Michael Jackson’s Forgotten Fortune: Secret Art Collection Uncovered & Valued At $900M /Update @pg10

Not about the MJ drawings, but about one of BLS's 'MJ' pieces.....the BLS FB site suggests that 'The lovers' has gone missing...but whether this means someone bought it and the cheque bounced(?) or otherwise, I have no idea. I thought this was one of the paintings up for sale on e-bay recently...but I am not sure if this is the 'misty' or the 'non-misty' version that has apparently gone missing.


Re-EDIT: The 'Misty' version appears to be available on e-bay, at 150KUSD

Official Brett-Livingstone Strong
STOLEN ART ANNOUNCEMENT REWARD OFFERED $5000 for the return of
"The Lovers," an original Brett-Livingstone Strong painting of Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley BEWARE IF YOU OR ANYBODY YOU KNOW PURCHASES THIS PAINTING THEY WILL HAVE TO RETURN IT AS STOLEN PROPERTY!!!

(PS I'm not Lorrie C!)

This seems not to be the first time that any BLS art has gone missing....a while back a (non-MJ) piece was apparently stolen from display in a restaurant....and the BLS internet site has had a notice on it for a while regarding stolen art (type unspecified)


Edit: PS Er, whose were those MJ drawings that were given to the Childrens hospital again?...think we are still waiting for the answer on that one.


18th Aug 11 EDIT: More info on the supposedly 'stolen' 'The Lovers' (the 'misty' version).
http://cgi.ebay.com/LOVERS-MICHAEL-JACKSON-LISA-MARIE-PRESLEY-PAINTING-/360363390447

The e-bay seller has now posted a bill of sale for this item, which indicates that it was taken (among other items) by a finance company to settle a debt for the BLS 'City of Angels' project. There is no indication that there is anything wrong with the bill of sale and the owner would therefore be entitled to sell the painting to raise funds against the debt. (Indeed BLS has initialled the bill of sale against the description of the painting, at the bottom -despite this BLS says this painting was not 'part of the GMAC inventory))

http://[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/804/zbillofsaletheloversloa.jpg/][/URL]


http://[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/841/ztheloversmistyversione.jpg/][/URL]
 
Last edited:
cit. Myosotis: "Edit: PS Er, whose were those MJ drawings that were given to the Childrens hospital again?...think we are still waiting for the answer on that one."


We can be sure that this "picture question" is not 'eaten' so simply by the executors !
Now we can observe already so long the approach of Mr. Branca:
He goes always only on the public in a thing if he has the Trumph in the sleeve and his plays cards can move! And till it is so far, he works covertly.
We will hear from him if he is so far.


To the BLS painting "The Lovers":
Which picture is BLS missing?
In the German forum we had one year ago a Thread to this picture. Besides, we had found out that there are obviously several versions:
-.. Michael and The Nymphs, Commisioned Early 1993
-.. Pacific Palisades August 1994
-..This original oil painting is signed by the artist, dated '95 and elegantly framed (http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=h...26tbs=isch:1) link ist in-activ now. There, by the way, the painting was also entitled not „Michael and the nymphs“, but "passion".

I write this here in this Thread because to me occurs in addition: Maybe it is a sort of "system" of BLS: He removes the clarity; then back the confusion and blurring remains.
I mean, it has resemblance to his history to eigentum in Michael's drawings (in another kind).
 
http://blogs.laweekly.com/stylecouncil/2011/08/michael_jacksons_art_revealed.php

Shannon Cottrell
The interior of Michael Jackson's art studio, which he shared with friend and artist Brett-Livingstone Strong
​
See more photos in "Michael Jackson Art: An Exclusive Look at the Musician's Drawings and Paintings."

Until now, Michael Jackson's art collection was shrouded in mystery. It was said to be stuck in a legal dispute over possession. Then, people speculated that buyers such as Cirque du Soleil's Guy Laliberté were interested. It's been valued at the staggering (and slightly unbelievable) sum of $900 million.

One crucial fact: Jackson's art collection isn't art by other people -- it's mainly drawings and paintings that he created himself. So what does that art look like?

Yesterday, LA Weekly was the first to visit the (until now) top-secret Santa Monica Airport hangar that Jackson used as his studio and art storehouse. The collection is currently owned by Brett-Livingstone Strong, the Australian monument builder and Jackson's art mentor through the years, in conjunction with the Jackson estate.

Though the entire art collection has been mired in disputes and battles for rights, Strong claims that he is working with everybody -- the family, the estate, as well as others -- to exhibit and publish as much of Jackson's work as possible.

According to Strong, he and Jackson formed an incorporated business partnership in 1989, known as the Jackson-Strong alliance. This gave each partner a fifty-percent stake in the other's art. In 2008, Strong says, Jackson requested that his attorney sign the rights to Jackson's portion of the art over to Strong. Now, Strong is beginning to reveal more and more of the art as he goes ahead with Jackson's dream of organizing a museum exhibit.Strong gave us a tour of the hangar, beginning with the Michael Jackson monument that Strong and Jackson co-designed several years ago. It's perhaps bombastic, but designed with good intentions and the rabid Jackson fan in mind. Strong explains, "He wanted his fans to be able to get married at a monument that would have all of his music [in an archive, and playing on speakers], to inspire some of his fans."

The current design is still in the works, but it's conceived as an interactive monument -- fans who buy a print by Jackson will receive a card in the mail. They can scan this card at the monument, and then have a computer organize a personal greeting for them, or allow them to book it for weddings. Jackson initially thought it would be perfect for Las Vegas, but Strong says that Los Angeles might have the honor of hosting it -- apparently, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa recently paid a visit and made a few oblique promises.

As for Jackson's art, the contents of the hangar barely scratched the surface of the collection, as Strong estimates Jackson's total output at 150 to 160 pieces. A few large pieces hanging on the walls had been donated as reproductions to the L.A. Children's Hospital last Monday, along with other sketches and poems.[/B]In all of his art, certain motifs kept cropping up: chairs (usually quite baroque), gates, keys and the number 7. His portrait of Bubbles, his pet chimpanzee, shows a monkey-like face vanishing into a cushy, ornate lounge chair. "He loved chairs," says Strong. "He thought chairs were the thrones of most men, women and children, where they made their decisions for their daily activity. He was inspired by chairs. Rather than just do a portrait of the monkey, he put it in the chair. And you see, there are a few sevens -- because he's the seventh child."

Jackson, who was a technically talented artist -- and completely self-taught -- fixated on these motifs, elevating everyday objects into cult symbols. Strong added that Jackson's sketchbooks are completely filled with studies of his favorite objects, in endless permutations.

But Jackson also created portraits: a small sketch of Paul McCartney, and a large drawing of George Washington, created as Strong was working with the White House to commemorate the bicentennial of the Constitution back in 1987. He also sketched self-portraits -- one as a humorous four-panel drawing charting his growing-up process, and a darker one that depicts him as a child cowering in a corner, inscribed with a sentence reflecting on his fragility.

As an artist, Jackson preferred using wax pencils, though Strong adds, "He did do a lot of watercolors but he gave them away. He was a little intimidated by mixing colors." Some surviving pencils are archived in the hangar; Strong moves over to a cabinet on the far wall of the hangar and pulls out a ziploc bag containing a blue wax pencil, a white feathered quill and a white glove that Jackson used for drawing.

Jackson turned to art as times got hard for him. "His interest in art, in drawing it, was just another level of his creativity that went on over a long period of time," Strong says. "It was quite private to him. I think he retreated into it when he was being attacked by those accusations against him." The sketches and drawings certainly reveal an extremely sensitive creator, though it's clear that Jackson also had a sense of humor.

Jackson's art was kept under wraps for such a long time simply because of the pedophilia scandal, which erupted right around the time that he was looking for a way to publicize the works. "A lot of his art was going to be exhibited 18 years ago. Here's one of his tour books, where he talks about exhibiting art. He didn't want it to be a secret," Strong says, pointing at a leaflet from the 1992 Dangerous World Tour.

Prior to that period, Jackson and Strong had met and become fast friends. This marked the beginning of Strong's mentorship, in which he encouraged Jackson to create bigger paintings and drawings, and exhibit his work. The idea behind their Jackson-Strong Alliance was that Strong would help Jackson manage and exhibit his art. Notably, the alliance birthed Strong's infamous $2 million portrait of Michael Jackson entitled The Book, the only known portrait Jackson ever sat for.

In 1993, everything blew up. At the time, Jackson and Strong were both on the board of Big Brothers of Los Angeles (now known as Big Brothers Big Sisters), a chapter of the national youth mentoring organization established in L.A. by Walt Disney and Meredith Willson. They had planned out a fundraising campaign involving Jackson's art. Strong explains, "We thought that if we would market [his art] in limited edition prints to his fans, he could support the charities that he wanted to, rather than have everybody think that he was so wealthy he could afford to finance everybody." When the pedophilia scandal erupted, Disney put a freeze on the project. The artwork stayed put, packed away from public eyes in storage crates.

As for the spectacular appraisal of $900 million for Jackson's art collection, Strong says that it derives from the idea of reproducing prints as well. The figure was originally quoted by Eric Finzi, of Belgo Fine Art Appraisers. "The reason somebody came out with that was because there was an appraisal on if all of his originals were reproduced -- he wanted to do limited editions of 777 -- and he would sell them to his fan base in order to build his monument, support kids and do other things. You multiply that by 150 originals, and if they sold for a few thousand dollars each, then you would end up with 900 million dollars." Fair enough, though now Strong says he has gone to an appraiser in Chicago to get that value double-checked, and they arrived at an even higher estimate. The story of Jackson's art ends up being quite a simple one, though confused by so much hearsay and rumor. Strong and the Jackson estate will slowly reveal more works as time passes, and an exhibit is tentatively planned for L.A.'s City Hall. Negotiations with museums for a posthumous Jackson retrospective are still underway, but Strong has high hopes. He's even talking of building a Michael Jackson museum that would house all of Jackson's artwork.We'll leave you with Strong's own description of Jackson at work, during the time where they shared a studio in a house in Pacific Palisades:

He was in a very light and happy mood most of the time. He would have the oldies on, and sometimes he'd hear some of his Jackson Five songs. He'd kind of move along to that, but most of the time he would change it and listen to a variety of songs. He liked classical music. His inspiration to create was that he loved life, and wanted to express his love of life in some of these simple compositions. I came to the studio one day, and we had a Malamute. I came into the house, and I heard this dog barking and thought, Wow, I wonder what that is. I go into the kitchen, and I couldn't help but laugh when I see Michael up in the pots and pans in the middle of the center island. He's holding a pen and paper and the dog is running around the island and barking at him, and he says, "He wants to play! He wants to play!" He's laughing, and I'm laughing about it as I'm thinking to myself, "I'm wondering how long he's been up there."


Michael Jackson's dedication to art: so strong that he'll end up perched on a kitchen island


EDIT: I've just noticed the scale of the MJ statue above the model figures below it!!!! Fairly epic (LOL)





Uploaded with ImageShack.us




Uploaded with ImageShack.us

http://[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/27/zmjmonumentmockup.jpg/][/URL]



http://[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/36/zmjdrawingsonhangarwall.jpg/][/URL]


http://[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/819/zbluedoormj.jpg/][/URL]


http://[URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/zmjaircraft.jpg/][/URL]
 
Last edited:
I am confused now. So do they figure out who owns all these arts now? The estate or BLS?
The whole things are so confusing and all the BLS' act looks skeptical.
I hope the estate can take control over these ASAP.
 
myosotis;3460624 said:
A few large pieces hanging on the walls had been donated as reproductions to the L.A. Children's Hospital last Monday, along with other sketches and poems.

Does this mean the pieces donated to the hospital were not the originals?


In 1993, everything blew up. At the time, Jackson and Strong were both on the board of Big Brothers of Los Angeles (now known as Big Brothers Big Sisters), a chapter of the national youth mentoring organization established in L.A. by Walt Disney and Meredith Willson. They had planned out a fundraising campaign involving Jackson's art. Strong explains, "We thought that if we would market [his art] in limited edition prints to his fans, he could support the charities that he wanted to, rather than have everybody think that he was so wealthy he could afford to finance everybody." When the pedophilia scandal erupted, Disney put a freeze on the project. The artwork stayed put, packed away from public eyes in storage crates.

This is so sad and all because of the Chandlers.

I came into the house, and I heard this dog barking and thought, Wow, I wonder what that is. I go into the kitchen, and I couldn't help but laugh when I see Michael up in the pots and pans in the middle of the center island. He's holding a pen and paper and the dog is running around the island and barking at him, and he says, "He wants to play! He wants to play!" He's laughing, and I'm laughing about it as I'm thinking to myself, "I'm wondering how long he's been up there."


Michael Jackson's dedication to art: so strong that he'll end up perched on a kitchen island

Only Michael!!!


Is the Estate working with Strong?
 
Aquarius;3460757 said:
Does this mean the pieces donated to the hospital were not the originals?

good catch

look to the below pics


myosotis;3460624 said:

3rd painting from the left. it's the same as "blanket chair"

28l5je0.jpg



here it is again

Latoya+Jackson+Children+Hospital+Los+Angeles+sUfQJMvJoJol.jpg


and bubbles chair close up from the article

MJ5.jpg


bubbles chair

Latoya+Jackson+Children+Hospital+Los+Angeles+H56t6mDjQTNl.jpg
 
A few large pieces hanging on the walls had been donated as reproductions to the L.A. Children's Hospital last Monday, along with other sketches and poems

Thank you to Aquarius for picking this up...I also missed the bit about 'other sketches and poems' being donated.

I agree with Mneme above...confusion seems to reign in all things associated with BLS

Quote 'Maybe it is a sort of "system" of BLS: He removes the clarity; then back the confusion and blurring remains' .
 
ivy;3460790 said:
good catch

look to the below pics




3rd painting from the left. it's the same as "blanket chair"

28l5je0.jpg

Livingstone renamed the pieces. Blanket was 8 when MJ passed. And MJ drew these in the 90's when he was chummy with BLS...so 1) MJ couldn't have name this after Blanket because Blanket was born in 2002
2) If he did draw it in 2000's (which I highly doubt), knowing MJ's childlike spirit he wouldn't have drawn such an grown up chair for a baby.

SMDH

He is defacing MJ's art.
 
Memefan;3461011 said:
Livingstone renamed the pieces. Blanket was 8 when MJ passed. And MJ drew these in the 90's when he was chummy with BLS...so 1) MJ couldn't have name this after Blanket because Blanket was born in 2002
2) If he did draw it in 2000's (which I highly doubt), knowing MJ's childlike spirit he wouldn't have drawn such an grown up chair for a baby.

SMDH

He is defacing MJ's art.

true dat, just a lil correction Blanket was 7 when Michael passed ;)
 
So were the pictures that were donated, the actuals or prints? It's not very clear in the article. I woudn't be surprised if they are prints. BLS is sly. He can use the positive media story about the donation to the children's hospital to hide, and weasel away the actual art for money.
 
Rhilo;3461157 said:
So were the pictures that were donated, the actuals or prints? It's not very clear in the article. I woudn't be surprised if they are prints. BLS is sly. He can use the positive media story about the donation to the children's hospital to hide, and weasel away the actual art for money.

I think that is anyone's guess, right now. This guy seems to play bluff and double bluff. Eventually, as with 'Chicken Licken', you end up believing nothing.
I think it would only be possible to tell a good print from the original if you can take it out of the frame and look at it really closely..maybe the hospital are doing that right now, LOL.
But if they sell one of the items openly, we should get to know then. (I wonder even if the Estate know!)
 
Last edited:
BLS is so shady. They are using MJ's kids to gain good public view.
It's really hard to believe that MJ would just give away all his arts.
Doesn't make sense at all.
I hope the estate can take some action and take those arts back.
Those should belong to MJ's kids.
I really don't like once again, the J family were involved in this again and MJ's kids were used again.
Shame on them.
 
More of Michael Jackson's artwork.

michael-jackson-art-an-exclusive-look-at-the-musicians-drawings-and-paintings.7117662.87.jpg


George Washington, the leader of the American Revolution and the first President of the United States of America.


michael-jackson-art-an-exclusive-look-at-the-musicians-drawings-and-paintings.7117663.87.jpg

michael-jackson-art-an-exclusive-look-at-the-musicians-drawings-and-paintings.7117665.87.jpg



michael-jackson-art-an-exclusive-look-at-the-musicians-drawings-and-paintings.7117671.87.jpg





 
Honestly: I am very glad that the originals were not donated to the child hospital !
Donations may carry out excluding Michael's children, and namely only when they are older and ripe enough trhat they which can judge the final validity of a donation themselves.
(my opinion! But nobody asks me ...it is to despair.....)


I know: It belongs in the other Thread, and I permit this remark here to myself only quite briefly---

Even if these are to "only" 3 printings which the hospital will sell or auction: The amount of money could become substantial if will maded it maybe of a charity gala.

Even if these are to "only" 3 printings which the hospital will sell or auction: The amount of money could become substantial if will maded it maybe of a charity gala.

Nevertheless, would have been only Prince & Paris without Blanket with this donation act!
Then my opinion 100% would be positive:
Now (nearly) the whole world knows because that Michael Jackson still had another big talent. He controlled the art of drawing with big charm and grace with a distinctive sense for delicacies and details.
Who is openly for that can get to know quite a new side of Michael in the pictures and throw a look at his soul.

In this respect the event was there absolutely well for Michael.

Nevertheless, according to my opinion it is absolutely necessary that the Estate publishes an explanation because the ownership is still unsettled!
In the reports of the press of the hospital this completely set, and the impression was woken as if BLS is the owner.
 
maybe BLS is just saying they are copies so the estate doesntgo after them as they would if they were giving the originals away
 
Wow! The whole thing is a mess. :unsure: So the hospital knows they are not original? Or they believed they were the originals and have been deceived? :scratch: If it is really true, a replica does not have the same value as the original, is the same as nothing.
 
This is totally a mess. What the hell is BLS doing? I am so confused.
Something weird must go on.
So they didn't donate the original one? The replica just worth nothing.
What a big mess.
I just hope the estate can just take back all the collection. Jesus.........
 
BLS is trying to steal Michael's art so he can make money off them. That's what he's up to.
 
My favourite piece

michael-jackson-art-an-exclusive-look-at-the-musicians-drawings-and-paintings.7117665.87.jpg


Jackson's sketch of the White House doors, to which he added the following quote from John Adams:

"I pray heaven to bestow the best of blessings on this house and all that shall inhabit it. May none but honest and wise men [MJ's addition:] or women rule under this roof."

Then my favourite part of the article

"I came to the studio one day, and we had a Malamute. I came into the house, and I heard this dog barking and thought, Wow, I wonder what that is. I go into the kitchen, and I couldn't help but laugh when I see Michael up in the pots and pans in the middle of the center island. He's holding a pen and paper and the dog is running around the island and barking at him, and he says, "He wants to play! He wants to play!" He's laughing, and I'm laughing about it as I'm thinking to myself, "I'm wondering how long he's been up there."

:)

LOVE HIM!!!

But this release of MJ's art is just another part of the jig-saw since Michael's passing ... that says to me 1+1 does not = 2

Just sayin ...........................


http://blogs.laweekly.com/stylecouncil/2011/08/michael_jacksons_art_revealed.php?page=2
 
So everything surrounding BLS art is shrouded in confusion, and why every time Michael plans a new venture a plot comes out to sabotage him? Look at all the plans he had for after TII. I really want to buy some of his sketches if reproductions are made, but not as long as BLS owns them. I seriously cannot believe Michael would give away all his art. This is something he created and came from within himself; it is not like art you buy that was done by another. Michael had children, so why would he give his art to BLS who could draw himself?

PS: I do not know why BLS says he is working with the family, since the family does not have any right to Michael things. He should only be working with the Estate to inform them when he should return the art. The estate should work on this premise: no documentation, then the art belongs to Michael--the end.
 
Last edited:
^^ I can't get over that sketch of the White House doors...Look at the detail!
 
Yes the detail ^^ this guy was ssoo talented. He could sing, dance, draw, paint, talk in different voices. Now doubt he gave the same art, expertise, and attention to detail to his love making as well. The last is for you Alanna.
 
Petrarose;3462231 said:
Yes the detail ^^ this guy was ssoo talented. He could sing, dance, draw, paint, talk in different voices. Now doubt he gave the same art, expertise, and attention to detail to his love making as well. The last is for you Alanna.

Yes. :wild: He was a complete artist. :girl_sigh:
 
Petrarose;3462231 said:
Yes the detail ^^ this guy was ssoo talented. He could sing, dance, draw, paint, talk in different voices. Now doubt he gave the same art, expertise, and attention to detail to his love making as well. The last is for you Alanna.

LOL :naughty:
 
Sign of a scam...? The stories keep changing...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top