elusive moonwalker
Guests
Re: Update : Ortega removed as defendant / Katherine & MJ's kids sue AEG / AEG wants case dismissed
thanks
thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still don't get how is it AEG's fault that Michael was cold and wearing coats and if he was so sick like they say he was what was wrong with him?
yeah.from what we have seen over the years with civil cases most seem to go to trial cause the judges prefer the jury to decide unless its obviously a false case or the allegations dont stand up in a legal sense. ie the judge telling the family to go re write their claims over negligence etcdo not think of this as determination of "fault" it's simply that the judge might have thought that a jury has to decide about this claims.
he didnt work for AEG he worked for colony.
do not think of this as determination of "fault" it's simply that the judge might have thought that a jury has to decide about this claims.
It's all about where the responsibility begins and where it ends.
For example
- one might say as Michael was ill a few days ago they should have cancelled the rehearsals for some time
- others can argue that as they sent Michael home for the day and he and his doctor said he was fine they didn't need to do anything further.
similarly
- one can argue that as Murray as a legit doctor with no malpractice that's all AEG needed to know.
- others can argue that regardless AEG was required to ask "what are you doing" to Murray.
Judge could have said "it's better if we let a jury decide".
no idea. i just said he worked for colony which he did he didnt work for AEG. him getting an advance via mj has nothing to do with whether he was working for AEG.it shows he wasnt if he was getting paid via mjs advance like others who were on the tour
As far as I can tell from the above article :
breach of contract (not caring of MJ's wellbeing) and negligent hiring, training and supervision of Murray claims stands and can go to trial
but
fraud, conspiracy and emotional distress of Prince is thrown out for the time being- unless KJ can come up with evidence to support those claims.
anyone know who MLB is?Karen Faye just tweeted again:
Karen Faye
On Wednesday 2nd February 2011, @wingheart said:
It is very unusual that neither MLB or myself...who were closest, (actually TOUCHING) and were demanded and hired directly by MJ, have NOT been questioned by the attorneys in ANY case. APPEARS getting to the truth is not the IMPORTANT issue. Too many big guys with very deep pockets running the "truth about MJ" show.
anyone know who MLB is?
so does this judge believe that AEG hired Murry and NOT Michael? Or is that for a Jury to decide? Also....IMO..the Jackson may have their own personal agenda for filing this lawsuit...but ..maybe it will help get more valuable information out there as to what happened to Michael.....Who know anymore.
It is very unusual that neither MLB or myself...who were closest, (actually TOUCHING) and were demanded and hired directly by MJ, have NOT been questioned by the attorneys in ANY case.
City News Service says the judge ruled that Jackson family lawyers will have to show evidence of fraud, negligent infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy.
The judge gave Jackson family lawyers 20 days to amend the complaint.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110202/us-jackson-concert-promoter-suit/
Karen Faye just tweeted again:
Karen Faye
On Wednesday 2nd February 2011, @wingheart said:
It is very unusual that neither MLB or myself...who were closest, (actually TOUCHING) and were demanded and hired directly by MJ, have NOT been questioned by the attorneys in ANY case. APPEARS getting to the truth is not the IMPORTANT issue. Too many big guys with very deep pockets running the "truth about MJ" show.
yeah.from what we have seen over the years with civil cases most seem to go to trial cause the judges prefer the jury to decide unless its obviously a false case or the allegations dont stand up in a legal sense. ie the judge telling the family to go re write their claims over negligence etc
so does this judge believe that AEG hired Murry and NOT Michael? Or is that for a Jury to decide?
What kind of fraud did AEG do according to Katherine?
How was the conspiracy layed out according to KJ? (was it that MJ put up his assets in the contract and they all knew he wouldnt be able to make the shows and then AEG would get his assets? Some ppl claim AEG knew MJ would never make it hence they filmed the rehearsals).
It seems as Prince will be dragged into this. Does he have to testify that he saw his father being mistreated by AEG the weeks/days following June 25th???
Boyle said he expects the allegations Palazuelos found deficient to pass muster next time.
Karen Faye just tweeted again:
Karen Faye
On Wednesday 2nd February 2011, @wingheart said:
It is very unusual that neither MLB or myself...who were closest, (actually TOUCHING) and were demanded and hired directly by MJ, have NOT been questioned by the attorneys in ANY case. APPEARS getting to the truth is not the IMPORTANT issue. Too many big guys with very deep pockets running the "truth about MJ" show.
So emotional distress is against Prince only?
I thought it was against Michael also since we heard that Michael was scared of missing rehearsals and afraid AEG would pull the plug on the shows and Michael Bush said on TV Michael told him something like "Please don't say anything" (regarding his loss of weight).
And how is it that Prince is the only one being alleged to have suffered emotional distress etc. What about Paris? both of them were upstairs witnessing the scene unfold as per witnesses. Why only name him?
Michael Bush said on TV Michael told him something like "Please don't say anything" (regarding his loss of weight).
As far as I can tell from the above article :
breach of contract (not caring of MJ's wellbeing) and negligent hiring, training and supervision of Murray claims stands and can go to trial
but
fraud, conspiracy and emotional distress of Prince is thrown out for the time being- unless KJ can come up with evidence to support those claims.
I have to say..I am probably amongst the minority that is not happy about Kenny's name being taken off the lawsuit...and that is ok. I feel by taking him off that the door is being closed for others that may have been responsible for Michael contributing death....I realize my opinion is not a popular one. But I just felt that I had to post it and get it out....I still and always will feel that everyone around Michael on a daily bases in their own way helped contribute to is death....they ll saw him ..they all had eyes. Everyone chose to say nothing..do nothing..except insist that he gets up on that stage. Michael is gone now and they have to live with themselves. ...alot went on behind the scene that we will never know about.... Like I said I don't expect to be applauded for my post....I do however hope I can be respected for my opinion.
. .
But as MJ fans, we are painfully aware of how a set of circumstances can be misconstrued and an innocent person can be lumped in the same pool as those with bad intentions. .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILBydaIrnNU&NR=1
What I understand is....
M.Bush_ " He was like bone thin, and he grabbed me on the arm, and he said, ' You promised me you wouldn't tell."
Interv._ " Tell what?"
M.Bush_'' What I'm seeing."
I don't know how is that supposed to be interpreted.