wonderouzmj
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
- Messages
- 2,999
- Points
- 113
Smh these stupid assholes
Looks like Rose McGowan has jumped on the MJ is guilty bandwagon. Telling us to accept our hero was a bad man.
Hollywood people are such a bunch of flakes.
MJRemixed;4245833 said:UK FANS: do not watch the documentary on channel 4 tomorrow. Don’t add to the viewing figures which is what they want.
Also please keep streaming Money on YouTube via mjs official channel ONLY, and via Spotify and iTunes. We need this track in the top 20 at least. I’ve had it repeated a lot of times today. THIS is THE track that explains this whole mess.
Michael Jackson's legacy clouded by dark documentary
By Associated Press
Published: 18:14 GMT, 5 March 2019
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Can the memory of Michael Jackson survive "Leaving Neverland"?
.
UK TV viewers:
NEW INTERVIEW COMING UP
Taj and Dan Reed, on Newsnight, BBC 2 at 10.30 pm tonight, Tues 5th March
UK TV viewers:
NEW INTERVIEW COMING UP
Taj and Dan Reed, on Newsnight, BBC 2 at 10.30 pm tonight, Tues 5th March
Charles Thomson whould have been a really good person to go with him. He is so calm and very well spoken.Just saw the advert for this. Turned it over asap. Wondered who was on. Both together. Jeez poor taj. This is live aswell i believe
There's a documentary on Channel 5 tonight (UK). The title looks very impartial. Update: on at 23:15
Charles Thomson whould have been a really good person to go with him. He is so calm and very well spoken.
Is it actually gonna be Taj and Dan at the same time? Let's hope it will be at least a fair interview. Hopefully Taj can come out swinging but I don't really know about that. He does his best though.
Is it actually gonna be Taj and Dan at the same time? Let's hope it will be at least a fair interview. Hopefully Taj can come out swinging but I don't really know about that. He does his best though.
nextbigthing56;4245859 said:The FBI secretly investigate Michael Jackson for four years - tracking his where abouts, his computers, phone calls, etc and release a 300 plus page file completely vindicating him, stating there was absolutely nothing to even remotely suggest he was an abuser, and the general public (and media) completely ignores it. Yet two admitted liars and perjurers (one of which who even refers to himself as a ‘master of deception’) can come out with a completely one sided, sensationalist story (yes story not documentary) which contains literally no evidence whatsoever (and is full of inconsistencies) and a large majority of the public doesn’t even question it.
The jurors who found Michael Jackson not guilty in his 2005 trial agree with the FBI. Juror Paulina Coccoz said: ‘It was pretty obvious there was no molestation done...it was pretty obvious that there were ulterior motives on behalf of the family. And the mother, she orchestrated the whole thing..there wasn’t a shred of evidence’.
Just because a story is graphic and disturbing doesn’t make it factual. Before you judge anything do your research. Facts don’t lie, people do.
The bottom line is..
If you want to view Michael Jackson as a pedophile, you will. It’s easy to do. He admitted to allowing children to sleep in his bedroom (which itself is the same size as a small two story house) and has been accused of child molestation more then once. He’s not the guy next door, was undeniably eccentric, and most certainly didn’t live a conventional life.
But to anyone who has bothered to look into the allegations against him - and I mean really look into them - there is more than enough evidence to demonstrate that he was a victim of extortion and of copycat false claims for the past twenty five years. Yet despite the Los Angeles Police Department stating that Jackson should be presumed to be innocent, despite a jury finding him not guilty on every single charge against him, despite the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services twice investigating and clearing him of wrongdoing, despite the FBI conducting a very thorough investigation in which no evidence of wrongdoing was found, and despite the cash grab lawsuits of his posthumous accusers being tossed out of court, the court of public opinion may sadly be what defines this saga and a large part of his legacy.
And oprah is still catching it very bad even today.myosotis;4245880 said:“Leaving Neverland” Second Night was a BUST With Fewer than 1 Million Viewers, Oprah Part Scored Just 780K
Yikes! The second night of “Leaving Neverland” was worse than the first.
Only 927.000 people watched. The audience didn’t break 1 million. Oprah’s “After Neverland” did worse–780,000.
Viewers rejected the stories of Wade Robson and Jimmy Safechuck. I’m amazed. I really thought this would be a blockbuster.
But the overall negativity and pointlessness of the documentary left audiences cold.
This is very important: no victim of sexual abuse should ever be disbelieved, or ignored. Everyone should share their stories, and there is no shame.
But “Leaving Neverland” broke several conventions of documentary. It functioned not as journalism but as a personal grudge. I expected lie detector tests to show the veracity of the claims. But there were none.
There was also no context provided. No medical or psychological expert to explain how Jackson could have been one way with so many other children, and this way with Safechuck and Robson.
Also, you can never underestimate the power of the Michael Jackson fans. They’ve organized before to fend off Jackson accusers. I’ve seen some pretty ill informed criticism of them by people who were in foreign territory.
Michael Jackson was no angel. I watched him do a lot of crazy and mean things over the years. He was terrible to his employees at Neverland and Hayvenhurst. He wasn’t so nice to the fans when his trial was over. They thought they’d be going to a picnic at Neverland. Michael just shut the gates and left.
There’s more to say, but for right now, it’s instructive to see how ratings bottomed out.
https://www.showbiz411.com/2019/03/...-was-a-bust-with-fewer-than-1-million-viewers
(???? at the remarks about the employees and the 'expected' picnic. I'd have thought everyone would realise that MJ would be 'all in' after the trial finished, and I did read that fans were invited near / before the beginning of the trial).
Golden opportunity for Taj to make an impact. Let's hope he keeps his cool. It would be even better if Reed says something really stupid
Everything Reed says is really stupid!
myosotis;4245880 said:“(???? at the remarks about the employees and the 'expected' picnic. I'd have thought everyone would realise that MJ would be 'all in' after the trial finished, and I did read that fans were invited near / before the beginning of the trial).
Everything Reed says is really stupid!