classic
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,135
- Points
- 0
Re: Frank Cascio to write memoir of his friend Michael Jackson / press release at pg12 / Nov 15 ,201
Actually, I'm just trying to understand what it is that people are saying they want. One minute people are stating that it should now only be about the music and keep personal info. out of it.
So, why would we keep half of what is on the board? We can't want to hold Frank to one standard and ourselves to another--we can delve into private info. talk when we want but not his personal friend Frank. That wouldn't make sense.
And as for people citing two examples of people watching 20/20 and thinking that Michael doctor shopped or was a druggie. People can think what they want. Were those opinions formed at that precise moment? The autopsy report has been out there for a long time now. People believe what they want to sometimes despite what is actually said. However, again, for how long were we told by some people that Michael was a "has-been" and irrelevant? How long were we told that much of the public thought Michael was guilty of inappropriate behavior towards children? The world does not react to the death of a person in the way that it did when that person is not still beloved, treasured, and relevant-- and most definitely not if that person is thought to have harmed a child.
I'm just voicing out my opinion. There is no need to blow my comment out of proportion.
Actually, I'm just trying to understand what it is that people are saying they want. One minute people are stating that it should now only be about the music and keep personal info. out of it.
So, why would we keep half of what is on the board? We can't want to hold Frank to one standard and ourselves to another--we can delve into private info. talk when we want but not his personal friend Frank. That wouldn't make sense.
And as for people citing two examples of people watching 20/20 and thinking that Michael doctor shopped or was a druggie. People can think what they want. Were those opinions formed at that precise moment? The autopsy report has been out there for a long time now. People believe what they want to sometimes despite what is actually said. However, again, for how long were we told by some people that Michael was a "has-been" and irrelevant? How long were we told that much of the public thought Michael was guilty of inappropriate behavior towards children? The world does not react to the death of a person in the way that it did when that person is not still beloved, treasured, and relevant-- and most definitely not if that person is thought to have harmed a child.
Last edited: