Earlier in this thread I gave a couple of examples of what kind of evidence and testimony could be provided here. For example if it's true what some people here say that despite of what the Estate statement said it's not true that all producers and musicologists agreed it was MJ and they testify about that then it's more than just expert testimony. Then that would show that the Estate knowingly lied and mislead the public in that statement. As we know there was also a strong protest from the family at the time and Tarryll wrote this back then:
If this is true and these people would testify to this then that's more than just expert testimony. This shows at the very least that there wasn't an unanimous agreement from all who were present that it was MJ. As the Estate of MJ why would you push something that is so controversial? If there are question marks over these vocals there should be more due diligence done until those questions are resolved. Not to rush them to get published while there are people with strong doubts about those vocals.
Also in a court case Eddie would be forced to present whatever evidence he has if he has some. If he doesn't then that too would be telling taken together with all the other facts.
I really find it shocking that some people can be so invested in taking sides with people around Michael that they end up throwing Michael under the bus to defend those people. Whether it's the Karen Faye fans or Cascio fans, or LMP or Debbie Rowe fans. Sometimes I wonder if these people are more fans of these people than Michael. Because they keep defending these people even at the price of throwing MJ under the bus. There was no need to to use words which are insulting to MJ such as "mooching off" the Cascios.
@Kreen. It's not like the Cascios never had their benefits from befriending Michael, so to say MJ "mooched them off" because he lived there for a couple of weeks is just out of line. For how many weeks, months and years the Cascios kept visiting Neverland and some of them basically lived there and invited all their friends and buddies there to have parties and what not? Michael also took them to trips and tours etc. But yeah, because MJ lived there for a few weeks let's insult him and say he "mooched them off" and somehow he owed something to the Cascios.
Why did the Robsons, Safechucks etc. become just that? You act like this never happened around Michael, when in reality it just keeps happening over and over again. (Not to say this is as bad as what the Robsons and Safechucks pulled - nothing tops that in terms of betrayal and evil.) I actually don't think the whole family is on it. They may defend their own, which is natural, but they may be mislead too. It's about Eddie, not the whole Cascio family. I'm not mad at the whole family. In fact, I think they seem nice people. But those songs are not MJ.
)Michaels vocals were a bit weaker the last years. I can hear it on 'Invincible'. Not less convincing or passionate, but different. Older maybe. Not that powerful to me.
