Considering they obviously have been talking to each other extensively about their case as can be shown since both were at the Sundancce Q&A talking about the very case TOGETHER, they have a very few chances for their case because you are not allowed to talk to other witnesses. If the case is on appeal, it means it's still active which means they still aren't allowed to be in contact. Also...there is a video tape of Wade knowingly lying to the Sundance audience about when he last talked to James so the case can already be dismissed based on that because he said different things under oath during his depositon. It will be hard for him to explan how he could have "mistaken" having talked to James in 2014 as he said in his deposition if he in fact had not had ANY contact IN DECADES with him before that. He will also have a hard tme explaning why he was telling the audience at Sundance they hadn't talked or met before that when he knew they talked in 2014. No matter what way you twist it, he has talked himself to a corner which already is proof enough to have the case dismissed.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I've adopted a new way of trying to argue our case for MJ on social media. I've recognised that force feeding people with facts doesn't work. It causes people to instantly discredit you as you're considered the caricature portrayal of an insane MJ fan. You have to play the part of an uninformed member of the public, creating doubt by making sutble suggestions and leaving breadcrumbs of evidence for them to make their own conclusions. I've noticed that you're taken far more seriously and as you're considered somewhat neuteral so the barriers don't shoot up so quick. It's almost like someone forcing religion down your throat. Your instant reaction is to brickwall them.

Slight tip for those who feel like their fire fighting at the moment..

In saying that - the response so far to the trailer hasn't been as horrrific as I first imagined *staying optimistic*
Good advice, thank you!

On the other hand, how absurd is that people who can provide facts are considered delusional...
 
The fact that they state they are not getting paid for this is laughable. There is no way in hell they are not getting paid. If the estate sit around and do nothing except send out a 10 page letter I will be very disappointed. I honestly don’t know what the best course of action is with this b.s. I have a hard time believing people will watch this for 4hs. 99% of the population still don’t know about this documentary. These allegations are the absolute worst thing anyone can be accused of. How they can get away with doing this is mind blowing.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Like somebody said at the start of this thread, where do wade and safechuck go from here? They would have told Reed everything that "happened" already in the documentary. If there plan is to release a book then they will just come across as even more money grabbing and fame seeking. This is going to back fire on them especially if the estate release a counter-documentary and the fans keep spreading the facts.
 
SeeingVoices;4242026 said:
I've adopted a new way of trying to argue our case for MJ on social media. I've recognised that force feeding people with facts doesn't work. It causes people to instantly discredit you as you're considered the caricature portrayal of an insane MJ fan. You have to play the part of an uninformed member of the public, creating doubt by making sutble suggestions and leaving breadcrumbs of evidence for them to make their own conclusions. I've noticed that you're taken far more seriously and as you're considered somewhat neuteral so the barriers don't shoot up so quick. It's almost like someone forcing religion down your throat. Your instant reaction is to brickwall them.

Slight tip for those who feel like their fire fighting at the moment..

In saying that - the response so far to the trailer hasn't been as horrrific as I first imagined *staying optimistic*

That really sounds like a damn good idea. Personally I can easily get riled up and that's when I've already "lost". Can you give some examples of how to bring suggestions to them and breadcrumbs? Where to start and to make sure you don't come off as "too informed/obsessed"?

barbee0715;4242027 said:
You really have to wonder what is going on in Australia for their version of 60 Minutes to run another garbage piece. I believe this is the 3rd or so one that they've run since Michael's death.
Somebody should send an email to them that Michael J. is being prosecuted for forging Michael's signature. Can't believe he ordered a copy of that old book just to fabricate some "proof."
And what's with Jermaine and LaToya? They can't stay off camera. Hopefully 60 Minutes paid them.

Where are you all "fighting" on Facebook? I'm sure everyone's tired-I'm tired just trying to keep up with the two forums I'm on, and fighting on YouTube. I haven't been to Facebook since Christmas, I think.

Wait, Jacobshagen is actually being prosecuted for that? I'm sure this pathetic program he will be in along with mister murderer and Diane Denon won't mention that at all. Wow.

Carmour260;4242039 said:

Charlemagne talking nothing but sense here, I really like that!

Erandi;4242106 said:
I have heard from fans, who were together with Jacobshagen at a fan gathering, that he was trying to get information out of people who had met Michael and how that was for them (fishing for things to put in a book he was writing or something to that extent), while, at the same time, trying to sell more of his fake autographed crap. When they started demasking him, he turned violent, police were called and he got arrested.

Sneaky little snake he sounds like, but one glance at his face on that photo where he's holding the book and you can see this dude isn't to be trusted to be honest. Good that he got arrested!

Zeus7;4242111 said:
Why does everybody immediately start writing books???

Exactly. It's like they've chosen the wrong careers. Should have authors.

La74;4242116 said:
As disgusting as this is we have to remember that Michael can’t die again. He has already been gone almost 10 years. His family however is still alive. Paris right now on twitter talking about what she sounds like then she is stoned. I hope it’s a joke but I kind of feel like a concerned parent. She is an adult by now but she is still so young, to young to remember anything about what it was actually like in 05 and I hope people are there to support her.

Not a word about her dad then? While in the past she had been posting a lot about him, always about how much she misses him, always love. Wasn't she admitted to a help center of some kind recently though? Whatever the case, she has her reasons for staying quiet about this. Just like her brothers and just like the whole family really.

It's not up to me to judge that.

myosotis;4242117 said:
The press will grasp at any straw to join this bandwagon (sorry to mix metaphors!).

Jacobshagen is just another 'straw'. He had one day (as a child) of basking in MJ's reflected glory, and has spent the rest of his life trying to recapture the magic, by any means possible.

He's tried everything, always for max publicity. He's taken German press into Forest Lawn, he's made out that he had a trove of letters from MJ (selling fake autographs and then pretending that MJ left him messages in 2009 that MJ feared being killed- Jacobshagen wrote all those letters). He's tried getting close to MJ associates (Ola Ray, as her 'manager'), and to Katherine (possibly by selling fake autographs to another MJ associate, and then using the money to access Katherine).
Also seemingly getting Katherines' permission to release his fake MJ 2009 letters to the press.

Now he'll trash MJ with fake writings and autographs, just to get himself on the current news bandwagon.
Sadly, he has some very serious problems, and the press are using him.

R and S are not much different, except they had a plan, and tried to get money.

What the hell man. This guy has taken things very far, very sad really. It's definitely clear he has issues and in some cases I could have sympathy for that, but for this? Oh hell no.

aqwsz;4242118 said:
For me it never felt as bad as it does now because MJ was innocent and I believed in court to show the world the truth. MJ must have felt it too, if you're innocent you believe in a positive verdict. He had nothing to hide so he must have been very confident.
People like Paris now or other family and friends are basically defenseless.
Now the verdict is already out and it's negative.

Hmmm, can't say I was that optimistic back then. Especially because the USA can be a weird place where racism absolutely still fully existed/exists and there have been plenty of black men convicted of crimes they didn't commit.

I remember one episode of Oprah where she had several black men in her interview and they had been sitting in death row for a long ass time, until I believe a new mayor came into town and started looked at the case and long story short these men hadn't done anything.

On top of that we had one particular guy on CNN who was asked what was gonna happen on the day of the verdict. And he went like "well, when Mr Jackson will be found guilty he will be heading to this here facility." unbelievable, the guy had already thought it was a given, a sure shot that Michael was going to be found guilty.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

They are relying on fans to tune in to watch it to get good ratings. That's their "master plan". Trust me. That is why I keep trying to make everyone understand WHY it is EXREMELY IMPORTANT that no fan tunes in whatsoever no matter for what reason. Giving them ratings for WHATEVER REASON means endorsing them and helpng them in their plan. We can debunk their lies the way we have been doing it now too....once someone posts something that is untrue, go correct them and post them some facts. But don't watch and then start ACTIVELY debunking everything going "I watched it and I'm outraged" because that would just give them free publicity and attention and endorsement (because you watched it).. After it airs...LET IT DIE. If someone posts lies first, go correct them but don't start posting YOURSELF. And ignore the tabloids like The Sun, The Mirror, Radar Online, The Irish Times, etc....no use in wasting your energy on them because they won't change. Their whole business is based on spreading lies. It's wasted energy. LET T DIE. That's how the whole news world works...there will always be another shocking story around the corner and people will get tired of the old one and forget it. Let it become "yesterday's news".



I think we all need to have some patience and give the Estate time and have a little more faith in them.They already sent warning letters before the mockumentary airs. After it airs without HBO, etc. STILL having given them a chance to defend MJ's side or let them see the film or even agree to meet with the Estate...it could be that they have more ammunition to take some kind of legal action. Or they will have a better position because they weren't given a fair opportunity for their voice. It could be they found some legal loophole they can use and are just waiting now until after it airs for their counter action. It ain't over until the fat lady sings so be patient.



We will.



99% of the comments everywhere are pro MJ. The media is trying to do whatever they can to slander MJ but obviously the majority isn't having it. People are starting to see the media as it is: not trustworthy. Even a radio reporter said, when talking about Smollet, that "I don't even know what's true anymore" because the media keeps posting so many stories that it's hard to know what is the truth because so many media outlets have stooped to the tabloid level and aren't reporting the truth anymore but a biased twisted version of lies. They try to lynch MJ in public and destroy his image and that is why it's important that we keep keep posting facts and keep posting MJ's songs and postive MJ related things to fight back. And whatever you do.....DO NOT TUNE IN to watch the mockumentary and give them ratings. They can try all their tricks but if the audience disagrees and they keep getting negative feedback and low ratings they will be forced to re-think how they treat MJ in the future if they want to still be able to stay in the busness and HAVE an audience.



Exactly. This ain't nothing compared to 2005. At least now they can't hurt MJ. He's in a safe place and thank god won't have to see this and go through this anymore.(Which is exactly why Wade and James are doing this now and keep saying "MJ's dead." Because that is how they are obviously justifying this to themselves. In their sick minds they apparently think they aren't hurting him now when he's dead, so it's somehow okay.) I do feel really sorry for his children though and it breaks my heart to think what this does to his mother. But for us this is nothing compared to 2005 and we have learned a LOT since then. And unlike in 2005 when it was just the media who had a voice...thanks to social media now WE ALSO have a voice and can use it to fight back and to share FACTS to inform people on what is REALLY going on. In 2005 we didn't have that.

And yeah, this film would never exist if MJ would still be alive. 1. Because he would be able to sue for defamation and defend himself and 2. Because Wade would be too busy giving interviews on how he's friends with MJ.




Do a lot of people usually have HBO in Norway? Is that a major channel there or is it on cable only?



They won't. And as I keep saying...they are betting all of their chips on MJ fans watching it. If MJ fans tune in they get great ratings and that's what they are relying on. But if MJ fans stay away...Most of the publc is blissfully unaware about the film. Then they need to have enough free time first to watch it for two hours. And enough interest to tune in....not to mention...enough interested to keep watching. Then they also need enough time and interest to watch another two hours. if you're not a fan, that's one major time investement. people with families don't have time to sit in front of the TV for 2 hours. And people with families will turn the channel the second they start getting graphic. No parent will let their kids watch someone talk about spreading butt cheeks and masturbating. And if there are a lot of commercials, people will change the channel by the second commercial. I know I do. I haven't been able to commit myself to one show for years because I got sick of all the commercial breaks. I got so sick of it that i ended up not turning my TV on for over a year. And once I did, it blew up (literally LOL) and I couldn't have been bothered to buy a new one. They are expecting a lot from the audience to watch the film and like I said, a lot of people don't even know about it. I haven't heard ONE person mention it here and it has not been anywhere in the media here. Have also not heard anything from my family about it.

And what comes to the public....there have always been the sick jokes about MJ and name calling even before this. But he still sold out 50 shows in London. People keep throwing thoughtless comments and jokes around about MJ because they think it's "funny" but most of them don't mean it. And as the father of the boy whose nanny I used to be used to always say in the end of our arguments about MJ "I don't really hate him or think he's a bad person....I actually like him. But I love how riled up you get and how you start defending him so passionately every time so I'm just too tempted to tease you about him." A lot of people are like that....especially on social media... They are just trolls who get a kick out of getting people riled up but in reality they don't really care one way or the other...or are actually in reality more fans than haters but just like pushing people's buttons.

I agree with that about the estate. Let's give it some time and see what happens. It would be a huge shame if this is it for them, but let us not forget they did say that even though we hear nothing and they understand how frustrating that is, they aren't sitting still. Now it's possible that they meant the 10 page letter with that and perhaps the documentary that Taj has planned, but could be something else too. I guess it's possible the estate wants to see what the reaction from the general public is, because just like we don't take the media seriously at all anymore, neither does the estate. So their "reviews" don't matter at all.

I also 100 % agree with you about that fans really should not watch this mockumentary. Not on HBO, not on Channel 4, not on VPRO, nowhere. I hadn't seen it like you've explained that Reed is hoping fans will watch it, but you're right and we can't give in to that. I really hope fans that aren't here won't watch it either. And if they really need to see it, hopefully someone pirates it. It's so damn great to see all the positive comments and the ones that aren't are disliked and get replied to with facts. It's so motivating to see comments from people that used to be doubters or actually believers of him being guilty and now they have completely did a 360 on that. I've not always been a supporter of social media for certain things but for this it's a blessing really.

Like you said, we now have a voice and we can actually fight for Michael and God knows he deserves it. This is a huge difference with 2005. I remember how I tried to convince people on a certain hiphop forum only to be turned down. If that had been now I could have posted tweets with facts, the Razorfist videos and so much more.

Oh and as for people being aware of the mockumentary, same here. Back in 2013 when Wade came with this shit my stepfather did tell me about it because he knows I don't have cable or digital TV. I haven't heard him about this at all yet.

Nor have friends or other relatives. It was when I visited Hotnewhiphop that I saw the news about it. It would be wonderful if it stays like that. But I doubt that a little. My stepfather watches a lot of TV and I'm sure something like De wereld Draait Door will talk about it once it has aired on VPRO. But we'll see and I'll just tell him that it's a work of fiction.

And if my English aunt (who said years ago "why do you think he had that theme park") starts about this I will say the same. I don't want a falling out with my aunt because she's real dear to me. I'll just say, dear aunt, we'll never agree about this, it's a work of fiction, there's zero evidence, and these guys have defended him until the money was low.


Like somebody said at the start of this thread, where do wade and safechuck go from here? They would have told Reed everything that "happened" already in the documentary. If there plan is to release a book then they will just come across as even more money grabbing and fame seeking. This is going to back fire on them especially if the estate release a counter-documentary and the fans keep spreading the facts.

I guess it depends on how the media overall reacts to it. How movie websites and channels react to it. If they all fall for it, I'm sure the two or three shits will be invited to all kinds of talk shows and crap like that. My wish is that they get exposed, lose their career altogether or what's left of it. I'd give money to see these lowlives behind bars.

And we now know Dan Reed is open to make a mockumentary and this time about Chandler and Arvizo, well... pathetic excuse for a documentary maker, do your worst.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

While we can be upset to see reviews that praise the documentary, we can't really be that upset at the individuals that watch it and indeed to find it 'powerful' 'compelling' etc.. To speak through our annoyance and anger, we have to come to grips with the fact the MAIN reason we see through the BS is because we've spent decades studying the allegations. If we can't come to terms with the idea that IF you/I did not have the information we are aware of, we too would probably find the documentary compelling.

It's ok to even state that to them. "Look, I totally get how he comes off, and if I did not go through hundreds (if not thousands) of legal documents/including FBI files - I would probably be thinking the same thing..." Starting convos off like this more so opens the discussion and gets people curious of what you know..

pull them in to listen to you by using the same emotion Dan Reed does to suck them in.. We suck them out by first reaching them emotionally and introducing ACTUAL facts!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

many people in UK starting to see this as a savile/cosby style where everyone is coming forward - even if the claims are many years old [neverland maids]
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

What's the deal with this loser Jacobshagen anyway? So he's carrying that book And we all know there's nothing wrong with that book. So even if it was MJ's real autograph, which I really doubt, what does that prove at all? Seriously laughable.

Quick comment on Jacobshagen:

The book he's claiming was personally signed by Michael c. 1997 is The Boy: A Photographic Essay.
Of which there was only ever one copy known to be in Michael's possession.
Which was found at Neverland and seized in November 2003.
Which they never gave back.

Jacobshagen's narrative, then, is that Michael gave him the one and only copy of the book complete with a personalized autograph, took it back sometime before November 2003, somehow had the inscription removed, had it seized by the FBI and LAPD to be later used in his trial, re-obtained it from law enforcement, re-signed it for Jacobshagen, and gave it back at any time after his return to the United States in 2007.

The likely defense will be that Michael owned two copies, which (1) is complete guesswork, and (2) plays against the presentation of Michael as a paranoid pedophile who didn't want to leave a trail.
 
Back
Top