elusive moonwalker
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2003
- Messages
- 26,838
- Points
- 48
Report their posts then put them on ignore and dont quote them as those who have them on ignore get to see their posts when they are quoted
Strangely enough, I've seen more of the opposite. People being skeptical of the new allegations.
Exactly,moron of the highest degree.
TMZ are as bad as those you mentioned
I haven't seen the exact headline but they aren't daft,it probably says the word reported in it....Paris reportedly taken to hospital kind of thing.... that's their get out clause.
fraroc04;4250044 said:Strangely enough, I've seen more of the opposite. People being skeptical of the new allegations.
Administraton/Moderation Statement
We are getting an extraordinary number of reports daily from this thread. If you want it to remain open and in the News and Discussion section, then you will need to respect each others' opinions surrounding this documentary and the repercussions of it.
Please do not backseat moderate by openly calling for people to be banned, or asking why they aren't banned yet, etc. Please do not make assumptions about someone being a troll, or coming from other sites, just to make trouble here. The owner has expressly stated that he does not want people to be banned purely for having an opinion that is non-conformative with staff, or with the majority on the board.
Cursing at each other doesn't solve anything. Be mindful that the members set the tone here; the members create the vibe. We do want a positive and nurturing atmosphere, where everyone is respected and feels safe enough to share their opinions, without being attacked or bullied.
As some have suggested, if there is a member on the board whose posts upset you, then please place them on ignore and do not quote them.
This doesn't mean that we are discouraging reports - please still use the reporting system for disrespectful and inappropriate posts that are offensive in nature, or where a forum rule is being broken.
Thank you.
Please carry on.
No wonder respect77, Ivy, and TSCM no longer post here.
I appreciate this writing as it's the essential of this whole farce, but how ironic he had to call the fans "weirdos" for their action, not realising he basically does the same: investing his writing in favour of justice even by going against the crowd.myosotis;4250069 said:True. Although journalists in particular seem to like to 'sit on the fence' to some degree about MJ.
Another journalist here is also fence sitting, but at least acknowledges the legal facts. (He has written for several publications, but this seems to be his own 'blog'.):
The Thing Is, Michael Jackson Is Innocent
By Tim Worstall - March 15, 2019
That Michael Jackson may have been more than just a little bit dodgy is a fair enough comment. So too is the idea that he didn’t have an easy childhood, it’s the environment that makes us what we are and so on. And yet to insist that Michael Jackson is not – or was not to use grammar – innocent is to deny the very basis of civil rights and justice.
For we are all innocent until proven guilty. For those still alive, for we cannot libel the dead, it is actually libellous to insist otherwise.
Adverts declaring Michael Jackson innocent taken off London buses
Transport for London orders removal based on ‘public sensitivity and concern’; Simpsons producer meanwhile suggests Jackson appearance may have helped groom boys
That those funding the ads are weirdos is possibly true. That they’re wasting their money on their obsession could also be correct. But they are just stating an actual fact about our universe. Michael Jackson is indeed innocent. He’s not been convicted in a trial, with evidence, jury, the ability to confront his accusers and all that. He’s innocent.
We did in fact go through this:
People v. Jackson (full title: 1133603: The People of the State of California v. Michael Joe Jackson) was a 2004–2005 criminal trial held in Santa Barbara County Superior Court in which American singer Michael Jackson was charged with molesting Gavin Arvizo, a 13-year-old boy. Jackson was indicted for four counts of molesting a minor, four counts of intoxicating a minor to molest him, one count of attempted child molestation, one count of conspiring to hold the boy and his family captive, and conspiring to commit extortion and child abduction. He pleaded not guilty to all counts. The trial spanned approximately 18 months, from Jackson’s arraignment on January 16, 2004 to June 13, 2005. The jury delivered a verdict of not guilty on all charges, including four lesser misdemeanour counts.
Michael Jackson was tried and found not guilty. Michael Jackson is innocent. That’s that, all there is to it.
https://www.continentaltelegraph.com/entertainment/the-thing-is-michael-jackson-is-innocent/
I really appreciated there I site. Where are they now?
somewhereinthedark;4250089 said:This person is a troll, pure and simple. He/she is here to divide and dissuade real fans. Btw, what this person is spewing is noT true. I see much more positive comments than I do negative ones. So don’t fall for the BS that Demon is spewing. He/she has an agenda.
somewhereinthedark;4250089 said:This person is a troll, pure and simple. He/she is here to divide and dissuade real fans. Btw, what this person is spewing is noT true. I see much more positive comments than I do negative ones. So don’t fall for the BS that Demon is spewing. He/she has an agenda.
It’s important to note we are not making a statement of innocence or guilt. Let me clarify the actions we took.
Three Michael Jackson artifacts have been removed from two exhibits: his iconic fedora and white glove that we purchased several years ago at auction for our American Pop exhibit, and the signed Michael Jackson poster that was in The Power of Children exhibit.
As the world’s largest children’s museum, we are very sensitive to our audience. In an excess of caution, and in response to the controversy over the HBO film “Leaving Neverland”, which directly involved allegations of abuse against children, we removed those objects while we carefully consider the situation more fully.
The museum's nationally-recognized The Power of Children exhibit directly addresses issues of discrimination and intolerance of all kinds. Several Michael Jackson pictures on display in The Power of Children exhibit remain because they are part of a direct re-creation of Ryan White’s room. Ryan’s family found Michael Jackson’s kindness to them to be an important part of Ryan’s story and the pictures of Michael displayed in that exhibit will always be an integral part of the Ryan White story. The poster was removed because it was not part of the original re-creation of Ryan’s room.
Thank You. And when they see these 2 liars start to be reveal even more, they will put it back.Go there and ask to buy MJ's items they remove, You WONT get it. But he still is in the mueum under the Ryan White display.I haven't seen this about the Indianapolis Children's museum (who removed some MJ artifacts). My apologies if I missed it being posted before (Also many thanks to the original poster who shared this on social media).
People want this stuff to be true.