smoothlugar
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2010
- Messages
- 484
- Points
- 0
Re: Judge to decide Jackson syringe testing issues
- Yes, it's documented both in AR and in the Seach Warrant.has it ever been documented what exactly was found at the scene or did alberto say what he saw.
- Alberto also declared that he was instructed to help to clear the scene, according to some articles and I think both Joe and Katherine also mention that in their lawsuits.
- We won't really know till next 29 December.cause what exactly is the allegation from the defence
Some people have suggested they are aiming at the self-administration via IV drip, but I disagree with that, since it will be IMPOSSIBLE for them to allegue that.
We have already discussed what Chernoff implied and the impossibility of such defence: there was no long tube found with traces of propofol, which proves that if there was continuous infusion (the "spiked" bottle), the long tube, together with the spiked bottle were removed from the scene ONLY by the person who prepared that infusion. Murray was alone and knew the full implications if the police found those items.
They did find an IV bag with liquids to treat rehydration. That's why Murray was there every night eventhough he now wants everyone to believe he was there to give propofol .Either propofol is given via a bolus injection using a syringe or the propofol vial is directly hooked to the long section of an IV tube which is connected with the Y connector attached to the body , you can't mix propofol with other liquids in an IV bag, it is not given that way.
YES, I agree with everything, except the last sentence, as propofol can be mixed with SOME fluids specified in the medication directions. However, in this case it seems that the spiked bottle was used.
In both cases a "controllable infusion pump" (a precision dosifier) would have been required.
Last edited: