I personally think it's a bad idea for any avid fan to watch this documentary as it risks destroying your own personal image of Michael for good - regardless if you go into watching it as staunch believer in MJ's innocence. I've saw many fans fall victim to this already which is incredibly sad. To repeatedly engrain idea's into someones mind is undoubtedly going to have an impact. This is Reeds intention and it's clearly been effective for some which is why people have self declared cancelling MJ.
At the same time, social media is hell at the moment and you come to his fan forum to kind of find solace and you hear the same stuff you do on Twitter.
People have calmly presented these people with facts as well and theyve been ignored, same as Twitter. I have no patience for doubters at the moment.
Harun;4247624 said:tbh what is about the freedom speech? Imo when „fans“ have doubts its the wrong way to ban them. That's why the Social Media say that we are fanatics... this is Not Good. When somebody has doubts let give him facts to destroy their doubts
Proven because Taj says so?Wade, his wife and his sister are lying about the timeline of their dinner at Neverland in 2005 to help spin their narrative. Proven.
Wade's wife can not keep her story straight about whether she was abused or not. In Leaving Neverland she says she had no idea about child sexual abuse and it's effects. One way or another, she is lying. Proven.
I'm just gonna say it here now, i hope people like Speed Demon will receive a ban. Beyond tired of posters like this that truly feel like I am talking to a hater. This poster earlier today already said that we'd still defend him if proof came out that he did it and now this poster said it to me personally, you've really REALLY gone too far there mister/woman.
Maybe you could add an "ignore" function to the forum, so that those who are upset by the doubters can just put them on ignore instead of fighting with them.
Proven because Taj says so?
Were talking 2005 which would make it hard for either side to remember where the helle they were.
Or is there video of the event?
Proven because Taj says so?
Were talking 2005 which would make it hard for either side to remember where the helle they were.
Or is there video of the event?
Why then, did channel 4 remove the segment from the film after Taj high lighted it? Very suspicious
I agree completely. Stacey and I are trying to create a calm space here, for people who are loyal to Michael. This is perhaps one of the few sane and safe havens left in MJ fandom.
And don't forget Michael JacohabsenI am tired of people calling me to talk about Michael Jackson.and say mean things about him!!! I am not going to argue with them
elusive moonwalker;4247678 said:Thanks to socav. So glad reed picked morgan to troll.it wont end well😆 shows a picture of morgan with the jackson bros
Reed now trolling one of the only journalists who bothered to do his job.
Piers Morgan
✔
@piersmorgan
What are you ‘sayin’, Dan?
Dan Reed
@danreed1000
Just sayin ⁦⁦@piersmorgan⁩
View image on Twitter
707
10:42 PM - Mar 8, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
347 people are talking about this