Club30s
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 122
- Points
- 0
Re: Michael: first review
Very True! I have been an MJ fan since BAD and clearly remember Dangerous release. Starting from History (post 93 crap) the hostility towards MJ was much worse and often mixing his personal so-called "problems" with his music. They (critics) were very harsh on History and even more so with Invincible.
Rolling Stone has never cared for MJ since Thriller and will likely never as long as their "critics" are more concerned with being "cool" and have their heads up their a$$es. Please don't use them for MJ news, facts or any info about MJ. They are like 99% of the critics out there with favoring "respectable" bands/singers like Beatles, Elvis, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, the Stones, The who, Jimmy Hendrix blah blah and their eternal love for Nirvana.
Mj is good in Off the Wall and Thriller and everything after that BAD... same old crap
Their "special" on MJ death was real turd encrusted of a jewel of music journalism. Here is what they had to say about MJ
On page 68 while discussing BAD
"Ideas for superstar collaboration also led to problems : Jones had conceived BAD as a duet with Prince, imagining a blockbuster video in which the purple one and MJ square off, "like fighters" but Prince demurred after hearing the song, telling Jackson in a meeting organized by Jones that Jackson didn't need help to have a hit."
Now someone please correct me but I thought Prince was brought in solely for video and it is where the disagreement happened as to who will say what lyrically in video. This above from Rolling Stones gives you the impression that the song was written as a duet in mind and Prince's objection was to the song which it absolutely WAS NOT.
Then more BS on BAD album
Jackson's pet chimp Bubbles rode around Los Angeles studio on the recording engineer's Great Dane, and Jackson's 300 pound, 20 feet python was given free rein. As the months dragged on, celebs like Oprah Winfrey and Robert De Niro came by to offer moral support."
WTF????
First what does this has to do with his music and BAD album and secondly what is their source for this info? Oprah Helped MJ during BAD era... does anybody have ever heard this before or clearly their writer's heads are so far up their$$es that they can't think straight.
On page 71 is a black and white picture of MJ during Beat It from History tour. The caption reads "In New York on his third and final world tour behind History in 1997".
The hell?
pg 68 Final thoughts on Dangerous "dangerous might be remembered as Pop historians as the record that Nirvana's Nevermind knocked off the top of the Billboard charts, ringing in the alt-rock era".
They also have a nice quote about MJ being lighter in skin on cover of Thriller album because of Plastic surgery. I will try to find this one. You go like you idiots confused Bad cover for thriller didn't ya?
Just like anyone from outside can say that we the fans will find a reason to cover, protect or like MJ no matter what he does, equally the press like rolling stones will always find a reason to hate him and spill their poison. Always! As long the latter is true, I say keep united against these morons.
God Bless MJ!
P.S In case it wasn't clear. Please never read Rolling Stones for hoping to see anything even remotely decent about MJ. Sorry my blood boils at Rolling Stones
http://www.answers.com/topic/thriller-album
ROLLING STONE MAG ....
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/reviews/album/3045/21548
and .....
http://www.muzikalmafia.com/michael-jackson-thriller-album-review/
CRITICS ALWAYS HATED MICHAEL not to mention the bad album reviews I remember as it was yesterday they said like it is "too commercial with lack of his Black roots, is like a soap opera" ....
Very True! I have been an MJ fan since BAD and clearly remember Dangerous release. Starting from History (post 93 crap) the hostility towards MJ was much worse and often mixing his personal so-called "problems" with his music. They (critics) were very harsh on History and even more so with Invincible.
If You like to read a review for MICHAEL, wait till some 'more serious' papers will have it.
(Rolling Stone, Vibe, LA Times, Source, or whatever, BUT NOT OF ALL THINGS TABLOID)
Rolling Stone has never cared for MJ since Thriller and will likely never as long as their "critics" are more concerned with being "cool" and have their heads up their a$$es. Please don't use them for MJ news, facts or any info about MJ. They are like 99% of the critics out there with favoring "respectable" bands/singers like Beatles, Elvis, Bob Dylan, Eric Clapton, the Stones, The who, Jimmy Hendrix blah blah and their eternal love for Nirvana.
Mj is good in Off the Wall and Thriller and everything after that BAD... same old crap
Their "special" on MJ death was real turd encrusted of a jewel of music journalism. Here is what they had to say about MJ
On page 68 while discussing BAD
"Ideas for superstar collaboration also led to problems : Jones had conceived BAD as a duet with Prince, imagining a blockbuster video in which the purple one and MJ square off, "like fighters" but Prince demurred after hearing the song, telling Jackson in a meeting organized by Jones that Jackson didn't need help to have a hit."
Now someone please correct me but I thought Prince was brought in solely for video and it is where the disagreement happened as to who will say what lyrically in video. This above from Rolling Stones gives you the impression that the song was written as a duet in mind and Prince's objection was to the song which it absolutely WAS NOT.
Then more BS on BAD album
Jackson's pet chimp Bubbles rode around Los Angeles studio on the recording engineer's Great Dane, and Jackson's 300 pound, 20 feet python was given free rein. As the months dragged on, celebs like Oprah Winfrey and Robert De Niro came by to offer moral support."
WTF????
First what does this has to do with his music and BAD album and secondly what is their source for this info? Oprah Helped MJ during BAD era... does anybody have ever heard this before or clearly their writer's heads are so far up their$$es that they can't think straight.
On page 71 is a black and white picture of MJ during Beat It from History tour. The caption reads "In New York on his third and final world tour behind History in 1997".
The hell?
pg 68 Final thoughts on Dangerous "dangerous might be remembered as Pop historians as the record that Nirvana's Nevermind knocked off the top of the Billboard charts, ringing in the alt-rock era".
They also have a nice quote about MJ being lighter in skin on cover of Thriller album because of Plastic surgery. I will try to find this one. You go like you idiots confused Bad cover for thriller didn't ya?
Just like anyone from outside can say that we the fans will find a reason to cover, protect or like MJ no matter what he does, equally the press like rolling stones will always find a reason to hate him and spill their poison. Always! As long the latter is true, I say keep united against these morons.
God Bless MJ!
P.S In case it wasn't clear. Please never read Rolling Stones for hoping to see anything even remotely decent about MJ. Sorry my blood boils at Rolling Stones
Last edited: