Prince Of Pop
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 3,333
- Points
- 83
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this brings up something that has been weighing on my mind. surely, John Lennon is to be remembered.
now..what about Paul McCartney?
they're playing Beatles stuff on the radio, all the time..but..Paul..it's like he's being treated like just another guy. and i get the feeling that it would take his death for him to not be treated like just another musician, the way it looks, these days.
what is it about death?
Basically it's age. Today is about the youth and Paul and other older acts are considered "has beens" or "old school". Even MJ was basically considered a has been by the general public. Sure you can hear Beatles and Wings on oldies radio, but nobody plays Paul's new music & albums. Old acts aren't considered relevant. Look at the Isley Brothers. They've been recording since the 1950s, but to get airplay today Ron Isley had to do this "Mr. Biggs" gimmick that R.Kelly came up with. Charlie Wilson from the Gap Band had to start singing hooks on rap tracks to get heard. Carlos Santana & Herbie Hancock got young popular performers on their records to sell. George Benson recently released a new album, but no one knows about it. It even has a new song written by Bill Withers, who pretty much retired in the mid 1980s.now..what about Paul McCartney?
I'm currently listening to John. I'll be listening to all of his solo and Beatles songs that I have today. Another good song to listen to is Paul McCartney's "Here Today." He wrote it as a tribute to John. Paul tears up every time he sings it. The song I always tear up on is "Beautiful Boy (Darling Boy)" which he wrote for Sean.
RIP, John, you are greatly missed. Thanks to Yoko, Julian, Sean, Cyn (first wife), sister Julia, Paul, and Ringo for keeping his memory alive!
Me at Strawberry Fields in NYC:
![]()
![]()
![]()
At the Dakota:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Basically it's age. Today is about the youth and Paul and other older acts are considered "has beens" or "old school". Even MJ was basically considered a has been by the general public. Sure you can hear Beatles and Wings on oldies radio, but nobody plays Paul's new music & albums. Old acts aren't considered relevant. Look at the Isley Brothers. They've been recording since the 1950s, but to get airplay today Ron Isley had to do this "Mr. Biggs" gimmick that R.Kelly came up with. Charlie Wilson from the Gap Band had to start singing hooks on rap tracks to get heard. Carlos Santana & Herbie Hancock got young popular performers on their records to sell. George Benson recently released a new album, but no one knows about it. It even has a new song written by Bill Withers, who pretty much retired in the mid 1980s.
Getting on the radio has nothing to do with sampling but record company payola. Ageism is a factor in any field, not just music. If you turn on a radio station that plays new music, they don't play Paul McCartney, Prince, Basia, Motley Crue, or George Benson, they play Lil Wayne or Beyonce. I saw a comment on one of Charlie Wilson's new songs on Youtube. It said something like he was pretty good for an old man. A lot of old acts tour Japan because the Japanese don't care about age as much but the quality of the music. Even younger acts who perform old style music don't get any airplay or promotion like Raul Midon, Lalah Hathaway, Eric Benet, or Esperanza Spalding. If age isn't important, what's with all the facelifts, Botox, & heavy airbrushing? Young people usually didn't buy their parents or grandparents music. In the 1950s young people liked Elvis Presley & Fats Domino, not Perry Como or the Andrews Sisters. Even on this site I remember that Troubleman would start threads about Mary Wells, Patti LaBelle, or Curtis Mayfield and they'd get ignored, but threads about Miley Cyrus, Chris Brown, & Justin Timberlake would get hundreds or thousands of views. As far as death, it also helped acts that weren't forgotten about or ignored when they died, like Aaliyah, Jimi Hendrix, or Stevie Ray Vaughn.well..that's a cloudy subject, since most of the acts, today, can't get on the radio, without sampling classic music. and Amy Winehouse couldn't get on the radio, till she did a song that sounded like it was from the 50's. and 'general public' is a cloudy term, since teenagers, randomly, were chasing Michael Jackson down random streets, up to the most recent of times.
so..if it's down to what's played on radio..it's, at best, an ironic situation.
so, to me, the best way to look at it is, it's a finicky situation. so, if Paul suddenly drops dead, and people suddenly decide to make him relevant, i just think it's an isolated case of, generally not knowing what you have, till it's gone. i don't know that age has much to do with it.
this brings up something that has been weighing on my mind. surely, John Lennon is to be remembered.
now..what about Paul McCartney?
they're playing Beatles stuff on the radio, all the time..but..Paul..it's like he's being treated like just another guy. and i get the feeling that it would take his death for him to not be treated like just another musician, the way it looks, these days.
what is it about death?
Wow, 29 years have passed already. That is a day I will never forget. I was 17. They played "Just Like Starting Over", his single from his new album "Double Fantasy" over and over on the radio as well as other Beatles songs. And then watching the news coverage. And then the fans gathering at the Dakota. It was so sad.
Getting on the radio has nothing to do with sampling but record company payola. Ageism is a factor in any field, not just music. If you turn on a radio station that plays new music, they don't play Paul McCartney, Prince, Basia, Motley Crue, or George Benson, they play Lil Wayne or Beyonce. I saw a comment on one of Charlie Wilson's new songs on Youtube. It said something like he was pretty good for an old man. A lot of old acts tour Japan because the Japanese don't care about age as much but the quality of the music. Even younger acts who perform old style music don't get any airplay or promotion like Raul Midon, Lalah Hathaway, Eric Benet, or Esperanza Spalding. If age isn't important, what's with all the facelifts, Botox, & heavy airbrushing? Young people usually didn't buy their parents or grandparents music. In the 1950s young people liked Elvis Presley & Fats Domino, not Perry Como or the Andrews Sisters. Even on this site I remember that Troubleman would start threads about Mary Wells, Patti LaBelle, or Curtis Mayfield and they'd get ignored, but threads about Miley Cyrus, Chris Brown, & Justin Timberlake would get hundreds or thousands of views. As far as death, it also helped acts that weren't forgotten about or ignored when they died, like Aaliyah, Jimi Hendrix, or Stevie Ray Vaughn.
this brings up something that has been weighing on my mind. surely, John Lennon is to be remembered.
now..what about Paul McCartney?
he's still here. and a concert was done, here, in los angeles, at the beginning of this year, featuring Paul, and it was treated like just another back yard concert at a fair. he was one of many musicians. all the other musicians were up and coming. and he was treated as just another musician on the bill.
is it because Paul is still alive? will it take another legend dying for him to be treated like a legend?
i was shocked at how i don't believe the world knew that Paul was playing in my own backyard, and it wasn't treated like a world-wide announcement. it was a while after he appeared at a Super Bowl. maybe it was his choice. maybe he is humble. but, it just weirded me out, that he was treated like just another musician. maybe i'm thinking this way, because of Michael's death. and the thoughts are reigniting in me, because of this John Lennon thread..but...i was just floored at how the McCartney concert was treated.
they're playing Beatles stuff on the radio, all the time..but..Paul..it's like he's being treated like just another guy. and i get the feeling that it would take his death for him to not be treated like just another musician, the way it looks, these days.
what is it about death?