honeysucklejasmine
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 197
- Points
- 0
Re: CA Medical Board Seeking to Suspend Murray's Medical License
I am aware of how the justice system works and exactly how the defense will try to win this by painting Michael in the worst possible light - frankly they wouldn't be a very good defense team if they DIDN'T try to do that, as painful as it will be for those of us who love Michael. And of course we don't KNOW what the jury will see as relevant or irrelevant.
We all know they will be given facts from both sides, my post was simply emphasising the one indisputable fact (Murray's breach of his duty of care) which directly led to Michael's passing and my HOPE that this is what the jury will focus on in determining whether or not to convict Murray of IM, assuming this is what the final charge is.
Anyway, returning back to topic, at the very least one would expect his license to practice to be removed for his litany of failings when 'caring' for Michael.
It is very hard for us to know what is going to be relevant or irrelevant to the jury. They will be given the facts from both sides of the case.
While the DA may show Murray to be a greedy doctor, the defense team may try to show Michael as a powerful entertainer throwing his money in a struggling poor doctors face. This is the part of a trial that is so difficult. For each charge there will be some sort of defense.
They will get doctors to defend Murrays actions. There will be people who attempt to dispute the anesthesiologists report from the coroner. You may be shocked but they will throw it all out there. They will make it a point to show the jury that Michael used these drugs many times before and they will make it a point to show that Michael asked for this drug this time. This is why I am really against going for a higher charge. I think it is asking for Murray to get off and skip out the door whistling. At least this charge has a chance of sticking.
People do get away with murder in this country if they have a good enough lawyer. The jury will hear everything Michael did or said in the last months of his life from all sorts of people and they will attempt to show reasonable doubt to the jury.
I actually am not looking forward to this. It will be 'interesting' but it is too close to my heart to want to hear it all.
I am aware of how the justice system works and exactly how the defense will try to win this by painting Michael in the worst possible light - frankly they wouldn't be a very good defense team if they DIDN'T try to do that, as painful as it will be for those of us who love Michael. And of course we don't KNOW what the jury will see as relevant or irrelevant.
We all know they will be given facts from both sides, my post was simply emphasising the one indisputable fact (Murray's breach of his duty of care) which directly led to Michael's passing and my HOPE that this is what the jury will focus on in determining whether or not to convict Murray of IM, assuming this is what the final charge is.
Anyway, returning back to topic, at the very least one would expect his license to practice to be removed for his litany of failings when 'caring' for Michael.