The Official 'Michael' Bio-Pic Thread

What about Diana Ross and Janet Jackson did not agree to be in the movie don't you get??

What do you know about it's not enjoyable, if you're not into his music? You are, so you can't speak for people who aren't.
I know Janet didn’t agree to be in it (didn’t know about Diana though), either way as a viewer it still leaves a gap in the story. And yeah, this is just my opinion and I don't completely disagree with the critics on this one. The audience scores just shows how many fans MJ still hast (IMO!) which is of course great.
 
Last edited:
Irgendwie widersprichst du dich 😅
I get that those moments were part of his life and show his isolation from the real world, but there was so much more depth to him. His life and personality were way more interesting than just showing him watching TV or escaping into stuff like that (or turning Branca into one of the main characters). It just feels like the movie barely scratches the surface, which is a shame—because it could’ve been a great chance for non-fans to actually understand him better. It’s kind of a missed opportunity.
 
Last edited:
I just hope they realize that the only reason why people are happy with the first movie being a "celebration" of Michael is because this was accurate for the time period covered by the first part. But this would NOT be acceptable for a part 2. They need to find a way to put the truth out there about 1993, just skipping it won't do. This is their one chance to correct the false narrative and let the public hear the Evan Chandler recorded phone tape, so if they don't do EVERYTHING in their power to make that happen, they can expect a lot of angry people. When they say, "We've tried, but the settlement agreement..." I just want to tell them exactly what Michael told Walter Yetnikoff when they wouldn't play his video on MTV: "You haven't tried hard enough." In the best case scenario, they need to either find a loophole or get Jordan Chandler to agree to be depicted. In the worst case scenario, Graham King should do a separate short film on his own to cover just the 1993 allegations without the estate. But skipping the Evan Chandler recorded phone call is not okay with me, not when it is the strongest piece of evidence that Michael was innocent. If the estate cares at all about Michael's legacy, they will not let that phone call be forever buried as if it never existed. You're a lawyer, Branca, find a way.
The CEO of Lionsgate said in the video with Belloni that they are checking viewers' comments very closely to see what they want for Part 2. I think we should make it clear in comments that in part according to the timeline of Michael's life, the accusations have to be part of the film and 2 part can not only be a celebration of his music.
 
Luiz Fernando
@Luiz_Fernando_J
·
8h


Pre-sales for this weekend on fire for both #TheDevilWearsPrada2 debut & #MICHAEL’s 2nd frame. Many who didn’t experience the party last weekend playing catch up along with repeat viewers for the biopic, while the female leaning comedy is generating a Barbie-esque party revival. Several screenings selling out or just about to for both films.Hollywood has been trying to recreate #Barbenheimer for so long, and just like in 2023, a new event might be coming together organically when no one was looking.#MichaelWearsPrada might be happening just in front of our eyes!Let’s see how the weekend will actually pan out though, but regardless, 2026 has been the most exciting the US #BoxOffice has felt in a long time. There’s genuine momentum building up weekend after weekend!
 
Luiz Fernando
@Luiz_Fernando_J
·
8h


Pre-sales for this weekend on fire for both #TheDevilWearsPrada2 debut & #MICHAEL’s 2nd frame. Many who didn’t experience the party last weekend playing catch up along with repeat viewers for the biopic, while the female leaning comedy is generating a Barbie-esque party revival. Several screenings selling out or just about to for both films.Hollywood has been trying to recreate #Barbenheimer for so long, and just like in 2023, a new event might be coming together organically when no one was looking.#MichaelWearsPrada might be happening just in front of our eyes!Let’s see how the weekend will actually pan out though, but regardless, 2026 has been the most exciting the US #BoxOffice has felt in a long time. There’s genuine momentum building up weekend after weekend!
MichaelWearsPrada 🫠 🫠 🫠

How about:

MoonPrada
Michael Prada
TheMoonwalkerWearsPrada

🫠 🫥
 
The CEO of Lionsgate said in the video with Belloni that they are checking viewers' comments very closely to see what they want for Part 2. I think we should make it clear in comments that in part according to the timeline of Michael's life, the accusations have to be part of the film and 2 part can not only be a celebration of his music.
Do you have a link to the video?
 
I just hope they realize that the only reason why people are happy with the first movie being a "celebration" of Michael is because this was accurate for the time period covered by the first part. But this would NOT be acceptable for a part 2. They need to find a way to put the truth out there about 1993, just skipping it won't do. This is their one chance to correct the false narrative and let the public hear the Evan Chandler recorded phone tape, so if they don't do EVERYTHING in their power to make that happen, they can expect a lot of angry people. When they say, "We've tried, but the settlement agreement..." I just want to tell them exactly what Michael told Walter Yetnikoff when they wouldn't play his video on MTV: "You haven't tried hard enough." In the best case scenario, they need to either find a loophole or get Jordan Chandler to agree to be depicted. In the worst case scenario, Graham King should do a separate short film on his own to cover just the 1993 allegations without the estate. But skipping the Evan Chandler recorded phone call is not okay with me, not when it is the strongest piece of evidence that Michael was innocent. If the estate cares at all about Michael's legacy, they will not let that phone call be forever buried as if it never existed. You're a lawyer, Branca, find a way.

Got lots of love for you, etoile and I agree with a lot of your points but, I think it’s a bit presumptuous to say that

“the only reason people are happy is….”

You can’t possibly know that?
I know many people who just wanted to watch a positive movie, and hear music LOUD, from the greatest artist who ever lived. I know I wanted that, more than anything.

There may be some people, like me, who are tired of hearing about the PROVABLY WRONG allegations. We’ve had decades of it.

I know he’s innocent. I don’t need anymore proof.
I would probably not have gone (even if I could) to watch a film that (would have to) spend AGES trying to explain the complexities of the chandl3r case and why it’s bullsh1t - mainly to peoples in cinemas who already know he’s innocent.

You can make any film you want that includes hours and hours telling MJ’s side.
The media/press will deride it as lies.
MJ haters/guilters will say it’s ’one Sided bull’

Each to their own, as they say, but I’m enjoying the positivity and MASSIVE success of this film.

I’m also enjoying that it’s annoying a lot of doubters. 💪😂

As I said at the start though, etoile,
It’s all said with love for you 😉
 
I don't care if part 2 talks about the accusations. I think It s too soon for part 2 and should be more appropriate for the third movie ( at this point, not everything has to happen chronologically).
The goal of these movies was not to make Citizen Kane again, but to sell the brand Michael Jackson, by making a movie worth to be watched with the scenic performances.
It s surely not to justify the injustifiable, or to destroy the brand.
People won't pay a tickets to watch that sad story of a superstar falling an all-time low. People wants to see feel-good movies.
 

Here is the full text:

Who will direct ‘Michael: Part Two’?: I teased this yesterday on The Town, but it’s true: Michael producer Graham King has floated the idea of stepping in to direct the sequel, once it’s officially greenlit. That might sound nuts given that King has zero directing credits, but he was very hands-on in coordinating the reshoots and assembling the final cut after legal issues required a total overhaul of the first film.

Plus, if King and Lionsgate want Michael: Part Two to shoot later this year for a 2027 release, that will require replacing Antoine Fuqua, who directed Michael but is committed for the rest of this year to Netflix’s big-budget Denzel Washington epic about Hannibal (the general, not the cannibal).

Fuqua shot a bunch of additional musical performances and long sequences at Neverland Ranch (hence why Ron Burkle, the owner of Neverland, is a credited executive producer on Michael). That footage was not used when the original three-hour story was truncated to end in 1988, but given his familiarity with everything, King might make sense to step in and direct, with Fuqua serving as a producer, rather than King bringing in another filmmaker to combine the existing footage with new stuff. (Ironically, that’s exactly what happened on King’s Bohemian Rhapsody, when director Bryan Singer was fired and replaced with Dexter Fletcher for the final few weeks of filming.)

Fuqua isn’t the only Michael talent with scheduling issues, of course, so punting the shoot until 2027 may still happen. A follow-up film will also require negotiating new deals with all the principals, who, now that Michael opened to a massive $219 million worldwide, have tons of leverage.

And unlike on the first film, whose budget ballooned due to a legal oversight by the Jackson estate, co-executor John Branca is unlikely to want to foot the bill for the additional footage needed for a second film. (A rep for King declined to comment.)

And speaking of ‘Michael’ pay…: Nia Long, who plays Jackson’s mother, Katherine, in Michael, is quietly fighting Lionsgate over her compensation on the movie, according to three sources.

Long had a “favored nations” clause in her contract, meaning she could not be paid less than her co-stars, and she is said to have learned that both Colman Domingo and Miles Teller earned more than she did. Not great, if that’s true.

She’s now threatening to take the studio to mediation over the discrepancy. Before you note that Long appeared far less in Michael than Domingo, remember that the movie changed significantly from what she signed on for, and in the original script I read, Long’s part was bigger, including a key scene at the end of the film. Lionsgate declined to comment, and reps for Long did not respond to my email."
 
I don't care if part 2 talks about the accusations. I think It s too soon for part 2 and should be more appropriate for the third movie ( at this point, not everything has to happen chronologically).
The goal of these movies was not to make Citizen Kane again, but to sell the brand Michael Jackson, by making a movie worth to be watched with the scenic performances.
It s surely not to justify the injustifiable, or to destroy the brand.
People won't pay a tickets to watch that sad story of a superstar falling an all-time low. People wants to see feel-good movies.
After ’93, how do you make that a feel-good movie without basically rewriting reality?
 
Luiz Fernando
@Luiz_Fernando_J
·
4h


But not even #TheDevilWearsPrada2’s record breaking opening is overshadowing KING OF POP #MichaelJackson in Europe!In #Italy’s #BoxOffice, music biopic #MICHAEL grossed $883k on 2nd THU, going actually up (!!!) +8.1% from first THU, reaching $11.1M 9-day cume and crossing the 1M admissions mark, hitting 1.2M moviegoers to cinemas.Second weekend poised for a historic hold never seen Post-Covid out of holiday corridor.
 
Luiz Fernando
@Luiz_Fernando_J
·
4h


But not even #TheDevilWearsPrada2’s record breaking opening is overshadowing KING OF POP #MichaelJackson in Europe!In #Italy’s #BoxOffice, music biopic #MICHAEL grossed $883k on 2nd THU, going actually up (!!!) +8.1% from first THU, reaching $11.1M 9-day cume and crossing the 1M admissions mark, hitting 1.2M moviegoers to cinemas.Second weekend poised for a historic hold never seen Post-Covid out of holiday corridor.
Never been so proud of my Country before
 
i'm french but italian too my aunt live in
Bologna.
I hope your aunt went to watch the film. (I'm joking)

Nice! I left my country 10 years ago and I'm currently living in the UK but I do go back quite often to visit family and enjoy the good weather.
 
They just have to find a way mentioning everything in part 2, an experienced lawyer (maybe not Branca 😉) has to check everything every scene line by line. It may depend on the exact wording if its allowed or not imo. Not metioning it is not an option, unfortunately. I wish it went different for Michael.
 
I know Janet didn’t agree to be in it (didn’t know about Diana though), either way as a viewer it still leaves a gap in the story. And yeah, this is just my opinion and I don't completely disagree with the critics on this one. The audience scores just shows how many fans MJ still hast (IMO!) which is of course great.
The Diana scenes were filmed and apparently Diana had it blocked or at least that is what is understood reading between the lines of what the actress playing her said. Yeah. It leaves a gap, but what can they do when they want to respect these people's wishes?
 
After ’93, how do you make that a feel-good movie without basically rewriting reality?
Well, after that there still was the HIStory album and tour, which given what happened was a triumph. There was vindication in the trial and the fact that he sold 1 mio tickets in 1 city 2 months before his death. It wasn't all bad after '93. But yes, it will be a different movie than the first one.
 
The Diana scenes were filmed and apparently Diana had it blocked or at least that is what is understood reading between the lines of what the actress playing her said. Yeah. It leaves a gap, but what can they do when they want to respect these people's wishes?
It’s not really about blaming the filmmakers, it just shows how limited the movie ends up feeling (at least to me) because of those restrictions.
I guess that’s also why it leans more into a ‘safe’ version of MJ instead of a fuller picture.
 
The Diana scenes were filmed and apparently Diana had it blocked or at least that is what is understood reading between the lines of what the actress playing her said. Yeah. It leaves a gap, but what can they do when they want to respect these people's wishes?
It would really be helpful getting some sort of explanation for why Diana didn't want to be in the movie... This way only leaves the door open for bad thoughts... which I think might be the real reason.
 
I think it's easier to find Jordan Chandler and change the settlement than to look for a possible loophole.
Why not work something out with Jordan C.?
Of course he would have to be willing to come out.
But the estate could let him know, that they are willing to forfeit any actions they were legally allowed to pursue, if he came clean.

And if he comes clean and could keep the money, maybe the estate could dramatize the events how they really went down..
 
If the accusations in part 2 also stay out, the media will make biopic bad again
Yeah and they would take the „L“ again, just like this time around!
Because the people would again come out and watch the movie.
Like they watch the musical and MJ One.

Because the public/humanity knows deep down that those accusations are not true and that MJ always was and always will be innocent!
 
Back
Top