Allusio
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 580
- Points
- 0
An CGI face thrown on the head of a tribute artist, then labeled as magic...
Wait....
In my opinion, of course.
Hard work can create magic. IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An CGI face thrown on the head of a tribute artist, then labeled as magic...
Wait....
In my opinion, of course.
I enjoy it more now as I keep watching it cos I think it's a good way to keep Mike alive, but these comments need to be made so the Estate know that there is still a lot of work to do regarding a "Live Michael Jackson" experience
innuendo141;4010251 said:Another thing that grated me- when was Michael ever out performed by his backup dancers? Never.
I enjoy it more now as I keep watching it cos I think it's a good way to keep Mike alive, but these comments need to be made so the Estate know that there is still a lot of work to do regarding a "Live Michael Jackson" experience
Allusio;4010262 said:Sorry but you know one letter from you and some others to the thread “MJJC members submit messages to Estate via MJ Online Team” and NO need to bother yourself with comments.
How likely are the Estate to reply to my message if I send one? I'll definitely send a message if they reply.
How likely are the Estate to reply to my message if I send one? I'll definitely send a message if they reply.
If they don't reply it doesn't mean they won't have read it, however, if you don't send it they definitely won't.
I even disagree with the thread title. Michael Jackson didn't unleash anything, nor was it Michael Jackson like we've never seen before.
innuendo141;4010282 said:I also make these comments for others to share their opinion, so I will bother making these comments in the forum thank you.
Why do people keep saying they wish it was like 2Pac's? IMO MJ's looked much more advanced, had much more detail. Pac's looked like a cartoon.
Why do people keep saying they wish it was like 2Pac's? IMO MJ's looked much more advanced, had much more detail. Pac's looked like a cartoon.
Why do people keep saying they wish it was like 2Pac's? IMO MJ's looked much more advanced, had much more detail. Pac's looked like a cartoon.
Allusio;4010289 said:So it all for us!!! Thank you for your effort.
Something tells me you better to bother to send at least one letter to the Estate … from here they won’t hear you for sure.
Actually if you see any wrongs in the performance you just have to post it ALL to them !!! Make a list and post it. They arrange that “connection” with fans to know better.
Please, everyone, spend a little time on it.
WhoIsIt89;4010333 said:This thought process is invalid. We can send letters to the Estate, and most likely won't be responded to. That doesn't mean people have to stop posting their differing opinions in this thread nor should they be expected to.
This thought process that you either have to like everything the Estate does, or be labeled a hater, is doing this forum more harm than those of us who simply feel this was lackluster.
You are forgetting the other problem:Exactly. Pac looked like Casper the Ghost. You could see through him. The only problem with Virtual MJ was the face. And you could barely see Pac's face because he was in the dark the whole time and had a microphone on his mouth the whole time.
You are forgetting the other problem:
That some MJ impersonator learned the choreography, dance it, pretended to be MJ. The whole thing just stinks. I don't know about Tupac hologram, it looks less real but maybe that one was actually made without any other fake people involved in it, I don't know too much about it.
[youtube]0oaYzlYkfBE[/youtube] 3:43
You are forgetting the other problem:
That some MJ impersonator learned the choreography, dance it, pretended to be MJ. The whole thing just stinks. I don't know about Tupac hologram, it looks less real but maybe that one was actually made without any other fake people involved in it, I don't know too much about it.
[youtube]0oaYzlYkfBE[/youtube] 3:43