What's wrong with beautiful girlI prefer hot street anyway...slapstick is so weird. Slapstick & beautiful girl can stay in the vaults!! Never thought I'd hate any of his songs even if they are demos

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's wrong with beautiful girlI prefer hot street anyway...slapstick is so weird. Slapstick & beautiful girl can stay in the vaults!! Never thought I'd hate any of his songs even if they are demos
I can't see them releasing two demos of the same calibor on 1 new albumi think itās only right we get hot street seeing as michael himself said how much he loved the song. i agree that it would be awesome if it were released as a single and maybe with a b-side being slapstick
I don't know about it being in his top ten best songs but it is quite magical and very soothing. I like to look at it as the first part of the trilogy ('Beautiful Girl', 'The Loser' and 'Days In Gloucestershire').āBeautiful Girlā is in his top ten best songs. I wonāt be taking any questions.
I'd love to see Hot Street as a single, but a b-side? Are they still a thing in the age of streaming?i think itās only right we get hot street seeing as michael himself said how much he loved the song. i agree that it would be awesome if it were released as a single and maybe with a b-side being slapstick
According to the first announcement: no, the vinyl will contain the album itself only, nothing else. So, I'm assuming it'll be the new remaster and that's it.The questions no one seems to be asking themselves are: will the vinyl contain the bonus material also? And will they change the artwork for the vinyl, as they have done for the CD?
How disappointing! Why release the same album with the same 9 tracks again, but with a different cover? Doesnāt make any sense. Besides, many people prefer vinyl over CD.According to the first announcement: no, the vinyl will contain the album itself only, nothing else. So, I'm assuming it'll be the new remaster and that's it.
My guess is that this reissue (Thriller 40) will be a new remaster and they want to put it out in replacement of the 2014 one.How disappointing! Why release the same album with the same 9 tracks again, but with a different cover? Doesnāt make any sense. Besides, many people prefer vinyl over CD.
Thatās an interesting theory. I do, however, doubt they will take the 2014 reissue off the shelves, and instead use this edition, with the awful-looking artwork and the number, as a replacement.My guess is that this reissue (Thriller 40) will be a new remaster and they want to put it out in replacement of the 2014 one.
Yes, that's what I meant. They will stop pressing vinyl with the 2014 master.Thatās an interesting theory. I do, however, doubt they will take the 2014 reissue off the shelves, and instead use this edition, with the awful-looking artwork and the number, as a replacement.
A lot of History outakes? I thought there are barely any.This album is nothing but a money grab. They missed out with Dangerous and History anniversaries . There were a LOT of songs made for those.
Apparently the Estate believes that a potential anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album may not be a good idea because it would attract people's attention to the accusations against Michael Jackson.This album is nothing but a money grab. They missed out with Dangerous and History anniversaries . There were a LOT of songs made for those.
It has been estimated that there are about 40 outtakes from the 'HIStory' album, but most of them are not fully finished (they are still in the final stages of production).A lot of History outakes? I thought there are barely any.
When did they ever say/imply that?Apparently the Estate believes that a potential anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album may not be a good idea because it would attract people's attention to the accusations against Michael Jackson.
Somehow it would make sense if it turned out that mj_frenzy = John BrancaWhen did they ever say/imply that?
They have stated that an anniversary for HIStory was indeed planned, but cancelled, due to the COVID pandemic. And no, they did not make such a statement only to give a pathetic excuse to the fans. There is truth in what they have said and we have proof of it: the Munich 97ā 4K remaster. So, thereās another one of your theories debunked.Apparently the Estate believes that a potential anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album may not be a good idea because it would attract people's attention to the accusations against Michael Jackson
Highly doubtful. 40 outtakes is way too much for the HIStory era, especially when taking into consideration how many songs which did make the track list, were written many years before.It has been estimated that there are about 40 outtakes from the 'HIStory' album, but most of them are not fully finished (they are still in the final stages of production).
Iirc, one of the engineers who worked on the album sessions said there's about 3 or 4 finished songs and anything between 10 and 20 unfinished tracks in various stages of completion. According to him, HIStory was rushed to the point where MJ didn't go for his famous work ethic of trying various ideas. He just got what he felt had the more potential at first and developed them, leaving all the rest aside.Highly doubtful. 40 outtakes is way too much for the HIStory era, especially when taking into consideration how many songs which did make the track list, were written many years before.
they arenāt unfortunately but it would a great opportunity for the estate to do a limited physical release for the fans and it would boost the performance of the song on the charts and make the thriller 40 campaign more excitingI'd love to see Hot Street as a single, but a b-side? Are they still a thing in the age of streaming?
Despite of the Estate's official statement about that, the COVID-19 pandemic had nothing to do with a possible anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album.They have stated that an anniversary for HIStory was indeed planned, but cancelled, due to the COVID pandemic.
I hope we can hear one more unleaked songI think starlight or niteline will be next![]()
Countless artists postponed new projects at the outset of the pandemic, most of which werenāt even public knowledge until afterwards. Also, letās not forget the impact COVID had (and continues to have) on supply chains, deliveries, and manufacturing. Canāt release a project that canāt be made or delivered, can you?Despite of the Estate's official statement about that, the COVID-19 pandemic had nothing to do with a possible anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album.
The COVID-19 pandemic did not really affect studio album releases, anniversary album releases, and so on.
Look at all those artists and producers who were able to continue working on their albums, just like they did before that pandemic.
As a matter of fact, the COVID-19 pandemic led to the release of more albums, because they had more time on their hands, so they spent that time on working on their new music.
The COVID-19 pandemic mainly affected public events that people physically attend, such as music festivals, music awards, concert tours.
The Beatles were supposed to release the 50th anniversary of Let It Be in 2020. Guess what? They didnāt! Why? Because of COVID. They originally planned to release the Get Back documentary in theaters, which they subsequently couldnāt do, so they waited a year.Despite of the Estate's official statement about that, the COVID-19 pandemic had nothing to do with a possible anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album.
The COVID-19 pandemic did not really affect studio album releases, anniversary album releases, and so on.
Look at all those artists and producers who were able to continue working on their albums, just like they did before that pandemic.
As a matter of fact, the COVID-19 pandemic led to the release of more albums, because they had more time on their hands, so they spent that time on working on their new music.
The COVID-19 pandemic mainly affected public events that people physically attend, such as music festivals, music awards, concert tours.
If the COVID-19 pandemic was the real reason, they could have easily delayed for some months the anniversary release of the 'HIStory' album.Countless artists postponed new projects at the outset of the pandemic, most of which werenāt even public knowledge until afterwards. Also, letās not forget the impact COVID had (and continues to have) on supply chains, deliveries, and manufacturing. Canāt release a project that canāt be made or delivered, can you?
Iām not entirely convinced the estate had big plans for HIStory in 2020, but saying COVID couldnāt have impacted them is objectively false.
The theatrical release of the HIStory Tour was apparently cancelled due to the backlash (against that release) that the Estate received from fans.The HIStory Tour was most likely going to be released in theaters for HIStory 25, and with the whole world shut down, it, also, wouldnāt have been possible.
LOL, I'd say it's more likely the fear of another lawsuit that makes the estate and/or Sony rethink some of their steps.Note that fans' feedback plays an important role for the Estate.
Fans have been vocal about their opinions about a release of the HIStory Tour for a long time, ever since John Branca first announced they were planning on releasing the Munich show back in 2012.The theatrical release of the HIStory Tour was apparently cancelled due to the backlash (against that release) that the Estate received from fans.