But you didn't. What's at 3:57? The only difference the video shows in body form is the difference in height. And Michael was wearing heels. I simply respectfully asked you to point out these differences to me, you couldn't then resulted to imply that I don't know Michael from an impersonator, which the blatant implication of so is just incorrect.
Valentino does walk the stage like VMJ though. VMJ walks more like Earnest Valentino, than he does Michael Jackson.
This is ignorant. What crew of Estate haters? Who here is an Estate hater? I don't contribute to the Estate or they're effort to get Michael out of debt? Are you freaking kidding me? I bought that piece of shit album they disrespectfully called "Michael". Either I'm crazy, or that was actually my 10 dollars I gave as contribution to the Estate to actually go to Theatre to see This Is It. I've bought the DVD twice, standard edition and a limited edition that I found not too while ago. I bought the Blu Ray just for the "extra" extras. Either I'm crazy, or that wasn't my money they got from my purchase of Bad 25 Special edition...Hell, me purchasing Xscape, the more expensive deluxe edition, was just a figment of my imagination...Because I'm an Estate hater and have made no contributions to support them and most of all, Michael's children..And perhaps, just perhaps, Michael wanted to do one last tour, like many close to have claimed, so his children can see him perform live? Of course he knew he'd get paid, of course he wanted to get paid for his performance, but perhaps money, wasn't the sole reason for him deciding to come back for us? Nah no way right!?!? Because the guy was completely broke and simply couldn't figure out any other way to make money, like an album, or Las Vegas residency.....NEXT!!!!
@Allusio again, this isn't about mistakes, you're making more inaccurate claims there buddy. Clearly I gave them a chance to correct their mistake by continuing to purchase the products they put out after Michael. And for a while, and again, you can actually search through my posts and see that they attest to this, for a while I supported, defended, and even said on this very forum numerous times that they've rectified said mistake, for me with the release of Bad 25. When people were shitting on that album, I responded everytime by saying it was a quality effort and project and that made up for the Michael album, and that they honored us and our wishes by including the demos Michael were working on, audio of the Wembley show, and even the DVD of the Wembley show. I've said numerous times that I enjoy the Xscape album, and that I thought the only flaw that album had was the Leave Me Alone sample on APWNN. Which is the one song that I mentioned earlier, that I had an issue with, even with the complete removal of everything Michael outside of vocals that they called "contemporizing". So clearly, I've allowed them to make "one mistake", contrary to your belief.
But yet, this is another mistake of Michael magnitude. Not so much the performance itself, not so much the idea, as again, ALL of my previous posts before the performance in regard to matter, are me telling others how I don't think it's "unethical", like many were saying, and that I thought was kind of cool and hoped more would come out it. It's not even so much the execution of it all. It's the fact that they expect us to just believe that instead the image of an impersonator, we got an image of Michael. It's the fact that they insult our intelligence by first telling us no impersonators were used, and now expecting us to believe that it was a total CGI image. That's the mistake, and if I see a mistake like this, I don't simply have to eat it up and move along because you say so. I'm allowed to be critical of it, and I'm allowed to voice that.