Michael Jackson: Erotic Identity Disorder?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Crisstti

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
197
Points
0
Location
Chile
http://www.scientificblogging.com/j...ackson_erotic_identity_disorder#comment-25395

An article in a scientific website claiming Michael was an "autopedophile" and probably abused children...
The guy says that Michael was probably sexually attracted to the idea of himself as a child and that he probably abused children.

Just a quote: "Normal people would hate to look like Michael Jackson did near the end of his life, and so normal people tend to assume that the surgeries were a series of big, compounded mistakes that Jackson must have regretted. Bad plastic surgery surely happens. But when it does, it is generally recognizable as a poor rendition of an aesthetically pleasing goal. Not so, Michael Jackson's face, which resembled nothing in the actual human, living world. Moreover, it has seemed to me that there was something coherent about the redesign of his face—coherent, not normal—suggesting that there was method in his madness. If so, the 13 surgeries may be explained by something other than 13 different errors of judgment".

Another article by the same guy called "Was Michael Jackson A Pedophile?"

http://www.scientificblogging.com/j_michael_bailey/was_michael_jackson_pedophile

The beggining of that article: "The predictably massive postmortem analysis of Michael Jackson has focused on both his enormous talent and his spectacular strangeness. Although there is lively debate whether Jackson or Elvis Presley is the all time King of Pop, there is no question which of them is the King of Weird.

Elvis Presley had his quirks—secret meetings with Nixon, shooting at television sets, and of course, drug abuse. But these did not compare with Michael Jackson's bizarre physical appearance, abetted by untold plastic surgeries; child-like speech; enjoyment in sleeping with (and perhaps "sleeping with") boys; obsession with Peter Pan; and of course, drug abuse".

The articles have a lot of comments so there must be a lot of people reading them... I post the links in case they haven't been posted already and someone wants to leave a comment. I think we should.

You can also email the guy...
 
This article is corny....on the real I strongly feel he never touch a child in a wrong matter in his life.
 
http://www.scientificblogging.com/j...ackson_erotic_identity_disorder#comment-25395

An article in a scientific website claiming Michael was an "autopedophile" and probably abused children...
The guy says that Michael was probably sexually attracted to the idea of himself as a child and that he probably abused children.

Just a quote: "Normal people would hate to look like Michael Jackson did near the end of his life, and so normal people tend to assume that the surgeries were a series of big, compounded mistakes that Jackson must have regretted. Bad plastic surgery surely happens. But when it does, it is generally recognizable as a poor rendition of an aesthetically pleasing goal. Not so, Michael Jackson's face, which resembled nothing in the actual human, living world. Moreover, it has seemed to me that there was something coherent about the redesign of his face—coherent, not normal—suggesting that there was method in his madness. If so, the 13 surgeries may be explained by something other than 13 different errors of judgment".

Another article by the same guy called "Was Michael Jackson A Pedophile?"

http://www.scientificblogging.com/j_michael_bailey/was_michael_jackson_pedophile

The beggining of that article: "The predictably massive postmortem analysis of Michael Jackson has focused on both his enormous talent and his spectacular strangeness. Although there is lively debate whether Jackson or Elvis Presley is the all time King of Pop, there is no question which of them is the King of Weird.

Elvis Presley had his quirks—secret meetings with Nixon, shooting at television sets, and of course, drug abuse. But these did not compare with Michael Jackson's bizarre physical appearance, abetted by untold plastic surgeries; child-like speech; enjoyment in sleeping with (and perhaps "sleeping with") boys; obsession with Peter Pan; and of course, drug abuse".

The articles have a lot of comments so there must be a lot of people reading them... I post the links in case they haven't been posted already and someone wants to leave a comment. I think we should.

You can also email the guy...


These ppl are sicko!!!

mj was not a pedo!!!!!! LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!
 
UGH. Just UGH.....:cry:
I want to email this person, but I don't have the energy to argue right now.

The thing about his face being un-human! Michael was beautiful...
What a sad, ignorant man this is.
 
That is honestly one of the most disgusting "scientific" articles I have ever read.

Poor Michael. True genius is always misunderstood.
 
That person doesn't know anything about Mike, only believes the cheap tabs and stuff. And I thought scientists are supported to have a brain? :mat:
 
That person doesn't know anything about Mike, only believes the cheap tabs and stuff. And I thought scientists are supported to have a brain? :mat:

thats just it, these so called scientists are too brainy, they over think everything, they over analyse everything and come up with CRAP...
they should put their brains to better use and start trying to save our world.
 
There are many, many comments in those articles. From what I've read, they tend to be positive. But many aren't, and it isn't a bad idea to answer them so that untrue information isn't just there online unchallenged.

There's for example someone saying Quincy Jones is the one who wrote the songs Michael sang. And it's not the first time I've read someone saying that...

It's a shame, really, that a university professor publishes something like that. He even writed in a style similar to tabloid writers...
If you read the comments, you'll see that there's at least one another university professor strongly criticizing him. There seems to be a polemic going on between the writer of the article and people related to the transsexual community (and with that another university professor). The writer published a book about them, and they accuse him of not obtaining informed consent from his study subjects, of being ver prejudiced against them, saying things like that they are best suited to be prostitues. And other things.

In fact, the theory that such a thing as "autopedophiles" exist at all in VERY disputed.
 
WTF???


pff... RENT-A-"scientist" thats all...has NO clue...

that man needs a swift kick in the ass
 
i,ve come to the conclusion,we are never gonna stop sick articles like this,i think all we can do is just ignore them,don,t buy the tabloids don,t click on to any websites unless they are a trusted website,they get money just by you clicking on their websites,
i know you feel like writing to them,and if it makes you feel better by all means do it,
but i always remember michael being asked by an interviewer,i thinkl it might have been on oprah,where the interviewer said to him,why don,t you sue all these people,and michael said ,if i did i would be in court everyday in my life,so i just ignore them he said,i know the truth,
so my point is like michael said,if you let the articles get to you to much,you would be writing and campaigning the rest of your life,just let them rot in their own puke,
 
:bored2:

As Michael always sayd.... don't read the tabloid......
i thinks Michael was so loan from a normal man (i mean naturally in a positive way) that they will never undestand him... they are not able to do it.... but they will continue to study him because they must find an explication to theyr ignorance.......

Michael Jackson is not of this earth....
 
Ok! This guy is in my list! I got his web page. He is going to hear something from me :mad: I know I should just ignore this kinda things, but they can't not claim they are professionals while doing this, is juts not right!

Edit: As I say I mostly ignore this kinda shiz... not now, noy whenthey say is science!!! So I send this mail to the man:

First of all I want to apologize since english is not my native lenguage. Saying this, for me the real question of your analysis would be: Are you a professional or even a real scientist???
As far as I know scientist work with prove and facts, wich you have completelly ignored.
Have you ever treated, talk or even meet Mr. Jackson?
How or where do you get your facts from? Tabloids?
How come in all this text I haven't read a single fact or prove or anything that you say? Facts like this:
Fact: Mr. Jakson was examined by real doctors at the 2006 trial. Doctors that testified on court that Mr. Jackson didn't had a pedophile personality.
Fact: The kids on the trial were also examined by doctors and there was not trace of psicological trauma or traces of sexual abuse in any of them.
Fact: The Mr. Jakson was indictment, wich in the State of Califormia required the votes of at least twelve jurors.
I am shock that you can acusse a man like that with no prove or facts. Obviously you are just using Mr. Jackson's name to seek for attetion wich I bealive is very sad for a "scientist" to do.
One more thing, not beause you can't understand the behavior of Mr.Jackson make him weird. That is only your personal oppinion, that in no way can be used in a scientific study.
-----
I hope I not over reacted, but this really get on my nervs!
 
Last edited:
thats just it, these so called scientists are too brainy, they over think everything, they over analyse everything and come up with CRAP...
they should put their brains to better use and start trying to save our world.

I'm a scientist.

And your comment is ridiculous.

Are you remotely capable of objecting to someone's comments without being stupid and trashing an entire occupation, filled with countless dedicated and caring people, in the most illogical manner imaginable?

I would suggest you start putting your own brain to better use.
 
I believe it's time for me to exit the MJJ Community. Had enough of the hatefest.
 
Hey guys come on, i know you feel angry about these reports but please try and control your selfs, we have alot of children and sensitive people on here and some of the language and phrases used were most definitely not required

*Closed*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top