MJTruth
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 872
- Points
- 18
While I feel it is imperative that the claims in Leaving Neverland are comprehensively debunked and that people are made aware of that information I have always been aware that the MJ fans have played a major part in promoting Leaving Neverland but we were left with very little choice. Remaining silent was worse than giving it more coverage IMO.
Although our continued Twitter war on the show prolongs the promotion of the show and keeps it in the news, it IS important to note that the stories over the last couple of weeks have been MUCH MORE balanced than they were around Sundance. Yes they are still very weak, refusing to call them liars in most cases, but at least they're reporting about the train station, grand canyon trip etc.
Mike Smallcombe has played a pivotal role in turning the media around, BUT even now, when Mike has the concrete evidence that the press themselves can see and verify they are STILL using phrases like "he claims to have evidence..." or "the train station story may be inaccurate". It's infuriating because the press can check! .
so to sum that situation up, the allegations were reported as fact with no evidence, yet the concrete evidence that contradicts those claims are reported as only 'indicative' or 'claims'. Ludicrous!!
The problem with alleged events between two people in a private room with no witnesses is that it is rarely possible to say with 100% certainty that those event didn't happen.
we are lucky that we know with 100% certainty that the Neverland train station wasn't built until 1994 and that it directly contradicts Safechuck's statements in interviews, in the film, in his legal documents. He was consistent. Even now he hasn't publicly said he was wrong on those occasions. Only Dan has said it (in a move that was frankly arrogant in the extreme)
We're also lucky that court testimony and depositions, particularly on the Robson side, have provided a contradicting narrative but sadly they are not being challenged robustly to get answers about exactly when they are lying - then or now?!
These cases rely entirely on witness/victim credibility and fortunately for the MJ fan community there is plenty of evidence that undermines their credibility, and there is plenty of evidence that undermines Dan Reed's credibility. so we have two dubious 'victims' and a dubious director.
That should be enough to cast significant doubt over the ALL the allegations in the film, and I would have hoped for better reporting on that, BUT it doesn't prove that MJ never abused them. Yes I know that may upset some people, but although I feel he never did, nothing proves he never did.
I've used this analogy before but I'll use it again.
If I said I went to the grand canyon on holiday and somebody tells me to prove it I can provide photos, and may be able to show email evidence of buying tickets for the viewing platform etc. That's good evidence. If I say I have NEVER been to the grand canyon and someone tells me to prove it, WHAT evidence could I possible show to prove I never in my life went to the grand canyon??? It's would probably be impossible for me to prove!
That's the situation here for MJ. That's what the haters rely on, that's what Robson, Safechuck, Reed are relying on.
Although our continued Twitter war on the show prolongs the promotion of the show and keeps it in the news, it IS important to note that the stories over the last couple of weeks have been MUCH MORE balanced than they were around Sundance. Yes they are still very weak, refusing to call them liars in most cases, but at least they're reporting about the train station, grand canyon trip etc.
Mike Smallcombe has played a pivotal role in turning the media around, BUT even now, when Mike has the concrete evidence that the press themselves can see and verify they are STILL using phrases like "he claims to have evidence..." or "the train station story may be inaccurate". It's infuriating because the press can check! .
so to sum that situation up, the allegations were reported as fact with no evidence, yet the concrete evidence that contradicts those claims are reported as only 'indicative' or 'claims'. Ludicrous!!
The problem with alleged events between two people in a private room with no witnesses is that it is rarely possible to say with 100% certainty that those event didn't happen.
we are lucky that we know with 100% certainty that the Neverland train station wasn't built until 1994 and that it directly contradicts Safechuck's statements in interviews, in the film, in his legal documents. He was consistent. Even now he hasn't publicly said he was wrong on those occasions. Only Dan has said it (in a move that was frankly arrogant in the extreme)
We're also lucky that court testimony and depositions, particularly on the Robson side, have provided a contradicting narrative but sadly they are not being challenged robustly to get answers about exactly when they are lying - then or now?!
These cases rely entirely on witness/victim credibility and fortunately for the MJ fan community there is plenty of evidence that undermines their credibility, and there is plenty of evidence that undermines Dan Reed's credibility. so we have two dubious 'victims' and a dubious director.
That should be enough to cast significant doubt over the ALL the allegations in the film, and I would have hoped for better reporting on that, BUT it doesn't prove that MJ never abused them. Yes I know that may upset some people, but although I feel he never did, nothing proves he never did.
I've used this analogy before but I'll use it again.
If I said I went to the grand canyon on holiday and somebody tells me to prove it I can provide photos, and may be able to show email evidence of buying tickets for the viewing platform etc. That's good evidence. If I say I have NEVER been to the grand canyon and someone tells me to prove it, WHAT evidence could I possible show to prove I never in my life went to the grand canyon??? It's would probably be impossible for me to prove!
That's the situation here for MJ. That's what the haters rely on, that's what Robson, Safechuck, Reed are relying on.